Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Drugs 11/2012

01.07.2012 | Current Opinion

Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases

Is it Time to Revisit Their Special Market Access Status?

verfasst von: Professor Dr Steven Simoens, David Cassiman, Marc Dooms, Eline Picavet

Erschienen in: Drugs | Ausgabe 11/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Orphan drugs are intended for diseases with a very low prevalence, and many countries have implemented legislation to support market access of orphan drugs. We argue that it is time to revisit the special market access status of orphan drugs. Indeed, evidence suggests that there is no societal preference for treating rare diseases. Although society appears to assign a greater value to severity of disease, this criterion is equally relevant to many common diseases. Furthermore, the criterion of equity in access to treatment, which underpins orphan drug legislation, puts more value on health improvement in rare diseases than in common diseases and implies that population health is not maximized. Finally, incentives for the development, pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs have created market failures, including monopolistic prices and the artificial creation of rare diseases. We argue that, instead of awarding special market access status to orphan drugs, there is scope to optimize research and development (R&D) of orphan drugs and to control prices of orphan drugs by means of, for example, patent auctions, advance purchase commitments, pay-as-you-go schemes and dose-modification studies. Governments should consider carefully the right incentive strategy for R&D of orphan drugs in rare diseases.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, et al. A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Pol 2010; 97: 173–9CrossRef Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, et al. A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Pol 2010; 97: 173–9CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, et al. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: grounds for special status. Drug Dev Res. In press Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, et al. Orphan drugs for rare diseases: grounds for special status. Drug Dev Res. In press
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010 Dec; 9(12): 921–9PubMedCrossRef Tambuyzer E. Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010 Dec; 9(12): 921–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C, Stafinski T, Menon D. Is it time to revisit orphan drug policies?. Yes, for equity’s sake. BMJ 2010; 341: c4777PubMedCrossRef McCabe C, Stafinski T, Menon D. Is it time to revisit orphan drug policies?. Yes, for equity’s sake. BMJ 2010; 341: c4777PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Burls A, Austin D, Moore D. Commissioning for rare diseases: view from the frontline. BMJ 2005 Oct 29; 331(7523): 1019–21PubMedCrossRef Burls A, Austin D, Moore D. Commissioning for rare diseases: view from the frontline. BMJ 2005 Oct 29; 331(7523): 1019–21PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, et al. Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ 2010; 341: c4715PubMedCrossRef Desser AS, Gyrd-Hansen D, Olsen JA, et al. Societal views on orphan drugs: cross sectional survey of Norwegians aged 40 to 67. BMJ 2010; 341: c4715PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nord E. The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care. Health Policy 1993 Aug; 24(3): 227–38PubMedCrossRef Nord E. The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care. Health Policy 1993 Aug; 24(3): 227–38PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. Distributing scarce livers: the moral reasoning of the general public. Soc Sci Med 1996 Apr; 42(7): 1049–55PubMedCrossRef Ubel PA, Loewenstein G. Distributing scarce livers: the moral reasoning of the general public. Soc Sci Med 1996 Apr; 42(7): 1049–55PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe Tsuchiya A, Claxton K, et al. Orphan drugs revisited. QJM 2006 May; 99(5): 341–5CrossRef McCabe Tsuchiya A, Claxton K, et al. Orphan drugs revisited. QJM 2006 May; 99(5): 341–5CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cookson R, McCabe C, Tsuchiya A. Public healthcare resource allocation and the rule of rescue. J Med Ethics 2008; 34(7): 540–4PubMedCrossRef Cookson R, McCabe C, Tsuchiya A. Public healthcare resource allocation and the rule of rescue. J Med Ethics 2008; 34(7): 540–4PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonsen AR. Bentham in a box: technology assessment and health care allocation. Law Med Health Care 1986; 14(3–4): 172–4PubMed Jonsen AR. Bentham in a box: technology assessment and health care allocation. Law Med Health Care 1986; 14(3–4): 172–4PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C. Balancing economic, ethical and equity concerns in orphan drugs and rare diseases. Eur J Hosp Pharm Practice 2010; 16(4): 22–4 McCabe C. Balancing economic, ethical and equity concerns in orphan drugs and rare diseases. Eur J Hosp Pharm Practice 2010; 16(4): 22–4
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, et al. Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010; 8(5): 343–50PubMedCrossRef Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, et al. Issues surrounding orphan disease and orphan drug policies in Europe. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010; 8(5): 343–50PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Heemstra HE. Variations in access and use of orphan drugs among EU Member States. Eur J Hosp Pharm Practice 2010; 16(4): 25–7 Heemstra HE. Variations in access and use of orphan drugs among EU Member States. Eur J Hosp Pharm Practice 2010; 16(4): 25–7
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton JH, Emanuel EJ. The patents-based pharmaceutical development process: rationale, problems, and potential reforms. JAMA 2005 Oct 26; 294(16): 2075–82PubMedCrossRef Barton JH, Emanuel EJ. The patents-based pharmaceutical development process: rationale, problems, and potential reforms. JAMA 2005 Oct 26; 294(16): 2075–82PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Simoens S. Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011 Jun 17; 6: 42PubMedCrossRef Simoens S. Pricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparency. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011 Jun 17; 6: 42PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, et al. Drugs for rare diseases: orphan designation status influences price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2011; 9(4): 1–5CrossRef Picavet E, Dooms M, Cassiman D, et al. Drugs for rare diseases: orphan designation status influences price. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2011; 9(4): 1–5CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollis A. Drugs for rare diseases: paying for innovation. In: Beach C, editor. Health services restructuring in Canada: new evidence and new directions. Montreal (QC): McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006 Hollis A. Drugs for rare diseases: paying for innovation. In: Beach C, editor. Health services restructuring in Canada: new evidence and new directions. Montreal (QC): McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Loughnot D. Potential interactions of the Orphan Drug Act and pharmacogenomics: a flood of orphan drugs and abuses?. Am J Law Med 2005; 31(2–3): 365–80PubMed Loughnot D. Potential interactions of the Orphan Drug Act and pharmacogenomics: a flood of orphan drugs and abuses?. Am J Law Med 2005; 31(2–3): 365–80PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, the RARECARE working group. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 2493–511PubMedCrossRef Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, the RARECARE working group. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 2493–511PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(2): 209–16PubMedCrossRef DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. Economics of new oncology drug development. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(2): 209–16PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, et al. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23(1): 36–42PubMedCrossRef Drummond MF, Wilson DA, Kanavos P, et al. Assessing the economic challenges posed by orphan drugs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23(1): 36–42PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Grabowski HG, Vernon J. The distribution of sales revenues from pharmaceutical innovation. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 18 Suppl. 1: 21–32PubMedCrossRef Grabowski HG, Vernon J. The distribution of sales revenues from pharmaceutical innovation. Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 18 Suppl. 1: 21–32PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?. Health Policy 2009 Dec 24; 95(2–3): 216–28PubMed Wellman-Labadie O, Zhou Y. The US Orphan Drug Act: rare disease research stimulator or commercial opportunity?. Health Policy 2009 Dec 24; 95(2–3): 216–28PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekins S, Williams AJ, Krasowski MD, et al. In silico repositioning of approved drugs for rare and neglected diseases. Drug Discov Today 2011 Apr; 16(7–8): 298–310PubMedCrossRef Ekins S, Williams AJ, Krasowski MD, et al. In silico repositioning of approved drugs for rare and neglected diseases. Drug Discov Today 2011 Apr; 16(7–8): 298–310PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Schey C, Milanova T, Hutchings A. Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011 Sep 27; 6: 62PubMedCrossRef Schey C, Milanova T, Hutchings A. Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe: 2010–2020. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011 Sep 27; 6: 62PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Maurer SM. Choosing the right incentive strategy for research and development in neglected diseases. Bull World Health Organ 2006 May; 84(5): 376–81PubMedCrossRef Maurer SM. Choosing the right incentive strategy for research and development in neglected diseases. Bull World Health Organ 2006 May; 84(5): 376–81PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C, Edlin R, Round J. Economic considerations in the provision of treatments for rare diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 686: 211–22PubMedCrossRef McCabe C, Edlin R, Round J. Economic considerations in the provision of treatments for rare diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010; 686: 211–22PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Posada de la Paz M, Groft SC, editors. Rare diseases epidemiology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology — Vol. 686. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010 Posada de la Paz M, Groft SC, editors. Rare diseases epidemiology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology — Vol. 686. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond M, Evans B, LeLorier J, et al. Evidence and values: requirements for public reimbursement of drugs for rare diseases: a case study in oncology. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 16(2): e273–81PubMed Drummond M, Evans B, LeLorier J, et al. Evidence and values: requirements for public reimbursement of drugs for rare diseases: a case study in oncology. Can J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 16(2): e273–81PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Claxton KP, Sculpher MJ. Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: some lessons from recent UK experience. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(11): 1055–68PubMedCrossRef Claxton KP, Sculpher MJ. Using value of information analysis to prioritise health research: some lessons from recent UK experience. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(11): 1055–68PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Tunis SR, Pearson SD. Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare’s ‘coverage with evidence development’. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006 Sep; 25(5): 1218–30CrossRef Tunis SR, Pearson SD. Coverage options for promising technologies: Medicare’s ‘coverage with evidence development’. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006 Sep; 25(5): 1218–30CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28(2): 113–42PubMedCrossRef Stafinski T, McCabe CJ, Menon D. Funding the unfundable: mechanisms for managing uncertainty in decisions on the introduction of new and innovative technologies into healthcare systems. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28(2): 113–42PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen A, Sprinks J, Meehan A, et al. A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. J Med Econ 2008; 11: 235–43PubMed Owen A, Sprinks J, Meehan A, et al. A new model to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of orphan and highly specialised drugs following listing on the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme: the Bosentan Patient Registry. J Med Econ 2008; 11: 235–43PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R. Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(7): 551–6PubMedCrossRef Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R. Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(7): 551–6PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry’s disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(20): iii–113 Connock M, Juarez-Garcia A, Frew E. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies for Fabry’s disease and mucopolysaccharidosis type 1. Health Technol Assess 2006; 10(20): iii–113
47.
Zurück zum Zitat McCabe C, Claxton K, Tsuchiya A. Orphan drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity? BMJ 2005 Oct 29; 331(7523): 1016–9PubMedCrossRef McCabe C, Claxton K, Tsuchiya A. Orphan drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity? BMJ 2005 Oct 29; 331(7523): 1016–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Orphan Drugs for Rare Diseases
Is it Time to Revisit Their Special Market Access Status?
verfasst von
Professor Dr Steven Simoens
David Cassiman
Marc Dooms
Eline Picavet
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2012
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Drugs / Ausgabe 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0012-6667
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1950
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11635320-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2012

Drugs 11/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Adis Drug Evaluation

Docetaxel