nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

28.09.2018 | Original Article

Mechanical and hydrolytic degradation of an Ormocer®-based Bis-GMA-free resin composite

verfasst von: Elena Klauer, Renan Belli, Anselm Petschelt, Ulrich Lohbauer

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to evaluate the mechanical stability of bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) and Ormocer-based resin composites before and after water absorption and to examine water saturation.

Material and methods

Disc-shaped specimens of the Bis-GMA (Grandio SO, Voco) and the Ormocer-based (Admira Fusion, Voco) dental resin composites were produced, stored in water, and weighed after pre-determined times to measure the absorbed water. Bend bars were produced and stored for 24 h in dry conditions as well as in distilled water for 14 days or 60 days at 37 °C. The initial flexural strength (FS) under quasi-static loading and flexural fatigue strength (FFS) under cyclic loading were determined under 4-point bending. Fracture toughness (K_Ic) of both composites was measured using the single-edge-V-notch-beam (SEVNB) technique after the same storage conditions under 3-point bending.

Results

Within the first 14 days, storage conditions did not affect the initial FS of Grandio SO, while a significant drop in initial FS was observed for Admira Fusion after 2 weeks in water and most of the water was absorbed within this time. FFS for the Bis-GMA composite was not reduced before 2 months in water, whereas for the Ormocer®-based composite, there has been a significant decrease in strength after cyclic fatigue already at 2 weeks of water storage. K_Ic of Admira Fusion decreased significantly after both storage periods, while K_Ic of Grandio SO decreased only significantly after 2 weeks of water storage.

Conclusion

All mechanical properties of the Bis-GMA composite were superior to those of the Ormocer®-based material, except water sorption.

Clinical significance

Water storage seems to have a much more pronounced effect on the mechanical properties of Ormocer®-based dental composites in comparison to Bis-GMA-based composites.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2008) Office of the Commissioner: Food additives and ingredients - bisphenol A (BPA): use in food contact application. https://www.fda.gov/food/ingredientspackaginglabeling/foodadditivesingredients/ucm064437.htm. Accessed 16.07.2017

Commission Directive (2015) Amending Directive 2002/72/EC as regards the restriction of use of bisphenol A in plastic infant feeding bottles. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:026:0011:0014:EN:PDF. Accessed 16.07.2017

European Food Safety Authority , Parma, Italy (2015) Scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of bisphenol a (BPA) in foodstuffs. EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids EFSA J 13:3978

EYK F, Ewoldsen NO, St. Germain HA, Marx DB, Miaw C-L, Siew C, Chou H-N, Gruninger SE, Meyer DM (2000) Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol A released from a dental sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 131:51–58CrossRef

Joskow R, Barr DB, Barr JR, Calafat AM, Needham LL, Rubin C (2006) Exposure to bisphenol A from bis-glycidyl dimethacrylate–based dental sealants. J Am Dent Assoc 137:353–362CrossRefPubMed

Kang Y-G, Kim J-Y, Kim J, Won P-J, Nam J-H (2011) Release of bisphenol A from resin composite used to bond orthodontic lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140:779–789CrossRef

Sasaki N, Okuda K, Kato T, Kakishima H, Okuma H, Abe K, Tachino H, Tuchida K, Kubono K (2005) Salivary bisphenol-A levels detected by ELISA after restoration with composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater Med 16:297–300CrossRefPubMed

Zimmerman-Downs JM, Shuman D, Stull SC, Ratzlaff RE (2010) Bisphenol A blood and saliva levels prior to and after dental sealant placement in adults. J Dent Hyg 84:145–150PubMed

Schmidt H (1984) Organically modified silicates by the sol-gel process. MRS Proc 32

10.

Moszner N, Gianasmidis A, Klapdohr S, Fischer UK, Rheinberger V (2008) Sol-gel materials 2. Light-curing dental composites based on ormocers of cross-linking alkoxysilane methacrylates and further nano-components. Dent Mater 24:851–856CrossRefPubMed

11.

Ilie N, Hickel R (2009) Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Invest 13:427–438CrossRef

12.

Moszner N, Salz U (2001) New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 26:535–576CrossRef

13.

Polydorou O, Konig A, Hellwig E, Kummerer K (2009) Long-term release of monomers from modern dental-composite materials. Eur J Oral Sci 117:68–75CrossRefPubMed

14.

Al-Hiyasat AS, Darmani H, Milhem MM (2005) Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives. Clin Oral Invest 9:21–25CrossRef

15.

