nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

06.06.2021 | Hip Arthroplasty

Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature

verfasst von: Mandeep Singh Dhillon, Karan Jindal, Prasoon Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Deepak Neradi

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

CLS Spotorno is a time-tested femoral stem design with excellent early results; the present review was designed to assess the published evidence on CLS Spotorno stem in the literature to evaluate its long-term outcomes and compare it to two other popular stem designs the uncemented Corail™ and the cemented Exeter™ stems.

Research question

Do CLS Spotorno stems provide adequate long-term rates of survival in terms of revisions and functional outcomes?

Methodology

Medline, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases were searched for relevant articles and a total number of 670 hits were obtained, out of which 14 relevant studies were included in this review. Pooled analysis of revisions rates, subsidence and Harris Hip scores (HHS) were done.

Results

All the 14 studies were retrospective in design but had sufficiently large follow-up periods (12.3–27 years, mean 17.1 years). Of the 2459 hips reviewed, the documented revision rate was only 6.2%, with aseptic loosening reported in 3.1% and subsidence > 2 mm in 2.6% cases. The overall survival was similar to reported smaller cohorts of Corail (95% at 12 years) and Exeter stems (100% at 17 years). Varus malposition was seen in 10.6% cases, but it did not show any influence on implant survival or revision rates. Distal pedestal formation was seen in 172 of 805 hips across seven studies, while distal cortical hypertrophy was seen in 70 cases out of 398 hips; these were not related with stem malposition. The overall functional outcome was good, with mean HHS of 88.65 (95% CI = 86.08–91.23, p < 0.01). The improvement in scores from preoperative values (of 43.9 points) were comparable to Corail (43.8) and Exeter (45) stems. Thigh pain was seen in only 41 cases out of 1097 hips.

Conclusion

Despite the limitations due to high heterogeneity of the cumulative data, the review suggests that CLS Spotorno femoral stems provides excellent long-term survival and good hip function. These outcomes are comparable to other commonly utilized femoral stems like the Corail and Exeter.

Level of evidence

IV.

Kumar P, Sen R, Aggarwal S, Agarwal S, Rajnish RK (2019) Reliability of modified Harris Hip Score as a tool for outcome evaluation of total hip replacements in Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10(1):128–130PubMedCrossRef

Chammout G, Muren O, Laurencikas E, Bodén H, Kelly-Pettersson P, Sjöö H, Stark A, Sköldenberg O (2017) More complications with uncemented than cemented femoral stems in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 69 patients. Acta Orthop 88(2):145–151PubMedCrossRef

Paprosky WG, Sporer SM (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976–2007(417):203–209CrossRef

Sudhahar T, Morapudi S, Branes K (2009) Evaluation of subsidence between collarless and collared Corail femoral cementless total hip replacement. J Orthop 6(2):e3

Ries C, Boese CK, Dietrich F, Miehlke W, Heisel C (2019) Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study. Int Orthop 43(2):307–314PubMedCrossRef

Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165CrossRef

Engh CA, McGovern T, Bobyn J, Harris WH (1992) A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(7):1009–1020PubMedCrossRef

Katz JN, Wright J, Wright EA, Losina E (2007) Failures of total hip replacement: a population-based perspective. Orthop J Harvard Med Sch 9:101–106

Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1997) Comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12(3):273–280PubMedCrossRef

10.

Demey G, Fary C, Lustig S, Neyret P, si Selmi TA (2011) Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1549–1555PubMedCrossRef

11.

Panichkul P, Bavonratanavech S, Arirachakaran A, Kongtharvonskul J (2019) Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(8):1693–1704PubMedCrossRef

12.

Louboutin L, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2017) Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(7):987–992PubMedCrossRef

13.

Vidalain J-P (2011) Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem. Int Orthop 35(2):189–194PubMedCrossRef

14.

Spotorno L, Grappiolo G, Mumenthaler A (1995) The CLS stem. Endoprosthetics. Springer, pp 271–296CrossRef

15.

Graceffa A, Indelli PF, Latella L, Poli P, Fulco A, Marcucci M (2016) Clinical outcome of design modifications to the CLS Spotorno Stem in total hip replacement. Joints 4(3):134PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

16.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):1000097CrossRef

17.

Wallace BC, Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Trow P, Schmid CH (2012) Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. J Stat Softw 49(5):1–15CrossRef

18.

Banaszkiewicz PA (2014) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Classic papers in orthopaedics. Springer, pp 13–17CrossRef

19.

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716PubMedCrossRef

20.

The Cochrane Collaboration (2020) (RevMan) RM Version 5.4. The Cochrane Collaboration

21.

Aldinger PR, Jung AW, Breusch SJ, Ewerbeck V, Parsch D (2009) Survival of the cementless Spotorno® stem in the second decade. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(9):2297–2304PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Biemond J, Venkatesan S, Van Hellemondt G (2015) Survivorship of the cementless Spotorno femoral component in patients under 50 years of age at a mean follow-up of 18.4 years. Bone Joint J 97(2):160–163PubMedCrossRef

23.

Evola F, Evola G, Graceffa A, Sessa A, Pavone V, Costarella L, Sessa G, Avondo S (2014) Performance of the CLS Spotorno uncemented stem in the third decade after implantation. Bone Joint J 96(4):455–461PubMedCrossRef

24.

