Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports 3/2013

01.09.2013 | Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Mammographic Density: Potential as a Risk Factor and Surrogate Marker in the Clinical Setting

verfasst von: Celine M. Vachon, Karthik Ghosh, Kathleen R. Brandt

Erschienen in: Current Breast Cancer Reports | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Mammographic breast density reflects the relative proportions of fat, connective, and epithelial tissue on the mammogram. Studied for over 30 years, breast density continues to be one of the strongest risk factors for all types of breast cancer. Recent evidence suggests breast density may be a useful surrogate marker for response to endocrine therapies and potentially, a marker of local recurrence as well. High density is also prevalent in the population, with 32 % of women estimated to have breasts over 50 % dense. Because of the importance and prevalence of breast density, state and federal governments have proposed or passed legislation to mandate physicians to provide information on a woman’s breast density, especially if increased. We review the evidence and clinical utility for mammographic breast density in context of breast cancer risk, outcomes, and response to therapy. Further, we describe the implications of high density for screening, and include a discussion of potential supplemental screening strategies for women with high density.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Cook AJ, Buist DS, et al. Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3830–7.PubMed Kerlikowske K, Cook AJ, Buist DS, et al. Breast cancer risk by breast density, menopause, and postmenopausal hormone therapy use. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3830–7.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormack VA, dos Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1159–69. McCormack VA, dos Santos SI. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:1159–69.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine JJ, Scott CG, Sellers TA, et al. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1028–37.PubMed Heine JJ, Scott CG, Sellers TA, et al. A novel automated mammographic density measure and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1028–37.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12:332–8. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2003;12:332–8.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maskarinec G, Meng L. A case–control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;63:153–61.PubMed Maskarinec G, Meng L. A case–control study of mammographic densities in Hawaii. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;63:153–61.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, et al. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:384–98.PubMed Cummings SR, Tice JA, Bauer S, et al. Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:384–98.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–36.PubMed Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–36.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1622–9.PubMed Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1622–9.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Olson JE, Sellers TA, Scott CG, et al. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R147.PubMed Olson JE, Sellers TA, Scott CG, et al. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the mayo mammography health study cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R147.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:43–9. Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K, et al. Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:43–9.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:217.PubMed Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:217.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 2008;6:11.PubMed Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 2008;6:11.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, et al. Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2207–12.PubMed Ghosh K, Hartmann LC, Reynolds C, et al. Association between mammographic density and age-related lobular involution of the breast. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2207–12.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, Sasano H, Ghosh K, et al. Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125:243–52.PubMed Vachon CM, Sasano H, Ghosh K, et al. Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;125:243–52.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat McTiernan A, Martin CF, Peck JD, et al. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: women's health initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1366–76.PubMed McTiernan A, Martin CF, Peck JD, et al. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: women's health initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1366–76.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:621–8.PubMed Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:621–8.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Son HJ, Oh KK. Significance of follow-up mammography in estimating the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who have undergone surgery. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:905–9. Son HJ, Oh KK. Significance of follow-up mammography in estimating the effect of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients who have undergone surgery. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:905–9.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Brisson J, Brisson B, Cote G, et al. Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2000;9:911–5. Brisson J, Brisson B, Cote G, et al. Tamoxifen and mammographic breast densities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2000;9:911–5.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith J, Dilawari A, Ursin G, et al. A pilot study of letrozole for one year in women at enhanced risk of developing breast cancer: effects on mammographic density. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:1327–31.PubMed Smith J, Dilawari A, Ursin G, et al. A pilot study of letrozole for one year in women at enhanced risk of developing breast cancer: effects on mammographic density. Anticancer Res. 2012;32:1327–31.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Prowell TM, Blackford AL, Byrne C, et al. Changes in breast density and circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant anastrozole. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4:1993–2001. Prowell TM, Blackford AL, Byrne C, et al. Changes in breast density and circulating estrogens in postmenopausal women receiving adjuvant anastrozole. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4:1993–2001.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Han W, Moon HG, et al. Breast density change as a predictive surrogate for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R102.PubMed Kim J, Han W, Moon HG, et al. Breast density change as a predictive surrogate for response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R102.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mousa NA, Crystal P, Wolfman WL, et al. Aromatase inhibitors and mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy. Menopause. 2008;15:875–84.PubMed Mousa NA, Crystal P, Wolfman WL, et al. Aromatase inhibitors and mammographic breast density in postmenopausal women receiving hormone therapy. Menopause. 2008;15:875–84.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:744–52.PubMed Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, et al. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:744–52.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168–75.PubMed Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168–75.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Habel LA, Dignam JJ, Land SR, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1467–72.PubMed Habel LA, Dignam JJ, Land SR, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1467–72.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Habel LA, Capra AM, Achacoso NS, et al. Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:2488–95. Habel LA, Capra AM, Achacoso NS, et al. Mammographic density and risk of second breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:2488–95.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2007;16:2587–93 Hwang ES, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Association between breast density and subsequent breast cancer following treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2007;16:2587–93