Pick B, Pelka M, Belli R, Braga RR, Lohbauer U (2011) Tailoring of physical properties in highly filled experimental nanohybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 27:664–669CrossRefPubMed

16.

Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 53:353–361CrossRefPubMed

17.

Yap AU, Soh MS (2004) Post-gel polymerization contraction of “low shrinkage” composite restoratives. Oper Dent 29:182–187PubMed

18.

Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F (2007) A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results. J Dent 35:163–171CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Alaerts M, Keulemans F (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: five-year results. J Dent 37:198–203CrossRefPubMed

20.

Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2014) Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater 30:424–432CrossRefPubMed

21.

Llena C, Fernández S, Forner L (2017) Color stability of nanohybrid resin-based composites, ormocers and compomers. Clin Oral Invest 21:1071–1077CrossRef

22.

Poggio C, Matteo C, Beltrami R, Mirando M, Wassim J (2016) Color stability of esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric analysis. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand 2:95–101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Quinn JB, Quinn GD (2010) A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials. Dent Mater 26:135–147CrossRefPubMed

24.

Quinn JB, Quinn GD (2010) Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite. Dent Mater 26:589–599CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

EN843-5 (1997) Mechanical testing of monolithic ceramics at room temperature. Part 5: statistical treatment

26.

Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2014) Are linear elastic material properties relevant predictors of the cyclic fatigue resistance of dental resin composites? Dent Mater 30:381–391CrossRefPubMed

27.

Munz D, Fett T (2001) Ceramics: mechanical properties, failure behaviour, materials selection. Springer, Berlin

28.

Andrzejewska E (2001) Photopolymerization kinetics of multifunctional monomers. Prog Polym Sci 26:605–665CrossRef

29.

Haas K-H, Wolter H (1999) Synthesis, properties and applications of inorganic–organic copolymers (ORMOCER®s). Cur Op Solid State Mater Sci 4:571–580CrossRef

30.

Gregor L, Krejci I, Di Bella E, Feilzer AJ, Ardu S (2016) Silorane, ormocer, methacrylate and compomer long-term staining susceptibility using DeltaE and DeltaE 00 colour-difference formulas. Odontology 104:305–309CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lohbauer U, Rahiotis C, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Eliades G (2005) The effect of different light-curing units on fatigue behavior and degree of conversion of a resin composite. Dent Mater 21:608–615CrossRefPubMed

32.

Htang A, Ohsawa M, Matsumoto H (1995) Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater 11:7–13CrossRefPubMed

33.

Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A (2006) Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 76:114–120CrossRefPubMed

34.

Ilie N, Hickel R, Valceanu AS, Huth KC (2012) Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Invest 16:489–498CrossRef

35.

Randolph LD, Palin WM, Leloup G, Leprince JG (2016) Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties. Dent Mater 32:1586–1599CrossRefPubMed

36.

Ferracane JL, Marker VA (1992) Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res 71:13–19CrossRefPubMed

37.

Ornaghi BP, Meier MM, Lohbauer U, Braga RR (2014) Fracture toughness and cyclic fatigue resistance of resin composites with different filler size distributions. Dent Mater 30:742–751CrossRefPubMed

38.

Drummond JL (2008) Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res 87:710–719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Lohbauer U, Belli R, Ferracane JL (2013) Factors involved in mechanical fatigue degradation of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 92:584–591CrossRefPubMed

40.

Watanabe H, Khera SC, Vargas MA, Qian F (2008) Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites. Dent Mater 24:418–425CrossRefPubMed

41.

Im YW, Lee SH, Lee JW, Lee HH (2016) Static and cyclic flexural strength of various dental composite resins. Dent Mater 32:e37–e38CrossRef

42.

Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Feilzer AJ, Krämer N (2012) Fatigue behavior of dental resin composites: flexural fatigue in vitro versus 6 years in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100B:903–910CrossRef

43.

Kramer N, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2005) Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. Am J Dent 18:75–81PubMed

44.

Braem MJ, Davidson CL, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G (1994) In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res 28:1397–1402CrossRefPubMed

45.

Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A (2003) Time-dependent strength and fatigue resistance of dental direct restorative materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 14:1047–1053CrossRefPubMed

46.

Braden M, Causton EE, Clarke RL (1976) Diffusion of water in composite filling materials. J Dent Res 55:730–732CrossRefPubMed

47.

Braden M, Clarke RL (1984) Water absorption characteristics of dental microfine composite filling materials. I. Proprietary materials. Biomaterials 5:369–372CrossRefPubMed

48.

