nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 29.08.2023 | Original Article

Long-Term Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients According to Advanced Imaging Characteristics.

verfasst von: Morin Beyeler, Fabienne Pohle, Loris Weber, Madlaine Mueller, Christoph C. Kurmann, Adnan Mujanovic, Leander Clénin, Eike Immo Piechowiak, Thomas Raphael Meinel, Philipp Bücke, Simon Jung, David Seiffge, Sara M. Pilgram-Pastor, Tomas Dobrocky, Marcel Arnold, Jan Gralla, Urs Fischer, Pasquale Mordasini, Johannes Kaesmacher

Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

Purpose

Data on long-term effect of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large ischemic cores (≥ 70 ml) are scarce. Our study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes in MT-patients according to baseline advanced imaging parameters.

Methods

We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study of stroke patients receiving MT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018. We assessed baseline imaging to determine core and mismatch volumes and hypoperfusion intensity ratio (with low ratio reflecting good collateral status) using RAPID automated post-processing software. Main outcomes were cross-sectional long-term mortality, functional outcome and quality of life by May 2020. Analysis were stratified by the final reperfusion status.

Results

In total 519 patients were included of whom 288 (55.5%) have deceased at follow-up (median follow-up time 28 months, interquartile range 1–55). Successful reperfusion was associated with lower long-term mortality in patients with ischemic core volumes ≥ 70 ml (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.20; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.10–0.44) and ≥ 100 ml (aHR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08–0.87). The effect of successful reperfusion on long-term mortality was significant only in the presence of relevant mismatch (aHR 0.17; 95% CI 0.01–0.44). Increasing reperfusion grade was associated with a higher rate of favorable outcomes (mRS 0–3) also in patients with ischemic core volume ≥ 70 ml (aOR 3.58, 95% CI 1.64–7.83).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated a sustainable benefit of better reperfusion status in patients with large ischemic core volumes. Our results suggest that patient deselection based on large ischemic cores alone is not advisable.

eFigures I–VII and eTables I–II

STROBE Checklist

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01337-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The authors Pasquale Mordasini and Johannes Kaesmacher contributed equally to the manuscript.

EQ-5D

EuroQoL 5‑Dimension

eTICI

Expanded Treatment In Cerebral Infarction

HIR

Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio

HRQOL

Health-related quality of life

Mechanical Thrombectomy

mRS

Modified Rankin Scale

NIHSS

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

RAPID

Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion

RCT

Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for large vessel occlusion strokes and advanced imaging (CT perfusion or MRI-based diffusion and perfusion imaging) assessments have allowed for expanding the indication group for this treatment [1‐3]. However, the radiological selection criteria remain controversial in certain situations, especially in the case of large ischemic core [4]. According to two trials on thrombolysis, an arbitrary chosen ischemic core volume of 70 ml is commonly used as the cut-off for large infarcts and was defined as the upper limit regarding MT’s indication [5, 6]. In addition to the ischemic core volume itself, the mismatch between the core and the tissue at risk (commonly called penumbra) plays a pivotal role in patient selection for MT [4, 7]. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR) is used to assess collateral status with low HIR being associated with robust collaterals and described as a potential selection factor for thrombectomy eligibility and a predictor of favorable outcome [8, 9]. Despite residual uncertainties regarding the benefit of MT beyond 6 h from symptom onset in large ischemic cores, the short-term benefit of MT in this population after selection by advanced imaging criteria are well known [9‐13]. In contrast, the long-term effects of MT, especially based on advanced imaging criteria, remain poorly described [14]. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of reperfusion status on the long-term outcomes (mortality, functional outcomes and quality of life) according to strata of baseline advanced imaging characteristics (ischemic core volumes, presence of mismatch and HIR) using the Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion (RAPID) software [15].

Methods

Study Cohort

All consecutive stroke patients treated with MT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 from the local single-center prospective stroke registry were retrospectively assessed for eligibility. STROBE checklist for cohort studies was used to report the present study. Study data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors, and after clearance by the local ethics committee. Inclusion criteria were: (1) acute ischemic stroke treated with MT, (2) available long-term vital status and follow-up time (3) available baseline advanced imaging (including CT perfusion or MRI with diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI)) and perfusion-imaging and RAPID analysis, (4) available reperfusion status graded by the expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI). All eligible patients were included in analyses to avoid potential survivorship bias, potentially occurring if only 3‑month survivors are included [16].

