Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2012

01.03.2012 | Thoracic Oncology

Esophagectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy for Submucosal Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

verfasst von: Toshiaki Tanaka, MD, Satoru Matono, MD, Takeshi Nagano, MD, Kazuo Shirouzu, MD, Hiromasa Fujita, MD, Hideaki Yamana, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There are controversies regarding the extent of lymphadenectomy necessary during the course of esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term outcomes after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in patients with submucosal esophageal cancer and to investigate the prognostic factors in these patients.

Materials

A prospectively maintained database identified 105 previously untreated patients with submucosal esophageal cancer who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with three-field or two-field lymphadenectomy. Median follow-up was 101 months.

Results

All patients received R0 resection. Ninety-eight patients had squamous cell carcinoma, and seven had adenocarcinoma. Lymph node metastasis was present in 38 patients (36.2%), of whom 9 patients (23.7%) had positive cervical nodes. Thirty-five patients (33.3%) had other primary malignancies. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 74.4 and 57.4%, respectively. The cause of death was recurrent disease in 16 patients, other malignancy in 12, and noncancer-related disease in 18. Univariate analyses demonstrated that other primary malignancy (P = 0.0041), poor differentiation (P = 0.0203), and angiolymphatic invasion (P = 0.0347) significantly affected overall survival. There was no difference in survival between patients with lymph node metastasis and those without (P = 0.9809). Multivariate analysis found other primary malignancy to be the only independent prognostic factor (hazards ratio, 2.295; 95% confidence interval, 1.201–4.386; P = 0.0119).

Conclusions

Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer results in 57.4% survival at 10 years. Other primary malignancy is the only independent predictor affecting long-term survival. Patients should be examined rigorously for other primary malignancy as well as recurrent disease during long-term follow-up.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T, Ell C. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer. Gut. 2007;56:1625–34.PubMedCrossRef Pech O, May A, Rabenstein T, Ell C. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal cancer. Gut. 2007;56:1625–34.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishihara R, Ishi H, Uedo N, et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1066–72.PubMedCrossRef Ishihara R, Ishi H, Uedo N, et al. Comparison of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1066–72.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka T, Matono S, Nagano T, et al. Photodynamic therapy for large superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1–6.PubMedCrossRef Tanaka T, Matono S, Nagano T, et al. Photodynamic therapy for large superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachibana M, Hirahara N, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H. Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:104–16.PubMedCrossRef Tachibana M, Hirahara N, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H. Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:104–16.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, et al. Optimal treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2001;25:424–31.PubMedCrossRef Fujita H, Sueyoshi S, Yamana H, et al. Optimal treatment strategy for superficial esophageal cancer: endoscopic mucosal resection versus radical esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2001;25:424–31.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Endo M, Yoshino K, Kawano T, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of lymph node metastasis in surgically resected superficial cancer of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13:125–9.PubMedCrossRef Endo M, Yoshino K, Kawano T, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of lymph node metastasis in surgically resected superficial cancer of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2000;13:125–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schröder W, Prenzel K, Gutschow C, Schneider PM, Hölscher AH. High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy. 2006;38:149–56.PubMedCrossRef Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schröder W, Prenzel K, Gutschow C, Schneider PM, Hölscher AH. High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy. 2006;38:149–56.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Grotenhuis BA, van Heijl M, Zehetner J, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer. Extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Ann Surg. 2010;252:823–30.PubMedCrossRef Grotenhuis BA, van Heijl M, Zehetner J, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer. Extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Ann Surg. 2010;252:823–30.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Naehrig J, Sarbia M, Siewert JR. Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2005;242:566–75.PubMed Stein HJ, Feith M, Bruecher BL, Naehrig J, Sarbia M, Siewert JR. Early esophageal cancer: pattern of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for long-term survival after surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2005;242:566–75.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 10th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2008. Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer. 10th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2008.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein HJ, von Rahden BH, Feith M, et al. Surgery for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:210–7.PubMedCrossRef Stein HJ, von Rahden BH, Feith M, et al. Surgery for early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2005;92:210–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe M, Kuwano H, Araki K, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with submucosal carcinoma of the esophagus. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:609–13.PubMedCrossRef Watanabe M, Kuwano H, Araki K, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with submucosal carcinoma of the esophagus. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:609–13.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tajima Y, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, et al. Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors. Cancer. 2000;88:1285–93.PubMedCrossRef Tajima Y, Nakanishi Y, Ochiai A, et al. Histopathologic findings predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis of patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 240 surgically resected tumors. Cancer. 2000;88:1285–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weserterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:497–504.CrossRef Weserterp M, Koppert LB, Buskens CJ, et al. Outcome of surgical treatment for early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastro-esophageal junction. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:497–504.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Natsugoe S, Matsumoto M, Okumura H, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with submucosal esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:631–5.PubMedCrossRef Natsugoe S, Matsumoto M, Okumura H, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with submucosal esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:631–5.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, et al. Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1048–55.PubMedCrossRef Pennathur A, Farkas A, Krasinskas AM, et al. Esophagectomy for T1 esophageal cancer: outcomes in 100 patients and implications for endoscopic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1048–55.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220:364–73.PubMedCrossRef Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220:364–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.PubMedCrossRef Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resection: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome. A plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–74.PubMedCrossRef Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, et al. Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resection: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome. A plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2004;240:962–74.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:98–109.PubMedCrossRef Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, Shibakita M, Tonomoto Y, Dhar DK, Nagasue N. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:98–109.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248:549–56.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg. 2008;248:549–56.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsubara T, Yamada K, Nakagawa A. Risk of second malignancy after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4336–41.PubMedCrossRef Matsubara T, Yamada K, Nakagawa A. Risk of second malignancy after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4336–41.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumagai Y, Kawano T, Nakajima Y, Nagai K, Inoue H, Nara S, Iwai T. Multiple primary cancers associated with esophageal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2001;31:872–6.PubMedCrossRef Kumagai Y, Kawano T, Nakajima Y, Nagai K, Inoue H, Nara S, Iwai T. Multiple primary cancers associated with esophageal carcinoma. Surg Today. 2001;31:872–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon RT, Law SY, Chu KM, Branicki FJ, Wong J. Multiple primary cancers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: incidence and implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1529–34.PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Law SY, Chu KM, Branicki FJ, Wong J. Multiple primary cancers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: incidence and implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:1529–34.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Esophagectomy with Extended Lymphadenectomy for Submucosal Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
verfasst von
Toshiaki Tanaka, MD
Satoru Matono, MD
Takeshi Nagano, MD
Kazuo Shirouzu, MD
Hiromasa Fujita, MD
Hideaki Yamana, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2023-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.