Mortier E, Gerdolle DA, Dahoun A, Panighi MM (2005) Influence of initial water content on the subsequent water sorption and solubility behavior in restorative polymers. Am J Dent 18:177–181PubMed

49.

Yiu CKY, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MRO, Tay FR (2004) Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials 25:5789–5796CrossRefPubMed

50.

Mohsen NM, Craig RG, Filisko FE (2001) The effects of moisture on the dielectric relaxation of urethane dimethacrylate polymer and composites. J Oral Rehabil 28:376–392CrossRefPubMed

51.

Ferracane JL (2006) Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 22:689–692CrossRefPubMed

52.

Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi EC (2011) Physical properties of current dental nanohybrid and nanofill light-cured resin composites. Dent Mater 27:598–607CrossRefPubMed

53.

Wei Y-j, Silikas N, Zhang Z-t, Watts DC (2011) Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mater 27:197–205CrossRefPubMed

54.

Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Bikiaris DN (2007) Aging studies of light cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins and a resin composite in water or ethanol/water. Dent Mater 23:1142–1149CrossRefPubMed

55.

Oysaed H, Ruyter IE (1986) Water sorption and filler characteristics of composites for use in posterior teeth. J Dent Res 65:1315–1318CrossRefPubMed

56.

Ruyter IE, Oysaed H (1987) Composites for use in posterior teeth: composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res 21:11–23CrossRefPubMed

57.

Ferracane JL (2006) Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 22:211–222CrossRefPubMed

58.

Mohsen NM, Craig RG (1995) Hydrolytic stability of silanated zirconia-silica-urethane dimethacrylate composites. J Oral Rehabil 22:213–220CrossRefPubMed

59.

Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE (2001) Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 28:1106–1115CrossRefPubMed

60.

Cavalcante LM, Schneider LFJ, Hammad M, Watts DC, Silikas N (2012) Degradation resistance of ormocer- and dimethacrylate-based matrices with different filler contents. J Dent 40:86–90CrossRefPubMed

61.

Sideridou I (2003) Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 24:655–665CrossRefPubMed

62.

Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Rüttermann S (2007) Water sorption and solubility of contemporary resin-based filling materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 82B:545–551CrossRef

63.

Lekatou A, Faidi SE, Ghidaoui D, Lyon SB, Newman RC (1997) Effect of water and its activity on transport properties of glass/epoxy particulate composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 28:223–236CrossRef

64.

Antonucci JM, Dickens SH, Fowler BO, Xu HHK, McDonough WG (2005) Chemistry of silanes: interfaces in dental polymers and composites. J Res Nat Inst Stand Technol 110:541–558CrossRef

65.

Calais JG, Soderholm KJ (1988) Influence of filler type and water exposure on flexural strength of experimental composite resins. J Dent Res 67:836–840CrossRefPubMed

66.

Michalske TA, Freimann SW (1983) A molecular mechanism for stress corrosion in vitreous silica. J Am Ceram Soc 66:284–288CrossRef

67.

Charles RJ (1958) Static fatigue of glass. I. J Appl Phys 29:1549–1553CrossRef

68.

Tanaka K, Taira M, Shintani H, Wakasa K, Yamaki M (1991) Residual monomers (TEGDMA and Bis-GMA) of a set visible-light-cured dental composite resin when immersed in water. J Oral Rehabil 18:353–362CrossRefPubMed

69.

Ferracane JL (1994) Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 21:441–452CrossRefPubMed

70.

Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N, Watts DC (2011) Degradation resistance of silorane, experimental ormocer and dimethacrylate resin-based dental composites. J Oral Sci 53:413–419CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Mechanical and hydrolytic degradation of an Ormocer®-based Bis-GMA-free resin composite
verfasst von: Elena Klauer
Renan Belli
Anselm Petschelt
Ulrich Lohbauer
Publikationsdatum: 28.09.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2651-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Mechanical and hydrolytic degradation of an Ormocer®-based Bis-GMA-free resin composite

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical significance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical significance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Comparison of linear and volumetric measurements obtained from periodontal defects by using cone beam-CT and micro-CT: an in vitro study

Long-term scopolamine treatment and dental caries

Evaluation of the genotoxic potential of different delivery methods of at-home bleaching gels: a single-blind, randomized clinical trial

Longevity, effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life of low-concentration hydrogen peroxides in-office bleaching: a randomized clinical trial

Screening and diagnosis of oral cancer: a critical quality appraisal of clinical guidelines

Clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage resin composite in endodontically treated premolars: 3-year follow-up

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter