Malignant fibrous neoplasms (MFN) of long bones are rare lesions. Moreover, the prognostic determinants of MFN of long bones have not been reported. This study aimed to present epidemiological data and analyse the prognostic factors for survival in patients with MFN.
Materials and methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programme database was used to screen patients with malignant fibrous neoplasms (MFN) of long bones from 1973 to 2015, with attention to fibrosarcoma, fibromyxosarcoma, periosteal fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. The prognostic values of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model with univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to obtain OS and CSS curves.
Results
A total of 237 cases were selected from the SEER database. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the most common form of lesion in long bones. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent predictors of OS included age, stage, tumour size and surgery. Age, stage, tumour size and surgery were also independent predictors of CSS. Additionally, the most significant prognostic factor was whether metastasis had occurred at the time of initial diagnosis.
Conclusion
Among patients with MFN of long bones, age (> 60 years), tumour size (> 10 cm), distant stage, and non-surgical treatment are factors for poor survival.
Hinweise
Yiting Huang and Jianqiao Hong equally contributed to this study and are considered co-first authors.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CK
Cytokeratin
CSS
Cancer-specific survival
GCT
Giant cell tumour
LBFS
Fibrosarcoma of long bone
MFH
The malignant fibrous histiocytoma
MFN
Malignant fibrous neoplasms
mo
Months
NA
Not available
NED
No evidence of disease
NSAIDs
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
OS
Overall survival
PVNS
Pigmented villonodular synovitis
ROM
Range of motion
SC
Synovial chondromatosis
SEER
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
SMA
Smooth muscle actin
yr
Years
Background
Malignant fibrous neoplasms (MFN) are very rare malignant tumours of long bones. These tumours include fibrosarcoma, fibromyxosarcoma, periosteal fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) according to classification from the SEER database. Malignant fibrous neoplasms most commonly arise from the extremities [1], occasionally from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses [2], and rarely from long bone.
MFH was first described by O’Brien in 1963 [3] and by Kauffman and Stout (Histiocytic tumors (fibrous xanthoma and histiocytoma) in children in 1961 [4]. It was the most common soft tissue sarcoma [5]. Fibrosarcoma of long bone (LBFS) is another neoplasm in this region that exhibits nonspecific symptoms such as pain. The final diagnosis of this tumour is based on histopathology and immunohistochemistry [6].
Anzeige
Malignant tumours of the long bones are challenging with regard to improving patient survival [7]. Few studies have reported the complications associated with surgical resection. Therefore, it remains unresolved whether a uniform treatment strategy could be beneficial to all patients.
Here, we present an epidemiologic analysis of MFN of long bone using the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s SEER database from 1973 to 2015. No previous study has specifically performed an in-depth analysis of cases with MFN of long bones using the database. We analysed 237 cases of MFN of long bones from 18 SEER registries, representing the largest cohort of patients with MFN of long bones studied to date. Our analysis includes demographic and clinicopathologic features of this rare neoplasm, along with its survival outcomes.
Materials and methods
Frequency and survival data were obtained from the SEER 18 dataset from 1973 to 2015. SEER had considerably fewer participating registries in the early years, and the number gradually increased relatively recently to reach 18. The cases included in this dataset were diagnosed between 1973 and 2015. Fibrosarcoma cases were screened using the morphological codes for fibrosarcoma (8810/3), fibromyxosarcoma (8811/3), periosteal fibrosarcoma (8812/3), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (8830/3). Based on the topographical codes, cases with MFN were restricted to the long bone, namely, the long bones of the upper limb, scapula, and associated joints (C40.0), as well as the long bone of the lower limb and associated joints (C40.2).
Frequency data were stratified and analysed by age, gender, race, grade, tumour size, SEER extent of disease, and treatment strategy. SEER extent of disease is categorized into localized, regional, and distant disease. Localized tumour, regional tumour and distant disease are defined as previously reported [8‐11]. Five-year survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, calculating overall survival (OS) and calculating disease-specific survival (CSS) rates [12]. SEER*Stat 8.1.5 software (National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD) and Microsoft Excel 2013 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) were used to process the data. Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 24th edition was used to yield Kaplan-Meier curves and CSS rates. Probability values (p values) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all tests.
Anzeige
Results
The demographic characteristics of the 237 patients with MFN of the long bones identified in the SEER database are displayed in Table 1. The specific histopathological diagnosis was fibrosarcoma (21.5%), fibromyxosarcoma (1.7%), periosteal fibrosarcoma (5.1%), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (71.7%).