Data Collection

Baseline and 90-day follow-up data were extracted from the local stroke registry. Between September 2019 and May 2020, current vital status was extracted from the National Population Registry, which records the vital status of residents of the country on monthly basis. In addition, two neurologists conducted a telephone interview with surviving patients between September 2019 and June 2020. They obtained long-term functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) from patients, their next of kin, or health care professionals. Deceased patients at the time of follow-up were assigned a mRS of 6. Long-term favorable functional outcomes were defined as mRS 0–3 and long-term good functional outcomes as mRS 0–2. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using the 3‑level version of the EuroQoL 5‑Dimension (EQ-5D-3L) tool was equally assessed [17]. The detailed assessment and interpretation of the HRQOL using EQ-5D-3L in general and in this patient cohort was described somewhere else [18]. The EuroQoL 5‑Dimension (EQ-5D) utility index was derivated from collected data and served to evaluate individual HRQOL [19]. An EQ-5D utility index of 0 indicates deceased patients and an EQ-5D utility index of 1 the best health status possible. A negative EQ-5D utility index value refers to a condition subjectively worse than death [19].

For surviving patients, the follow-up time was defined as the interval between the index ischemic stroke and the last update of the National Population Registry for survival analysis. For outcomes analysis, as the time between the index ischemic stroke and the telephone interview. For deceased patients, the follow-up time was defined as the interval between the index ischemic stroke and the date of death for survival analysis. For outcomes analysis, as the time between the index ischemic stroke and the last update of the National Population Registry.

Initial advanced imaging characteristics were assessed on baseline brain CT and MRI using the RAPID automated post-processing software (iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA, USA), with predefined cut-offs for both entities. All digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOMs) of the evaluated patients were transmitted to a single scientific RAPID server. DICOMs were analyzed regarding ischemic core, mismatch volume and HIR at one time. Using CT, the ischemic core volume was determined by relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) of less than 30% of the corresponding contralateral side [20]. Using MRI, the ischemic core was defined as the volume with apparent diffusion coefficient < 620 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s on b0/b1000 image [21, 22]. Ischemic core volume cut-offs for analysis were set at 50 ml, 70 ml and 100 ml according to the values generally used in the literature (Fig. 1a, b and c, [1, 2, 23, 24]). Absolute mismatch volume was calculated as volume with T_max > 6 s minus volume with a rCBF < 30% (ischemic core) [20]. Relevant mismatch was considered to be present in case of an absolute mismatch volume of > 50 ml (Fig. 1d). The HIR is defined as the ratio between time-to-maximum (T_max) > 10 s and T_max > 6 s in perfusion imaging [25]. A higher percentage of well-perfused tissue and consequently less prolonged blood flow reflect a low HIR and is meant to be associated with robust collaterals [8]. According to previous studies, the dichotomization for low and high HIR was based on the median value of HIR in the present study cohort [8, 25]. After automatic estimation by RAPID, a neuroradiologist manually checked the quality of available perfusion imaging and assessed their plausibility by comparing them with the vessel occlusion site. The expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia (eTICI) score proposed by Liebeskind et al. was core-lab adjudicated to determine the reperfusion grade in the study population [14, 26]. A score of eTICI2b50 or higher was considered to be a successful reperfusion. Stratification by successful reperfusion was used for statistical analyses when the number of patients allowed it. Otherwise, the ordinal reperfusion grade on the eTICI scale was used.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics between groups were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test when applicable for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. The characteristics were reported as number and percentage for categorical variables, and median and interquartile range (IQR 25–75%) for continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to display the mortality rates across the time. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate mortality rates at 90 days, 1 year and 5 years. The long-term mortality was assessed with survival analysis for the different imaging parameters independently from and stratified by the reperfusion status. To avoid outliers’ bias, patients were right censored at 2556 days (7 years) of follow-up. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were assessed with multivariate Cox regression analysis. For the association between reperfusion status and the long-term functional outcomes, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% CI were calculated from multivariate logistic regression. The association between the reperfusion grade and the EQ-5D utility index was determined using the adjusted linear correlation coefficient from multivariate linear regression.

