Introduction
Mental illness stigma refers to the negative beliefs, emotional reactions and attitudes towards people with serious mental illness (SMI) endorsed by the general population (also referred to as public stigma [
1]). People with SMI are generally acutely aware of public stigma and expect to be rejected by others (69.4% of the 1229 participants with schizophrenia (SZ) and 71.6% of the 1182 participants with mood disorders in the GAMIAN-Europe study had high perceived stigma [
2,
3]). Self-stigma occurs when someone moves beyond awareness of stigma to accepting the negative stereotypes about SMI as true to describe him/herself [
1]. Self-stigma refers to the process whereby a person’s previously held social identity (defined by social roles such as son, brother, sister, friend, employee or potential partner) is progressively replaced by a devalued and stigmatized view of oneself. Self-stigma is highly frequent in Europe (41.7% in SZ and 21.7% in mood disorders [
2,
3]) and the USA (36.1% out of 144 people with SMI [
4]). The ‘illness identity model’ [
5] proposed that self-stigma can have pervasive effects on outcomes related to recovery from SMI, including self-esteem, hopefulness, social interaction, employment and symptom severity. The evidence consistently supports many of the model’s predictions, including that self-stigma is negatively associated with self-esteem, motivation to achieve personal life goals, shared-decision making, adherence into treatment, well-being, quality of life, personal recovery and social function [
6‐
14]. People with elevated self-stigma report more dysfunctional attitudes, social withdrawal, depressive symptoms and increased suicidal ideation [
5,
15‐
21]. High insight into illness directly predicts and compounds the effects of self-stigma on depression [
15,
17,
22‐
24]. Impairments in cognitive functioning, metacognition and social cognition predict increased self-stigma [
12,
24‐
29].
Several psychosocial interventions have been designed to reduce self-stigma and its impact on patient’s outcomes, with preliminary results on self-stigma, insight and self-efficacy [
30]. Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) is a structured, 20 session group-based approach which combines psychoeducation to counteract SMI stereotypes, cognitive restructuring to challenge dysfunctional attitudes about the self and story-telling exercises to enhance meaning-making and the person’s ability to move beyond their illness-identity to a more integrated sense of self [
31]. NECT is manualized and can be implemented with fidelity in routine treatment settings [
31]. Four controlled studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCT) in three different countries (USA, Israel, Sweden) have been published to date in psychotic-related disorders. NECT was effective in improving self-stigma, hope and self-esteem [
32‐
34] with persisting effects after 6 months’ follow-up [
33,
34]. The results on subjective quality of life were mixed, one study found improvements [
32] but another found no effectiveness [
33]. NECT was effective in reducing social withdrawal and avoidant coping strategies in participants with schizophrenia (SZ) in comparison with an active control condition [
34]. However, NECT was not effective on social functioning, measured with the Quality of Life Scale [
35], a global measure of psychosocial function [
34]. In almost all studies of NECT, the samples were mixed, with some participants showing low levels of self-stigma (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) total score < 2.5) and others moderate to high self-stigma (ISMI > 2.5). Changes in coping strategies were higher in participants from centres providing the intervention within the context of psychiatric rehabilitation [
34].
In summary, NECT has demonstrated effectiveness on self-stigma and subjective aspects of recovery (hope, self-esteem and quality of life) in participants with psychotic-related disorders and SZ. Its effectiveness on social function and in other stigmatized SMI conditions (bipolar disorder (BD), borderline personality disorder (BPD)) are, however, still unclear. Similarly, NECT’s effectiveness in improving depression, treatment adherence, wellbeing and personal recovery is still unknown.
The objectives of the present study are to investigate (i) NECT effectiveness on social functioning in SMI participants, (ii) NECT effectiveness on self-stigma, psychiatric symptoms, depression, well-being, subjective quality of life and personal recovery, (iii) whether insight into illness and cognitive functioning at baseline predict improvements at follow-up and (iv) whether the effects on primary and secondary outcomes persist after 6 and 12 months’ follow-up.
The primary hypothesis to be tested is whether NECT significantly improves social functioning in comparison with the control group. The secondary hypotheses are to determine if, when compared to the control condition, NECT results in significant improvements in self-stigma, psychiatric symptoms, depression, wellbeing, self-esteem, subjective quality of life and personal recovery.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.