nach oben

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.03.2011

Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) is Associated with Negative NEO PI-R Personality Patterns

verfasst von: Charles R. Jonassaint, Ilene C. Siegler, John C. Barefoot, Christopher L. Edwards, Redford B. Williams

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with poor health. One potential pathway accounting for this relationship may be an association between low SES and personality characteristics that affect health.

Methods

Associations among parent's education, current SES (education and income), and personality were examined among 233 African Americans and Caucasian, male and female community volunteers.

Results

Using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to model neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness simultaneously, participant's education, household income, and father's and mother's education each had significant main effects on personality. When examining the life course—the combination of both current and childhood SES—distinctive patterns emerged for each domain, depending upon whether mother's or father's education was used to index childhood SES. When using mother's education as a childhood SES index, a high life course SES (high participant's SES/high mother's education) was associated with high extraversion and openness. Using father's education as a childhood SES index, a low life course SES (low participant's SES/low father's education) was associated with disproportionately high neuroticism and low conscientiousness. These effects did not differ by race or sex.

Conclusion

The implications of these findings for the role of personality in the SES–health relationship are discussed.

Frank JW, Cohen R, Yen I, Balfour J, Smith M. Socioeconomic gradients in health status over 29 years of follow-up after midlife: the Alameda county study. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(12):2305–23.CrossRefPubMed

Laaksonen M, Prattala R, Lahelma E. Sociodemographic determinants of multiple unhealthy behaviours. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(1):37–43.PubMed

Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck personality questionnaire. Sevenoaks: Hodder and Stoughton; 1975.

Lazarus RS. Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. New York: Springer; 1999.

Rosenman RH. Personality, behaviour patterns and heart disease. In: Cooper CL, editor. Handbook of stress, medicine and health. New York: CRC; 1996.

Smith TW, MacKenzie J. Personality and risk of physical illness. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:435–67.CrossRefPubMed

Digman JM. Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:417–40.

John OP. The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: dimensions of personality in the natural languages and in questionnaires. In: Pervin LA, editor. Handbook of personality: theory and research. New York: Guilford; 1990. p. 66–100.

McCrae R, Costa P. Trait explanations in personality psychology. Eur J Pers. 1995;9:231–52.CrossRef

10.

Costa PT, McCrae RR, Psychological Assessment Resources Inc. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1992.

11.

McCrae R, Costa P Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychol. 1997;52:509–16.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Savla J, Davey A, Costa P, Whitfield K. Replicating the NEO-PI-R factor structure in African-American older adults. Pers Individ Dif. 2007;43:1279–88.CrossRef

13.

Costa PT Jr, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(2):322–31.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Roepke S, McAdams L, Lindamer LA, Patterson TL, Jeste DV. Personality profiles among normal aged individuals as measured by the NEO-PI-R. Aging Ment Health. 2001;5:159–64.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Heath AC, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Eaves LJ, Kendler KS. Evidence for genetic influences on personality from self-reports and informant ratings. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(1):85–96.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. J Pers Assess. 1995;64(1):21–50.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Avia MD, Sanz J, Sanchez-Bernardos ML, Martinez-Arias MR, Silva F, Grana JL. The five-factor model—II. Relations of the NEO-PI with other personality variable. Pers Individ Dif. 1995;19(1):81–97.CrossRef

18.

Krueger PM, Chang VW. Being poor and coping with stress: health behaviors and the risk of death. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(5):889–96.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Tsenkova VK, Love G, Singer BH, Ryff CD. Coping and positive affect predict longitudinal change in glycosylated hemoglobin. Health Psychol. 2008;27:163–71.CrossRef

20.

Bosma H, van de Mheen HD, Mackenbach JP. Social class in childhood and general health in adulthood: questionnaire study of contribution of psychological attributes. BMJ. 1999;318(7175):18–22.PubMed

21.

Barefoot JC, Peterson BL, Dahlstrom WG, Siegler IC, Anderson NB, Williams RB Jr. Hostility patterns and health implications: correlates of Cook-Medley Hostility Scale scores in a national survey. Health Psychol. 1991;10(1):18–24.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kubzansky L, Kawachi I, Sparrow D. Socioeconomic status, hostility, and risk factor clustering in the normative aging study: any help from the concept of allostatic load? Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(4):330–8.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Harper S, Lynch J, Hsu WL, Everson SA, Hillemeier MM, Raghunathan TE, et al. Life course socioeconomic conditions and adult psychosocial functioning. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(2):395–403.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Korner A, Geyer M, Gunzelmann T, Brahler E. The influence of socio-demographic factors on personality dimensions in the elderly. Gerontol Geriatr. 2003;36(2):130–7.CrossRef

25.

Shipley B, Weiss A, Der G, Taylor M, Deary IJ. Neuroticism, extraversion, and mortality in the UK health and lifestyle survey: a 21-year prospective cohort study. Psychosom Med. 2007;69:923–31.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Suarez EC, Harlan E, Peoples MC, Williams RB Jr. Cardiovascular and emotional responses in women: the role of hostility and harassment. Health Psychol. 1993;12(6):459–68.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Siegman AW, Anderson R, Herbst J, Boyle S, Wilkinson J. Dimensions of anger-hostility and cardiovascular reactivity in provoked and angered men. J Behav Med. 1992;15(3):257–72.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Pearson GL, Freeman FG. Effects of extraversion and mental arithmetic on heart-rate reactivity. Percept Mot Skills. 1991;72(3):1239–48.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Terracciano A, Costa PT Jr. Smoking and the five-factor model of personality. Addiction. 2004;99(4):472–81.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kuntsche E, Knibbe R, Gmel G, Engels R. Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people. Addict Behav. 2006;31(10):1844–57.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Siegler IC, Blumenthal JA, Barefoot JC, Peterson BL, Saunders WB, Dahlstrom WG, et al. Personality factors differentially predict exercise behavior in men and women. Womens Health. 1997;3(1):61–70.PubMed

32.

