Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Surgery 1/2013

Open Access 01.12.2013 | Case report

Lumbar herniation following extended autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction

verfasst von: Sheila Margaret Fraser, Hiba Fatayer, Rajgopal Achuthan

Erschienen in: BMC Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2013

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

Reconstructive breast surgery is now recognized to be an important part of the treatment for breast cancer. Surgical reconstruction options consist of implants, autologous tissue transfer or a combination of the two. The latissimus dorsi flap is a pedicled musculocutaneous flap and is an established method of autologous breast reconstruction.
Lumbar hernias are an unusual type of hernia, the majority occurring after surgery or trauma in this area. The reported incidence of a lumbar hernia subsequent to a latissimus dorsi reconstruction is very low.

Case presentation

We present the unusual case of lumbar herniation after an extended autologous latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction following a mastectomy. The lumbar hernia was confirmed on CT scanning and the patient underwent an open mesh repair of the hernia through the previous latissimus dorsi scar.

Conclusion

Lumbar hernias are a rare complication that can occur following latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. It should be considered in all patients presenting with persistent pain or swelling in the lumbar region.
Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​1471-2482-13-16) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SMF wrote the background and discussion and revised the manuscript. HF wrote the case presentation. RA is the Consultant Surgeon who operated on the patient and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abkürzungen
CT
Computerized tomography
LD
Latissimus dorsi.

Background

Breast reconstruction is an important part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer, and is usually performed following a mastectomy. Surgical options for reconstruction include implants, autologous tissue transfer or a combination of both. Autologous tissue transfer is often the preferred option as it can give a more natural appearance to the breast compared to implants alone [1, 2]. The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is an established method of autologous breast reconstruction with relatively few contraindications and complications [35].
Lumbar hernias are an unusual type of herniation of the postero-lateral abdominal wall. The majority of this hernia type is acquired, rather than congenital and occurs after surgery or trauma. The diagnosis is usually suspected on clinical grounds and confirmed by CT scanning [6, 7].
Lumbar herniation after an LD flap is an uncommon complication that patients are not routinely warned about during the counseling and consent for the procedure. There have been very few published reports over the past 20 years regarding the incidence, detection and management of this complication [8, 9].
We present the rare case of lumbar herniation following a latissismus dorsi reconstruction for breast cancer and the consequent diagnosis and treatment.

Case presentation

A 63-year old female with a past medical history of bronchiectasis was diagnosed with a grade 3 ductal breast cancer. She initially underwent breast conservation surgery in the form of a right wide local excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Due to the proximity of the carcinoma to the surgical resection margins she subsequently had a skin sparing mastectomy and extended autologous latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction.
On her first post-operative outpatient visit she had a large seroma in relation to the tumour site, which was drained in clinic. She was seen two weeks later and was found to have a large seroma over the back wound (LD site); this was aspirated and drained 650 mls serous fluid. On two consecutive outpatient visits at fortnightly intervals she had recurrent large seromas at the LD site. On each occasion these were aspirated and over a litre of serous fluid drained.
On her fourth visit, following aspiration of the seroma there was a residual fullness in the lower region of the LD donor site. On palpation this felt like a separate firm lump, clinically in keeping with a possible lumbar hernia. An urgent CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed the diagnosis of a lumbar hernia containing the majority of the small bowel and right colon (Figures 1 and 2). The CT scan also demonstrated an incidental finding of an enlarged polycystic liver.
She accordingly underwent an open repair of the lumbar hernia using the previous LD scar for access (Figure 3). Small bowel loops within the hernia sac were freed from adhesions and the small bowel and caecum reduced into the intra-abdominal cavity. The edges of the defect were closed with interrupted PDS, and a 30 × 30 cm onlay prolene mesh was used for reinforcement.
Postoperative recovery was uneventful and she was commenced on adjuvant hormonal and herceptin therapy.

