Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs 5/2000

01.05.2000 | Adis Drug Evaluation

Iomeprol

A Review of its Use as a Contrast Medium

verfasst von: Mukta Dooley, Blair Jarvis

Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 5/2000

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Abstract

Iomeprol is a nonionic, monomeric iodinated contrast medium. Unlike the older ionic agents, iomeprol has low chemotoxicity, osmolality and viscosity and high water solubility. Compared with other nonionic contrast media, the osmolality and viscosity are lower and the water solubility is reported to be higher with iomeprol.
Most radiographs (about 67 to 100%) obtained with iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) were of good or excellent quality in noncomparative and comparative trials recruiting 40 to 6127 patients undergoing various radiographic procedures. As expected, the diagnostic efficacy of iomeprol did not differ significantly from that of other nonionic agents (iopamidol, iopromide, iohexol and iotrolan).
Iomeprol (containing 150 to 400 mg/ml of iodine) was well tolerated in clinical trials. Most adverse events were transient and of mild to moderate intensity and were similar to those observed with other contrast media. The overall incidence of adverse events ranged from 3 to 49.7% and mainly included localised pain (≤6%) and heat sensations (8 to 45%), taste disturbances (3 to 27%) and various pseudoallergic reactions (≤20% for each type of event).
The incidence of heat or pain and taste disturbances with iomeprol was similar to that observed with iopromide and iopamidol. Pain (but not heat sensations) was reported significantly less frequently and taste disturbances reported significantly more frequently with iomeprol than with iohexol in a comparative trial. Pseudoallergic reactions (such as nausea, vomiting, skin reactions, dizziness, headache) were significantly less common with iomeprol than with ioxaglate and occurred at a similar frequency to that with iopromide and iopamidol. Cardiovascular events were rarely observed with iomeprol.
Currently available iomeprol solutions contain a range of iodine concentrations (150 to 400 mg/ml) and are approved for a wide variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol solutions are chemically stable which negates the need for chelating agents. Formulations of this agent are therefore the first not to contain edetic acid (EDTA).
Conclusions: Iomeprol shows equivalent diagnostic efficacy, and a similar adverse event profile, to that of other nonionic contrast media. The availability of a range of iodine concentrations enables iomeprol to be used in a variety of diagnostic procedures. Iomeprol, like others in its class, is suitable for use in diagnostic imaging.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Almén T. The etiology of contrast medium reactions. Invest Radiol 1994; 29 Suppl. 1: S37–45PubMedCrossRef Almén T. The etiology of contrast medium reactions. Invest Radiol 1994; 29 Suppl. 1: S37–45PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McClennan B, Stolberg H. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 1991 May; 29(3): 437–54 McClennan B, Stolberg H. Intravascular contrast media. Ionic versus nonionic: current status. Radiol Clin North Am 1991 May; 29(3): 437–54
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smedby Ö. Viscosity of some contemporary contrast media before and after mixing with whole blood. Acta Radiol 1992 (33): 600-5 Smedby Ö. Viscosity of some contemporary contrast media before and after mixing with whole blood. Acta Radiol 1992 (33): 600-5
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fattori R, Piva R, Schicchi F, et al. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S61–66PubMedCrossRef Fattori R, Piva R, Schicchi F, et al. Iomeprol and iopamidol in cardiac angiography: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S61–66PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris TW. X-ray contrast media: where are we now, and where are we going? Radiology 1993; 188(1): 11–6PubMed Morris TW. X-ray contrast media: where are we now, and where are we going? Radiology 1993; 188(1): 11–6PubMed
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Simonetti G, Guazzaroni M, Carpanese L, et al. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of iomeprol in renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S73–6PubMedCrossRef Simonetti G, Guazzaroni M, Carpanese L, et al. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of iomeprol in renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S73–6PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ugolotti U, Larini P, Marcato C, et al. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S77–82PubMedCrossRef Ugolotti U, Larini P, Marcato C, et al. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S77–82PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer GP, Trappe H-J, Jost S, et al. Tolerance of a new non-ionic contrast medium during heart catheterization. Arzneimittel Forschung 1993 Aug; 43: 932–4PubMed Meyer GP, Trappe H-J, Jost S, et al. Tolerance of a new non-ionic contrast medium during heart catheterization. Arzneimittel Forschung 1993 Aug; 43: 932–4PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner GS, Schmidt T, Scholz KH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994 Sep; 33: 11–9PubMedCrossRef Werner GS, Schmidt T, Scholz KH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic effects of a new low osmolar nonionic and a standard ionic contrast agent after left ventriculography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994 Sep; 33: 11–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Himi K, Takemoto A, Himi S, et al. Clinical usefulness of iomeprol 400 mgl/mL in cardioangiography evaluation of patient discomfort and hemodynamic and ECG effects. Acad Radiol 1998 Apr; 5 Suppl. 