Over the past two decades, the literatures [
3,
12,
22,
26‐
32] available on the incidence of adverse retinal disorders such as macular hole that are associated with VMA has been limited. Furthermore, the findings are quite variable due to differences in a range of factors; these include the study design (cross sectional or longitudinal; prospective or retrospective), the diagnostic tools used (ultrasound, OCT, etc) and the different criteria utilized to define the classification and diagnosis of VMA or vitreomacular separation (with or without acute symptoms) [
2‐
4,
8,
12,
22,
27]. Additionally, a recent retrospective multicenter study [
27] has reported that full thickness macular holes occurred in 7 out of 168 eyes (4.2%) with vitreomacular traction. This differs to some extent to the present retrospective study in which the incidence of full thickness macular holes was 6.5% (8 out of 124 eyes). Compared to the present results, it has been suggested that VMA and vitreomacular traction appear to be two different entities in view of the difference in the incidence (6.5% vs. 4.2%) of full thickness macular hole [
27]. There are also differences in SD-OCT-based findings, namely without or with interruption of all foveal retinal layers and distortion of the foveal contour (normal depression vs. dome-shaped elevation; see also Supplementary file
2) [
2,
3,
11,
12,
27]. In contrast to the vitreomacular traction associated idiopathic full thickness macular hole that occurs sometimes in the presence of foveal detachment due to vertical traction [
12], none of the present eight VMA eyes with subsequent full thickness macular hole complications showed foveal detachment. Gass [
28] has postulated that premacular vitreous tangential contraction might lead to a macular hole. This hypothesis regarding tangential vitreoretinal traction has been replaced by a newer theory, which suggests that macular holes are the result of anteroposterior vitreofoveal traction in the perifoveal area [
12,
22,
29,
30]. However, the postulation of Gass seems to explain better the present finding, which is that six out of eight eyes (Tables
1 and
2) displayed V-shaped VMAs (Figs.
2a,
3a and
4a) and that this state might have induced tangential traction resulting in the complication, specifically, full thickness macular hole. Compared to VMA with unilateral hyaloid membrane separation, V-shaped VMAs perhaps indicate a bilateral pull with greater traction force. This might then be more likely to induce macular hole formation. However, this hypothesis needs further investigation. In a prospective report of Johnson, Van Mewkirk and Meyer [
32], it was shown by the SD-OCT that perifoveal vitreous detachment was the initial pathogenesis associated with grade 1–2 macular hole (
n = 26). Moreover, persistent vitreofoveolar adherence, namely VMA [
3], was evident in 18 eyes of those eyes with defined macular hole. This evidence [
32] also strongly supports why eyes with VMA in the present study have a significant greater possibility of ocular complications, such as macular hole (
n = 8), than eyes with vitreomacular separation. In contrast to the above, the study of Carrero [
8] was prospective and the recruited eyes had acute symptoms; this might have contributed to his finding that macular holes were not found.
Tsai et al. [
12] and Theodossiadis et al. [
22] have reported that the vitreomacular angles between the posterior vitreous membrane and the horizontal lines of the retina (inner retinal surface [
12] or retinal pigment epithelium [
22]) are proportionally associated with the severity of vitreomacular traction [
22,
31,
33]. Their findings [12. 22] seem to support the present results whereby the mean vitreomacular angle (Fig.
2; Table
2) of the eight eyes with VMA and consequent sequelae, i.e. macular holes, was significantly (
p = 0.04) higher at 24.2°, with possible stronger traction force, compared to those of patients without adverse complications (
n = 104; at 13.6°). This is not inconsistent with a recent prospective study [
31] where out of fifty one cases of VMA (2%), one case (Case 2) with an initial vitreomacular angle 27° nasally or 20° temporally [
31] [vs. 31.2° nasally or 24.6° temporally (measured by the present measurement method)] showed an evolved vitreofoveal separation associated with a highly suspected complicated macular hole. This was in spite of an intact external limiting membrane (presumably due to healing process), 10 days after the last examination in the VMA stage. To determine whether VMA eyes with a vitreomacular angle more than the present critical vitreomacular angle of 13.3° (mean) have a greater possibility of associated macular hole complication requires a larger scale investigation. On the other hand, Tsai et al. [
12] and Spaide et al. [
26] have suggested that the wider the diameter of the VMA, the stronger the traction exerted on the fovea. However, the adhesion diameters (mean: 239.0 ± 52.5 μm) in the present study are somewhat difficult to be definitively measured, for example the broad typed VMA [
3] nasal to the fovea presented in Case 2 (Fig.
1a). V-shaped vitreomacular traction has been reported to lead to tractional macular hole [
25]. This seems also to be the case in our study and the above study when there are initial V-shaped VMAs, specifically for six out of 8 eyes with complicated macular holes in the present study (Tables
1 and
2) and for the above mentioned Case 2 with a suspected complicated macular hole in Figure 6 (middle) of a recent publication [
31]. Classification of VMA induced macular hole, based on the morphology, seems to be at present the most practical approach, rather than one based on the diameter of the adhesion.