Discussion

Breast conservation surgery is an established method of treatment for early breast cancer. In the majority of patients this method of surgery, in combination with radiotherapy, provides effective oncological therapy and long-term survival as compared to mastectomy [10]. However over 30% women in the UK still require a mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer. Reasons for mastectomy include large cancers, those directly behind the nipple, multi-focal cancers, patient preference and increasingly prophylactic mastectomies due to an improved understanding of the genetics of breast cancer [11, 12].
Mastectomy is known to be associated with significant psychological consequences including a distorted body image, loss of self-esteem and sexual dysfunction. Breast reconstruction should be offered to virtually all women undergoing a mastectomy and is an integral part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The benefits of an immediate or delayed breast reconstruction are well recognized, for both emotional and physical well being [4]. Furthermore reconstruction techniques have been shown to be safe with minimal morbidity and no affect on local recurrence rates [5, 13].
The aims of reconstructive surgery are to correct the anatomical defect after mastectomy and restore the shape and symmetry of the breasts. Surgical reconstruction options consist of implants, autologous tissue transfer or a combination of the two. In comparison to implants, autologous tissue transfer is considered to give a better aesthetic look [1, 2, 14].
The latissimus dorsi flap is a pedicled musculocutaneous flap, first used in the late 19th century to cover chest wall deformities following mastectomy complications. The current use of the latissimus dorsi flap was developed in the 1970s for breast reconstruction following mastectomy in patients with radiation damage to the skin and chest wall [1517]. There are relatively few absolute contraindications to latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Complications can be split into flap complications and donor site complications, the most common being mastectomy skin flap necrosis and donor site seroma [18].
Lumbar hernias are an uncommon type of hernia, only 20% present as a congenital condition, the majority are acquired following surgery, trauma or inflammation [7]. Lumbar hernias typically are wide necked and therefore less likely to be prone to strangulation or obstruction. Lumbar hernias usually occur in 2 weak sites in the posterolateral abdominal wall – the superior (Grynfeltt-Lesshalft) and the inferior (Petit) lumbar triangles. However in large incisional defects the hernia can affect the entire lumbar region [6, 19].
Due to its rarity there is no standardized surgical technique for lumbar hernia repair. When there is clinical suspicion of a lumbar hernia CT is recommended to get exact information on the size and content of the hernia and to plan for surgical repair [19].
Our patient had pre-disposing factors that in hindsight contributed to the development of a lumbar hernia, despite preservation of the lumbar fascia during the operation. The co-morbidities of bronchiectasis and a polycystic liver both reduced the intra-abdominal compartment size and increased the intra-abdominal pressure. This caused herniation of abdominal contents through a weakened area of the abdominal wall. On further questioning she admitted to a post-operative chest infection with associated coughing and had received oral antibiotics from her GP.
We currently do not routinely image seromas occurring in post-operative breast reconstruction patients. However there was clinical suspicion following recurrent aspiration, due to the residual fullness and the anatomical site of the seroma, that raised the suspicion of a lumbar hernia.

Conclusion

Lumbar herniation is a rare complication that can occur following LD breast reconstruction. It should be clinically suspected in patients with a persistent swelling or pain in the lumbar region and subsequent CT scanning should be performed. Surgical repair is recommended in suitable patients; due to the large size these hernias can reach and related patient discomfort. Pre-existing co-morbidities should be carefully considered in all patients undergoing breast reconstruction.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Series Editor of this journal.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this manuscript was provided by the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SMF wrote the background and discussion and revised the manuscript. HF wrote the case presentation. RA is the Consultant Surgeon who operated on the patient and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Anhänge

