Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) usually present with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal mass, pain, anorexia and bowel obstruction.
Methods
We report a case of a 42 year old male who presented with a solitary intracranial space occupying lesion which was established as a metastasis from a mesenteric tumour.
Results
The patient was initially treated as a metastatic sarcoma, but a lack of response to chemotherapy prompted testing for CD117 which returned positive. A diagnosis of mesenteric GIST presenting as solitary brain metastasis was made, and the patient was treated with imatinib.
Conclusion
We recommend that all sarcomas with either an intraabdominal or unknown origin be routinely tested for CD117 to rule out GIST.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1477-7819-4-78) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
TP, GG, MM, SG, AKD, PKJ, GKR contributed significantly to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Background
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are thought to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal, the intestinal pacemaker cells [1]. GIST commonly arises from the stomach and small intestine and usually presents with non-specific abdominal symptoms [2]. GIST mostly metastasizes within the abdomen [3]. To our knowledge, GIST presenting with brain metastasis has not been reported in the literature. We report a case of a 42 year old male who presented with a solitary intracranial space occupying lesion which was subsequently established to be a metastasis from a mesenteric GIST.
Case presentation
A 42-year-old male presented in January 2004 complaining of headache and left-sided weakness of eight months duration and vomiting of four months duration. There was no history of trauma, seizures or loss of consciousness. Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the brain (Figure 1) showed a 3.5 cm sized ring-enhancing mass in the right parietal lobe with significant perilesional oedema. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head showed the mass to be isointense on T1 and hypointense on T2 weighted images. The patient underwent right parietal craniotomy with gross total excision of the tumour. Histopathology of the operative specimen showed features of undifferentiated sarcoma with areas of necrosis (Figure 2). The pathological differential diagnoses given were metastatic sarcoma and primary intracranial sarcoma. Radiographic skeletal survey, chest x-ray and ultrasonogram of the abdomen were normal at this time. The patient was treated with postoperative cranial radiotherapy to a dose of 60 Gray with concomitant chemotherapy with carboplatin at a dose of 150 mg weekly.
×
×
Anzeige
The patient remained asymptomatic till June 2004 when he complained of abdominal fullness and pain. CT of the abdomen showed a large mesenteric mass measuring 8 × 6 cm in size. An ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy from the mesenteric mass revealed a malignant spindle cell tumour with morphology similar to that of the brain tumour. The mitotic index of the abdominal tumour was 10 per 50 HPF (high power fields). Immunohistochemistry was positive for CD34, vimentin; and negative for GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and SMA (smooth muscle actin). Thereafter the patient was treated with six cycles of combination chemotherapy with ifosfamide 1.8 gm/m2 i.v. D1-4 with mesna uroprotection and epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. in two divided doses, as 3-weekly cycles until November 2004. However, there was no apparent clinical response to chemotherapy, and abdomen CT (Figure 3) done at this time showed a 10 × 8 cm sized heterogeneously enhancing mesenteric mass.
×
Given the failed response to chemotherapy, the pathology specimen was retested for CD117/c-kit which turned out to be positive. Thus, the patient was diagnosed as a primary mesenteric gastrointestinal stromal tumour presenting as solitary brain metastasis. The patient was then treated with imatinib mesylate 600 mg oral daily. CT scan of the chest and abdomen after three months of therapy showed a good response, evidenced by a cystic conversion of tumour mass with no visible areas of enhancement (Figure 4). The patient continued to remain on imatinib therapy. However, after the initial response, CT scan of abdomen done after another three months showed a focal nodular area of enhancement (arrow) within the mesenteric mass, suggestive of disease progression. (Figure 5) The patient subsequently developed cachexia and died four months later.
×
×
Discussion
Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are thought to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal, the intestinal pacemaker cells [1]. GIST most commonly arises from the stomach (60–70%) and small intestine (20–30%) with less than 10% arising from the rest of gastrointestinal tract (oesophagus, colon, rectum) or extraintestinal sites (omentum, mesentery, retroperitoneum) [2‐4].
The clinical presentation of patients with GIST can vary depending on the tumour location, size and aggressiveness. Typically, patients present with non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal mass, pain, vomiting, anorexia and bowel obstruction. Rarely, patients may present with acute haemorrhage into peritoneal cavity from tumour rupture or cutaneous metastases [5, 6].
Anzeige
GIST mostly metastasizes within the abdomen. In one series of 83 patients [7], the common sites of metastases were to the liver (46%) and peritoneum (41%). Other sites of metastases reported in this series include the retroperitoneum, lung, bone and abdominal scar. Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) by metastatic GIST is extremely rare. A review of the literature reveals only three reports of CNS involvement by GIST. In all cases, patients had known metastatic disease elsewhere prior to the development of CNS metastases. In one case [8], a 60-year-old male with diagnosed metastatic GIST developed sudden unilateral blindness that was found to be caused by metastatic involvement of the cavernous sinus. In the second case [9], a 47-year-old male who was being treated with imatinib for metastatic GIST developed multiple cerebral relapses even while systemic disease appeared to be controlled. In the third case [10], a 75-year-old male with multiple liver and peritoneal metastases developed a single intracranial lesion. In the third patient, all lesions including the intracranial lesion showed a good response to imatinib therapy.
In the present case, the patient had an unusual presentation as an intracranial metastasis. The patient was initially treated as a metastatic sarcoma from unknown primary due to the absence of extracranial disease on radiological workup. Even after the detection of the mesenteric primary, the patient was initially treated as a mesenteric sarcoma as histopathology showed a sarcoma which was positive for CD34 and vimentin antigen. The possibility of GIST was suspected only after the patient failed to respond to ifosfamide and epirubicin combination chemotherapy. As the immunohistochemisty returned positive for CD117 at this stage, the patient was treated with imatinib [11, 12]. A good initial treatment response was noted with imatinib, with a reduction in tumour size and the development of cystic changes in the tumour mass. However, the patient subsequently developed progressive disease and died.
Conclusion
The present report describes a unique presentation of GIST as intracranial metastasis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of its kind in the literature. The true nature of disease remained obscure for a considerable duration; this delay could be attributed, in part to the atypical presentation and to the lack of routine testing for CD117. We recommend that all cases of sarcomas with an intraabdominal origin or unknown origin be routinely tested for CD117 to detect GIST as these tumours usually respond to imatinib.
Acknowledgements
Consent was taken from the patient's relatives for publication of this report.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
TP, GG, MM, SG, AKD, PKJ, GKR contributed significantly to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.
Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.
Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.
Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.
Update Chirurgie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.
Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.