Background
Osteoblasts and osteoclasts are responsible for bone turnover by mediating bone formation and bone resorption, respectively. Osteoblasts are derived from the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in different regulatory processes [
1]. Moreover, osteogenic differentiation of MSCs is a complex process, correlating to numerous environmental factors, like hormones and growth factors [
2]. MSC osteogenic differentiation is pivotal for bone disease treatment and the repair of bone defect [
3]. Furthermore, a prior study has documented the critical effects of human bone marrow MSC (hBMSC) osteogenic differentiation on bone regenerative therapies and regenerative potential of hBMSC-secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs) [
4]. More importantly, it has been reported that BMSC-derived EVs could restore the BMSC function to suppress radiation-induced bone loss in rat models [
5].
EVs are essential regulators and a critical means of intercellular communication, which are carriers of membrane cells and cytoplasmic proteins, lipids, and RNA [
6]. It has been acknowledged that EVs secreted from various cells including BMSCs and osteoclasts, as well as the delivery of microRNAs (miRs) to osteoblasts, could regulate bone formation [
7]. A study showed that miR-15b was observed in human MSC (hMSC)-secreted EVs [
8]. The miR-15b is a member of the miR-15/107 group of miR genes that play an essential role in cell angiogenesis, stress response, metabolism, and division of vertebrate species [
9]. Overexpression of miR-15b has been found during osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in a previous study [
10]. In our study, Starbase predicted the binding sites of miR-15b on the WW domain-containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 (WWP1) 3′-untranslated region (UTR). WWP1 encompasses an N-terminal C2 domain, four tandem WW domains for substrate binding, and a C-terminal catalytic HECT domain for ubiquitin transferring, which can function as the E3 ligase for PY motif-containing proteins, including Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5), and for non-PY motif-containing proteins-like KLF2 [
11]. A prior study has identified the correlation between WWP1 and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs [
12]. Meanwhile, it has been clarified that KLF2 could promote osteogenic differentiation in osteoblasts [
13]. Moreover, WWP1 mediates both poly-ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of KLF2 [
14]. In this regard, we hypothesized that BMSC-secreted EVs mediated delivery of miR-15b might be involved in the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via the WWP1/KLF2 axis. In order to verify this hypothesis, we therefore provide functional evidence by performing overexpression and inhibition/silencing treatment, as well as co-culture in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) after osteogenic induction.
Materials and methods
Ethics approval
The animal experiments were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Lanzhou University Second Hospital (No. 2019A-224) and conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the National Institutes of Health. All efforts were made to minimize unnecessary distress to the animals.
Culture of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
The hBMSCs (ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were cultured in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2 with full relative humidity. For in vitro experiments, hBMSC incubation was performed with proliferation medium (PM) encompassing minimum essential medium α (α-MEM, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, ScienCell Research Laboratories), and 100 IU/mL antibiotics (Gibco).
As for osteogenic induction, hBMSC culture was conducted with osteogenic medium (OM) encompassing standard PM, 10 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate, 0.2 mmol/L ascorbic acid, and 100 nmol/L dexamethasone. All other materials were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise.
Cell transfection
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting WWP1 and negative control (NC) of siRNA (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were transfected into BMSCs under the mediation of DharmaFECT one transfection reagent (Thermo Scientific, Lafayette, CO, USA,
www.dharmacon.com).
Based on the manuals provided by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), lentiviral vectors carrying short hairpin RNA (sh)-NC, sh-KLF2, overexpression (oe)-NC, oe-KLF2, and oe-WWP1 (Ribobio, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) were transduced into BMSCs. Following 6 h, the medium was renewed, and cell culture was further conducted for 48 h.
Mimic-NC (100 nM), miR-15b mimic (100 nM), inhibitor-NC (100 nM) and, miR-15b inhibitor (100 nM) (Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were transfected into BMSCs by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After 48 h of transfection, reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed to assess the transfection efficiency.