1: S54–7PubMedCrossRef Himi K, Takemoto A, Himi S, et al. Clinical usefulness of iomeprol 400 mgl/mL in cardioangiography evaluation of patient discomfort and hemodynamic and ECG effects. Acad Radiol 1998 Apr; 5 Suppl. 1: S54–7PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lins M, Röhling D, Zahorsky R, et al. Comparison of the non-ionic low osmolar (Iomeprol 350) and ionic high osmolar (Diatrizoat 370) contrast agents on haemodynamics during heart catheterization: a double-blind randomized study [in German]. Z Kardiol 1994 Sep; 83: 626–33PubMed Lins M, Röhling D, Zahorsky R, et al. Comparison of the non-ionic low osmolar (Iomeprol 350) and ionic high osmolar (Diatrizoat 370) contrast agents on haemodynamics during heart catheterization: a double-blind randomized study [in German]. Z Kardiol 1994 Sep; 83: 626–33PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner J, Zwicker B. Electrocardiographic and haemodynamic effects of contrast medium in coronary angiography [in German]. Z Kardiol 1994 Feb; 83: 146–54PubMed Wagner J, Zwicker B. Electrocardiographic and haemodynamic effects of contrast medium in coronary angiography [in German]. Z Kardiol 1994 Feb; 83: 146–54PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami R, Tajima H, Kumazaki T, et al. Effect of iodixanol on renal function immediately after abdominal angiography: clinical comparison with iomeprol and ioxaglate. Acta Radiol 1998 Jul; 39: 368–71PubMed Murakami R, Tajima H, Kumazaki T, et al. Effect of iodixanol on renal function immediately after abdominal angiography: clinical comparison with iomeprol and ioxaglate. Acta Radiol 1998 Jul; 39: 368–71PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami R, Tajima H, Kumazaki T. Effect of iomeprol on renal function immediately after abdominal angiography. Acta Radiol 1996 Nov; 37(6): 962–5PubMedCrossRef Murakami R, Tajima H, Kumazaki T. Effect of iomeprol on renal function immediately after abdominal angiography. Acta Radiol 1996 Nov; 37(6): 962–5PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schräder R, Esch I, Ensslen R, et al. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 Feb; 33: 395–402PubMedCrossRef Schräder R, Esch I, Ensslen R, et al. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999 Feb; 33: 395–402PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dacoronias D, Minguzzi P, Ugolotti U, et al. Iomeprol vs iopamidol in itraarterial peripheral digital subtraction angiography. Angiology 1992 Sep; 43: 734–40PubMedCrossRef Dacoronias D, Minguzzi P, Ugolotti U, et al. Iomeprol vs iopamidol in itraarterial peripheral digital subtraction angiography. Angiology 1992 Sep; 43: 734–40PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Beltramello A, Piovan E, Rosta L. Double-blind comparison of safety and efficacy of iomeprol and iopamidol in carotid digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S67–72PubMedCrossRef Beltramello A, Piovan E, Rosta L. Double-blind comparison of safety and efficacy of iomeprol and iopamidol in carotid digital subtraction angiography. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S67–72PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Minguzzi P, Ruggiero R, Carannante G, et al. Iomeprol in computed axial tomography of the brain: phase II study in children. Neuroradiology 1991; 33 suppl.: 434–5 Minguzzi P, Ruggiero R, Carannante G, et al. Iomeprol in computed axial tomography of the brain: phase II study in children. Neuroradiology 1991; 33 suppl.: 434–5
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracco S.p.A. Double-blind comparison of the safety, tolerance and efficacy of iomeprol-350 vs. iodixanol-320 in cardiac angiography. Bracco S.p.A, (Data on file) Bracco S.p.A. Double-blind comparison of the safety, tolerance and efficacy of iomeprol-350 vs. iodixanol-320 in cardiac angiography. Bracco S.p.A, (Data on file)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallotti A, Uggeri F, Favilla A, et al. The chemistry of iomeprol and physico-chemical properties of its aqueous solutions and pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 Suppl. 1: S1–S12PubMedCrossRef Gallotti A, Uggeri F, Favilla A, et al. The chemistry of iomeprol and physico-chemical properties of its aqueous solutions and pharmaceutical formulations. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 Suppl. 1: S1–S12PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause W, Press W-R. Influence of contrast media on blood coagulation. Invest Radiol 1997; 32(5): 249–59PubMedCrossRef Krause W, Press W-R. Influence of contrast media on blood coagulation. Invest Radiol 1997; 32(5): 249–59PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopko P, Smith D, Bull B. Thrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 1990; 174(2): 459–61PubMed Kopko P, Smith D, Bull B. Thrombin generation in nonclottable mixtures of blood and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 1990; 174(2): 459–61PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Morcos S, Thomsen H, Webb J, et al. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1602–13PubMedCrossRef Morcos S, Thomsen H, Webb J, et al. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1602–13PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracco S.p.A. Iomeron prescribing infformation. Milan, Italy, 1999 Bracco S.p.A. Iomeron prescribing infformation. Milan, Italy, 1999