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of patients with MFN of long bones
Histologically, 55.3% of cases were high grade, 12.2% were low grade, and 32.5% were an unknown tumour grade. More than half (50.2%) of the tumours were at less than 5 cm in size. The extent of disease showed that the majority presented with locally invasive disease (38.4%). Forty-six patients (19.4%) had developed metastasis at presentation. Most patients were diagnosed first with malignant primary tumours (87.8%). After diagnosis, 75.9% of patients underwent surgical treatment and 56.5% of the patients underwent chemotherapy. A total of 160 patients (67.5%) died. The OS rates of the entire cohort at 5 and 10 years were 39.7 and 22.8%, respectively. The CSS rates at 5 and 10 years were 60.3 and 56.5%, respectively.
The 5- and 10-year OS rates for patients with fibrosarcoma of long bones were 31.4 and 11.8%, respectively, and the respective 5- and 10-year CSS rates were 62.7 and 58.8%. For patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma of long bones, the OS rates were 40.6 and 23.5% and the CSS rates were 58.8 and 55.3%, respectively (Table 1).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of parameters that influence overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) are illustrated in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2
Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS for patients identified in the SEER Program database from 1973 to 2015
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
p-value
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
p-value
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Age
≤16
/
1
/
1
17–39
0.124
2.562
0.098
2.765 (0.827–9.243)
40–60
0.037*
3.47 (1.075–11.202)
0.027*
3.81 (1.163–12.486)
>60
0.001*
7.381 (2.323–23.45)
0.004*
5.688 (1.722–18.782)
Sex
Male
/
1
Female
0.276
0.840 (0.613–1.150)
Decade of diagnosis
1970s
/
1
1980s
0.938
0.977 (0.552–1.731)
1990s
0.204
1.444 (0.819–2.545)
2000s
0.382
0.784 (0.454–1.353)
2010s
0.999
1 (0.512–1.954)
Race recode
Other
/
1
White
0.435
1.293 (0.679–2.462)
Black
0.505
1.301 (0.6–2.822)
Tumor Grade
Low
/
1
High
0.065
1.691 (0.968–2.954)
Unknown
0.02*
1.97 (1.115–3.48)
Tumor type
Fibrosarcoma (NOS)
/
1
Fibromyxosarcoma
0.188
0.263 (0.036–1.923)
Periosteal fibrosarcoma
0.249
0.649 (0.311–1.354)
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma
0.609
0.906 (0.621–1.322)
Tumor Size
<5 cm
/
1
/
1
5 cm-10
0.109
1.889 (0.868–4.114)
0.034*
2.335 (1.065–5.124)
>10
< 0.001*
4.714 (2.111–10.527)
0.001*
4.051 (1.769–9.275)
Unknown
< 0.001*
3.301 (1.602–6.801)
0.027*
2.324 (1.1–4.91)
Tumor sequence
First
/
1
/
1
≥Second
0.031*
1.618 (1.045–2.505)
0.142
1.425 (0.889–2.287)
Stage
Local
/
1
/
1
region
0.128
1.355 (0.916–2.004)
0.091
1.421 (0.945–2.135)
distant
< 0.001*
5.383 (3.517–8.237)
< 0.001*
3.917 (2.427–6.321)
unknown
< 0.001*
2.68 (1.468–4.892)
0.515
1.239 (0.65–2.359)
Surgery
No
/
1
/
1
Yes
< 0.001*
0.267 (0.19–0.376)
< 0.001*
0.397 (0.262–0.6)
unknown
0.408
0.433 (0.06–3.144)
0.528
0.515 (0.066–4.05)
Radiotherapy
no/unknown
/
1
/
1
Yes
0.003*
1.684 (1.196–2.371)
0.831
0.959 (0.655–1.404)
Chemotherapy
no/unknown
/
1
/
1
Yes
0.023*
0.688 (0.499–0.949)
0.282
0.816 (0.563–1.182)
Abbreviations: OS Overall survival, SEER Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results
*p < 0.05
Table 3
Univariate and multivariate analyses for CSS for patients identified in the SEER Program database from 1973 to 2015
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
p-value
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
p-value
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Age
≤16
/
1
/
1
17–39
0.192
2.243 (0.666–7.554)
0.1
2.803 (0.822–9.556)
