Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2016

01.03.2016 | Breast Oncology

Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?

verfasst von: Brandy L. Edwards, MD, MS, Christopher A. Guidry, MD, MS, Krista N. Larson, BS, Wendy M. Novicoff, PhD, Jennifer A. Harvey, MD, Anneke T. Schroen, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Limited and conflicting data exist on an association between mammographic density (MD) and re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Additionally, the correlation of MD with resection of unnecessary margins during initial BCS is unknown.

Methods

All women with a diagnosis of breast cancer from 2003 to 2012 and enrolled in a larger study on MD were evaluated. Operative and pathology reports were reviewed to determine margin resection and involvement. Mammographic density was determined both by breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification and by an automated software program (Volpara Solutions). Additional margins were deemed unnecessary if the lumpectomy specimen margin was free of invasive tumor [≥2 mm for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)] or if further re-excision was needed.

Results

Of 655 patients, 398 (60.8 %) had BCS, whereas 226 (34.5 %) underwent initial mastectomy. The women with denser breasts (BI-RADS 3 or 4) underwent initial mastectomy more frequently than the women with less dense breasts (40.0 vs. 30.5 %, respectively; p = 0.0118). Of the patients with BCS, 166 (41.7 %) required separate re-excision. Additional margins were taken during BCS in 192 (48.2 %) patients, with 151 (78.6 %) proving to be unnecessary. In the bivariable analysis, the patients with denser breasts according to BI-RADS classification and volumetric density showed a trend toward requiring more frequent re-excision, but this association was not seen in the multivariable analysis. The rate of unnecessary margins did not differ by breast density. In the multivariate analysis, the re-excision rates increased with DCIS (p < 0.0003) and decreased with resection of additional margins (p = 0.0043).

