nach oben

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.08.2012 | Original Article

Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Kidney Transplantation: Intent Vs. Forgetfulness and Clinical Markers of Medication Intake

verfasst von: Konstadina Griva, Ph.D., Andrew Davenport, FDRC, Michael Harrison, FDRC, Stanton P. Newman, Ph.D.

Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although adherence to immunosupressive medication after transplantation is important to maximize good clinical outcomes it remains suboptimal and not well-understood. The purpose of this study was to examine intentional and unintentional non-adherence to immunosuppression medication in kidney transplant patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional sample of N = 218 patients [49.6 ± 12.3 years] recruited in London, UK (1999–2002) completed measures of medication beliefs, quality-of-life, depression, and transplantation-specific emotions. Adherence was measured with self-report and serial immunosuppressive assays.

Results

Intentional non-adherence was low (13.8 %) yet 62.4 % admitted unintentional non-adherence and 25.4 % had sub-target immunosuppressive levels. The risk of sub-target serum immunosuppressive levels was greater for patients admitting unintentional non-adherence (OR = 8.4; p = 0.004). Dialysis vintage, doubts about necessity, and lower worry about viability of graft explained R ² = 16.1 to 36 % of self-report non-adherence. Depression was related only to intentional non-adherence.

Conclusions

Non-adherence is common in kidney transplantation. Efforts to increase adherence should be implemented by targeting necessity beliefs, monitoring depression, and promoting strategies to decrease forgetfulness.

Laupacis A, Keown P, Pus N, et al. A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1996; 50(1): 235.PubMedCrossRef

Loubeau PR, Loubeau JM, Jantzen R. The economis of kidney transplantation versus hemodialysis. Prog Transplant. 2001; 11(4):291–7PubMed

Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341(23): 1725PubMedCrossRef

Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: A systematic review. Transplantation 2004; 77:769–76.PubMedCrossRef

Fine RN, Becker Y, De Geest S, Eisen H, Ettenger R, Evans R, Rudow DL, McKay D, Neu A, Nevins T, Reyes J, Wray J, Dobbels F. Nonadherence consensus conference summary report. Am J Transplant 2009; 9:35–41.PubMedCrossRef

Denhaerynck K, Burkhalter F, Schäfer-Keller P, Steiger J, Bock A, De Geest S. Clinical consequences of non adherence to immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients. Transpl Int 2009; 22:441–6PubMedCrossRef

Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Cleemput I et al. Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: A literature review. Transpl Int 2005; 18: 1121–1133.PubMedCrossRef

Morrissey PE, Flynn ML, Lin S: Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients. Drugs 2007; 67:1463–1481PubMedCrossRef

Dew MA, DiMartini AF, De Vito Dabbs A et al. Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation. Transplantation 2007; 83: 858–873.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Chisholm MA, Vollenweider LJ, Mulloy LL, et al. Renal transplant patient compliance with free immunosuppressive medications. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1240–1244.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Chisholm MA, Lance CE, Mulloy LL. Patient factors associated with adherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients. Am J Health-System Pharm 2005; 62: 1775–1781.CrossRef

12.

Chisholm-Burns MA, Kwong WJ, Mulloy LL, Spivey CA. Nonmodifiable characteristics associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2008; 65: 1242–1247.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Denhaerynck K, Steiger J, Bock A, Schäfer-Keller P, Köfer S, Thannberger N, De Geest S. Prevalence and risk factors of non-adherence with immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 108–116.PubMed

14.

Cukor D, Rosenthal DS, Jindal RM, Brown CD, Kimmel PL. Depression is an important contributor to low medication adherence in hemodialyzed patients and transplant recipients. Kidney Int 2009; 75:1223–1229.PubMed

15.

Achille MA, Ouellette A, Fournier S, et al Impact of stress, distress and feelings of indebtedness on adherence to immunosuppressants following kidney transplantation. Clin Transpl 2006; 20: 301–306.

16.

Chisholm MA, Williamson GM, Lance CE, Mulloy LL. Predicting adherence to immunosuppressant therapy: A prospective analysis of the theory of planned behaviour. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22:2339–2348.PubMed

17.

Butler JA, Peveler RC, Roderick P, Smith PW, Horne R, Mason JC. Modifiable risk factors for non-adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:3144–3149.PubMed

18.

Greenstein S, Siegal B. Evaluation of a multivariate model predicting noncompliance with medication regimens among renal transplant patients. Transplantation 2000; 69:2226–2228.PubMed

19.

Clifford S, Barber N, Horne R. Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: Application of the Necessity-Concerns Framework, J Psychosom Res 2008; 64: 41–46.PubMed

20.

Wroe A. Intentional and unintentional nonadherence: A study of decision making. J Behav Med 2001; 25(4): 355–372.

21.

Lehane E, McCarthy G. Intentional and unintentional medication non-adherence: A comprehensive framework for clinical research and practice? A discussion paper. Int J Nurs Stud 2007; 44: 1468–1477PubMed

22.

Siegal B, Greenstein S. Compliance and noncompliance in kidney transplant patients: Cues for transplant coordinators. J Transpl Coord. 1999; 9:104–108.PubMed

23.

Griva K, Ziegelmann JP, Thompson D, Jayasena D, et al. Quality of life and emotional responses in cadaver and living related renal transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 2204–2211.PubMed

24.

Craven J, Littlefield C, Rodin G, Murray M. The Endstage Renal Disease Severity Index (ESRD-SI). Psychol Med 1991; 21: 237–241.PubMed

25.

Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychol Rev 1988; 8:77–100.

26.

Watnick S, Wang PL, Demadura T, et al. Validation of 2 depression screening tools in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46: 919–924.PubMed

27.

Chilcot J, Wellsted DM, Farrington K. Screening for depression while patients dialyze. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 2653–65.PubMed

28.

Ziegelmann JP, Griva K, Hankins M et al. The Transplant Effects Questionnaire (TxEQ). The development of a questionnaire to assess the multidimensional outcome of organ transplantation: Example of end-stage renal disease. Br J Health Psychol 2002; 7:393–408.PubMed

29.

Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire: The development and evaluation of a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of medication. Psychol Health 1999; 14: 1–24

30.

Hays, RD, Kallich, JD, Mapes, DL, Coons, SJ, Amin, N, & Carter, B. Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF ^TM ), Version 1.3: A Manual for Use and Scoring. Santa Monica, CA: Rand P-7994; 1997

31.

Horne R, Clatworthy J, Polmear A, Weinman J. Do hypertensive patients’ beliefs about their illness and treatment influence medication adherence and quality of life? J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: S65–S68.PubMed

32.

Butler JA, Peveler RC, Roderick P et al . Measuring compliance with drug regimens after renal transplantation: Comparison of self-report and clinician rating with electronic monitoring, Transplantation 2004; 77:786–789.PubMed

33.

Lacy CF, Armstrong LL, Goldman MP, Lance LL. Drug Information Handbook – Pocket. Hudson: Lexi-Comp, Inc.; 2003.

34.

Schäfer-Keller P, Steiger J, Bock A, Denhaerynck K, De Geest S. Diagnostic accuracy of measurement methods to assess non-adherence to immunosuppressive drugs in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8:616–626.PubMed

35.

Cramer JA, Scheyer RD, Mattson RH. Compliance declines between clinic visits. Arch Intern Med 1990; 150: 1509–1510.PubMed

36.

Chisholm MA Mulloy LL, DiPiro JT. Comparing renal transplant patients’ adherence to free cyclosporine and free tacrolimus immunosuppressant therapy. Clin Transplant 2005; 19:77–82.PubMed

37.

Van Dulmen S, Sluijs E, Van Dijk L, De Ridder D, Heerdink R, Bensing J. Patient adherence to medical treatment: A review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7:55.PubMed

38.

Unni E J, Farris KB. Unintentional non-adherence and belief in medicines in older adults. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 265–268.PubMed

39.

Wetzels GEC, Nelemans P, Schouten JS, Prins MH. Facts and fiction of poor compliance as a cause of inadequate blood pressure control: A systematic review. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 1849–1855.PubMed

40.

Schroeder K, Fahey T, Ebrahim S. How can we improve adherence to blood pressure -lowering medication in ambulatory care? Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 722–732.PubMed

41.

Caplin B, Kumar S, Davenport A. Patients’ perspective of haemodialysis-associated symptoms. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26:2656–63.PubMed

42.

Spencer BW, Chilcot J, Farrington K. Still sad after successful renal transplantation: Are we failing to recognise depression? An audit of depression screening in renal graft recipients. Nephron Clin Pract 2011; 117:106–112.

43.

Chisholm MA, Kwong WJ, Spivey CA. Associations of characteristics of renal transplant recipients with clinicians’ perception of adherence to immunosuppressant therapy. Transplantation 2007; 84: 1145–1150PubMed

44.

Frazier P, Davis-Ali S, Dahl K. Correlates of noncompliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994; 8: 550PubMed

45.

Van der Mai SF, Van Sonderen ELLP, Van Son WJ, De Jong PL, Groothoff JW, Van de Heuvel WJA. Social participation after successful kidney transplantation. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29: 473–483.

46.

DiMatteo MR. Social Support and adherence to medical treatment: A metaanalysis. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 207–18.PubMed

47.

Einollahi B, Tavallaii SA, Bahaeloo-Horeh S, Omranifard V, Salehi-Rad S, Khoddami-Vishteh HR. Marital relationship and its correlates in kidney transplant recipients. Psychol Health Med 2009; 14:162–169.PubMed

48.

Kiley DJ, Lam CS, Pollak R. A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 55: 51–56.PubMed

49.

UK Renal Registry. UK Renal Registry Report 2000. Bristol UK: 2000.

50.

Cortazar F, Molnar MZ, Isakova T, et al. Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Long-Term Therapy With Inhibitors of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin. Am J Transplant 2012; 12: 379–387.PubMed

51.

Webster AC, Lee VW, Chapman JR, Craig JC. Target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression of kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Transplantation 2006; 81: 1234–1248PubMed

52.

Samaniego M, Becker BN, Djamali A. Drug Insight: Maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2006; 12: 688–699.

Titel: Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Kidney Transplantation: Intent Vs. Forgetfulness and Clinical Markers of Medication Intake
verfasst von: Konstadina Griva, Ph.D.
Andrew Davenport, FDRC
Michael Harrison, FDRC
Stanton P. Newman, Ph.D.
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9359-4

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Non-adherence to Immunosuppressive Medications in Kidney Transplantation: Intent Vs. Forgetfulness and Clinical Markers of Medication Intake

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Type D Personality and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Models Under Scrutiny—the Strengths and Limitations of Our Theoretical Frameworks: a Comment on Holla et al.

Behavioral Medicine Approaches to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Avoidance of Activities in Early Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: Results from the CHECK Cohort

Doing What Feels Good (and Avoiding What Feels Bad)—a Growing Recognition of the Influence of Affect on Exercise Behavior: a Comment on Williams et al.

Circadian Disruption—a New Direction for Psycho-oncology Research? A Comment on Dedert et al.

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung