Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017

02.11.2016 | Breast Oncology

Chemotherapy Significantly Improves Survival for Patients with T1c-T2N0M0 Medullary Breast Cancer: 3739 Cases From the National Cancer Data Base

verfasst von: Alina M. Mateo, MD, Todd A. Pezzi, BS, Mark Sundermeyer, MD, Cynthia A. Kelley, MD, V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD, Christopher M. Pezzi, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Medullary breast cancer (MBC) is a rare tumor associated with a better prognosis compared with other breast cancers. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy has not been extensively studied.

Methods

Female patients with invasive MBC reported to the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2012 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and treatment were studied using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazard model. Patients who had node-negative (N0), non-metastatic (M0) tumors 10 to 50 mm in size (T1cN0M0 and T2N0M0) treated with and without chemotherapy were analyzed using propensity score matching.

Results

Of 3739 patients with MBC, 2642 (71%) had T1b-T2N0M0 disease treated with and without chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis showed that for all MBC patients, the significant predictors of OS were age older than 65 years, one or more comorbidities, tumor larger than 2 cm, positive nodes, distant metastasis, and treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients with T1cN0M0 and T2N0M0 had improved OS if they received chemotherapy (p < 0.0005). Patients with T1bN0M0 who received chemotherapy did not show better OS than those who did not. Patients with T1c-T2N0M0 were then matched by propensity score based on age, presence of comorbidities, tumor size, and treatment methods used. After matching, the group receiving chemotherapy showed an improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26–0.62; p < 0.0005) compared to the group that did not receive chemotherapy.

Conclusions

For patients with T1c-T2N0M0 MBC, chemotherapy significantly improves OS.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen L, Zedeler K, Holck S, Schiodt T, Mouridsen HT. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: prevalence and prognostic importance of classical risk factors in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:2289–95. Pedersen L, Zedeler K, Holck S, Schiodt T, Mouridsen HT. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: prevalence and prognostic importance of classical risk factors in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:2289–95.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu Z, Lin H, Liang X, Huang R, Zhan Q, Jiang J, Zhou X. Clinicopathologic characteristics of typical medullary breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 117 cases. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111493. Chu Z, Lin H, Liang X, Huang R, Zhan Q, Jiang J, Zhou X. Clinicopathologic characteristics of typical medullary breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 117 cases. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111493. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0111493.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huober J, Gelber S, Goldhirsch A, et al. Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2843–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huober J, Gelber S, Goldhirsch A, et al. Prognosis of medullary breast cancer: analysis of 13 International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trials. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2843–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen ML, Kiaer H, Andersen J, Jensen V, Melsen F. Prognostic comparison of three classifications for medullary carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology. 1997;30:523–32.CrossRefPubMed Jensen ML, Kiaer H, Andersen J, Jensen V, Melsen F. Prognostic comparison of three classifications for medullary carcinomas of the breast. Histopathology. 1997;30:523–32.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4636–44.CrossRefPubMed Bertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. Gene expression profiling shows medullary breast cancer is a subgroup of basal breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2006;66:4636–44.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez SR, Beal SH, Canter RJ, Chen SL, Khatri VP, Bold RJ. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based perspective. Med Oncol. 2011;28:738–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martinez SR, Beal SH, Canter RJ, Chen SL, Khatri VP, Bold RJ. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a population-based perspective. Med Oncol. 2011;28:738–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fourquet A, Vilcoq JR, Zafrani B, et al: Medullary breast carcinoma: the role of radiotherapy as primary treatment. Radiother Oncol. 1987;10:1–6.CrossRefPubMed Fourquet A, Vilcoq JR, Zafrani B, et al: Medullary breast carcinoma: the role of radiotherapy as primary treatment. Radiother Oncol. 1987;10:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Park I, Kim J, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the characteristics of medullary breast carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:417–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park I, Kim J, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the characteristics of medullary breast carcinoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:417–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu-Nishino H, Tavassoli FA, Ahrens WA, Haffty BG. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of patients with medullary breast carcinoma managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Radiat Oncol Biol. 2005;62:1040–7.CrossRef Vu-Nishino H, Tavassoli FA, Ahrens WA, Haffty BG. Clinicopathologic features and long-term outcome of patients with medullary breast carcinoma managed with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Radiat Oncol Biol. 2005;62:1040–7.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:683–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mateo AM, Pezzi TA, Sundermeyer M, Kelley CA, Klimberg VS, Pezzi CM. Atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast has similar prognostic factors and survival to typical medullary breast carcinoma: 3976 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(5):533–36. doi:10.1002/jso.24367. Mateo AM, Pezzi TA, Sundermeyer M, Kelley CA, Klimberg VS, Pezzi CM. Atypical medullary carcinoma of the breast has similar prognostic factors and survival to typical medullary breast carcinoma: 3976 cases from the National Cancer Data Base. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(5):533–36. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​24367.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim S, Park SH, Park HK, Hur MH, Oh SJ, Suh YJ. Prognostic role of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative (N0), triple-negative (TN), medullary breast cancer (MBC) in the Korean population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0140208. doi:10.137/journal.pone.0140208. Lim S, Park SH, Park HK, Hur MH, Oh SJ, Suh YJ. Prognostic role of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative (N0), triple-negative (TN), medullary breast cancer (MBC) in the Korean population. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0140208. doi:10.​137/​journal.​pone.​0140208.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, et al. Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2966–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, et al. Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2966–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer, Version 2, 2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Retrieved 10 June 2016 at http://www.nccn.org. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer, Version 2, 2016. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Retrieved 10 June 2016 at http://​www.​nccn.​org.
Metadaten
Titel
Chemotherapy Significantly Improves Survival for Patients with T1c-T2N0M0 Medullary Breast Cancer: 3739 Cases From the National Cancer Data Base
verfasst von
Alina M. Mateo, MD
Todd A. Pezzi, BS
Mark Sundermeyer, MD
Cynthia A. Kelley, MD
V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD
Christopher M. Pezzi, MD
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5649-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.