Following clinically relevant covariates were included in all multivariate analysis: age, sex, year of treatment, time between last known well and groin puncture, occlusion site (internal carotid artery, M1-Segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), M2-Segment, other anterior occlusion, vertebrobasilar occlusion or other posterior occlusion), low HIR, pre-stroke independence (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2), national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score on admission, treatment with intravenous Alteplase, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, history or active smoking, previous stroke and coronary artery disease. Interaction terms were used to assess the influence of imaging parameters on the association between reperfusion success and long-term mortality. To limit the heterogeneity in the follow-up times of long-term functional outcomes and HRQOL, subgroups with different follow-up times and equal numbers of patients were defined. Analysis involving long-term functional outcomes and EQ-5D utility index were performed using mixed-effects models with defined follow-up time as a random effect.

No imputation was applied to compensate for missing data. Analyses were performed with Stata 16 and R (V. 3.6.0, R Core Team). Statistical significance level was defined as α = 0.05 and all tests were 2‑sided.

Results

Study Population

In total, 1303 consecutive patients treated with MT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 were evaluated (eFigure I—Study flowchart). Twenty-seven patients (2.1%) could not be identified in the National Population Registry, 9 patients (0.7%) deceased with unknown date of death, 731 patients (56.1%) including 395 patients with MRI (54%) and 336 with CT (46%) did not have perfusion imaging on admission (n = 307, 42%), RAPID analysis failed or was of poor quality (n = 424, 58%), 13 patients (0.9%) had unknown follow-up time and in 4 patients (0.3%) angiographic imaging for the evaluation of the reperfusion grade was missing. The final study cohort included 519 patients (39.8% of evaluated patients) of whom 288 (55.5%) have deceased at the time of the long-term follow-up. Long-term mRS and EQ-5D utility index were available for 88.3% of included patients (n = 458, eFigure I). The distribution of patients in the different follow-up groups is represented in Fig. 2. The telephone interview was conducted directly with 89% of surviving patients (n = 202) and with their next-of-kin or caregivers in the remaining 11% of patients (n = 25).

Baseline Characteristics

The eTable I (supplementary materials) summarizes the differences between included and excluded patients. There was no difference in mortality rate at 3 months (28.6% versus 25.7%, P = 0.29) and in the long-term follow-up (44.5% versus 41%, P = 0.22). Included patients were older (75.6 years old, IQR 62.8–82.9 versus 73.7, IQR 61.4–81.5), had a shorter time from last known well to admission (120 min, IQR 71–239 versus 169, IQR 87–290), had higher NIHSS on admission (16, IQR 10–20 versus 15, IQR 9–19) and were less likely to have had MRI as baseline imaging (47.6% versus 54.5%). As summarized in Table 1, included patients with successful reperfusion had a shorter time between last known well and admission or groin puncture compared to the included patients with failed reperfusion. Successful reperfusion was more frequent in proximal occlusions and when fewer maneuvers were performed. Based on the median HIR value of included patients (0.43, IQR 0.26–0.58), HIR ≤ 0.43 was defined as low HIR. The distribution of HIR in relation to ischemic core volumes is summarized in eFigure II. Three-month and long-term mortality rate were lower in the group with successful reperfusion (23.6% versus 53.6%, P < 0.01; 40.2% versus 66.7% P < 0.01, respectively), and they consequently had longer follow-up time (30 months, IQR: 6–58 versus 1 month, IQR: 0.1–25).

Table 1

Comparison of baseline characteristics between included patients with failed reperfusion and successful reperfusion

