Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 4/2024

29.02.2024 | Others

Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the ninth nationwide survey in 2022

verfasst von: Atsutaka Okizaki, Yoshihiro Nishiyama, Yoshitaka Inui, Hideki Otsuka, Kentaro Takanami, Masatoyo Nakajo, Koya Nakatani, Munenobu Nogami, Kenji Hirata, Yukito Maeda, Mana Yoshimura, Hiroshi Wakabayashi

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Subcommittee on Survey of Nuclear Medicine Practice in Japan has performed a nationwide survey of nuclear medicine practice every 5 years since 1982 to survey contemporary nuclear medicine practice and its changes over the years. The subcommittee sent questionnaires, including the number and category of examinations as well as the kind of the radiopharmaceuticals during the 30 days of June 2022 to all nuclear medicine institutes in Japan. The total numbers of them for the year 2022 were estimated depends on the 1-month data. A total of 1095 institutes responded to the survey, including 364 positron emission tomography (PET) centers. The recovery rate was 90.6%. The number of gamma cameras installed was 1299 in total, with 2.5% decrease in 5 years. Dual-head cameras and hybrid SPECT/CT scanners accounted for 83.8% and 35.5%, respectively. The number of single-photon tracer studies in 2022 was 1.11 million which means increase in 2.7% in 5 years. Bone scintigraphy was a leading examination (31.0%), followed by myocardial scintigraphy (27.1%) and cerebral perfusion study (23.8%) in order. The percentage of SPECT studies showed an increase from 63.5% in previous survey to 66.8% in this survey. PET centers have also increased from 389 to 412, as compared with the previous one. One hundred and twenty-two PET centers have installed one or two in-house cyclotrons. Increasing trends of the PET studies were observed from 1992 to 2017, the trend changed and PET studies showed 1.5% decrease in 5 years. 18F-FDG accounted for 98.6% (610,497 examinations). PET examinations using 11C-methionine, 13N-NH3 and 11C-PIB have decreased, with 1624, 2146 and 525 examinations, respectively in 2022. The total number of nuclear medicine examination was eventually increased by 1.0%. Therapies for pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (PPGL) with 131I-MIBG and for neuroendocrine tumor with 177Lu-DOTA-TATE were newly started, however, a total number of targeted radionuclide therapy was decreased by 17.7% because 131I-radioiodine and 223Ra targeted therapies were decreased and supply of some radioisotopes was discontinued. 131I-radioiodine targeted therapy showed a decrease in 5 years (− 15.9%), including 4099 patients for thyroid cancer. The number of out-patient thyroid bed ablation therapy with 1110 MBq of 131I was also decreased to 1015 per year. The number of admission rooms specialized for radionuclide targeted therapy increased from 157 to 160. The number of 223Ra targeted therapies for castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) was 1041 patients. This survey was performed during COVID-19 pandemic, however, total number of nuclear medicine examinations was almost same as previous survey (+ 1.0%). Radionuclide therapies with 131I-MIBG and 177Lu-DOTA-TATE were newly started, and new radionuclide therapy will be available in future, therefore, the development of radionuclide therapy will be continued. We are convinced that this survey report is useful in understanding the current status of the nuclear medicine practice in Japan, and in devising the new strategy to strengthen a role of nuclear medicine.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita F, Sasaki Y, Iio M, Iinuma T, Irie M, Uchiyama A, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the nationwide survey using ICPM code of WHO. Radioisotopes. 1983;32:454–67 (In Japanese).CrossRef Kinoshita F, Sasaki Y, Iio M, Iinuma T, Irie M, Uchiyama A, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the nationwide survey using ICPM code of WHO. Radioisotopes. 1983;32:454–67 (In Japanese).CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinoshita F, Sasaki Y, Uchiyama A, Ochi H, Kanao K, Kaneko M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 2nd nationwide survey in 1987. Radioisotopes. 1989;38:219–28 (In Japanese).CrossRef Kinoshita F, Sasaki Y, Uchiyama A, Ochi H, Kanao K, Kaneko M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 2nd nationwide survey in 1987. Radioisotopes. 1989;38:219–28 (In Japanese).CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasaki Y, Kubo A, Itoh K, Endo K, Odano I, Kawakami K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 3rd nationwide survey in 1992. Radioisotopes. 1993;42(Suppl):1–39 (In Japanese). Sasaki Y, Kubo A, Itoh K, Endo K, Odano I, Kawakami K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 3rd nationwide survey in 1992. Radioisotopes. 1993;42(Suppl):1–39 (In Japanese).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kubo A, Tamaki N, Ichiya Y, Inoue T, Odano I, Koizumi K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 4th nationwide survey in 1997. Radioisotopes. 1998;47(Suppl):1–54 (In Japanese). Kubo A, Tamaki N, Ichiya Y, Inoue T, Odano I, Koizumi K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 4th nationwide survey in 1997. Radioisotopes. 1998;47(Suppl):1–54 (In Japanese).