FBS was centrifuged for 18 h at 100,000×g in advance to remove EVs from the serum to obtain an EV-free medium. The hBMSCs at 80% confluency were cultured in the EV-free medium for 48 h, followed by the collection of the supernatants. EVs were isolated from supernatants of hBMSCs through differential centrifugation and filtration steps. Specifically, cell supernatants were centrifuged at 2000×g for 20 min, then at 10,000×g for 40 min, followed by filtration using a 0.22-μm sterilized filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After a 70-min ultracentifugation at 100,000×g, the supernatant was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 100,000×g for 70 min. After that, EVs were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer, followed by estimation of EV concentration based on the protocols of bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Identification of EVs from hBMSCs
A transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was adopted to measure the morphology of EVs. In brief, the hBMSC-derived EVs were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and assembled on carbon-coated copper grids, followed by air-drying. The 1% uranyl acetate was employed twice for negative staining of the mixture. An HT7700 TEM (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was adopted to capture images at 120 kV.
Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was applied for the evaluation of particle size and concentration of EVs. The ZetaView system (Particle Metrix GmbH, Microtrac, Meerbusch, Germany) was employed for the evaluation of EVs, followed by the result analysis by NTA analytical software (ZetaView, version 8.04.02). Western blot analysis was conducted to assess the protein expression of the specific markers (CD81, CD63), negative protein Calnexin, and co-expression protein tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) to identify EVs.
Labeling and tracking of EVs from hBMSCs
hBMSCs and EVs were labeled based on the manuals of 3,3′-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate (CM-Dio) and 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3, 3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (CM-DiI) (Beyotime Biotechnology, Haimen, China), respectively, followed by a 30-min culture in the dark at 37 °C. The unbound dye was removed by 70-min centrifugation at 100,000×g and 4 °C and 5-min centrifugation at 800×g at room temperature. Finally, EVs and BMSCs were mixed together, followed by a 24-h culture at 37 °C. The internalization of EVs was observed under fluorescence microscopy (Leica, Weltzlar, Germany), and images were analyzed using a Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence (LASAF) software.
Alkaline phosphatase activity measurement
Cells were cultured in OM for 7 days, followed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and quantitative analysis. The NBT/BCIP staining kit (Beijing Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was utilized for ALP staining after cell fixation. According to the manufacturer’s instructions of the ALP active colorimetric quantitative detection kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Reagent Company, Nanjing, China), cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min and treated with Triton-X100. The optical density (OD) values were evaluated at 520 nm.
Alizarin red S staining
hBMSCs were seeded onto six-well plates (1 × 105 cells/well). Upon cell confluence, the medium was renewed to induction medium supplemented with 10 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate, 0.2 mmol/L ascorbic acid, and 100 nmol/L dexamethasone. The cells cultured for 14 days were subjected to Alizarin red S (ARS) staining as per the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, the cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (15 min), and stained with 0.2% ARS solution for 30 min. After washing three times with distilled water, the stained cells were photographed.
RNA isolation and quantification
The RT-qPCR was initially carried out to determine the expression pattern of miR-15b in BMSCs at 7 days and 14 days of osteogenic differentiation. As per the manufacturer’s instructions, the TaqMan microRNA reverse transcription kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was adopted to reversely transcribe small RNA samples (10 ng) into single-stranded cDNA. Real-time PCR amplification of miR was performed using TaqMan 2X universal PCR master mix and Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Each sample was subjected to three repeated RT-qPCR.
The RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA,
www.qiagen.com) was adopted for the isolation of total RNA. cDNA was synthesized using a MiRcute miRNA First-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) or Primer-Script TM one-step RT-qPCR kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan). Targets were amplified on an ABI7500 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) using the SYBR Green I real-time PCR kit (Beijing Cowin Biotech Co., Ltd.). The relative expression level of mRNA or miR was normalized by glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) or U6 expression as internal controls. These values were then raised to the power of 2 (2
−ΔΔCt) to yield fold expression relative to the reference point. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table
1.
Western blot analysis
Whole-cell lysates were prepared from the BMSCs. Cells were lysed using mammalian protein extraction reagent (Pierce Chemical, Dallas, TX), containing protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). The whole-cell lysates (10 μg protein/lane) were loaded and separated in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electropheresis (SDS-PAGE) gels, electro-blotted into a nitrocellulose membrane, and immune-blotted with anti-rabbit antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) to GAPDH (ab181602, 1:10,000), KLF2 (ab139699, 1:1000), runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2, ab23981, 1:1000), osteocalcin (OCN, ab93876, 1:500), osteopontin (OPN, ab75285, 1:1000), WWP1 (ab43791, 1:1000), CD63 (ab134045, 1:1000), CD81 (ab109201, 1:1000), Calnexin (ab92573, 1:20,000), TSG101 (ab125011, 1:1000), p65 (ab32536, 1:1000), phosphorylated p65 (ab86299, 1:2000), IκBα (ab32518, 1:1000), and phosphorylated IκBα (ab133462, 1:10,000). The electrogenerated chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was employed to visualize these bands.
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The Starbase software was utilized to predict the binding site between miR-15b and WWP1. The WWP1 3′-untranslated region (UTR) containing the predicted miR-15b binding sites was synthesized and subsequently cloned into a modified pcDNA3.1 plasmid containing a firefly luciferase reporter gene to construct a WWP1 wild-type (WT) luciferase reporter plasmid. The miR-375 binding site in the 3′-UTR of WWP1 was mutated with a site-directed mutagenesis kit (SBS Genetech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), namely WWP1-mutant (MUT) luciferase reporter plasmid. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. The 293T cells were cultured in a 48-well plate when cells reached 70–80% confluence. Cells were co-transfected with 400 ng plasmids expressing WWP1-MUT or WWP1-WT and 40 ng firefly luciferase reporter plasmids or 4 ng pRL-TK, a plasmid-expressing Renilla luciferase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Following 24 h of transfection, the luciferase activity was detected on a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System with values normalized to Renilla luciferase and depicted as fold change relative to basal activity.
The transcription activity of NF-κB was detected by using NF-κB luciferase reporter plasmid (YT451-BSJ, Beijing Biolab Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis
Anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (F1804, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (m5546, Sigma-Aldrich), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody (ab20272, 1:5000, Abcam) were applied to perform co-immunoprecipitation according to the standard protocol. Briefly, each 100-mm culture dish was cultured with 0.6 mL of 1× ice-cold cell lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM ethyleneglycol-bis (beta-aminoethylether)-N,N′-tetraacetic acid, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 μg/mL leupeptin, and 1 mM fresh phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride on ice for 5 min to the transfected BMSCs, and BMSCs in the plate were transferred to the fresh microcentrifuge tubes. Cell lysates were then sonicated 4 times (5 s each time) on ice and centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C. The primary anti-Myc antibody (2 μL) was supplemented to 200 μL of culture supernatant overnight at 4 °C. The supernatant was then added with 30 μL of 50% protein A-agarose beads (Upstate, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by 2 h culture at 4 °C. Beads were washed with 500 μL of 1× cell lysis buffer for 5 times. Proteins were then resuspended in 50 μL of SDS sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot analysis.
Glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assay
Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion protein was purified from bacterial DNA fragments. After amplification, WWP1 was cloned into the pGEX-6p-1 GST fusion protein expression vector (Amersham Biosciences) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). GST fusion protein was induced by 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside for 3 h at room temperature, followed by purification with 1 L glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences). The purified GST fusion protein was eluted into 10 mM reduced glutathione. The 10% SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining were conducted to identify the purity of the protein. With bovine serum albumin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) as a standard, the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method. RNA transcription and protein translation were carried out in vitro using [35S] methionine (Amersham Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions of TNT Quick-coupled Transcription/Translation systems (Promega).
Equal molar amounts of purified GST fusion proteins (GST, GST-WWP1) were fixed using 0.5 mL GST pull-down binding buffer containing 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineëthanesulfonic acid (pH 7.6), 3 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, and 0.5% CA630, and the solution was added into 50 μL of 50% glutathione-Sepharose 4B suspended beads (Amersham Biosciences). Following 1 h of culture at 4 °C with rotation, beads were washed 3 times with GST pull-down binding buffer and recovered with 0.5 mL GST pull-down binding buffer. The 10-μL 35 S-labeled in vitro-translated protein (KLF2) was supplemented and mixed for 2 h at 4 °C with rotation.
The beads were then washed twice with 0.5 mL ice-cold radioimmune precipitation assay buffer and 1 mL cold PBS, respectively. The bound proteins were eluted with 30 μL boiled loading buffer. Coomassie Blue staining was performed and the GST protein was observed, followed by autoradiography to measure the 35 S-labeled protein. The in vitro ubiquitination assay was carried out using the Ubiquitin-Protein Conjugation kit (BostonBiochem, Cambridge, MA, USA). Briefly, 2 μL of rabbit reticulocyte lysate-translated 35 S-labeled KLF2 was incubated in the absence or presence of GST-WWP1 (2.5 μg), 8 μg fraction A, 8 μg fraction B, 26 μg ubiquitin, 4 μM ubiquitin aldehyde, and 2.5 μL energy solution (10×) in a 25-μL system, followed by a 30-min culture at 37 °C. The reaction was terminated with the addition of 25 μL of 3× sample loading buffer. Samples were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by autoradiography.
In vivo ubiquitination analysis
The 293T cells were transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)-ubiquitin, Myc-WWP1, and either Flag-KLF2 or Flag-KLF2-MUT, followed by treatment with 10 μM MG132 for 4 h, and harvested. Cells were lysed in 100 μL of regular lysis buffer. The cell lysates were denatured at 95 °C for 5 min with the presence of 1% SDS, followed by overnight culture in anti-Flag antibody and protein G-agarose (Sigma-Aldrich,
www.sigmaaldrich.com) overnight at 4 °C. Western blot analysis with an anti-HA antibody was conducted to analyze the immunoprecipitates.
BMSCs were first treated with 10 μM MG132 (MedChemExpress, Shanghai, China) for 4 h. Cell lysates were then cultured with anti-KLF2 antibody and protein G agarose overnight at 4 °C. The endogenous ubiquitination of KLF2 in the immunoprecipitates was assessed by Western blot analysis with the use of an anti-ubiquitin antibody.
Protein half-life assay
Cells were treated with 10 μM cycloheximide (CHX, MedChemExpress) for different times, or cells were treated with MG132 at the same time to prepare crude extracts. The protein levels were then determined by Western blot analysis.
Establishment of ovariectomized rat model
All the operations on rats were carried out under general anesthesia and sterile conditions, and the postoperative analgesia nursing was performed using anti-amine phencycline. In this study, a total of 40 female Sprague-Dawley rats (Tengxin Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China) aged 3 months were selected, among which, 8 rats received sham operation and 32 rats were used for induction of ovariectomized (OVX) models. In brief, rats were anesthetized by 30 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium, followed by the preparation of 10-mm bilateral lumbar lateral skin linear incision. After exposing the muscles and peritoneum by blunt dissection, bilateral ovaries were gently excised. All sham-operated rats underwent a similar procedure, except for the removal of bilateral ovaries. After the tissues were repositioned and sutured into the synthetic layer, the rats were injected with 40,000 IU/mL penicillin at 1 mL/kg for 3 days. After OVX model establishment, OVX rats were injected with 20 μL of PBS, 20 μL of EVs suspension derived from BMSCs (BMSC-EVs), 20 μL of EVs suspension isolated from BMSCs transfected with inhibitor NC using liposomes (EV-inhibitor NC), or 20 μL of EVs suspension isolated from BMSCs transfected with miR-15b inhibitor using liposomes (EV-miR-15b inhibitor) through the periosteum of the bone marrow cavity of femur twice in a week [
15] (8 rats for each injection). After 3 weeks, the distal femur was taken and subjected to micro-CT and HE staining to observe the tissue morphology [
16,
17].
Micro-CT analysis
Three weeks later, the micro-CT system (mCT-80, Scanco medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) was adopted to analyze the changes of the microstructure and the formation of new bone in the defected area. In the medium-resolution mode, the samples were scanned with a thickness of 0.018 mm per slice, a 1024-reconstruction matrix, and 200-ms integration time. After 3D reconstruction, bone mineral density (BMD), the ratio of bone volume to total tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and connective density (Conn.D) were automatically determined.