Han S-I, Lee J-H, Kim JW, Oh CW, Kim S-Y (2013) Long-term durability of the CLS femoral prosthesis in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty 28(5):828–831PubMedCrossRef

25.

Hwang K-T, Kim Y-H, Kim Y-S, Choi I-Y (2012) Total hip arthroplasty using cementless grit-blasted femoral component: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 27(8):1554–1561PubMedCrossRef

26.

Mert M, Ermutlu C, Kovalak E, Ünkar E, Okur SÇ (2019) Long term survival analysis of cementless Spotorno femoral stem in young patients. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 53(1):19–23PubMedCrossRef

27.

Müller LA, Wenger N, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Forst R, Carl H-D (2010) Seventeen-year survival of the cementless CLS Spotorno stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(2):269PubMedCrossRef

28.

De Rada PD, Silverberg J, Barriga A, Llombart R, Valentí J (2011) Long-term clinical-radiological evaluation of the CLS Spotorno stem. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 55(2):85–90

29.

Grappiolo G, Blaha J, Gruen T, Burastero G, Spotorno L (2002) Primary total hip arthroplasty using a grit-blasted, press-fit femoral prosthesis. Long-term results with survivorship analysis. HIP Int 12(2):55–72PubMedCrossRef

30.

Smeekes C, de Witte PB, Ongkiehong BF, van der Wal BC, Barnaart AF (2017) Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty with the cementless Spotorno (CLS) system. Hip Int 27(5):465–471PubMedCrossRef

31.

Streit MR, Lehner B, Peitgen DS, Innmann MM, Omlor GW, Walker T, Merle C, Moradi B (2020) What is the long-term (27-to 32-year) survivorship of an uncemented tapered titanium femoral component and survival in patients younger than 50 years? Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(6):1283–1291PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Streit MR, Schröder K, Körber M, Merle C, Gotterbarm T, Ewerbeck V, Aldinger PR (2012) High survival in young patients using a second generation uncemented total hip replacement. Int Orthop 36(6):1129–1136PubMedCrossRef

33.

Terré RA (2010) Estimated survival probability of the Spotorno total hip arthroplasty after a 15-to 21-year follow-up: one surgeon’s results. Hip Int 20(7_suppl):70–78CrossRef

34.

Zang J, Uchiyama K, Moriya M, Li Z, Fukushima K, Yamamoto T, Takahira N, Takaso M, Liu J, Feng W (2018) Long-term clinical and radiographic results of the cementless Spotorno stem in Japanese patients: a more than 15-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg 26(1):2309499017750310CrossRef

35.

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. JBJS 55(8):1629–1632CrossRef

36.

Engh CA, Bobyn J, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(1):45–55PubMedCrossRef

37.

d’Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. JBJS 36(3):451–475CrossRef

38.

Baba T, Nozawa M, Homma Y, Ochi H, Ozaki Y, Watari T, Matsumoto M, Kaneko K (2017) Long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy for osteonecrosis with collapse of the femoral head in young patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(7):925–931PubMedCrossRef

39.

Kumar P, Sen RK, Aggarwal S, Jindal K (2020) Common hip conditions requiring primary total hip arthroplasty and comparison of their post-operative functional outcomes. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11:S192–S195PubMedCrossRef

40.

Lewthwaite SC, Squires B, Gie GA, Timperley AJ, Ling RS (2008) The Exeter™ universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10–17 years’ followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(2):324–331PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

41.

Selvaratnam V, Shetty V, Sahni V (2015) Subsidence in collarless Corail hip replacement. Open Orthop J 9:194PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Ait Moussa A, Fischer J, Yadav R, Khandaker M (2017) Minimizing stress shielding and cement damage in cemented femoral component of a hip prosthesis through computational design optimization. Adv Orthop 2017:8437956PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

43.

Willert H-G, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH (1990) Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip: the role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 258:95–107CrossRef

44.

Marchetti P, Binazzi R, Vaccari V, Girolami M, Morici F, Impallomeni C, Commessatti M, Silvello L (2005) Long-term results with cementless Fitek (or Fitmore) cups. J Arthroplasty 20(6):730–737PubMedCrossRef

45.

Williams H, Browne G, Gie G, Ling R, Timperley A, Wendover N (2002) The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years: a study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(3):324–334PubMedCrossRef

46.

Merini A, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2016) Cementless Corail™ femoral stems with laser neck etching: long-term survival, rupture rate and risk factors in 295 stems. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(1):71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.10.009CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature
verfasst von: Mandeep Singh Dhillon
Karan Jindal
Prasoon Kumar
Rajesh Kumar Rajnish
Deepak Neradi
Publikationsdatum: 06.06.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03975-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Research question

Methodology

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2022

Standard radiographic assessments of distal radius fractures miss involvement of the distal radioulnar joint: a diagnostic study

Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases

Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years

Local bone quality measure and construct failure prediction: a biomechanical study on distal femur fractures

Comparison of extension block pinning technique versus pin orthosis-extension block pinning technique for acute mallet fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial