Background
The Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) is present in about 5% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 20–30% of adult ALL [
1]. The Ph-chromosome is produced by a reciprocal translocation t(9;22) between chromosomes 9 and 22. The translocation results in the generation of a
BCR/ABL fusion gene in which the
ABL protooncogene on chromosome 9 is fused to segments of the
BCR gene. Depending upon where the breakpoint occurs in the
BCR locus, two alternate products, P210 or P190 Bcr/Abl fusion proteins can be translated. P210 is predominantly associated with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), whereas the P190 form is mainly associated with Philadelphia positive ALL [
2,
3].
The deregulated tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr/Abl is essential for Bcr/Abl mediated transformation [
4‐
6], and imatinib, an inhibitor of the Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase [
7], is widely used clinically for treating Ph-positive leukemias [
8]. Imatinib is a very effective therapy for chronic phase CML [
9,
10]. However, patients in the accelerated phase or blast crisis of CML respond poorly and resistance frequently emerges [
11‐
21]. Additionally, Ph-positive ALL has a poor prognosis even with imatinib treatment [
22,
23].
New inhibitors for Bcr/Abl are under development. Weisberg et al [
24] first described experiments testing Nilotinib (Tasigna™; AMN107; Novartis Pharma AG), which was designed to improve potency and selectivity by incorporating alternate binding groups to the backbone of imatinib. In preclinical models of CML, nilotinib was confirmed to be much more potent than imatinib and also active against 32 of 33 Bcr/Abl mutant forms that are imatinib-resistant [
24‐
28]. However, additional nilotinib-resistant Bcr/Abl mutants can be generated
in vitro, in addition to the known T315I imatinib-resistant mutant [
29‐
32].
The reason for the poor response of Ph+ ALL towards imatinib therapy is unclear. To date, nilotinib has only been tested
in vitro on human Ph-positive ALL cells and on Bcr/Abl-transfected 32D and BaF3 cells [
24,
26]. Nilotinib was also used in phase I clinical trails for CML and for treatment of a very small number of Ph-positive ALL patients [
25]. To better understand the effectiveness of new therapies and the mechanisms of resistance in Ph-positive ALL, we generated a transgenic Bcr/Abl P190 mouse model for lymphoblastic leukemia [
33,
34]. In the current study, we tested the efficacy of nilotinib both
in vitro and
in vivo as monotherapy to eradicate P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblastic leukemia cells. We conclude that nilotinib is very effective in these settings in killing P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblastic leukemia cells but that resistance can develop.
Discussion
Nilotinib is a drug related to imatinib and that, based on preclinical studies, shows great promise in the treatment of Ph-positive leukemias. To date, the most extensive testing has been for effect in models for P210 Bcr/Abl caused CML and only a limited number of studies have examined Ph-positive ALL cells. Weisberg et al [
24] treated 32D cells transfected with P190 with nilotinib and reported that it is at least 10-fold more effective than imatinib in suppressing proliferation of these cells. Verstovsek et al [
26] tested nilotinib against two human Ph-positive ALL cell lines and reported that nilotinib was 30–40 times more potent than imatinib. We also found that
in vitro, nilotinib is 10–25 fold more effective than imatinib in eradicating P190 Bcr/Abl lymphoblasts. However, it is clear that a different sensitivity to this drug exists between the three independent cell lines that we tested which were derived from the same transgenic Bcr/Abl strain, but from different individuals in a different genetic background.
The effect of nilotinib on lymphoblastic leukemia has not been examined in mouse models. We used two different models to address this. In the transgenic mouse model, treatment was sufficient to eradicate very large numbers of leukemia cells in the lymph nodes within a single week. FACS analysis showed that numbers of circulating leukemic cells were also greatly reduced after treatment for this period of time. Indeed, treatment for 30 days may have been sufficient to cure two of the five mice of the first leukemia. Since these mice are Bcr/Abl transgenic, they can not be cured definitively and the finding that the mice succumbed to leukemia about 50 days later could represent the emergence of a second, independent leukemia.
In the second model, we transplanted a low number of previously cultured leukemia cells into compatible C57Bl/6J mice, which are congenic with the 8093 cells. The 8093 cells were isolated from an animal with terminal leukemia and can thus be considered to represent the final stages in the evolution of the leukemia in that animal. These cells appear to be highly malignant and within 21 days only 10,000 cells were needed to reproducibly cause terminal leukemia in all transplant recipients. Survival of the nilotinib-treated animals was significantly longer and we conclude that nilotinib is also very effective against these highly malignant cells in vivo.