Statistical analysis
All measurement data were shown as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), with a level of significance set at p < 0.05. Conforming to the normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, data between the two groups were compared by independent sample t test. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, and data comparison among the groups at different time points was analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Discussion
Osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs has been well documented to correlate to the formation and remodeling of the bone [
18]. Moreover, postmenopausal osteoporosis can also be caused by the repression of BMSC osteogenic differentiation [
19]. Therefore, the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs may be a potential target in the treatment of bone disease. A previous study has revealed that BMSC-secreted EVs were elucidated to regulate the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [
20]. Meanwhile, miRs also serve as modulators of osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [
21]. Therefore, this study was intended to explore the potential regulatory role of BMSC-derived EVs loaded with miR-15b in osteogenic differentiation. Together, the obtained findings revealed the promoting effects of BMSC-derived EVs loaded with miR-15b on osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via the WWP1/KLF2/NF-κB axis.
The present study revealed that WWP1 was under-expressed, but KLF2 was highly expressed in osteodifferentiated BMSCs, whereas WWP1 promoted ubiquitination and degradation of KLF2 to activate the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby suppressing osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. As an E3 ubiquitin ligase, inhibition of WWP1 has been reported to promote osteoblast activity and matrix mineralization [
22]. Another prior study revealed that WWP1 could repress osteoblast differentiation and migration to inversely modulate osteoblast function [
23]. More importantly, Zhao et al. reported that WWP1 elevated ubiquitination and degradation of JunB which positively mediated osteoblast differentiation [
12], indicating that WWP1 upregulation may contribute to the repression of osteogenic differentiation. Besides, our results were supported by a previous study whereby WWP1 promoted ubiquitination and degradation of KLF2 [
14]. KLF2 has been revealed to play an important role in maintaining the stemness of hMSCs during bone regeneration [
24]. Similarly, the silencing of KLF2 has been reported to repress osteoblast differentiation [
25]. Furthermore, the upregulation of KLF2 has been detected in the osteogenic differentiation process in previous work done by Hou et al. [
13]. The suppressive effects of KLF2 on the transcriptional activity of NF-κB in monocytes have also been reported in previous literature [
26], which was in line with our results. In fact, several studies have shown the effect of the NF-κB signaling pathway on osteogenic differentiation. For instance, the osteogenic differentiation of pre-osteoblasts was repressed through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [
27]. Another study evidenced that the taxifolin-inactivated NF-κB signaling pathway promoted osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs [
28]. Therefore, it was suggested that osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs could be regulated by the WWP1/KLF2/NF-κB axis.
Subsequently, it is well-known that miRs can bind to the complementary sequences in the 3′-UTR of their target mRNAs to inversely regulate gene expression, which triggers mRNA degradation or translation repression [
29]. In a previous study, miR-15b has been shown to directly target 3′-UTR of SMAD3 to downregulate SMAD3 in nucleus pulposus cells [
30]. Also, it has been reported that miR-452could directly target WWP1 in prostate cancer cells [
31], which partially supported our results that miR-15b could target and negatively regulate WWP1 to promote osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Similarly, another prior research unraveled that miR-15b overexpression resulted in osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs by targeting SMAD7 to alleviate steroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head [
32]. Moreover, miR-15b overexpression has been reported to increase osteoblast differentiation by activating Runx2, an osteoblast differentiation-related marker gene [
33]. In our study, BMSC-derived EVs loaded with miR-15b regulated the KLF2/NF-κB axis by targeting WWP1 to promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in vitro and attenuated bone loss in vivo. Due to the available osteogenic potential and abundant source, BMSCs have been regarded as the most promising cell type in bone regeneration [
34]. BMSC-secreted EVs also possess osteogenic effects to relieve steroid-induced femoral head necrosis [
35]. BMSC-derived EVs could alleviate bone loss caused by radiation in rats through the restoration of the BMSC function [
5]. Another recent research has suggested that miR-15b was present in hMSC-secreted EVs [
8]. In addition, another research uncovered that BMSC-secreted EVs could increase the expression of ALP, OCN, OPN, and Runx2 to induce osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via miR-196a [
20]. Hence, BMSC-derived EVs loaded with miR-15b might promote osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs via the WWP1/KLF2/NF-κB axis.