	All (N = 519)	Unsuccessful reperfusion (N = 84)	Successful reperfusion (N = 435)	P-value
Baseline
Age at admission (median, IQR)	75.6 (62.8–82.9)	72.2 (61.0–81.0)	75.9 (63.6–83.6)	0.33
Sex (female) (No./total No. (%))	271/519 (52.2)	45/84 (53.6)	226/435 (52.0)	0.81
Independence before stroke (mRS ≤ 2) (No./total No. (%))	452/515 (87.8)	69/82 (84.1)	383/433 (87.6)	0.27
Risk factors (No/total No. (%))
Diabetes	89/518 (17.2)	16/84 (19.0)	73/434 (17.0)	0.64
Hypertension	368/518 (71.0)	57/84 (68.0)	311/434 (71.7)	0.51
Dyslipidemia	287/515 (55.7)	43/83 (51.8)	244/432 (56.5)	0.47
Smoking	120/514 (23.3)	19/82 (23.2)	101/432 (23.4)	1.00
Previous stroke	66/519 (12.7)	10/84 (11.9)	56/435 (12.4)	1.00
CAD	109/516 (21.1)	18/83 (21.7)	9/433 (21.0)	0.88
Stroke characteristics
Time from last known well to admission in min (median, IQR)	120 (71–239)	150 (94–283)	109.5 (69–231)	0.02
NIHSS on admission (median, IQR)	16 (10–20)	15 (9–21)	16 (10–20)	0.44
Time from last known well to groin puncture in min (median, IQR)	218 (161–345)	252.5 (192.5–391.5)	208 (156–335)	0.002
Mechanical thrombectomy beyond 6 h No./total No. (%)	121/511 (23.7)	27/84 (29.8)	94/427 (22)	0.050
MRI as baseline imaging (No./total No. (%))	246/517 (47.6)	37/83 (44.6)	209/434 (48.2)	0.63
Initial ischemic core volume ≥ 50 ml (No./total No. (%))	136/519 (26.2)	25/84 (29.8)	111/435 (25.5)	0.42
Initial ischemic core volume ≥ 70 ml (No./total No. (%))	101/519 (19.5)	19/84 (22.6)	82/435 (18.9)	0.45
Initial ischemic core volume ≥ 100 ml (No./total No. (%))	60/519 (11.56)	14/84 (16.7)	46/435 (10.6)	0.13
HIR (median, IQR)	0.43 (0.26–0.58)	0.40 (0.26–0.59)	0.44 (0.26–0.57)	0.99
Low HIR (≤ 0.43) (No./total No. (%))	259/519 (49.9)	46/84 (54.8)	213/435 (49)	0.34
Relevant mismatch (≥ 50 ml) (No./total No. (%))	82/136 (60.29)	12/25 (48.0)	70/111 (63.1)	0.18
Site of occlusion (No./total No. (%))
ICA	132/519 (25.4)	25/84 (29.8)	107/435 (24.6)	< 0.001
M1	263/519 (50.7)	28/84 (33.3)	235/435 (54.0)
M2	83/519 (16.0)	23/84 (27.4)	60/435 (13.8)
Other anterior occlusion	7/519 (1.3)	3/84 (3.6)	4/435 (0.9)
Vertebrobasilar occlusion	23/519 (4.4)	1/84 (1.2)	22/435 (5.1)
Other posterior occlusion	11/519 (2.1)	4/84 (4.8)	7/435 (1.6)
Stroke treatment
IVT-bridging (No./total No. (%))	206 (39.7)	25/84 (29.8)	181/435 (41.6)	0.051
Number of maneuvers (median, IQR)	1 (1–2)	2 (1–4)	1 (1–2)	< 0.001
Long-term mortality
3‑months mortality (No./total No. (%))	143/518 (27.6)	45/84 (53.6)	98/434 (22.6)	< 0.001
Long-term follow-up time in months (median, IQR)	28 (1–55)	1 (0.1–25)	30 (6–58)	< 0.001
Long-term mortality (No./total No. (%))	231/519 (44.5)	56/84 (66.7)	175/435 (40.2)	< 0.001

CAD coronary artery disease; ICA internal carotid artery; HIR hypoperfusion intensity ratio; IQR interquartile range; IVT intravenous thrombolysis; mRS modified Rankin Scale; M1 and M2 first and second segment of the middle cerebral artery; NIHSS National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

Long-term Mortality According to Ischemic Core Volumes

Independently of the reperfusion status, the mortality rate at three months, one year and five years follow-up time differed depending on initial ischemic core volume as summarized in eFigure III. The mortality rate over the follow-up time was higher in patients with larger ischemic core volumes on admission (Fig. 3a, b and c, log-rank tests P < 0.01). The multivariate Cox regression analysis with adjustment for prespecified covariates demonstrated an association between successful reperfusion and lower long-term mortality rate for all ischemic core volumes assessed (eFigure IV). For ischemic core volume ≥ 50 ml the aHR was 0.29 (95% CI 0.16–0.53, eFigure IV-A), for ≥ 70 ml aHR 0.20 (95% CI 0.10–0.44, eFigure IV-B) and for ≥ 100 ml aHR 0.26 (95% CI 0.08–0.87, eFigure IV-C). There was no interaction of the initial ischemic core volumes on the association between the reperfusion status and the long-term mortality (≥ 50 ml, P = 0.11; ≥ 70 ml, P = 0.27; ≥ 100 ml, P = 0.55). Higher age at admission and previous stroke were associated with long-term mortality in all analyses (eFigure IV). The number of patients who were treated beyond 6 h and had an ischemic core volume larger than the predefined cut-offs was too small to perform subgroups analyses (≥ 50 ml, n = 28; ≥ 70 ml, n = 21; ≥ 100 ml, n = 10).