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cil T, Fishell E, Hanna W, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2009;115:5780–7.PubMed Cil T, Fishell E, Hanna W, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2009;115:5780–7.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Park CC, Rembert J, Chew K, et al. High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:75–9.PubMed Park CC, Rembert J, Chew K, et al. High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:75–9.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, et al. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, et al. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 1998;7:1133–44.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Oza AM, Boyd NF. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:196–208.PubMed Oza AM, Boyd NF. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15:196–208.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfe JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer. 1976;37:2486–92.PubMed Wolfe JN. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer. 1976;37:2486–92.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L. The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:131–6.PubMed Gram IT, Funkhouser E, Tabar L. The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:131–6.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:1473–82. Shepherd JA, Kerlikowske K, Ma L, et al. Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2011;20:1473–82.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:3090–7. Heine JJ, Carston MJ, Scott CG, et al. An automated approach for estimation of breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:3090–7.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5.PubMed Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5.PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, et al. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:1629–38.PubMed Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, et al. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:1629–38.PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. NCI-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (U01CA63740, U01CA86076, U01CA86082, U01CA63736, U01CA70013, U01CA69976, U01CA63731, U01CA70040, HHSN261201100031C). Downloaded from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium website - http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/variables/. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. NCI-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (U01CA63740, U01CA86076, U01CA86082, U01CA63736, U01CA70013, U01CA69976, U01CA63731, U01CA70040, HHSN261201100031C). Downloaded from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium website - http://​breastscreening.​cancer.​gov/​data/​variables/​.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:386–95.PubMed Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:386–95.PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast. 2005;14:269–75.PubMed Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, et al. Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast. 2005;14:269–75.PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1801–9.PubMed Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1801–9.PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, et al. High-throughput mammographic density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R114.PubMed Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, et al. High-throughput mammographic density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R114.PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital vs film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.PubMed Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital vs film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.PubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital vs film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:493–502.PubMed Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Miglioretti DL, et al. Comparative effectiveness of digital vs film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:493–502.PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, Fowler EE, Tiffenberg G, et al. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R1.PubMed Vachon CM, Fowler EE, Tiffenberg G, et al. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R1.PubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL, et al. Reported mammographic density: film-screen vs digital acquisition. Radiology. 2013;266:752–8.PubMed Harvey JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL, et al. Reported mammographic density: film-screen vs digital acquisition. Radiology. 2013;266:752–8.PubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine JJ, Fowler EE, Flowers CI. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1430–6.PubMed Heine JJ, Fowler EE, Flowers CI. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:1430–6.PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine JJ, Cao K, Rollison DE, et al. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:556–64.PubMed Heine JJ, Cao K, Rollison DE, et al. A quantitative description of the percentage of breast density measurement using full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:556–64.PubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciatto S, Bernardi D, Calabrese M, et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared with visual classification. Breast. 2012;21:503–6.PubMed Ciatto S, Bernardi D, Calabrese M, et al. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared with visual classification. Breast. 2012;21:503–6.PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Skippage P, Wilkinson L, Allen S, et al. Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra. Breast J. 2013;19:79–86.PubMed Skippage P, Wilkinson L, Allen S, et al. Correlation of age and HRT use with breast density as assessed by Quantra. Breast J. 2013;19:79–86.PubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:223.PubMed Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:223.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Brisson J, Morrison AS, Khalid N. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:1534–40.PubMed Brisson J, Morrison AS, Khalid N. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80:1534–40.PubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollan M, Ascunce N, Ederra M, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case–control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R9.PubMed Pollan M, Ascunce N, Ederra M, et al. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case–control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R9.PubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1179–89.PubMed Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins LC, et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1179–89.PubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoni S, Sasco AJ, dos Santos SI, McCormack V. Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:337–47.PubMed Antoni S, Sasco AJ, dos Santos SI, McCormack V. Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:337–47.PubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Phipps AI, Li CI, Kerlikowske K, et al. Risk factors for ductal, lobular, and mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer in a screening population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1643–54. Phipps AI, Li CI, Kerlikowske K, et al. Risk factors for ductal, lobular, and mixed ductal-lobular breast cancer in a screening population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1643–54.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.PubMed Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.PubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Phipps AI, Buist DS, Malone KE, et al. Breast density, body mass index, and risk of tumor marker-defined subtypes of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:340–8.PubMed Phipps AI, Buist DS, Malone KE, et al. Breast density, body mass index, and risk of tumor marker-defined subtypes of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:340–8.PubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, et al. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18:479–85. Ma H, Luo J, Press MF, et al. Is there a difference in the association between percent mammographic density and subtypes of breast cancer? Luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18:479–85.
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson L, Hall P, Czene K, et al. Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:18–23.PubMed Eriksson L, Hall P, Czene K, et al. Mammographic density and molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:18–23.PubMed
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:2090–5. Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:2090–5.
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, et al. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:859–66.PubMed Eriksson L, Czene K, Rosenberg L, et al. The influence of mammographic density on breast tumor characteristics. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:859–66.PubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinton CP, Roebuck EJ, Williams MR, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1103–7. Hinton CP, Roebuck EJ, Williams MR, et al. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1103–7.
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy SM, Pagano I, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Mammographic density and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35:448–52.PubMed Conroy SM, Pagano I, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Mammographic density and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35:448–52.PubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, et al. Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers: results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2643–9.PubMed Heusinger K, Jud SM, Haberle L, et al. Association of mammographic density with hormone receptors in invasive breast cancers: results from a case-only study. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2643–9.PubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang WT, Dryden M, Broglio K, et al. Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:405–10.PubMed Yang WT, Dryden M, Broglio K, et al. Mammographic features of triple receptor-negative primary breast cancers in young premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:405–10.PubMed
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879–86.PubMed Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879–86.PubMed
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, et al. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:358–66.PubMed Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, et al. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:358–66.PubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1215–26.PubMed Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1215–26.PubMed
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1204–14.PubMed Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1204–14.PubMed
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density and the gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94:115–22.PubMed Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K. Mammographic breast density and the gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;94:115–22.PubMed
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:337–47.PubMed Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, et al. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:337–47.PubMed
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, et al. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R25.PubMed Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, et al. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R25.PubMed
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:676–83. Porter GJ, Evans AJ, Cornford EJ, et al. Influence of mammographic parenchymal pattern in screening-detected and interval invasive breast cancers on pathologic features, mammographic features, and patient survival. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:676–83.
76.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:267–71.PubMed van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, et al. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:267–71.PubMed
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, et al. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1205–8.PubMed Olsen AH, Bihrmann K, Jensen MB, et al. Breast density and outcome of mammography screening: a cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:1205–8.PubMed
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1218–27.PubMed Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1218–27.PubMed
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Maskarinec G, Pagano IS, Little MA, et al. Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer survival: the Multiethnic Cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R7.PubMed Maskarinec G, Pagano IS, Little MA, et al. Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer survival: the Multiethnic Cohort. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R7.PubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, et al. Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1219–28. Chiu SY, Duffy S, Yen AM, et al. Effect of baseline breast density on breast cancer incidence, stage, mortality, and screening parameters: 25-year follow-up of a Swedish mammographic screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1219–28.
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:732–9. Maskarinec G, Pagano I, Lurie G, Kolonel LN. A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2006;15:732–9.
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, et al. Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:1027–36.PubMed Kelemen LE, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, et al. Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167:1027–36.PubMed
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11:1048–53. Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11:1048–53.
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Henson D, Tarone R. On the possible role of involution in the natural history of breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71S:2154-2156. Henson D, Tarone R. On the possible role of involution in the natural history of breast cancer. Cancer 1993;71S:2154-2156.