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomsen HS, Bush Jr WH. Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 1998; 19(4): 313–24PubMedCrossRef Thomsen HS, Bush Jr WH. Adverse effects of contrast media: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 1998; 19(4): 313–24PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Imai H, Hiruma H, Kumazaki T, et al. Effect of low-osmolality contrast media on red cell filterability. Acta Radiol 1993 May; 34: 214–9PubMedCrossRef Imai H, Hiruma H, Kumazaki T, et al. Effect of low-osmolality contrast media on red cell filterability. Acta Radiol 1993 May; 34: 214–9PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda J, Furukawa T, Higashino K, et al. Elimination of iomeprol by hemodialysis. Eur J Radiol 1996 Nov; 23: 197–200PubMedCrossRef Ueda J, Furukawa T, Higashino K, et al. Elimination of iomeprol by hemodialysis. Eur J Radiol 1996 Nov; 23: 197–200PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorusso V, Luzzani F, Bertani F, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of iomeprol in animals. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S13–20PubMedCrossRef Lorusso V, Luzzani F, Bertani F, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of iomeprol in animals. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S13–20PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat La Noce A, Bertani F, Lorusso V, et al. Preclinical safety assessment of iomeprol for injection as contrast medium for myelography. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S43–50 La Noce A, Bertani F, Lorusso V, et al. Preclinical safety assessment of iomeprol for injection as contrast medium for myelography. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S43–50
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinazzi A, Heneine N, van Gessel R, et al. Clinical experience with iomeprol in myelography and myelo-CT: clinical pharmacology and double-blind comparisons with iopamidol, iohexol and iotrolan. Invest Radiol. In press Spinazzi A, Heneine N, van Gessel R, et al. Clinical experience with iomeprol in myelography and myelo-CT: clinical pharmacology and double-blind comparisons with iopamidol, iohexol and iotrolan. Invest Radiol. In press
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pover G. Evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of iomeron (iomeprol injection) in healthy volunteers and patients with renal failure. Bracco Diagnostic Inc. B16880/042; Apr 15 1998 (Data on file) Pover G. Evaluation of the safety and pharmacokinetics of iomeron (iomeprol injection) in healthy volunteers and patients with renal failure. Bracco Diagnostic Inc. B16880/042; Apr 15 1998 (Data on file)
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozuka T, Katayama H, Ebata K. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S109–114PubMedCrossRef Kozuka T, Katayama H, Ebata K. Evaluation of the radiographic efficacy of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S109–114PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S93–96CrossRef Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S93–96CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 1995 Jul; 68: 712–5PubMedCrossRef Harding JR, Bertazzoli M, Spinazzi A. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial of iomeprol, iohexol and iopamidol in intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 1995 Jul; 68: 712–5PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons MJ, Waite DW, Galland RB, et al. Double blind comparison of Iomeprol 350 and Iopamidol 340 in intravenous digital subtraction angiography for peripheral vascular disease [see comments]. Clin Radiol 1992 May; 45: 338–9PubMedCrossRef Simmons MJ, Waite DW, Galland RB, et al. Double blind comparison of Iomeprol 350 and Iopamidol 340 in intravenous digital subtraction angiography for peripheral vascular disease [see comments]. Clin Radiol 1992 May; 45: 338–9PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini AL, Tartaglione T, Monti L, et al. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. l:S88–92PubMedCrossRef Valentini AL, Tartaglione T, Monti L, et al. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. l:S88–92PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmiedel E. Evaluation of the contrast density of iomeprol. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S97–103CrossRef Schmiedel E. Evaluation of the contrast density of iomeprol. Eur JRadiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S97–103CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballerini L, Dacoronias D, Paretti D, et al. First experiences with iomeprol in pediatric cardiac angiography. Contrast media in radiology. 18th International Congress of Radiology Handbook; Singapore; S540 Ballerini L, Dacoronias D, Paretti D, et al. First experiences with iomeprol in pediatric cardiac angiography. Contrast media in radiology. 18th International Congress of Radiology Handbook; Singapore; S540
40.