Long-term Functional Outcomes According to Ischemic Core Volumes

Of the 458 patients with available long-term mRS, 212 (46.3%) had a long-term favorable functional outcome. Favorable outcomes were reported in 37.6% of ischemic core volume ≥ 50 ml (n = 47/125), in 33% of volume ≥ 70 ml (n = 31/94) and in 24.5% of volume ≥ 100 ml (n = 13/53). Figure 2 depicted the distribution of mRS at 90-days and in the different long-term follow-up subgroups for all patients and for large ischemic core volumes only (≥ 50 ml, ≥ 70 ml and ≥ 100 ml). Differences in 90-days functional outcomes and long-term functional outcomes according to ischemic core volumes are summarized in eTable II. In the multivariate logistic regression increasing reperfusion grade was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with ischemic core volume ≥ 50 ml (aOR 2.54, 95% CI 1.47–4.38) and ≥ 70 ml (aOR 3.58, 95% CI 1.64–7.83; eFigure V). Increasing reperfusion grade were also associated with good outcomes in ischemic core volume ≥ 50 ml (aOR 3.58, 95% CI 1.64–7.83) and ≥ 70 ml (aOR 2.98, 95% CI 1.19–7.44; eFigure V). Interaction analyses did not identify an influence of the initial ischemic core volume on the relation between final eTICI grade and long-term functional outcomes (eFigure V). The number of patients in the group with infarcts ≥ 100 mL was insufficient to enable multivariate analysis.

The multivariate linear regression analysis demonstrated an association between higher reperfusion grade and higher EQ-5D utility index in patients with ischemic core volumes ≥ 50 ml, ≥ 70 ml and ≥ 100 ml (adjusted linear correlation coefficient 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.10; 0.09, 95% CI 0.06–0.13 and 0.06, 95% CI 0.02–0.10, respectively). No interaction of the ischemic core volumes was found in the association between the EQ-5D utility index and the eTICI grade (P Interaction for ≥ 50 ml = 0.99, ≥ 70 ml = 0.83 and ≥ 100 ml = 0.43).

Long-term Outcomes and Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio

Independently of the ischemic core volume and reperfusion status, the long-term mortality was lower in the case of low HIR (Fig. 3d, log-rank test P = 0.04). Low HIR was not associated with a lower long-term mortality rate in the adjusted analysis (eFigure IV). Nevertheless, a direct interaction of the ischemic core volumes on the association between the collateral status and long-term mortality was present for all volumes larger than the predefined cut-offs (≥ 50 ml, P < 0.01; ≥ 70 ml, P < 0.01; ≥ 100 ml, P < 0.01). Furthermore, low HIR was neither associated with long-term favorable outcomes (aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54–1.53) nor with long-term good outcomes (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.54–1.55). No association was found between low HIR and EQ-5D utility index (adjusted linear correlation coefficient 0.01. 95% CI −0.05–0.81).

Long-term Outcomes and Relevant Mismatch

The effect of successful reperfusion on the long-term mortality was demonstrated exclusively in presence of relevant mismatch (eFigure VI, log-rank test P < 0.01) and was associated with an aHR of 0.17 (95% CI 0.07–0.44, eFigure VII). Multivariate analyses regarding the effect of reperfusion on long-term functional outcomes in case of mismatch were not possible because of the small number of patients in the group without relevant mismatch. The effect of reperfusion on long-term HRQOL was more significant in the presence than in the absence of relevant mismatch (adjusted linear correlation coefficient 0.10, 95% CI 0.06–0.15 versus 0.05, 95% CI 0.01–0.10, respectively).

Discussion

The main findings of this study are: (1) The positive long-term effects of higher reperfusion grade are also present in large ischemic core volumes; (2) The relevance of mismatch status in the selection of patients for MT is also visible in the long-term (3) A favorable collateral status (defined by a low HIR) seems to be associated with lower long-term mortality.