85.
Zurück zum Zitat van Gils CH, Hendriks JH, Holland R, et al. Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999;8:509–15.PubMed van Gils CH, Hendriks JH, Holland R, et al. Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1999;8:509–15.PubMed
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, et al. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:921–8. Vachon CM, Pankratz VS, Scott CG, et al. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2007;16:921–8.
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A, et al. Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:262–9.PubMed Greendale GA, Reboussin BA, Sie A, et al. Effects of estrogen and estrogen-progestin on mammographic parenchymal density. Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Investigators. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:262–9.PubMed
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, et al. Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:171–6.PubMed Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, et al. Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormone replacement therapy. JAMA. 2001;285:171–6.PubMed
89.
Zurück zum Zitat McTiernan A, Chlebowski RT, Martin C, et al. Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6135–43.PubMed McTiernan A, Chlebowski RT, Martin C, et al. Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6135–43.PubMed
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachon CM, Suman V, Brandt KR, et al. Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;in press. [Epub ahead of print]. Vachon CM, Suman V, Brandt KR, et al. Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;in press. [Epub ahead of print].
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearman L, Kagan R, Arsenault J, Muram D. The effects of raloxifene on mammographic breast density: a review of clinical trials. Menopause. 2010;17:654–9.PubMed Pearman L, Kagan R, Arsenault J, Muram D. The effects of raloxifene on mammographic breast density: a review of clinical trials. Menopause. 2010;17:654–9.PubMed
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Eng-Wong J, Orzano-Birgani J, Chow CK, et al. Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:1696–701. Eng-Wong J, Orzano-Birgani J, Chow CK, et al. Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:1696–701.
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF. Tamoxifen, mammographic density, and breast cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:704–5.PubMed Boyd NF. Tamoxifen, mammographic density, and breast cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:704–5.PubMed
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–60.PubMed Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347–60.PubMed
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151–63.PubMed Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151–63.PubMed
96.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1081–7.PubMed Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1081–7.PubMed
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165–75.PubMed
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1432–40.PubMed Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, et al. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40–49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1432–40.PubMed
99.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case–control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:781–5.PubMed Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, et al. Case–control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:781–5.PubMed
100.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.PubMed Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, et al. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481–92.PubMed
101.
Zurück zum Zitat Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology. 2013;266:104–13.PubMed Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, et al. Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. Radiology. 2013;266:104–13.PubMed
102.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of Digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013;267:47–56.PubMed Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of Digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology. 2013;267:47–56.PubMed
103.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001;221:641–9.PubMed Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001;221:641–9.PubMed
104.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, et al. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09–41. Radiology. 2012;265:59–69.PubMed Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, et al. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09–41. Radiology. 2012;265:59–69.PubMed
105.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:734–42.PubMed Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:734–42.PubMed
106.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012;307:1394–404.PubMed Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012;307:1394–404.PubMed
107.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427–37.PubMed
108.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103:1898–905.PubMed Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P, et al. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005;103:1898–905.PubMed
109.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292:1317–25.PubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA. 2004;292:1317–25.PubMed
110.
Zurück zum Zitat Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.PubMed Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75–89.PubMed
111.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Phillips SW, et al. Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts. Radiology. 2011;258:106–18.PubMed Rhodes DJ, Hruska CB, Phillips SW, et al. Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts. Radiology. 2011;258:106–18.PubMed
112.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, et al. Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer. Radiology. 2005;237:274–80.PubMed Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Zisman G, et al. Occult breast cancer: scintimammography with high-resolution breast-specific gamma camera in women at high risk for breast cancer. Radiology. 2005;237:274–80.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Mammographic Density: Potential as a Risk Factor and Surrogate Marker in the Clinical Setting
verfasst von
Celine M. Vachon
Karthik Ghosh
Kathleen R. Brandt
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Breast Cancer Reports / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1943-4588
Elektronische ISSN: 1943-4596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-013-0118-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Current Breast Cancer Reports 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Breast Surveillance of Patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Aspirin and Breast Cancer Prevention

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Familial Breast Cancer Risk

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Alcohol Intake and Breast Cancer Risk: Weighing the Overall Evidence

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Biomarker Endpoints for Early-Phase Cancer-Prevention Studies

Risk, Prevention, and Screening (DL Hershman, Section Editor)

Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Prevention of Breast Cancer: an Update and the State of the Science

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.