However, in both the transplant model and the transgenic model, animals did die of leukemia after we stopped treatment and the relapse was relatively rapid (less than 2 weeks). There were also transplanted mice that developed leukemia while on treatment. Therefore, in these models, nilotinib did not provide a cure for P190 Bcr/Abl caused ALL. This result is of interest in the context of a phase I clinical trial that included 13 patients with Ph-positive ALL, [
25], in which one patient showed a partial hematological response and one a complete molecular remission, indicating that the drug was, overall, not highly effective in this type of leukemia.
The question therefore remains why Ph-positive ALL overall responds less well to Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors including imatinib and nilotinib. Our results do not support the view that subclones harboring point mutations in the Abl kinase domain are rapidly selected out. Our studies do suggest that drug levels may be an important factor. We saw a clear inhibition of P190 Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase activity at 2 hours but not at 23 hours after the last treatment with nilotinib, indicating that in these mice, the drug concentration in plasma at 23 hours was insufficient to fully inhibit the P190 Bcr/Abl. Weisberg et al [
24] measured plasma levels of nilotinib in mice and reported that at 75 mg/kg, nilotinib concentrations of 29 and 2.5 μM were present in their plasma at 2 and 24 hours. Kantarjian et al [
25] measured trough levels of nilotinib between 1 and 2.3 μM nilotinib in humans. Our transgenic construct was generated using human
BCR and
ABL gene segments and will therefore encode a protein that is identical to the P190 Bcr/Abl found in human Ph-positive ALL. Thus, even with the highest dose of nilotinib, (600 mg twice daily) in humans, there is a period in which the levels approach those which were unable to fully inhibit the human P190 Bcr/Abl protein
in vivo in the mice.
We speculate, that in the mice, a residual population of leukemic cells remains, and that over a 24-hour period, as the drug concentration starts to decrease during the later hours after administration, these residual resume proliferation. Over a period of time, this results in a slow increase in the tumor burden.
Ex vivo, stroma was able to provide protection to these cells as well as the original parent cells when we treated them with a moderate 20 nM dose of nilotinib. This outcome is similar to results obtained using other therapeutic drugs including imatinib, K25 and SCH66336 [
38‐
40] in such cells and suggests that the microenvironment provides very pronounced pro-survival support
in vivo when lymphoblastic leukemia cells experience waxing and waning drug concentrations in the course of daily treatment.
Other investigators have demonstrated that Jak is involved in the transformation caused by Bcr/Abl [i.e., [
41,
42]; review, [
43]]. The Jak family of kinases is involved in transducing signals from a number of receptors for cytokines including GM-CSF, Il-3, Il-7 and SDF-1α [
44‐
47]. Interestingly, Wang et al [
37] identified autosecretion of GM-CSF as a mechanism that allowed CML cells to resist imatinib and nilotinib treatment
in vitro. They further used an inhibitor for Jak, AG490, to show that this was mediated by Jak. Xie et al [
42] reported that in the presence of IL-3, Bcr/Abl-expressing cells become resistant to imatinib but that AG490 could overcome this. A similar Bcr/Abl-independent mechanism of imatinib resistance was reported by Williams et al. [
48], who found that Il-7 increased resistance of mouse Arf-/-, p210 Bcr/Abl pre-B cells to imatinib. AG490 was able to overcome this as well. Therefore, we tested if the inhibitor AG490 is able to re-sensitize cells to nilotinib. We found that the survival of the leukemia cells was significantly affected by treatment with AG490 alone. However, AG490 could not overcome nilotinib-resistance unless used in relatively high doses of 75 to 100 μM, which eradicated resistant as well as non-resistant cells similarly. Furthermore, besides leukemia cells, AG490 treatment also affected function of the feeder layer cells, thereby suggesting potential appearance of side-effects if used in combined therapy with nilotinib.
Methods
Mouse model and cell lines
The P190 Bcr/Abl transgenic mouse model has been previously described [
33,
34]. On a C57Bl/6J background, average age at death for the f10–f15 generation (n = 127) was 100 days (range 38–265 days). The 8093 lymphoblastic leukemia cell line was established from a P190 Bcr/Abl transgenic mouse on a C57Bl/6J (f11) background as described previously [
49]. B-1 and B-2 lymphoblastic leukemia cells have been previously described [
50]. Lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines A-5 and A21 were established from nilotinib-treated C57Bl/6J mice transplanted with 8093 cells. The cells were grown in complete lymphoblast medium consisting of McCoy's 5A medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) supplemented with 15% heat inactivated FCS, 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 ng/ml recombinant IL-3 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) and 50 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol in the presence of E14.5 irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) [
51].
All animal research was performed at the Animal Care Facility of the Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles in accordance with institutional guidelines. Animals were maintained in accordance with the NIH Guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals.
Treatment of lymphoblastic leukemia cells with Nilotinib, imatinib or AG490
Nilotinib was obtained from Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). AG490 was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, USA). The parental lymphoblastic leukemia cell line 8093 and the A-5 and A-21 cell lines were seeded in wells of a 6-well plate (3 × 106 cells/well) either in the presence or absence of E14.5 irradiated MEFs as described [
49]. Samples in triplicate wells were treated either with 20, 50, 100, or 200 nM nilotinib or 5 μM imatinib or DMSO as control. In additional pilot experiments, 8093 cells were treated with 100, 75, 50 and 5 μM AG490 while cultured on MEFs. The cell viability in control experiments was consistently above 80%. Drug in the experimental wells was added every second or third day along with the fresh change of medium dependent on proliferation of the treated cells. Aliquots were removed from each individual well and cell viability was determined using the Trypan Blue exclusion method. Viability is expressed as percentage of the number of Trypan Blue excluding cells divided by the number of total cells. In the case of AG490 treatment, viability was measured by propidium iodide uptake using a FACScan (BD Biosciences, San Jose, USA). Each data point is represented as mean ± SEM of triplicate samples.
Treatment with nilotinib in a transplant model
Fifteen C57Bl/6J mice (male, 6 weeks old, Jackson Lab, Bar Harbor, Maine) were transplanted with 1 × 104 8093 cells via a tail vein injection. Five days later, mice were randomly selected for vehicle or nilotinib treatment. Eight mice (vehicle group) were fed a mixture of 8 parts peanut butter and two parts vegetable oil and the remaining seven mice (treatment group) were treated with 75 mg of nilotinib/kg body weight added to the same peanut/oil mixture daily. Treatment was stopped 50 days after day 1 of transplantation.
Analysis of leukemia regression in transgenic mice treated with nilotinib
Peripheral blood of preleukemic and overtly leukemic P190 transgenic mice as well as wild-type littermates was examined by flow cytometry using a FACScan (BD Biosystems, Heidelberg, Germany) to identify markers suitable to detect the leukemic cells. Peripheral blood of three additional P190 transgenic animals that had developed overt leukemia/lymphoma was analyzed before and after seven days of treatment with nilotinib as described above. After erythrocyte lysis, cells were stained with antibodies against mouse CD19 and AA4.1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). In addition, five P190 Bcr/Abl transgenic mice with visible signs of lymphoma were selected at different time points and treated with 75 mg/kg nilotinib as described above. Treatment was continued for 30 days.
Western blot analysis
Animals that had been transplanted with 8093 cells in the nilotinib-treated group and that started showing signs of ALL were sacrificed either 2 hours or 23 hours after the daily administration of 75 mg/kg of nilotinib. SDS-SB lysates of lymphoma tissue were prepared and lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines were isolated from these mice. Two cell lines, A-5 and A-21, were subsequently used for further experiments. SDS-SB lysates from lymphoma tissues and lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines were run on 7.5% SDS-PAA gels (for detection of phosphotyrosine and Bcr) and 15% SDS-PAA gels (for Crkl detection). Membranes were reacted with PY-20-Horseradish peroxidase (1:2500, BD Transduction Laboratories, CA), Bcr N-20 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA), Crkl (1:1000, H-62, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or GAPDH (1:5000, Chemicon International, CA) antibodies using standard procedures.
Bcr/Abl gene copy number and point mutations
BCR/ABL gene copy number was assessed using Southern blotting of Bam HI digested genomic DNA isolated from the parental cell line 8093 and the lymphoma derived cell lines A-5 and A-21. To examine the
ABL segment in
BCR/ABL for mutations, a 417 bp region from the DNA of 8093, A-5 and A-21 was amplified using forward primer 5'-agagatcaaacaccctaacct-3' and reverse primer 5'-gcatttggagtattgctttgg-3' and sequenced. This region includes nucleotides 876–1293 (residues 293–462) of c-Abl (NM_005157) containing point mutations T315, F317, M351, Q252 and H396 detected in human patients [
20]. A larger region of 675 bp including both the ATP binding pocket and the activation loop was also amplified and sequenced using primers AN4+ 5'-tggttcatcatcattcaacggtgg-3' and A7- 5'-agacgtcggacttgatggagaact-3' as described by Sacha et al [
52].
Statistical analysis
The Log rank test was used to test the significance of survival. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Competing interests
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
PK performed the
in vivo drug treatment experiments, the experiments shown in Figures
3A, 3B,
4 and
5 and wrote part of the manuscript
BZ did the 8093 transplant experiments, contributed to drug treatment of transplanted mice and performed the experiments shown in Figure
1DT performed the experiment presented in Figure
3C and
3D.
NF performed the experiments shown in Figure
6 and wrote part of the manuscript.
MM and JG contributed to experimental design
VP performed pilot experiments with AMN107
NH planned experiments, analyzed results and wrote the manuscript.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.