Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Local diagnostic reference level based on size-specific dose estimates: Assessment of pediatric abdominal/pelvic computed tomography at a Japanese national children’s hospital

verfasst von: Rumi Imai, Osamu Miyazaki, Tetsuya Horiuchi, Hideo Kurosawa, Shunsuke Nosaka

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A child’s body size is not accurately reflected by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose–length product (DLP). Size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) was introduced recently as a new index of radiation dose. However, it has not yet been established as a diagnostic reference level (DRL).

Objective

To calculate the SSDE of abdominal/pelvic CT and compare the SSDE with CTDIvol. To calculate the DRLs of CTDIvol and SSDE. Our hypotheses are: SSDE values will be greater than CTDIvol, and our DRL will be smaller than the known DRLs of other countries.

Materials and methods

The CTDIvol and DLP of 117 children who underwent abdominal/pelvic CT were collected retrospectively. The SSDE was calculated from the sum of the lateral and anteroposterior diameters. The relationships between body weight and effective diameter and between effective diameter and CTDIvol/SSDE were compared. Further, the local DRL was compared with the DRLs of other countries.

Results

Body weight and effective diameter and effective diameter and SSDE were positively correlated. In children ages 1, 5 and 10 years, the SSDE is closer to the exposure dose of CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom, while in children ages 15 years, the SSDE falls between CTDIvol for the 16-cm phantom and that for the 32-cm phantom. The local DRL was lower than those of other countries.

Conclusion

With SSDE, the radiation dose increased with increasing body weight. Since SSDE takes body size into account, it proved to be a useful indicator for estimating the exposure dose.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce MS, Salloti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pearce MS, Salloti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective study. Lancet 380:499–505CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann. ICRP 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2007) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann. ICRP 37. Elsevier, Amsterdam
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed Verdun FR, Gutierrez D, Vader JP et al (2008) CT radiation dose in children: a survey to establish age-based diagnostic reference levels in Switzerland. Eur Radiol 18:1980–1986CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007-2008 SFIPR/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed Brisse HJ, Aubert B (2009) CT exposure from pediatric MDCT: results from the 2007-2008 SFIPR/ISRN survey. J Radiol 90:207–215CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kritsaneepaiboon S, Trinavarat P, Visrutarathna P (2012) Survey of pediatric MDCT radiation dose from university hospitals in Thailand: a preliminary for national dose survey. Acta Radiol 52:820–826CrossRef Kritsaneepaiboon S, Trinavarat P, Visrutarathna P (2012) Survey of pediatric MDCT radiation dose from university hospitals in Thailand: a preliminary for national dose survey. Acta Radiol 52:820–826CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyazaki O, Horiuchi T, Masaki H et al (2008) Estimation of adaptive computed tomography dose index based on body weight in pediatric patients. Radiat Med 26:98–103CrossRefPubMed Miyazaki O, Horiuchi T, Masaki H et al (2008) Estimation of adaptive computed tomography dose index based on body weight in pediatric patients. Radiat Med 26:98–103CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boone JM. Strauss KJ. Code DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM Report No. 204. Available via http://www.aapm.org. Accessed 14 June 2011 Boone JM. Strauss KJ. Code DD et al (2011) Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM Report No. 204. Available via http://​www.​aapm.​org. Accessed 14 June 2011
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:S472–S482CrossRef Strauss KJ, Goske MJ (2011) Estimated pediatric radiation dose during CT. Pediatr Radiol 41:S472–S482CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1–3) International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1991) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21 (1–3)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann. ICRP 26 (2) International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1996) Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann. ICRP 26 (2)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrimpton PC, Hiller MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed Shrimpton PC, Hiller MC, Lewis MA et al (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79:968–980CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization – trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol 41:S562–566CrossRef Thomas KE (2011) CT utilization – trends and developments beyond the United States’ borders. Pediatr Radiol 41:S562–566CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2013) Radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. ICRP Publication 121. Ann. ICRP 42 (2) International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2013) Radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. ICRP Publication 121. Ann. ICRP 42 (2)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindskoug BA (1992) The reference man in diagnostic radiology dosimetry. Br J Radiol 65:S431–437CrossRef Lindskoug BA (1992) The reference man in diagnostic radiology dosimetry. Br J Radiol 65:S431–437CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindskoug BA (1992) Exposure parameters in X ray diagnostics of children infants and the newborn. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:S289–292 Lindskoug BA (1992) Exposure parameters in X ray diagnostics of children infants and the newborn. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:S289–292
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Slovis TL, Hall ET, Huda W et al (2002) ALARA conference executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 32:221CrossRef Slovis TL, Hall ET, Huda W et al (2002) ALARA conference executive summary. Pediatr Radiol 32:221CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2002) Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–44: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601–2–44, edn 2.1. IEC Central Office, Geneva International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2002) Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–44: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for computed tomography. IEC publication No. 60601–2–44, edn 2.1. IEC Central Office, Geneva
Metadaten
Titel
Local diagnostic reference level based on size-specific dose estimates: Assessment of pediatric abdominal/pelvic computed tomography at a Japanese national children’s hospital
verfasst von
Rumi Imai
Osamu Miyazaki
Tetsuya Horiuchi
Hideo Kurosawa
Shunsuke Nosaka
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3189-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Pediatric Radiology 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.