Williams RB, Marchuk DA, Siegler IC, Barefoot JC, Helms MJ, Brummett BH, et al. Childhood socioeconomic status and serotonin transporter gene polymorphism enhance cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(1):32–9.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Galobardes B, Davey Smith G, Jeffreys M, McCarron P. Childhood socioeconomic circumstances predict specific causes of death in adulthood: the Glasgow student cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(6):527–9.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Galobardes B, Smith GD, Lynch JW. Systematic review of the influence of childhood socioeconomic circumstances on risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16(2):91–104.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Krieger N, Okamoto A, Selby JV. Adult female twins' recall of childhood social class and father's education: a validation study for public health research. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(7):704–8.PubMed

36.

Osler M, Andersen AM, Lund R, Holstein B. Effect of grandparent's and parent's socioeconomic position on mortality among Danish men born in 1953. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15(6):647–51.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Bonney JFK, Michelle L, Levant RF. A model of fathers' behavioral involvement in child care in dual-earner families. J Fam Psychol. 1999;13(3):401–15.CrossRef

38.

Wood JJ, Repetti RL. What gets dad involved? A longitudinal study of change in parental child caregiving involvement. J Fam Psychol. 2004;18(1):237–49.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Burroughs AR, Visscher WA, Haney TL, Efland JR, Barefoot JC, Williams RB Jr, et al. Community recruitment process by race, gender, and SES gradient: lessons learned from the Community Health and Stress Evaluation (CHASE) study experience. J Community Health. 2003;28(6):421–37.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Surwit RS, Williams RB, Siegler IC, Lane JD, Helms M, Applegate KL, et al. Hostility, race, and glucose metabolism in nondiabetic individuals. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(5):835–9.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Williams RB, Marchuk DA, Gadde KM, Barefoot JC, Grichnik K, Helms MJ, et al. Serotonin-related gene polymorphisms and central nervous system serotonin function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(3):533–41.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Power C, Graham H, Due P, Hallqvist J. The contribution of childhood and adult socioeconomic position to adult obesity and smoking behaviour: an international comparison. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(2):335–4.CrossRef

43.

Gallo LC, Matthews KA. Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: do negative emotions play a role? Psychol Bull. 2003;129(1):10–51.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, et al. Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol. 1994;49(1):15–24.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Poulton R, Caspi A. Commentary: personality and the socioeconomic-health gradient. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32(6):975–7.CrossRefPubMed

46.

David JP. Coping efforts in daily life: role of big five traits and problem appraisals. J Pers. 1999;67(2):265–94.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Jonassaint CR, Boyle SH, Williams RB, Mark DB, Siegler IC, Barefoot JC. Facets of openness predict mortality in patients with cardiac disease. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(4):319–22.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Cherry N, Kiernan K. Personality scores and smoking behaviour. A longitudinal study. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1976;30(2):123–31.PubMed

49.

Merenäkk L, Harro M, Kiive E, Laidra K, Eensoo D, Allik J. Association between substance use, personality traits, and platelet MAO activity in preadolescents and adolescents. Addict Behav. 2003;28(8):1507–14.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Blumenthal JA, Williams RS, Wallace AG, Williams RB Jr, Needles TL. Physiological and psychological variables predict compliance to prescribed exercise therapy in patients recovering from myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med. 1982;44(6):519–27.PubMed

51.

de Bruijn GJ, Kremers SP, van Mechelen W, Brug J. Is personality related to fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity in adolescents? Health Educ Res. 2005;20(6):635–44.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Bernard NS, Dollinger SJ, Ramaniah NV. Applying the big five personality factors to the impostor phenomenon. J Pers Assess. 2002;78(2):321–33.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Wilson RS, Mendes de Leon CF, Bienias JL, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Personality and mortality in old age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2004;59(3):110–6.

54.

Farley R, Allen W. The color line in the qualtiy of life in America. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987.

55.

Jaynes G, Williams RJ. A common destiny: blacks and American society. Washington: National Academy Press; 1989.

56.

Pappas G, Queen S, Hadden W, Fisher G. The increasing disparity in mortality between socioeconomic groups in the United States, 1960 and 1986. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:103–9.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Anderson NB, Armstead CA. Toward understanding the association of socioeconomic status and health: a new challenge for the biopsychosocial approach. Psychosom Med. 1995;57:213–25.PubMed

Titel: Low Life Course Socioeconomic Status (SES) is Associated with Negative NEO PI-R Personality Patterns
verfasst von: Charles R. Jonassaint
Ilene C. Siegler
John C. Barefoot
Christopher L. Edwards
Redford B. Williams
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9069-x

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Erratum to: Biofield Therapies: Helpful or Full of Hype? A Best Evidence Synthesis

Gender Patterns of Socioeconomic Differences in Premature Mortality: Follow-up of the Hungarian Epidemiological Panel

Meaning in Life: Is It a Protective Factor for Adolescents’ Psychological Health?

Selection Bias in a Study of Implantable Defibrillator Patients: The Role of Type D Personality

Cardiovascular and Psychological Reactivity and Recovery from Harassment in a Biracial Sample of High and Low Hostile Men and Women

Predicting Adult Physical Health Outcomes from Childhood Aggression, Social Withdrawal and Likeability: A 30-Year Prospective, Longitudinal Study