Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 6/2002

01.05.2002 | Original Research Article

Reporting Heterogeneity in the Measurement of Health and Health-Related Quality of Life

verfasst von: Dr Amir Shmueli

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 6/2002

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: To investigate heterogeneity (systematic and observable variation) in health or health-related quality-of-life reports across population groups, for a given level of ‘true health’.
Design: The investigators undertook full sit-down face-to-face interviews with 1999 individuals representing Jewish Israelis aged 45 to 75 years who resided in urban Israeli communities in 1993. Three popular measures of health and health-related quality of life were used: a categorical subjective evaluation, the 36-item Short Form health survey and a visual analogue health-related quality-of-life rating scale. The empirical analysis of the various relationships was based on the use of multiple-indicator linear structural equation models with latent variables. The model was estimated by the 2-stage least squares (2SLS) method.
Results: In general, the results confirm the existence of substantial measure-specific heterogeneity in reporting (with differences associated with age, gender and education level) for all three measures.
Conclusions: The existence of heterogeneity in reporting renders the results of quality-of-life investigations sensitive to the sample used, and considerably limits the ability to generalise from these results and make comparisons with other populations. Economic evaluations based on self-reports are thus sensitive not only to the measure used, but also to the sample used. The application of results to populations differing in their socioeconomic and demographic structures, even if similar in the distribution of ‘true health’, might be misleading.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Humphries K, van Doorslaer E. Income-related health inequality in Canada. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 663–671PubMedCrossRef Humphries K, van Doorslaer E. Income-related health inequality in Canada. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 663–671PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbrugge LM. Gender and health: update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav 1985; 26: 156–82PubMedCrossRef Verbrugge LM. Gender and health: update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav 1985; 26: 156–82PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, et al. Is self-rated health comparable across cultures and genders? J Gerontol Soc Sci 1998; 53B: S144–52CrossRef Jylha M, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, et al. Is self-rated health comparable across cultures and genders? J Gerontol Soc Sci 1998; 53B: S144–52CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Groot W. Adaptation and scale reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 403–20PubMedCrossRef Groot W. Adaptation and scale reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 403–20PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerkhofs M, Lindbroom M. Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errors. Health Econ 1995; 4: 221–35PubMedCrossRef Kerkhofs M, Lindbroom M. Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errors. Health Econ 1995; 4: 221–35PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple-category morbidity indicators. Health Econ 1994; 3: 281–91PubMedCrossRef Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Measuring inequalities in health in the presence of multiple-category morbidity indicators. Health Econ 1994; 3: 281–91PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Bleichrodt H, et al. Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 93–112PubMedCrossRef van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, Bleichrodt H, et al. Income-related inequalities in health: some international comparisons. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 93–112PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewin-Epstein N, Sagiv-Shifter T, Shabtai E, et al. Validation of the SF-36-itemshort-form health survey (Hebrew version) in the adult population of Israel. Med Care 1998; 36: 1361–70PubMedCrossRef Lewin-Epstein N, Sagiv-Shifter T, Shabtai E, et al. Validation of the SF-36-itemshort-form health survey (Hebrew version) in the adult population of Israel. Med Care 1998; 36: 1361–70PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–96PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–96PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldberger A S. Unobservable variables in econometrics. In: Frontiers in econometrics. Zarembka P, editor. New York (NY): Academic Press, 1974 Goldberger A S. Unobservable variables in econometrics. In: Frontiers in econometrics. Zarembka P, editor. New York (NY): Academic Press, 1974
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shmueli A. The SF-36 scales and health-related quality of life: an interpretive analysis. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 187–96PubMedCrossRef Shmueli A. The SF-36 scales and health-related quality of life: an interpretive analysis. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 187–96PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shmueli A. Subjective health status and health value in the general population. Med Decis Making 1999; 19: 122–7PubMedCrossRef Shmueli A. Subjective health status and health value in the general population. Med Decis Making 1999; 19: 122–7PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Reporting Heterogeneity in the Measurement of Health and Health-Related Quality of Life
verfasst von
Dr Amir Shmueli
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2002
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 6/2002
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220060-00005

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2002

PharmacoEconomics 6/2002 Zur Ausgabe

Review Article

Sickle Cell Anaemia