Regarding the effectiveness of MT in large infarcts, some studies (including the recently published ANGEL-ASPECT trial) reported the benefit in ischemic core volumes < 100 ml and hypothesized a potential benefit of MT in volumes up to 150 ml.[23, 27, 28]. Our study, based on advanced imaging characteristics, described an association between higher reperfusion grade and better long-term outcomes (lower mortality, better functional outcomes and better HRQOL). The associations were not only present in relatively smaller ischemic core volumes but also in ischemic core volumes ≥ 100 ml when the analyses were possible. As the indication for treatment of large ischemic infarcts (particularly if ≥ 70 ml) remains unclear, our results demonstrated a long-term benefit in these patients. Furthermore, as recently shown by the SATIN (Stroke treatment Assessments prior to Thrombectomy In Neurointervention) study, neurointerventionalists tend to predict 90-day outcomes in MT-patients negatively [29]. Our findings in the long-term could consequently reassure neurointerventionalits to perform thrombectomy in cases of large ischemic core at baseline and thus bring the benefits of MT to more stroke patients with an inaccurately assumed poor prognosis. The consideration of advanced imaging in patients treated with MT within 6 h after last known well is currently not included in the AHA recommendations. Despite this, it has enabled the extension of the MT indication beyond 6 h and remains a relevant tool to describe important imaging characteristics, such as the tissue at risk in borderline cases [1, 2, 12, 30, 31]. Randomized controlled trials (RCT), like DEFUSE 3 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3) and DAWN (Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo), which extended the time window for MT up to 16 h and 24 h, respectively, included patients with relatively small ischemic core (< 1/3 of MCA territory or < 70 ml) and the presence of a relevant mismatch [32]. Consequently, the indication for thrombectomy in large infarcts, especially in the late time window, remains unclear, even if growing evidence is surging [18]. Most recently, three RCTs (ANGEL ASPECT, SELECT2) and RESCUE-Japan LIMIT demonstrated the benefit of MT at 90 days in patients with large infarcts defined by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score (ASPECTS) of 3 to 5 [28, 33, 34]. Nevertheless, even though the ASPECTS is frequently used in clinical trials, it remains a coarse estimate of the ischemic core volume [35]. Compared to assigning ASPECTS on non-contrast CT, CT perfusion allows accurate ischemic core volume estimation and was associated with better prediction of the final infarct volume and complications such as symptomatic hemorrhage, neurologic deterioration and mortality at 90 days [23, 36]. Further studies showed that compared to CT perfusion, MRI imaging using DWI is associated with better prediction of good outcomes and can better delineate ischemic core [23, 37]. In our study, MRI with DWI and MR-perfusion was performed in approximately half of the patients at baseline. Thus, the large number of MRI scans performed in our study could have increased the quality of the presented results.

A relevant mismatch was associated with a reduction in long-term mortality and better HRQOL in case of higher reperfusion grade in our study. This association is in line with the DEFUSE 2 (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 2) study, which demonstrated a better short-term functional outcome when a significant mismatch before MT was present [38].

In our study, low HIR predicted lower long-term mortality (Fig. 3d). However, contrary to current evidence, a low HIR was not associated with better outcomes after adjustment for reperfusion status and other covariates [9, 39]. As summarized in eFigure II, patients with low HIR in subgroups with larger ischemic core volumes were underrepresented compared to patients with high HIR. The rationale for this underrepresentation might be that patients with a later presentation who are still eligible for MT are those with smaller ischemic core, relatively preserved penumbra and lower symptoms severity, as hypothesized by Monteiro et al. [40].

Limitations

Firstly, this was a monocentric and retrospective study with a small sample size due to the restricted patient population of interest. Due to the small number of patients included, the power of the study is reduced and the observational nature of the study makes the results susceptible to hidden bias. Secondly, non-conducted perfusion imaging, motion artifacts during acquisition and software errors in post-processing of imaging (algorithm threshold for displaying core infarct and poor contrast bolus) led to the exclusion of a consequent number of patients, limiting the use of the study results in the clinical routine [41]. Thirdly, the small number of patients did not allow subgroup analysis of patients treated beyond 6 h, who represents a subgroup of particular interest currently in the field of stroke research. Finally, the inclusion of MT patients only led to an underrepresentation of patients with low HIR in the subgroup with large ischemic cores. The interpretation of the results related to HIR should consequently be made with precaution. Further studies investigating advanced imaging-based long-term outcomes after MT and including data acquired after the extension of the MT time window beyond 6 h are warranted.