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamaki N, Koizumi K, Inoue T, Kanaya S, Kuwabara Y, Kousaka T, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 5th nationwide survey in 2002. Radioisotopes. 2003;52:389–446 (In Japanese).CrossRef Tamaki N, Koizumi K, Inoue T, Kanaya S, Kuwabara Y, Kousaka T, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 5th nationwide survey in 2002. Radioisotopes. 2003;52:389–446 (In Japanese).CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi K, Tamaki N, Inoue T, Kanaya S, Kuwabara Y, Kousaka T, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the 5th nationwide survey in 2002. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:73–8.CrossRefPubMed Koizumi K, Tamaki N, Inoue T, Kanaya S, Kuwabara Y, Kousaka T, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the 5th nationwide survey in 2002. Ann Nucl Med. 2004;18:73–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi K, Kuwabara Y, Ushijima Y, Kinuya S, Kinomura S, Suga K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 6th nationwide survey in 2007. Radioisotopes. 2008;57:491–558 (In Japanese).CrossRef Koizumi K, Kuwabara Y, Ushijima Y, Kinuya S, Kinomura S, Suga K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 6th nationwide survey in 2007. Radioisotopes. 2008;57:491–558 (In Japanese).CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuwabara Y, Koizumi K, Ushijima Y, Kinuya S, Kinomura S, Suga K, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the sixth nationwide survey in 2007. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:209–15.CrossRefPubMed Kuwabara Y, Koizumi K, Ushijima Y, Kinuya S, Kinomura S, Suga K, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the sixth nationwide survey in 2007. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:209–15.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuwabara Y, Kinuya S, Inoue K, Sakamoto S, Shimosegawa E, Takeoka K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 7th nationwide survey in 2012. Radioisotopes. 2013;62:545–608 (In Japanese). Kuwabara Y, Kinuya S, Inoue K, Sakamoto S, Shimosegawa E, Takeoka K, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 7th nationwide survey in 2012. Radioisotopes. 2013;62:545–608 (In Japanese).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinuya S, Kuwabara Y, Inoue K, Sakamoto S, Shimosegawa E, Takeoka K, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the seventh nationwide survey in 2012. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:1032–8.CrossRefPubMed Kinuya S, Kuwabara Y, Inoue K, Sakamoto S, Shimosegawa E, Takeoka K, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the seventh nationwide survey in 2012. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:1032–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinuya S, Nishiyama Y, Kato T, Kayano D, Sato S, Tashiro M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 8th nationwide survey in 2017. Radioisotopes. 2018;67:339–87 (In Japanese).CrossRef Kinuya S, Nishiyama Y, Kato T, Kayano D, Sato S, Tashiro M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 8th nationwide survey in 2017. Radioisotopes. 2018;67:339–87 (In Japanese).CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishiyama Y, Kinuya S, Kato T, Kayano D, Sato S, Tashiro M, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the eighth nationwide survey in 2017. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33:725–32.CrossRefPubMed Nishiyama Y, Kinuya S, Kato T, Kayano D, Sato S, Tashiro M, et al. Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the eighth nationwide survey in 2017. Ann Nucl Med. 2019;33:725–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishiyama Y, Okizaki A, Inui Y, Otsuka H, Takanami K, Nakajo M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 9th nationwide survey in 2022. Radioisotopes. 2023;72:49–100 (In Japanese).CrossRef Nishiyama Y, Okizaki A, Inui Y, Otsuka H, Takanami K, Nakajo M, et al. The present state of nuclear medicine practice in Japan—a report of the 9th nationwide survey in 2022. Radioisotopes. 