Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs 5/2001

01.04.2001 | Leading Article

Vaccines Without Thiomersal

Why So Necessary, Why So Long Coming?

verfasst von: Dr Albert-Jan van ’t Veen

Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 5/2001

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature.
The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children.
The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance.
In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children’s exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal.
In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Veen AJ van’t, Joost Th van. Sensitization to thiomersal (Merthiolate) is still present today. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 293–8CrossRef Veen AJ van’t, Joost Th van. Sensitization to thiomersal (Merthiolate) is still present today. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 293–8CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aberer W, Reiter E, Ziegler V, et al. The importance of including thimerosal, an increasingly frequent allergen in Europe, in standard screening series for allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 1991; 2: 110–2 Aberer W, Reiter E, Ziegler V, et al. The importance of including thimerosal, an increasingly frequent allergen in Europe, in standard screening series for allergic contact dermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat 1991; 2: 110–2
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Committees on Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, 1999–2000. Joint statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and United States Public Health Service (USPHS); thimerosal in vaccines: an interim report to clinicians. Pediatrics 1999; 104(3): 568–74CrossRef Committees on Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, 1999–2000. Joint statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and United States Public Health Service (USPHS); thimerosal in vaccines: an interim report to clinicians. Pediatrics 1999; 104(3): 568–74CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Parfitt K, editor. The extra pharmacopoeia. 31st ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1996: 1147–8 Parfitt K, editor. The extra pharmacopoeia. 31st ed. London: The Pharmaceutical Press, 1996: 1147–8
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Axton JHM. Six cases of poisoning after a parenteral organic mercurial compound (Merthiolate). Postgrad Med J 1972; 48: 417–21PubMedCrossRef Axton JHM. Six cases of poisoning after a parenteral organic mercurial compound (Merthiolate). Postgrad Med J 1972; 48: 417–21PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, et al. Intra-uterine methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Pediatrics 1974; 54: 587–95PubMed Amin-Zaki L, Elhassani S, Majeed MA, et al. Intra-uterine methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Pediatrics 1974; 54: 587–95PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfab R, Mückter H, Roider G, et al. Clinical course of severe poisoning with thiomersal. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34(4): 453–60CrossRef Pfab R, Mückter H, Roider G, et al. Clinical course of severe poisoning with thiomersal. Clin Toxicol 1996; 34(4): 453–60CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowell JA, Burgess S, Shenoy S, et al. Mercury poisoning associated with hepatitis-B immunoglobulin. Lancet 1996; 347: 480PubMedCrossRef Lowell JA, Burgess S, Shenoy S, et al. Mercury poisoning associated with hepatitis-B immunoglobulin. Lancet 1996; 347: 480PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA, Elhassani S, et al. Prenatal methyl-mercury poisoning: clinical observations over five years. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133: 172–7PubMed Amin-Zaki L, Majeed MA, Elhassani S, et al. Prenatal methyl-mercury poisoning: clinical observations over five years. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133: 172–7PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997; 19: 417–28PubMedCrossRef Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997; 19: 417–28PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Elferink JGR. Thimerosal: a versatile sulfhydryl reagent, calcium mobilizer, and cell function-modulating agent. Gen Pharmacol 1999; 33: 1–6PubMedCrossRef Elferink JGR. Thimerosal: a versatile sulfhydryl reagent, calcium mobilizer, and cell function-modulating agent. Gen Pharmacol 1999; 33: 1–6PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rietschel RL, Fowler Jr JF, editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger, 1996 Rietschel RL, Fowler Jr JF, editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger, 1996
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson H, Möller H. Patch test reactions to merthiolate in healthy young subjects. Br J Dermatol 1970; 83: 349–56PubMedCrossRef Hansson H, Möller H. Patch test reactions to merthiolate in healthy young subjects. Br J Dermatol 1970; 83: 349–56PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansson H, Möller H. Cutaneous reactions to merthiolate and their relationship to vaccination with tetanus toxoid. Acta Allergol 1971; 26: 150–6PubMed Hansson H, Möller H. Cutaneous reactions to merthiolate and their relationship to vaccination with tetanus toxoid. Acta Allergol 1971; 26: 150–6PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Möller H. Merthiolate allergy: A nationwide iatrogenic sensitization. Acta Derm Venereol 1977; 57: 509–17PubMed Möller H. Merthiolate allergy: A nationwide iatrogenic sensitization. Acta Derm Venereol 1977; 57: 509–17PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Förström L, Hannuksela M, Kousa M, et al. Merthiolate hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis 1980; 6: 241–5PubMedCrossRef Förström L, Hannuksela M, Kousa M, et al. Merthiolate hypersensitivity and vaccination. Contact Dermatitis 1980; 6: 241–5PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox NH, Forsyth A. Thiomersal allergy and vaccination reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 229–33PubMedCrossRef Cox NH, Forsyth A. Thiomersal allergy and vaccination reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 229–33PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosti A, Guerra L, Bardassi F. Hyposensitizing therapy with standard antigenic extracts: an important source of thimerosal sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 173–6PubMedCrossRef Tosti A, Guerra L, Bardassi F. Hyposensitizing therapy with standard antigenic extracts: an important source of thimerosal sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 173–6PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lisi P, Perno P, Ottaviani M, et al. Minimum eliciting patch test concentration of thimerosal. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 2–6CrossRef Lisi P, Perno P, Ottaviani M, et al. Minimum eliciting patch test concentration of thimerosal. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 2–6CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Danese P, et al. Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23: 162–7PubMedCrossRef Seidenari S, Manzini BM, Danese P, et al. Patch and prick test study of 593 healthy subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1990; 23: 162–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Osawa J, Kitamura K, Ikezawa Z, et al. A probable role for vaccines containing thimerosal in thimerosal hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 178–82PubMedCrossRef Osawa J, Kitamura K, Ikezawa Z, et al. A probable role for vaccines containing thimerosal in thimerosal hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 178–82PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong WK, Tan C, Ng SK, et al. Thimerosal allergy and its relevance in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 195–6PubMedCrossRef Wong WK, Tan C, Ng SK, et al. Thimerosal allergy and its relevance in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 195–6PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weston WL, Weston JA, Kinoshita J, et al. Prevelance of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 1070–4PubMed Weston WL, Weston JA, Kinoshita J, et al. Prevelance of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children and adolescents. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 1070–4PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Storrs FJ, Rosenthal LE, Adams RM, et al. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America — 1984 to 1985. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 20: 1038–45PubMedCrossRef Storrs FJ, Rosenthal LE, Adams RM, et al. Prevalence and relevance of allergic reactions in patients patch tested in North America — 1984 to 1985. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 20: 1038–45PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Barros MA, Batista A, Correia TM, et al. Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 25: 156–9PubMedCrossRef Barros MA, Batista A, Correia TM, et al. Patch testing in children: a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 25: 156–9PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, et al. Contact sensitization in children. Pediatric Dermatol 1998; 15: 12–7CrossRef Manzini BM, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, et al. Contact sensitization in children. Pediatric Dermatol 1998; 15: 12–7CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rees S, Gibson J, Forsyth A, et al. Thiomersal sensitivity in health care workers. Br Dent J 1997; 183(11/12): 395PubMedCrossRef Rees S, Gibson J, Forsyth A, et al. Thiomersal sensitivity in health care workers. Br Dent J 1997; 183(11/12): 395PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results from the IVDK. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78: 358–63 Schnuch A, Uter W, Geier J, et al. Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results from the IVDK. Acta Derm Venereol 1998; 78: 358–63
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Hydrogel lens solutions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1981; 21: 163–71PubMed Josephson JE, Caffery BE. Hydrogel lens solutions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1981; 21: 163–71PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zenarola P, Gimma A, Lomuto M. Systemic contact dermatitis from thimerosal. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 107–8PubMedCrossRef Zenarola P, Gimma A, Lomuto M. Systemic contact dermatitis from thimerosal. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 107–8PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zemtsov A, Bolton GG. Thimerosal-induced bullous contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 57PubMedCrossRef Zemtsov A, Bolton GG. Thimerosal-induced bullous contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 57PubMedCrossRef
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson LA, McNatt J, Reitschel R. Delayed hypersensitivity to thimerosal in soft contact lens wearers. Ophthalmology 1981; 8: 804–9 Wilson LA, McNatt J, Reitschel R. Delayed hypersensitivity to thimerosal in soft contact lens wearers. Ophthalmology 1981; 8: 804–9
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright P, Mackie I. Preservative-related problems in soft contact lens wearers. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1982; 102: 3–6PubMed Wright P, Mackie I. Preservative-related problems in soft contact lens wearers. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1982; 102: 3–6PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadnik K. Severe allergic reaction to saline preserved with thiomerosal. J Am Optom Assoc 1984; 7: 507–9 Zadnik K. Severe allergic reaction to saline preserved with thiomerosal. J Am Optom Assoc 1984; 7: 507–9
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosti A, Tosti G. Thimerosal: a hidden allergen in ophthalmology. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 268–73PubMedCrossRef Tosti A, Tosti G. Thimerosal: a hidden allergen in ophthalmology. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 268–73PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrizi A, Rizzoli L, Vincenzi C, et al. Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 94–7PubMedCrossRef Patrizi A, Rizzoli L, Vincenzi C, et al. Sensitization to thimerosal in atopic children. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 94–7PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Fräki JE, Kalimo K, Tuohimaa P, et al. Contact allergy to various components of topical preparations for treatment of external otitis. Acta Otolaryngol 1985; 100: 414–8PubMedCrossRef Fräki JE, Kalimo K, Tuohimaa P, et al. Contact allergy to various components of topical preparations for treatment of external otitis. Acta Otolaryngol 1985; 100: 414–8PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Honigman JL. Disinfectant ototoxicity. Pharm J 1975; 215: 523 Honigman JL. Disinfectant ototoxicity. Pharm J 1975; 215: 523
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Luka RE, Oppenheimer JJ, Miller N, et al. Delayed hypersensitivity to thiomersal in Rh (D) immunoglobulin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100(1): 138–9PubMedCrossRef Luka RE, Oppenheimer JJ, Miller N, et al. Delayed hypersensitivity to thiomersal in Rh (D) immunoglobulin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 100(1): 138–9PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindemayr H, Drobil M, Ebner H. Impfreaktione nach Tetanus- und Frühsommermeningoenzephalitis-Schutzimpfungen durch Merthiolat (Thiomersal). Der Hautarzt 1984; 35: 192–6 Lindemayr H, Drobil M, Ebner H. Impfreaktione nach Tetanus- und Frühsommermeningoenzephalitis-Schutzimpfungen durch Merthiolat (Thiomersal). Der Hautarzt 1984; 35: 192–6
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Tosti A, Melino M, Bardazzi F. Systemic reactions due to thiomersal. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15: 187–8PubMedCrossRef Tosti A, Melino M, Bardazzi F. Systemic reactions due to thiomersal. Contact Dermatitis 1986; 15: 187–8PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Maibach H. Acute laryngeal obstruction presumed secondary to thiomersal (merthiolate) delayed hyperensensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 221–2PubMedCrossRef Maibach H. Acute laryngeal obstruction presumed secondary to thiomersal (merthiolate) delayed hyperensensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 221–2PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Pirker C, Möslinger T, Wantke T, et al. Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thiomersal hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 152–4PubMedCrossRef Pirker C, Möslinger T, Wantke T, et al. Ethylmercuric chloride: the responsible agent in thiomersal hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 152–4PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wantke F, Demmer CM, Götz M, et al. Contact dermatitis from thimerosal: 2 years’ experience with ethylmercuric chloride in patch testing thimerosal-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 115–7PubMedCrossRef Wantke F, Demmer CM, Götz M, et al. Contact dermatitis from thimerosal: 2 years’ experience with ethylmercuric chloride in patch testing thimerosal-sensitive patients. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 115–7PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonçalo M, Figueiredo A, Gonçalo S. Hypersensitivity to thimerosal: the sensitizing moiety. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 201–3PubMedCrossRef Gonçalo M, Figueiredo A, Gonçalo S. Hypersensitivity to thimerosal: the sensitizing moiety. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 201–3PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Camera E, et al. Thimerosal positivities. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35: 366–7PubMedCrossRef Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Camera E, et al. Thimerosal positivities. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35: 366–7PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, et al. Thimerosal positivities: the role of organomercury alkyl compounds. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 325–8PubMedCrossRef Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, et al. Thimerosal positivities: the role of organomercury alkyl compounds. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 325–8PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, et al. Thimerosal positivities: the role of SH-groups and divalent ions. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 123–6PubMedCrossRef Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, et al. Thimerosal positivities: the role of SH-groups and divalent ions. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 123–6PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat McKerrow KJ, Greig DB. Piroxicam-induced photosensitive dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 15: 1237–41PubMedCrossRef McKerrow KJ, Greig DB. Piroxicam-induced photosensitive dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1986; 15: 1237–41PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Serrano G, Bonillo J, Aliaga A, et al. Piroxicam-induced photosensitivity and contact sensitivity to thiosalicylic acid. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 479–83PubMedCrossRef Serrano G, Bonillo J, Aliaga A, et al. Piroxicam-induced photosensitivity and contact sensitivity to thiosalicylic acid. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 23: 479–83PubMedCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirne de Castro JL, Freitas JP, Menezes Brandão T, et al. Sensitivity to thimerosal and photosensitivity to piroxicam. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 187–92CrossRef Cirne de Castro JL, Freitas JP, Menezes Brandão T, et al. Sensitivity to thimerosal and photosensitivity to piroxicam. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 24: 187–92CrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Youn JI, Lee HG, Yeo UC, et al. Piroxicam photosensitivity associated with vesicular hand dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1993; 18: 52–4PubMedCrossRef Youn JI, Lee HG, Yeo UC, et al. Piroxicam photosensitivity associated with vesicular hand dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 1993; 18: 52–4PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P. What risk of piroxicam photodermatitis in thimerosal-positive patients? Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 60–1PubMedCrossRef Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P. What risk of piroxicam photodermatitis in thimerosal-positive patients? Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 60–1PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Chishiki M, Kawada A, Fujioka A, et al. Photosensitivity due to ampiroxicam. Dermatology 1997; 195: 409–10PubMedCrossRef Chishiki M, Kawada A, Fujioka A, et al. Photosensitivity due to ampiroxicam. Dermatology 1997; 195: 409–10PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox NH, Moss C, Forsyth A. Allergy to non-toxoid constituents of vaccines and implications for patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 143–6PubMedCrossRef Cox NH, Moss C, Forsyth A. Allergy to non-toxoid constituents of vaccines and implications for patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 1988; 18: 143–6PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones HT. Danger of skin burns from thiomersal. BMJ 1972; II: 504–5CrossRef Jones HT. Danger of skin burns from thiomersal. BMJ 1972; II: 504–5CrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Cioletti RR. Determination of thimerosal content in contact lens polymers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980; 13: 3–7 Cioletti RR. Determination of thimerosal content in contact lens polymers. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980; 13: 3–7
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Binder PS, Rasmussen DM, Gordon M. Keratoconjunctivitis and soft lens solutions. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 87–90PubMedCrossRef Binder PS, Rasmussen DM, Gordon M. Keratoconjunctivitis and soft lens solutions. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 87–90PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Schilthuis HJ, Wijnen JH van. Thiomersal in gammaglobuline voor zwangere reizigers niet veilig voor de foetus. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 31(1622; 38): 1934–5 Schilthuis HJ, Wijnen JH van. Thiomersal in gammaglobuline voor zwangere reizigers niet veilig voor de foetus. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 31(1622; 38): 1934–5
Metadaten
Titel
Vaccines Without Thiomersal
Why So Necessary, Why So Long Coming?
verfasst von
Dr Albert-Jan van ’t Veen
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2001
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs / Ausgabe 5/2001
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2001

Drugs 5/2001 Zur Ausgabe

Adis New Drug Profile

Bendamustine

Adis New Drug Profile

Levosimendan

Adis New Drug Profile

Levosimendan