Conclusions

Mammographic density is not associated with an increased need for re-excision or resection of unnecessary margins at initial BCS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–16.CrossRefPubMed Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al. Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378:1707–16.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with re-excision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with re-excision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:717–30.CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Macaskill P, Marinovich ML, Morrow M. The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:717–30.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDonald H, Silverstein MJ, Lee LA, et al. Margin width as the sole determinant of local recurrence after breast conservation in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg. 2006;192:420–2.CrossRefPubMed MacDonald H, Silverstein MJ, Lee LA, et al. Margin width as the sole determinant of local recurrence after breast conservation in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Surg. 2006;192:420–2.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin-Dunlap TM, Cyr AE, Mushawah FA, Fao F, Margenthaler JA. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer? J Surg Res. 2013;84:228–33.CrossRef Martin-Dunlap TM, Cyr AE, Mushawah FA, Fao F, Margenthaler JA. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer? J Surg Res. 2013;84:228–33.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang SY. Shamliyan T, Virnig BA, Kane RL. Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:1–14.CrossRefPubMed Wang SY. Shamliyan T, Virnig BA, Kane RL. Tumor characteristics as predictors of local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:1–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang SY, Chu H, Samliyan T, Jalal H, Kuntz HM, Kane RL, Virnig BA. Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:507–16.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Chu H, Samliyan T, Jalal H, Kuntz HM, Kane RL, Virnig BA. Network meta-analysis of margin threshold for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:507–16.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reedijk M, Hodgson N, Gohla G, Boylan C, et al. A prospective study of tumor and technical factors associated with positive margins in breast-conservation therapy for nonpalpable malignancy. Am J Surg. 2012;204:263–8.CrossRefPubMed Reedijk M, Hodgson N, Gohla G, Boylan C, et al. A prospective study of tumor and technical factors associated with positive margins in breast-conservation therapy for nonpalpable malignancy. Am J Surg. 2012;204:263–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of re-excision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Rad Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef Smitt MC, Nowels K, Carlson RW, Jeffrey SS. Predictors of re-excision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Rad Oncol. 2003;57:979–85.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, Malcarne V, Beitsch PD, Ollila DW. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:608–13.CrossRefPubMed Blair SL, Thompson K, Rococco J, Malcarne V, Beitsch PD, Ollila DW. Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons? J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:608–13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–75.CrossRefPubMed McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–75.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:553–64.CrossRef Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:553–64.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabel MS, Rogers K,Griffith K, et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.CrossRefPubMed Sabel MS, Rogers K,Griffith K, et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin H, Han E, Moon H, et al. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1115–23.CrossRefPubMed Shin H, Han E, Moon H, et al. Nomogram for predicting positive resection margins after breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:1115–23.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen R, Macaskill EJ, Khalil A, et al. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: Is re-excision required? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38:302–6.CrossRefPubMed Mullen R, Macaskill EJ, Khalil A, et al. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: Is re-excision required? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012; 38:302–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–7.PubMed Balch GC, Mithani SK, Simpson JF, Kelley MC. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Am Surg. 2005;71:22–7.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Beron PJ, Horwitz EM, Martinez AA, et al. Pathologic and mammographic findings predicting the adequacy of tumor excision before breast-conserving therapy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1409–14.CrossRef Beron PJ, Horwitz EM, Martinez AA, et al. Pathologic and mammographic findings predicting the adequacy of tumor excision before breast-conserving therapy. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1409–14.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, Myers C, Hill AD, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRefPubMed Dillon MF, Maguire AA, McDermott EW, Myers C, Hill AD, O’Doherty A, Quinn CM. Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:39–45.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fadare O, Clement NF, Ghofrani M. High- and intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision. Diagn Pathol. 2009. DOI:10.1186/1746-1596-4-26.PubMedCentralPubMed Fadare O, Clement NF, Ghofrani M. High- and intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision. Diagn Pathol. 2009. DOI:10.​1186/​1746-1596-4-26.PubMedCentralPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, et al. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, Simunovic M. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast conservation surgery for early stage cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;197:740–6.CrossRefPubMed Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, Simunovic M. The relationship between surgical factors and margin status after breast conservation surgery for early stage cancer. Am J Surg. 2009;197:740–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Melstrom LG, Melstrom KA, Wang EC, Pilewskie M, Winchester DJ. Ductal carcinoma in situ: size and resection volume predict margin status. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33:438–42.CrossRefPubMed Melstrom LG, Melstrom KA, Wang EC, Pilewskie M, Winchester DJ. Ductal carcinoma in situ: size and resection volume predict margin status. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33:438–42.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Neushatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 2002;94:1917–24.CrossRef Neushatz AC, DiPetrillo T, Steinhoff M, et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer. 2002;94:1917–24.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakr RA, Poulet B, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Clough KB. Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: a surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:350–6.CrossRefPubMed Sakr RA, Poulet B, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Clough KB. Clear margins for invasive lobular carcinoma: a surgical challenge. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:350–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H, Graham R. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.CrossRefPubMed Wazer DE, Schmidt-Ullrich RK, Schmid CH, Ruthazer R, Kramer B, Safaii H, Graham R. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:291–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor NS, Eaton A, King TA, et al. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:600–6.CrossRefPubMed Kapoor NS, Eaton A, King TA, et al. Should breast density influence patient selection for breast-conserving surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:600–6.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1143–9.CrossRefPubMed Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:1143–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) atlas. 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, 2013. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) atlas. 4th edition. American College of Radiology, Reston, 2013.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Springer, New York, 2010. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Springer, New York, 2010.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, Tousimis E. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRefPubMed Huston TL, Pigalarga R, Osborne MP, Tousimis E. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Am J Surg. 2006;192:509–12.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Does Mammographic Density have an Impact on the Margin Re-excision Rate After Breast-Conserving Surgery?
verfasst von
Brandy L. Edwards, MD, MS
Christopher A. Guidry, MD, MS
Krista N. Larson, BS
Wendy M. Novicoff, PhD
Jennifer A. Harvey, MD
Anneke T. Schroen, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4917-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.