2023;72:49–100 (In Japanese).CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Umeda T, Koizumi M, Fukai S, Miyaji N, Motegi K, Nakazawa S, et al. Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:105–13.CrossRefPubMed Umeda T, Koizumi M, Fukai S, Miyaji N, Motegi K, Nakazawa S, et al. Evaluation of bone metastatic burden by bone SPECT/CT in metastatic prostate cancer patients: defining threshold value for total bone uptake and assessment in radium-223 treated patients. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:105–13.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Inui Y, Toyama H, Manabe Y, Sarai M, Iwata N. Comparison of (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy, brain perfusion SPECT, and voxel-based MRI morphometry for distinguishing between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:796–804.CrossRefPubMed Inui Y, Toyama H, Manabe Y, Sarai M, Iwata N. Comparison of (123)I-MIBG myocardial scintigraphy, brain perfusion SPECT, and voxel-based MRI morphometry for distinguishing between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:796–804.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwabuchi Y, Nakahara T, Kameyama M, Yamada Y, Hashimoto M, Ogata Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the tracer distribution in dopamine transporter SPECT for objective interpretation. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:363–71.CrossRefPubMed Iwabuchi Y, Nakahara T, Kameyama M, Yamada Y, Hashimoto M, Ogata Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the tracer distribution in dopamine transporter SPECT for objective interpretation. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:363–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Elisei F, Crivellaro C, Giuliani D, Dolci C, De Ponti E, Montanelli L, et al. Sentinel-node mapping in endometrial cancer patients: comparing SPECT/CT, gamma-probe and dye. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:93–9.CrossRefPubMed Elisei F, Crivellaro C, Giuliani D, Dolci C, De Ponti E, Montanelli L, et al. Sentinel-node mapping in endometrial cancer patients: comparing SPECT/CT, gamma-probe and dye. Ann Nucl Med. 2017;31:93–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda H, Uehara T, Okazawa H, Mizumura S, Yokoyama K, Yoshimura M. The 41st report on survey of the adverse reaction to radiopharmaceuticals (The 44th survey in 2018). Kaku Igaku. 2020;57:11–21 (In Japanese).PubMed Matsuda H, Uehara T, Okazawa H, Mizumura S, Yokoyama K, Yoshimura M. The 41st report on survey of the adverse reaction to radiopharmaceuticals (The 44th survey in 2018). Kaku Igaku. 2020;57:11–21 (In Japanese).PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Okazawa H, Uehara T, Kuji I, Higashi T, Yoshimura M. The 42nd report on survey of the adverse reaction to radiopharmaceuticals (The 45th survey in 2019). Kaku Igaku. 2021;58:1–11 (In Japanese).PubMed Okazawa H, Uehara T, Kuji I, Higashi T, Yoshimura M. The 42nd report on survey of the adverse reaction to radiopharmaceuticals (The 45th survey in 2019). Kaku Igaku. 2021;58:1–11 (In Japanese).PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Okazawa H, Uehara T, Kuji I, Higashi T, Yoshimura M. The 43rd report on the survey of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals (46th survey in 2020). Kaku Igaku. 2022;59:1–12 (In Japanese).PubMed Okazawa H, Uehara T, Kuji I, Higashi T, Yoshimura M. The 43rd report on the survey of adverse reactions to radiopharmaceuticals (46th survey in 2020). Kaku Igaku. 2022;59:1–12 (In Japanese).PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Nuclear medicine practice in Japan: a report of the ninth nationwide survey in 2022
verfasst von
Atsutaka Okizaki
Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Yoshitaka Inui
Hideki Otsuka
Kentaro Takanami
Masatoyo Nakajo
Koya Nakatani
Munenobu Nogami
Kenji Hirata
Yukito Maeda
Mana Yoshimura
Hiroshi Wakabayashi
Publikationsdatum
29.02.2024
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-024-01905-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 4/2024 Zur Ausgabe