nach oben

Erschienen in:

19.12.2018 | Original Article

Management of severe bio-radiation dermatitis induced by radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer: emphasizing the role of calcium alginate dressings

verfasst von: Pierluigi Bonomo, Isacco Desideri, Mauro Loi, Lucia Pia Ciccone, Monica Lo Russo, Carlotta Becherini, Daniela Greto, Gabriele Simontacchi, Nicola Pimpinelli, Lorenzo Livi

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Severe bio-radiation dermatitis may develop in patients treated with concurrent radiotherapy and cetuximab for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of our work was to report on the impact of a grade-specific management approach on treatment tolerability.

Methods

Concomitant radiotherapy and cetuximab was prescribed for patients deemed ineligible for cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Since 2014, an advanced wound care nursing team was established in our clinic to implement a standardized policy for skin toxicity. A central role of calcium alginate dressings was defined in our management algorithm. The correlation between patient, disease, and treatment features with severe bio-radiation dermatitis and treatment tolerability was evaluated.

Results

Between 2007 and 2018, 51 patients were treated at our center with radiotherapy and cetuximab. The incidence of G3/G4 bio-radiation dermatitis was 43.1%. Comparing two consecutive cohorts of 26 and 25 patients treated before and after January 2014, respectively, the adoption of a grade-specific dermatitis management allowed to improve treatment tolerability. A mean radiation treatment interruption of 8.42 days (SD, 6.73; 95% CI 5.7–11.1) was reduced to 0.86 days (SD, 2.66; 95% CI − 0.28–2.02) in the more recent group (p < 0.0001). Mean relative dose intensity of cetuximab was also significantly higher (86.3% vs 74.5%, p = 0.0226).

Conclusions

Routine involvement of an advanced wound care management team and early consideration for calcium alginate dressings in case of moist desquamation should be warranted to ensure high compliance to radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa053422 CrossRefPubMed

Bolderston A, Lloyd NS, Wong RKS, Holden L, Robb-Blenderman L, and the Supportive Care Guidelines Group of Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care (2006) The prevention and management of acute skin reactions related to radiation therapy: a systematic review and practice guideline. Support Care Cancer 14:802–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0063-4 CrossRefPubMed

Ferreira EB, Vasques CI, Gadia R, Chan RJ, Guerra ENS, Mezzomo LA, de Luca Canto G, dos Reis PED (2017) Topical interventions to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 25:1001–1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3521-7 CrossRefPubMed

Gregoire V, De Neve W, Eisbruch A et al (2007) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck carcinoma. Oncologist 12(5):555–564. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.12-5-555 CrossRefPubMed

Russi EG, Bensadoun RJ, Merlano MC, Bourhis J, Ricardi U, Giralt J, Pinto C, Budach W, Corvo R, Lacouture ME, Bernier J (2013) Bio-radiation dermatitis: the need of a new grading: in regard to Bernier et al. Ann Oncol 2011 22(10):2191–2200. Ann Oncol 24(9):2463–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt281 CrossRef

Pinto C, Barone CA, Girolomoni G, Russi EG, Merlano MC, Ferrari D, Maiello E (2016) Management of skin reactions during cetuximab treatment in association with chemotherapy or radiotherapy: update of the Italian expert recommendations. Am J Clin Oncol 39(4):407–415. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000291 CrossRefPubMed

Russi EG, Merlano MC, Numico G, Corvò R, Benasso M, Vigna-Taglianti R, Melano A, Denaro N, Pergolizzi S, Colantonio I, Lucio F, Brizio R, Ricardi U (2012) The effects on pain and activity of daily living caused by crusted exudation in patients with head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab and radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 20(9):2141–2147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1324-4 CrossRefPubMed

Eilers RE Jr, Gandhi M, Patel JD, Mulcahy MF, Agulnik M, Hensing T, Lacouture ME (2010) Dermatologic infections in cancer patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 102(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp439 CrossRefPubMed

Mirabile A, Numico G, Russi EG, Bossi P, Crippa F, Bacigalupo A, de Sanctis V, Musso S, Merlotti A, Ghi MG, Merlano MC, Licitra L, Moretto F, Denaro N, Caspiani O, Buglione M, Pergolizzi S, Cascio A, Bernier J, Raber-Durlacher J, Vermorken JB, Murphy B, Ranieri MV, Dellinger RP (2015) Sepsis in head and neck cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation: literature review and consensus. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 95(2):191–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.03.003 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Budach W, Bölke E, Homey B (2007) Severe cutaneous reaction during radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab. N Engl J Med 357(5):514–515CrossRefPubMed

11.

Giro C, Berger B, Bölke E, Ciernik IF, Duprez F, Locati L, Maillard S, Ozsahin M, Pfeffer R, Robertson AG, Langendijk JA, Budach W (2009) High rate of severe radiation dermatitis during radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab in head and neck cancer: results of a survey in EORTC institutes. Radiother Oncol 90:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.007 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Pryor DI, Porceddu SV, Burmeister BH, Guminski A, Thomson DB, Shepherdson K, Poulsen M (2009) Enhanced toxicity with concurrent cetuximab and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 90:172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.018 CrossRefPubMed

13.

McKloskey SA, Jaggernauth W, Rigual NR et al (2009) Radiation treatment interruptions greater than one week and low hemoglobin levels (12 g/dL) are predictors of local regional failure after definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Clin Oncol 32(6):587–591. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e3181967dd0 CrossRef

14.

Bernier J, Bonner J, Vermorken JB, Bensadoun RJ, Dummer R, Giralt J, Kornek G, Hartley A, Mesia R, Robert C, Segaert S, Ang KK (2008) Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol 19(1):142–149CrossRefPubMed

15.

Bernier J, Russi EG, Homey B, Merlano MC, Mesía R, Peyrade F, Budach W (2011) Management of radiation dermatitis in patients receiving cetuximab and radiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: proposals for a revised grading system and consensus management guidelines. Ann Oncol 22:2191–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr139 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Pinto C, Barone CA, Girolomoni G, Russi EG, Merlano MC, Ferrari D, Maiello E (2011) Management of skin toxicity associated with cetuximab treatment in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Oncologist 16(2):228–238. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0298 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

17.

Bonomo P, Loi M, Desideri I, Olmetto E, Delli Paoli C, Terziani F, Greto D, Mangoni M, Scoccianti S, Simontacchi G, Francolini G, Meattini I, Caini S, Livi L (2017) Incidence of skin toxicity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy and cetuximab: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 120:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.10.011 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Deutsch C, Edwards D, Myers S (2017) Wound dressings. Br J Hosp Med 78:C103–C109. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.C103 CrossRef

19.

NCCN guidelines: Head and Neck Cancers, version 1. 2018. Available at: http://www.nccn.org

20.

National Cancer Institute (2009). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. 2009 May. Available at: http://evs.nci.nih.gov/

21.

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed

22.

Tao Y, Auperin A, Sire C et al (2017) Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial GORTEC (Groupe Oncologie Radiotherapie Tete et Cou) 2009-01 Evaluating the Effect of the Regenerating Agent on Radiodermatitis of Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:590–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.019 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Iacovelli NA, Galaverni M, Cavallo A et al (2018) Prevention and treatment of radiation-induced acute dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients: A systematic review. Futur Oncol 14. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2017-0359

24.

Macmillan MS, Wells M, MacBride S et al (2007) Randomized Comparison of Dry Dressings Versus Hydrogel in Management of Radiation-Induced Moist Desquamation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:864–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.049 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Herst P, Bennet N, Sutherland A et al (2014) Prophylactic use of mepitel film completely prevents radiation-induced moist desquamation in an intra-patient controlled RCT of 78 breast cancer patients in New Zealand. Radiother Oncol 110:137–143CrossRefPubMed

26.

Wooding H, Yan J, Yuan L et al (2018) The effect of mepitel film on acute radiation-induced skin reactions in head and neck cancer patients: A feasibility study. Br J Radiol 91. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170298

27.

Narvaez C, Doemer C, Idel C et al (2018) Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. BMC Cancer 18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4119-x CrossRef

28.

Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariani V, Girolomoni G (2008) The epidermal growth factor receptor system in skin repair and inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 128:1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jid.5701184 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Harris R, Probst H, Beardmore C et al (2012) Radiotherapy skin care: A survey of practice in the UK. Radiography 18:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2011.10.040 CrossRef

30.

Tischer B, Huber R, Kraemer M, Lacouture ME (2017) Dermatologic events from EGFR inhibitors: the issue of the missing patient voice. Support Care Cancer 25:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3419-4 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Tischer B, Bilang M, Kraemer M et al (2018) A survey of patient and physician acceptance of skin toxicities from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Support Care Cancer 26:1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3938-7 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Management of severe bio-radiation dermatitis induced by radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer: emphasizing the role of calcium alginate dressings
verfasst von: Pierluigi Bonomo
Isacco Desideri
Mauro Loi
Lucia Pia Ciccone
Monica Lo Russo
Carlotta Becherini
Daniela Greto
Gabriele Simontacchi
Nicola Pimpinelli
Lorenzo Livi
Publikationsdatum: 19.12.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4606-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Management of severe bio-radiation dermatitis induced by radiotherapy and cetuximab in patients with head and neck cancer: emphasizing the role of calcium alginate dressings