Conclusion

In line with the studies reporting short-term benefits, our study demonstrated an association between successful reperfusion in stroke patients with large ischemic core volumes and better outcome. This association was stable in patients with a relevant mismatch, but further data is needed for patient without such a mismatch. Our analyses do not show large heterogeneity of the effect size of successful reperfusion on long-term outcomes and hence do not support patient deselection based on large core alone.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS) within the framework of the Young Talents in Clinical Research Program (grant number YTCR 03/19) and grants provided by the Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern (grant number 84801869).

Declarations

Conflict of interest

J. Kaesmacher reports grants from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences/Bangerter Foundation, Swiss Stroke Society, and Clinical Trials Unit Bern during the conduct of the study. U. Fischer reports grants during the conduct of the study from Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring, unrelated to the submitted work. J. Gralla is a global principal investigator of STAR (Solitaire FR Thrombectomy for Acute Revascularisation), Clinical Event Committee member of the PROMISE study (Prospective, Multicenter, Observational, Single-Arm European Registry on the ACE Reperfusion Catheters and the Penumbra System in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke; Penumbra), and a principal investigator and consultant for the SWIFT DIRECT study (Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous tPA Versus DIRECT Solitaire Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke; Medtronic) and receives Swiss National Science Foundation grants for magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. M. Arnold reports personal fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Nestlé Health Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Covidien during the conduct of the study. T.R. Meinel reports research support from the Bangerter Rhyner Foundation, Swiss National Foundation, and the Swiss Heart Foundation. P. Mordasini reports receipt of research support from Siemens, Cerenovus, iSchmaview, Medtronic, Stryker, the Swiss Heart Foundation and the Swiss National Foundation, and receipt of consultant fees from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Phenox and Microvention during the conduct of the study, unrelated to the submitted work. E.I. Piechowiak reports grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation. M. Beyeler, F. Pohle, L. Weber, M. Mueller,C.C. Kurmann, A. Mujanovic, L. Clénin, P. Bücke, S. Jung, D. Seiffge, S.M. Pilgram-Pastor and T. Dobrocky declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the Swiss law (reference ID: 2019-00547, Kantonale Ethikkomission Bern) and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ²

e.Med Neurologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ³

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Jetzt testen ⁴

Neuer Inhalt

Jetzt informieren

Supplementary Information

eFigures I–VII and eTables I–II

STROBE Checklist

Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1706442.CrossRefPubMed

Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(8):708–18. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1713973.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goyal M, Menon BK, Van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387(10029):1723–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.CrossRefPubMed

Nael K, Sakai Y, Khatri P, Prestigiacomo CJ, Puig J, Vagal A. Imaging-based selection for endovascular treatment in stroke. Radiographics. 2019;39(6):1696–713. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019190030.CrossRefPubMed

Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(4):299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70044-9.CrossRefPubMed

Lansberg MG, Thijs VN, Bammer R, et al. Risk factors of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage after tPA therapy for acute stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(8):2275–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.480475.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Olivot JM, Albucher JF, Guenego A, et al. Mismatch profile influences outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031929.CrossRefPubMed

Guenego A, Marcellus DG, Martin BW, et al. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio is correlated with patient eligibility for thrombectomy. Stroke. 2019;50(4):917–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024134.CrossRefPubMed

Baek JH, Kim YD, Lee KJ, et al. Low hypoperfusion intensity ratio is associated with a favorable outcome even in large ischemic core and delayed recanalization time. J Clin Med. 2021; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10091869.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Lim A, Senanayake C, Clissold B, Phan T, Ma H. The advanced imaging-guided approach to acute ischemic stroke in the extended reperfusion time window. Vessel Plus. 2021; https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.44.CrossRef

11.

Almallouhi E, Al Kasab S, Hubbard Z, et al. Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with stroke presenting with low alberta stroke program early computed tomography score in the early and extended window. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.37708.CrossRef

12.

Albers GW, Lansberg MG, Brown S, et al. Assessment of optimal patient selection for endovascular ehrombectomy beyond 6 hours after symptom onset: a pooled analysis of the AURORA database. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(9):1064–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2319.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Broocks G, Jafarov H, McDonough R, et al. Relationship between the degree of recanalization and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke is mediated by penumbra salvage volume. J Neurol. 2021;268(6):2213–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10410-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Beyeler M, Weber L, Kurmann CC, et al. Association of reperfusion success and emboli in new territories with long term mortality after mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017422.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Laughlin BB, Chan A, Tai WA, Moftakhar P. RAPID automated CT perfusion in clinical practice. Neuroimaging. 2019; 38–55. https://practicalneurology.com/articles/2019-nov-dec/rapid-automated-ct-perfusion-in-clinical-practice/pdf.