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawson AE, McClellan WT: Current concepts in breast reconstruction. W V Med J. 2009, 105 (3): 16-22.PubMed Rawson AE, McClellan WT: Current concepts in breast reconstruction. W V Med J. 2009, 105 (3): 16-22.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rozen WM, Ashton MW: Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009, 33 (3): 327-335. 10.1007/s00266-008-9272-1.CrossRefPubMed Rozen WM, Ashton MW: Improving outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009, 33 (3): 327-335. 10.1007/s00266-008-9272-1.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Perdikis G, Koonce S, Collis G, Eck D: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: bad rap or good flap?. Eplasty. 2011, 11-39. Perdikis G, Koonce S, Collis G, Eck D: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: bad rap or good flap?. Eplasty. 2011, 11-39.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eric M, Mihic N, Krivokuca D: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy; patient's satisfaction. Acta Chir Belg. 2009, 109 (2): 159-166.CrossRefPubMed Eric M, Mihic N, Krivokuca D: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy; patient's satisfaction. Acta Chir Belg. 2009, 109 (2): 159-166.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reefy S, Patani N, Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Osman H, Mokbel K: Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 171-10.1186/1471-2407-10-171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reefy S, Patani N, Anderson A, Burgoyne G, Osman H, Mokbel K: Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 171-10.1186/1471-2407-10-171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cavallaro G, Sadighi A, Paparelli C, Miceli M, D'Ermo G, Polistena A: Anatomical and surgical considerations on lumbar hernias. Am Surg. 2009, 75 (12): 1238-1241.PubMed Cavallaro G, Sadighi A, Paparelli C, Miceli M, D'Ermo G, Polistena A: Anatomical and surgical considerations on lumbar hernias. Am Surg. 2009, 75 (12): 1238-1241.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Salemis NS, Nisotakis K, Gourgiotis S, Tsohataridis E: Segmental liver incarceration through a recurrent incisional lumbar hernia. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007, 6 (4): 442-444.PubMed Salemis NS, Nisotakis K, Gourgiotis S, Tsohataridis E: Segmental liver incarceration through a recurrent incisional lumbar hernia. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007, 6 (4): 442-444.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans MD, Thomas C, Williams GL, Stephenson BM: Latissimus dorsi flap herniation: is it really that rare?. Surgery. 2011, 150 (1): 139-CrossRefPubMed Evans MD, Thomas C, Williams GL, Stephenson BM: Latissimus dorsi flap herniation: is it really that rare?. Surgery. 2011, 150 (1): 139-CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mickel TJ, Barton FE, Rohrich RJ, Daniel LB, Conner WC: Management and prevention of lumbar herniation following a latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999, 103 (5): 1473-1475.CrossRefPubMed Mickel TJ, Barton FE, Rohrich RJ, Daniel LB, Conner WC: Management and prevention of lumbar herniation following a latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999, 103 (5): 1473-1475.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (16): 1233-1241. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.CrossRefPubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (16): 1233-1241. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lostumbo L, Carbine N, Wallace J, Ezzo J: Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 4: CD002748 Lostumbo L, Carbine N, Wallace J, Ezzo J: Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 4: CD002748
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuttle TM, Abbott A, Arrington A, Rueth N: The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010, 12 (1): 16-21. 10.1007/s11912-009-0070-y.CrossRefPubMed Tuttle TM, Abbott A, Arrington A, Rueth N: The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010, 12 (1): 16-21. 10.1007/s11912-009-0070-y.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C: New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010, 122 (2): 439-451. 10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7.CrossRefPubMed Giacalone PL, Rathat G, Daures JP, Benos P, Azria D, Rouleau C: New concept for immediate breast reconstruction for invasive cancers: feasibility, oncological safety and esthetic outcome of post-neoadjuvant therapy immediate breast reconstruction versus delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010, 122 (2): 439-451. 10.1007/s10549-010-0951-7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiland-Smith J: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer. S D Med Spec. 2010, 31-37. Reiland-Smith J: Diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast cancer. S D Med Spec. 2010, 31-37.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bostwick J, Vasconez LO, Jurkiewicz MJ: Breast reconstruction after a radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978, 61 (5): 682-693. 10.1097/00006534-197805000-00004.CrossRefPubMed Bostwick J, Vasconez LO, Jurkiewicz MJ: Breast reconstruction after a radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978, 61 (5): 682-693. 10.1097/00006534-197805000-00004.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivari N: The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1976, 29 (2): 126-128. 10.1016/0007-1226(76)90036-9.CrossRefPubMed Olivari N: The latissimus flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1976, 29 (2): 126-128. 10.1016/0007-1226(76)90036-9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider WJ, Hill HL, Brown RG: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1977, 30 (4): 277-281. 10.1016/0007-1226(77)90117-5.CrossRefPubMed Schneider WJ, Hill HL, Brown RG: Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1977, 30 (4): 277-281. 10.1016/0007-1226(77)90117-5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP: Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002, 110 (3): 751-759. 10.1097/00006534-200209010-00005. discussion 60–1CrossRefPubMed Chang DW, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece GP: Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002, 110 (3): 751-759. 10.1097/00006534-200209010-00005. discussion 60–1CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobias-Machado M, Rincon FJ, Lasmar MT, Zambon JP, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER: Laparoscopic surgery for treatment of incisional lumbar hernia. Int Braz J Urol. 2005, 31 (4): 309-314.CrossRefPubMed Tobias-Machado M, Rincon FJ, Lasmar MT, Zambon JP, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER: Laparoscopic surgery for treatment of incisional lumbar hernia. Int Braz J Urol. 2005, 31 (4): 309-314.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Lumbar herniation following extended autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction
verfasst von
Sheila Margaret Fraser
Hiba Fatayer
Rajgopal Achuthan
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2013
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-16

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

BMC Surgery 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.