nach oben

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Erschienen in:

01.05.2015 | Original Article

Mental Health Court Outcomes by Offense Type at Admission

verfasst von: Bradley Ray, Sheryl Pimlott Kubiak, Erin B. Comartin, Elizabeth Tillander

Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Using a statewide database of mental health court (MHC) defendants, this study examines criminal justice outcomes by target arrest offense type. Findings suggest that defendants with a felony are less likely to complete MHC but those who do are at no greater risk of recidivism post-exit than those with a misdemeanor. In terms of jail days, both completers and noncompleters with a felony had reductions in jail days; however, misdemeanor defendants, especially those who did not complete MHC, had increases. We discuss why MHC supervision may sometimes have a negative effect and offer recommendations on how courts might modify supervision.

Moore and Hiday (2006) used charge type to create a severity score, while McNiel and Binder (2007) and Steadman et al. (2011) used it in propensity score matching. However, these studies did not report directly on target arrest charge type and MHC outcomes.

Abram, K. M., Teplin, L. A., & McClelland, G. M. (2003). Comorbidity of severe psychiatric disorders and substance use disorders among women in jail. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(5), 1007–1010.CrossRefPubMed

Almquist, L., & Dodd, E. (2009). Mental health courts: A guide to research-informed policy and practice. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center.

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Albany, New York: Lexis Nexis/Anderson Pub.

Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27.CrossRef

Arnold, M. E., & Hughes, J. N. (1999). First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 99–115.CrossRef

Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. (2003). Criminalization of people with mental illnesses: The role of mental courts in system reform. Jail Suicide/Mental Health Update, 12, 1–11.

Boothroyd, R. A., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Petrila, J. (2003). The Broward mental health court: Process, outcomes, and service utilization. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26(1), 55–71.CrossRefPubMed

Burns, P. J., Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2013). Effectiveness 2 years postexit of a recently established mental health court. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(2), 189–208.CrossRef

Carey, S. M., Mackin, J. R., & Finigan, M. W. (2012). What works? The ten key components of drug court: Research-based best practices. Drug Court Review, 8(1), 6–42.

Christy, A., Poythress, N. G., Boothroyd, R. A., Petrila, J., & Mehra, S. (2005). Evaluating the efficiency and community safety goals of the Broward County mental health court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 227–243.CrossRef

Cosden, M., Ellens, J. K., Schnell, J. L., & Yamini-Diouf, Y. (2005). Efficacy of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 199–214.CrossRef

Cosden, M., Ellens, J. K., Schnell, J. L., Yamini-Diouf, Y., & Wolfe, M. M. (2003). Evaluation of a mental health treatment court with assertive community treatment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(4), 415–427.CrossRef

DeMatteo, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., & Festinger, D. S. (2006). Secondary prevention services for clients who are low risk in drug court: A conceptual model. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 114–134.CrossRef

Diamond, P. M., Wang, E. W., Holzer, C. E., Thomas, C., & Cruser, D. A. (2001). The prevalence of mental illness in prison. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 29(1), 21–40.CrossRefPubMed

Dirks-Linhorst, A. P., Kondrat, D., Linhorst, D. M., & Morani, N. (2011). Factors associated with mental health court nonparticipation and negative termination. Justice Quarterly, 30(4), 681–710.CrossRef

Dirks-Linhorst, P. A., & Linhorst, D. M. (2012). Recidivism outcomes for suburban mental health court defendants. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 76–91.CrossRef

Fisher, W., Silver, E., & Wolff, N. (2006). Beyond criminalization: Toward a criminologically informed framework for mental health policy and services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 544–557.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Frailing, K. (2010). How mental health courts function: Outcomes and observations. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 207–213.CrossRefPubMed

Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(8), 991–998.CrossRefPubMed

Goodale, G., Callahan, L., & Steadman, H. J. (2013). What can we say about mental health courts today? Psychiatric Services, 64(4), 298–300.CrossRefPubMed

Griffin, P. A., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (2002). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services, 53(10), 1285–1289.CrossRefPubMed

Herinckx, H. A., Swart, S. C., Ama, S. M., Dolezal, C. D., & King, S. (2005). Rearrest and linkage to mental health services among clients of the Clark County Mental Health Court Program. Psychiatric Services, 56(7), 853–857.CrossRefPubMed

Hiday, V. A., & Ray, B. (2010). Arrests two years after exiting a well-established mental health court. Psychiatric Services, 61(5), 463–468.CrossRefPubMed

Hiday, V. A., Wales, H. H., & Ray, B. (2013). Effectiveness of a short-term mental health court: Criminal recidivism one year post-exit. Law and Human Behavior, 37(6), 401–411.CrossRefPubMed

Kubiak, S. P., Beeble, M. L., & Bybee, D. (2010). Testing the validity of the K6 in detecting major depression and PTSD among jailed women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(1), 64–80.CrossRef

Kubiak, S. P., Tillander, L., & Ray, B. (2013). Assessing the role of legal actors across eight mental health courts. Michigan State University Journal of Medicine and Law, 17(2), 301–326.

Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 263–290.CrossRef

McCord, J. (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(May), 16–30.CrossRef

McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2007). Effectiveness of a mental health court in reducing criminal recidivism and violence. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(9), 1395–1403.CrossRefPubMed

Moore, M. E., & Hiday, V. A. (2006). Mental health court outcomes: A comparison of re-arrest and re-arrest severity between mental health court and traditional court participants. Law and Human Behavior, 30(6), 659–674.CrossRefPubMed

Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Finckenauer, J. O. (2000). Well-meaning programs can have harmful effects! Lessons from experiments of programs such as Scared Straight. Crime and Delinquency, 46(3), 354–379.CrossRef

Porporino, F. J., & Motiuk, L. L. (1995). The prison careers of mentally disordered offenders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 18(1), 29–44.CrossRefPubMed

Ray, B. (2014). Long-term recidivism of mental health court defendants. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.017.

Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Petrila, J., & Griffin, P. A. (2005). The second generation of mental health courts. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 11(4), 527–538.CrossRef

Redlich, A. D., Steadman, H. J., Monahan, J., Robbins, P. C., & Petrila, J. (2006). Patterns of practice in mental health courts: A national survey. Law and Human Behavior, 30(3), 347–362.CrossRefPubMed

Rempel, M., Green, M., & Kralstein, D. (2012). The impact of adult drug courts on crime and incarceration: Findings from a multi-site quasi-experimental design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(2), 165–192.CrossRef

Steadman, H. J., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., Vesselinov, R., McGuire, T. G., & Morrissey, J. P. (2014). Criminal justice and behavioral health care costs of mental health court participants: A six-year study. Psychiatric Services. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300375.

Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 761–765.CrossRefPubMed

Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Callahan, L., Robbins, P. C., & Vesselinov, R. (2011). Effect of mental health courts on arrests and jail days: A multisite study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68(2), 167–172.CrossRefPubMed

Steadman, H. J., Redlich, A. D., Griffin, P. A., Petrila, J., & Monahan, J. (2005). From referral to disposition: Case processing in seven mental health courts. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(2), 215–226.CrossRef

Theurer, G., & Lovell, D. (2008). Recidivism of offenders with mental illness released from prison to an intensive community treatment program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(4), 385–406.CrossRef

Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.

Trestman, R. L., Ford, J., Zhang, W., & Wiesbrock, V. (2007). Current and lifetime psychiatric illness among inmates not identified as acutely mentally ill at intake in Connecticut’s jails. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35(4), 490–500.PubMed

Trupin, E., & Richards, H. (2003). Seattle’s mental health courts: Early indicators of effectiveness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 26(1), 33–53.CrossRefPubMed

Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1991). Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

Wolff, N. (2002). Courts as therapeutic agents: Thinking past the novelty of mental health courts. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 30(3), 431–437.PubMed

Wolff, N., & Pogorzelski, W. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of mental health courts: Challenges and recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 11(4), 539–569.CrossRef

Titel: Mental Health Court Outcomes by Offense Type at Admission
verfasst von: Bradley Ray
Sheryl Pimlott Kubiak
Erin B. Comartin
Elizabeth Tillander
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2015
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0572-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Typ-2-Diabetes und Depression folgen oft aufeinander

14.05.2024 Typ-2-Diabetes Nachrichten

Menschen mit Typ-2-Diabetes sind überdurchschnittlich gefährdet, in den nächsten Jahren auch noch eine Depression zu entwickeln – und umgekehrt. Besonders ausgeprägt ist die Wechselbeziehung laut GKV-Daten bei jüngeren Erwachsenen.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Spezielles Sportprogramm bei einer Reihe von psychischen Erkrankungen effektiv

08.05.2024 Psychotherapie Nachrichten

Sportliche Betätigung hilft nicht nur bei Depression, sondern auch in Gruppen von Patientinnen und Patienten mit unterschiedlichen psychischen Erkrankungen, wie Insomnie, Panikattacken, Agoraphobie und posttraumatischem Belastungssyndrom. Sie alle profitieren längerfristig.

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Psychotherapie Medizin aktuell

Fünf Jahren nach der Neugestaltung der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie wurden jetzt die Effekte der vorgenommenen Änderungen ausgewertet. Das Hauptziel der Novellierung war eine kürzere Wartezeit auf Therapieplätze. Dieses Ziel wurde nicht erreicht, es gab jedoch positive Auswirkungen auf andere Bereiche.

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Barriers to Supported Education Implementation: Implications for Administrators and Policy Makers

Validation of the Symptoms and Functioning Severity Scale in Residential Group Care

The Transformation of Behavioral Healthcare in New Mexico

The Effects of State Psychiatric Hospital Waitlist Policies on Length of Stay and Time to Readmission