16.

Elston DM. Survivorship bias. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, et al. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):845–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0834-1.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Beyeler M, Weber L, Buffle E, et al. Long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with stroke presenting with extensive early infarction. Stroke Vasc Intervent Neurol. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.121.000303.CrossRef

19.

Deb-Chatterji M, Konnopka A, Flottmann F, et al. Patient-reported, health-related, quality of life after stroke thrombectomy in clinical practice. Neurology. 2020;95(12):e1724–e32. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010356.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rebello LC, Bouslama M, Haussen DC, et al. Endovascular treatment for patients with acute stroke who have a large ischemic core and large mismatch imaging profile. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(1):34–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3954.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kranz PG, Eastwood JD. Does diffusion-weighted imaging represent the ischemic core? An evidence-based systematic review. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(6):1206–12. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1547.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Purushotham A, Campbell BCV, Straka M, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(3):348–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12068.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Yoshimoto T, Inoue M, Tanaka K, et al. Identifying large ischemic core volume ranges in acute stroke that can benefit from mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(12):1081–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016934.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kerleroux B, Janot K, Dargazanli C, et al. Perfusion imaging to select patients with large ischemic core for mechanical thrombectomy. J Stroke. 2020;22(2):225–33. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2019.02908.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Inoue M, et al. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort. Stroke. 2014;45(4):1018–23. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003857.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Liebeskind DS, Bracard S, Guillemin F, et al. ETICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(5):433–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Sarraj A, Grotta JC, Pujara DK, Shaker F, Tsivgoulis G. Triage imaging and outcome measures for large core stroke thrombectomy—A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(12):1172–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015509.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Huo X, Ma G, Tong X, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2213379.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Fargen KM, Kittel C, Curry BP, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy decision making and prognostication: stroke treatment assessments prior to thrombectomy in neurointervention (SATIN) study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2022-019741.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Jadhav AP, Goyal M, Ospel J, et al. Thrombectomy with and without computed tomography perfusion imaging in the early time window: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Stroke. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.121.034331.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019;50:e344–e418. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000211.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Yu W, Jiang WJ. A simple imaging guide for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: from time window to perfusion mismatch and beyond. Front Neurol. 2019; https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Yoshimura S, Sakai N, Yamagami H, et al. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2118191.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Sitton CW, Churilov L, Sundararajan S, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med. 2023; https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2214403.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sarraj BYA. Should We Still Care About Core Volume for Stroke Thrombectomy? Endovascular Today. 2020;19(2):2–4.

36.

Sarraj A, Hassan AE, Grotta J, et al. Optimizing patient selection for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke (SELECT): a prospective, multicenter cohort study of imaging selection. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(3):419–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25669.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Campbell BCV, Purushotham A, Christensen S, et al. The infarct core is well represented by the acute diffusion lesion: sustained reversal is infrequent. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(1):50–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.102.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Lansberg MG, Straka M, Kemp S, et al. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(10):860–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70203-X.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Park H, Kim BM, Baek JH, et al. Predictors of good outcomes in patients with failed endovascular thrombectomy. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(5):582–7. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0578.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Monteiro A, Cortez GM, Greco E, Aghaebrahim A, Sauvageau E, Hanel RA. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio for refinement of elderly patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2022;14(3):242–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017218.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lansberg MG, Lee J, Christensen S, et al. RAPID automated patient selection for reperfusion therapy: a pooled analysis of the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (EPITHET) and the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Stroke. 2011;42(6):1608–14. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Long-Term Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients According to Advanced Imaging Characteristics.
verfasst von: Morin Beyeler
Fabienne Pohle
Loris Weber
Madlaine Mueller
Christoph C. Kurmann
Adnan Mujanovic
Leander Clénin
Eike Immo Piechowiak
Thomas Raphael Meinel
Philipp Bücke
Simon Jung
David Seiffge
Sara M. Pilgram-Pastor
Tomas Dobrocky
Marcel Arnold
Jan Gralla
Urs Fischer
Pasquale Mordasini
Johannes Kaesmacher
Publikationsdatum: 29.08.2023
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01337-4

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Long-Term Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Patients According to Advanced Imaging Characteristics.