40–60
0.206
2.153 (0.655–7.074)
0.183
2.271 (0.679–7.601)
>60
0.032*
3.569 (1.112–11.454)
0.03*
3.863 (1.14–13.091)
Sex
Male
/
1
Female
0.427
0.854 (0.578–1.261)
Decade of diagnosis
1970s
/
1
1980s
0.82
1.088 (0.526–2.249)
1990s
0.447
1.323 (0.643–2.72)
2000s
0.358
0.726 (0.367–1.437)
2010s
0.514
0.755 (0.324–1.759)
Race recode
Other
/
1
White
0.853
1.076 (0.497–2.329)
Black
0.28
1.633 (0.671–3.974)
Tumor Grade
High
/
1
Low
0.101
1.859 (0.885–3.905)
Unknown
0.06
2.079 (0.969–4.464)
Tumor type
Fibrosarcoma (NOS)
/
1
Fibromyxosarcoma
0.436
0.45 (0.061–3.351)
Periosteal fibrosarcoma
0.571
0.754 (0.284–2.004)
Malignant fibrous histiocytoma
0.864
1.043 (0.643–1.693)
Tumor Size
<5 cm
/
1
/
1
5 cm-10
0.163
1.446 (0.861–2.426)
0.205
1.908 (0.703–5.176)
>10
< 0.001*
7.595 (4.553–12.671)
0.033*
3.075 (1.092–8.659)
Unknown
0.08
2.108 (0.914–4.863)
0.082
2.314 (0.899–5.951)
Tumor sequence
First
/
1
/
1
≥Second
0.023*
0.042 (0.003–0.641)
0.943
0
Stage
local
/
1
/
1
region
0.128
1.355 (0.916–2.004)
0.145
1.481 (0.873–2.514)
distant
< 0.001*
5.383 (3.517–8.237)
< 0.001*
4.401 (2.47–7.841)
unknown
< 0.001*
2.68 (1.468–4.892)
0.942
0.967 (0.396–2.363)
Surgery
No
/
1
/
1
Yes
< 0.001*
0.226 (0.15–0.34)
< 0.001*
0.318 (0.191–0.527)
unknown
0.963
0
0.989
0
Radiotherapy
no/unknown
/
1
/
1
Yes
0.02*
1.652 (1.084–2.517)
0.589
0.878 (0.546–1.409)
Chemotherapy
no/unkown
/
1
/
1
yes
0.481
0.87 (0.59–1.282)
0.871
0.963 (0.609–1.523)
Abbreviations: CSS Cancer-specific survival, SEER Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results
*p < 0.05
For both OS and CSS, race, gender, decade of diagnosis and tumour type showed no significant effect on survival (p > 0.05; Tables 2 and 3). Univariate survival analysis revealed that older age (age > 60 years) was significantly associated with a worse OS (HR = 7.381, p = 0.001; Table 2; Fig. 1a) and CSS (HR = 3.569, p = 0.032; Table 3; Fig. 2a). Tumour size (> 10 cm) was significantly associated with a worse OS (HR = 4.714, p < 0.001; Table 2; Fig. 1e) and CSS (HR = 7.595, p < 0.001; Table 3; Fig. 2e). Tumour sequence (second) was significantly associated with a worse OS (HR = 1.618, p = 0.031; Table 2) but a higher CSS (HR = 0.042, p = 0.023; Table 3). The stage (distant) was significantly associated with a worse OS (HR = 5.383, p < 0.001; Table 2; Fig. 1f) and CSS (HR = 5.383, p < 0.001; Table 3; Fig. 2f). Radiotherapy was significantly associated with a worse OS (HR = 1.684, p = 0.003; Table 2; Fig. 1d) and CSS (HR = 1.652, p = 0.02; Table 3; Fig. 2d). Surgery was significantly associated with a better OS (HR = 0.267, p < 0.001; Table 2; Fig. 1b) and CSS ((HR = 0.267, p = 0.226; Table 3; Fig. 2b). Chemotherapy was significantly associated with a better OS (HR = 0.688, p = 0.023; Table 2; Fig. 1c) but not with CSS (HR = 0.226, p < 0.001; Table 3; Fig. 2c).
×
×
Upon multivariate analysis of all patients (Table 2), age (> 60 years vs < 16 years, HR = 5.688; p = 0.004; 40–60 years vs < 16 years, HR = 3.81; p = 0.027), stage (distant vs. localized, HR = 3.917, p < 0.001), tumour size (> 10 cm vs < 5 cm, HR = 4.051; p = 0.001; 5–10 cm vs < 5 cm, HR = 2.335; p = 0.034), and surgery (HR = 0.397; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of OS.
The results of the multivariate analysis of the parameters that influence CSS are presented in Table 3. Age (> 60 years vs < 16 years, HR = 3.863; 95% CI, 1.14–13.091; p = 0.03), stage (distant vs. localized, HR = 4.401, 95% CI, 2.47–7.841, p < 0.001), tumour size (> 10 cm vs < 5 cm, HR = 3.075; 95% CI, 1.092–8.659; p = 0.033; 5–10 cm vs < 5 cm, HR = 2.335; 95% CI, 1.065–5.124; p = 0.034), and surgery (HR = 0.318; 95% CI, 0.191–0.527; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of CSS.
Discussion
MFN are rare malignant tumours. Attention was paid to fibrosarcoma, fibromyxosarcoma, periosteal fibrosarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma.
Anzeige
These tumours can infiltrate adjacent tissues and metastasize distally [13‐19]. However, the outcome and prognosis of patients with MFN of long bones have not been reported because of its rarity. To our knowledge, the current study is the first to report the prognostic factors that affect the survival of patients with MFN of long bones using multivariate regression analysis.
In the current study, we identified 237 cases of malignant fibrous neoplasms of long bone based on the SEER database from 1973 to 2015. The OS and CSS rates at 5 years were 39.7 and 60.3%, respectively, while the previous study results showed that the OS and CSS of sinonasal fibrosarcoma were 71.7 and 77.8%, respectively [13].
Although malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) ceased to be recognised as an entity in the 2013 edition of the WHO classification of bone and soft tissue tumours [20], undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma is listed as a new synonym for MFH of bone, still with the same code 8830/3, in the recently published ICD-O-3.2. However, the registrations of undifferentiated high-grade pleomorphic sarcoma of bone still decreased in the seer database. This might explain the recent decrease in registrations of MFH. Therefore, this study was of more than purely historical interest.
Survival by age
We observed different survival rates by age at diagnosis in many studies [14]. In contrast, we found a higher risk of poor OS in the elder group. In the multivariate analysis of OS for patients aged 17–39 years the HR was 2.765 (P = 0.098), for those aged 40–60 years the HR was 3.81 (P = 0.027), and for those aged > 60 years the HR was 5.688 (P = 0.004). We also found a higher risk of poor CSS in the elder group. In the multivariate analysis of CSS for those aged > 60 years, the HR was 3.863 (P = 0.03*).
Anzeige
Survival by gender, race and decade of diagnosis
Our results were consistent with previous results where no differences in survival by gender, or race but not decades were founded [21]. The differences of decades might be caused by the primary site of long bone or small bone.
Survival by radiotherapy and chemotherapy
Radiotherapy was used as an adjunct to surgical management in patients with positive margins [22]. In the univariate analysis of OS, radiotherapy (RT) was associated with poor CSS (HR was 1.652(P = 0.02)) and OS (HR was 1.684(P = 0.003)). The results were consistent with a recent study [15]. This may be caused by the selection bias of patients with radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was also an important adjuvant therapy. In the multivariate analysis of OS and CSS, we did not find that chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS. However, a previous study demonstrated that clinical factors were associated with radiotherapy only in nonmetastatic malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) of soft tissues [1].
Survival for tumour type and tumour sequence
Tumour type was not an independent prognostic indicator for OS or CSS in multivariate analysis. In addition, tumour sequence was an independent prognostic indicator of OS and CSS, suggesting that patients with second primary bone MFN in their long bones may have a worse prognosis than those with a first primary tumour. The patients’ number of more than 2 sequence was as low as 29, among which 12 in fibrosarcoma, 17 in malignant fibrous histiocytoma. This leads to the difficulty in analyzing in multivariate analysis. Therefore, the results of tumour sequence should be taken into consideration carefully.
Survival by tumour size
For smaller tumours with no evidence of metastasis, surgical extirpation alone may be the definitive treatment [16, 23]. Our study showed that tumour size > 10 cm was a prognostic factor for both poor OS and CSS, which was consistent with a recent study [16].
Anzeige
Survival for stage and surgery
Stage and surgery have been previously recognized as predictors of survival in patients with malignant bone tumours [24‐26]. These factors were also independent predictors of OS and CSS in the study. MFN was highly metastatic tumour. Therefore, surgical removal of the primary tumour and distant lesions should be addressed and may be applicable to prolong survival in patients with MFN of the long bones and metastasis at diagnosis. Surgery remains the primary treatment strategy for MFN. Patients treated with this strategy had the best OS and CSS. Finally, there was not significant difference between upper limbs and lower limbs (data not shown).
Strengths and limitations
This study is a population-based, with high-quality data, and the largest ever published on this category of rare tumours. However, this study has several limitations. These include the fact that there were no data on surgical type, node status, and RT dose.
Conclusion
This is the largest population-based study to show demographics and analyse the prognosis of patients with MFN of the long bones. Independent predictors of OS included age, stage, tumour size and surgery. Age, stage, tumour size and surgery were also independent predictors of CSS. The results of this study may improve doctors’ understanding of the features and outcomes of MFN of the long bones. It may also be useful for patient health education and to provide a foundation for future research.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Zexin Chen for teaching us about data analysis.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
The authors have obtained the patient’s written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.
Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders scheint das auf weibliche Kranke zuzutreffen, wie eine Studie zeigt.
Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.