Zurück zum Zitat de Geeter P, Melchior H. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 1994 Oct; 67: 958–63PubMedCrossRef de Geeter P, Melchior H. Iomeprol versus iopromide for intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 1994 Oct; 67: 958–63PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmiedel E. Are the tolerabilities of nonionic contrast media identical? The results of a double-blind randomised multi-centre study with iomeprol and iopromide [in German]. Aktuelle Radiol 1997; 7(4): 183–8PubMed Schmiedel E. Are the tolerabilities of nonionic contrast media identical? The results of a double-blind randomised multi-centre study with iomeprol and iopromide [in German]. Aktuelle Radiol 1997; 7(4): 183–8PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Katayama H, Kozuka T, Ebata K. Assessment of the side-effects of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S115–119PubMedCrossRef Katayama H, Kozuka T, Ebata K. Assessment of the side-effects of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S115–119PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Matthai WH. Clinical and economic factors in the selection of low-osmolality contrast media. PharmacoEconomics 1994; 5(3): 188–97PubMedCrossRef Matthai WH. Clinical and economic factors in the selection of low-osmolality contrast media. PharmacoEconomics 1994; 5(3): 188–97PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Spinazzi A, Davies A, Tirone P, et al. Predictable and unpredictable adverse reactions to uroangiographic contrast media. Acad Radiol 1996; 3 Suppl. 2: S210–3PubMedCrossRef Spinazzi A, Davies A, Tirone P, et al. Predictable and unpredictable adverse reactions to uroangiographic contrast media. Acad Radiol 1996; 3 Suppl. 2: S210–3PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Spencer C, Goa K. Iodixanol: Areview of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and diagnostic use as an x-ray contrast medium. Drugs 1996; 52(6): 899–927PubMedCrossRef Spencer C, Goa K. Iodixanol: Areview of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and diagnostic use as an x-ray contrast medium. Drugs 1996; 52(6): 899–927PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin DC, Gardiner Jr GA, Karasick S, et al. Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms. Radiology 1993 Dec; 189: 753–7PubMed Levin DC, Gardiner Jr GA, Karasick S, et al. Cost containment in the use of low-osmolar contrast agents: effect of guidelines, monitoring, and feedback mechanisms. Radiology 1993 Dec; 189: 753–7PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Radensky PW, Cahill NE. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s. Radiology 1997; 203(2): 310–1PubMed Radensky PW, Cahill NE. Universal use of low-osmolality contrast media for the 1990s. Radiology 1997; 203(2): 310–1PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomsen HS, Archer JW, Schiermer L, et al. The financial impact of Denmark’s decision to restrict the use of high-osmolar contrast media in intravascular radiographie procedures [letter]. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(2): 321–2PubMedCrossRef Thomsen HS, Archer JW, Schiermer L, et al. The financial impact of Denmark’s decision to restrict the use of high-osmolar contrast media in intravascular radiographie procedures [letter]. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(2): 321–2PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomsen HS. Universal use of low-osmolar contrast media: a Europeam perspective. Acad Radiol 1994; 1(3): 295–7PubMedCrossRef Thomsen HS. Universal use of low-osmolar contrast media: a Europeam perspective. Acad Radiol 1994; 1(3): 295–7PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomsen HS, Dorph S. High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media: an update on frequency of adverse drug reactions. Acta Radiol 1993; 34(3): 205–9PubMedCrossRef Thomsen HS, Dorph S. High-osmolar and low-osmolar contrast media: an update on frequency of adverse drug reactions. Acta Radiol 1993; 34(3): 205–9PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Morisetti A, Tirone P, Luzzani F, et al. Toxicology safety assessment of iomeprol, a new X-ray contrast agent. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 Suppl. 1: S21–31PubMedCrossRef Morisetti A, Tirone P, Luzzani F, et al. Toxicology safety assessment of iomeprol, a new X-ray contrast agent. Eur J Radiol 1994; 18 Suppl. 1: S21–31PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosati G. Clinical utility and safety profile of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S120–4PubMedCrossRef Rosati G. Clinical utility and safety profile of iomeprol. Eur J Radiol 1994 May; 18 Suppl. 1: S120–4PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Yasuda R, Munechika H. Delayed adverse reactions to nonionic monomeric contrast-enhanced media. Invest Radiol 1998; 33(1): 1–5PubMedCrossRef Yasuda R, Munechika H. Delayed adverse reactions to nonionic monomeric contrast-enhanced media. Invest Radiol 1998; 33(1): 1–5PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Iomeprol
A Review of its Use as a Contrast Medium
verfasst von
Mukta Dooley
Blair Jarvis
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2000
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs / Ausgabe 5/2000
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200059050-00013

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2000

Drugs 5/2000 Zur Ausgabe

Adis New Drug Profiles

Gemifloxacin

Adis New Drug Profiles

Gemifloxacin

Adis Drug Evaluation

Lisinopril

Review Article

Pancreatic Cancer