Anzeige
Erschienen in:
12.06.2021 | General Review
Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without trochleoplasty for patients with patella instability—correlation of trochlear dysplasia and patient outcome, classification and outcome measure in the past decade—a systematic review
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 4/2022
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
The primary aim of the study is to compare the patient outcome in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) or MPFLR concurrent with trochleoplasty (MPFLR + TP) and correlate it with the degree of trochlear dysplasia (TD). The secondary aim is to review TD classification, outcome measure, chronological and geographical trend of such studies in the past decade.
Methods
A systemic review of the literature in the past decade on studies of patients with patella instability and underwent either a MPFLR or MPFLR + TP. The degree of TD with the patient outcome was correlated and compared between the 2 groups. The TD classification, outcome measures, chronological and geographical trends of these studies were documented.
Results
There is no statistical difference in the overall improvement in the compared outcome scores between the 2 groups. However, the MPFLR studies reported a total of 16 re-dislocation in contrast to none in the MPFLR + TP studies. The 24 selected studies in the current review utilized different TD classification as well as outcome measures. A more homogeneous subgroup of 12 studies utilized Dejour classification as well as Kujala score that enabled comparison and showed no significant difference in outcome. The highest number of MPFLR publications was in 2019 and was from North and South Americas, Asia and Europe. The MPFLR + TP studies were from Europe during 2013 to 2017.
Conclusion
Though there is an overall improvement in post-operative outcomes scores with no statistical significance between MPFLR and MPFLR + TP, the documented re-dislocations in the MPFLR studies suggested an undetermined zone where the choice of procedure could result in a different outcome. The current review did not show correlation between the degree of TD with the patient outcome to provide a clear indication for either procedure according to the degree of TD. The diverse TD classifications and varied outcome measures indicated the need for standardization and consistency in documentation to guide the treating clinician in the choice of procedure. MPFLR was more commonly performed and studied than MPFLR + TP in the past decade.