nach oben

International Urology and Nephrology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2015 | Urology - Review

Open partial nephrectomy: ancient art or currently available technique?

verfasst von: Mauro Seveso, Fabio Grizzi, Giorgio Bozzini, Alberto Mandressi, Giorgio Guazzoni, Gianluigi Taverna

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 3 % of adult solid tumors, with the highest incidence between 50 and 70 years of age. Nephron-sparing surgery was initially reserved to patients with small renal masses detected in anatomically or functionally solitary kidney or in the presence of multiple bilateral tumors or hereditary forms of RCC, which posed a high risk of developing a tumor in the contralateral kidney. Nowadays, partial nephrectomy (PN) has grown up to an established approach for the treatment of small renal masses. In patients with T1a-staged RCCs, PN has proven to be associated with better survival, long-term renal function preservation with lower dialysis need or renal transplantation. Currently, most of the kidney masses are incidentally detected, up to 40 %, with smaller size due to the widespread use of imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Here we review the role of open PN in the management of small renal masses particularly focusing on indications, oncological outcomes and comparison with laparoscopic and robotic PN. Recent studies demonstrate that PN confers better survival, oncologic equivalence and lower risk of severe chronic kidney disease compared to radical nephrectomy becoming then the gold-standard surgical technique, even if increasingly challenged by laparoscopic and/or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy which in the hands of experts seems to achieve comparable outcome results albeit with slightly higher complication rate.

Uzzo RG, Novick AC (2001) Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 166(1):6–18CrossRefPubMed

Margreiter M, Marberger M (2010) Current status of open partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 20(5):361–364. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833c7b2d CrossRefPubMed

Kane CJ, Mallin K, Ritchey J, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR (2008) Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 113(1):78–83. doi:10.1002/cncr.23518 CrossRefPubMed

Kirkali Z, Canda AE (2008) Open partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses. Adv Urol. doi:10.1155/2008/309760 PubMedCentralPubMed

Herr HW (2005) A history of partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. J Urol 173(3):705–708. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000146270.65101.1d CrossRefPubMed

Licht MR, Novick AC (1993) Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 149(1):1–7PubMed

Russo P, Huang W (2008) The medical and oncological rationale for partial nephrectomy for the treatment of T1 renal cortical tumors. Urol Clin N Am 35(4):635–643. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2008.07.008 (vii) CrossRef

Lee CT, Katz J, Shi W, Thaler HT, Reuter VE, Russo P (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemporary cohort. J Urol 163(3):730–736CrossRefPubMed

Patel SG, Penson DF, Pabla B, Clark PE, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr, Barocas DA (2012) National trends in the use of partial nephrectomy: a rising tide that has not lifted all boats. J Urol 187(3):816–821. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.173 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Miller DC, Schonlau M, Litwin MS, Lai J, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2008) Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer 112(3):511–520. doi:10.1002/cncr.23218 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, Novick AC (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167(2 Pt 1):467–469 (discussion 475–466)

12.

Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S (2009) Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol 55(5):1171–1178. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Zheng JH, Zhang XL, Geng J, Guo CC, Zhang XP, Che JP, Yan Y, Peng B, Wang GC, Xia SQ, Wu Y (2013) Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy. Chin Med J 126(15):2938–2942PubMed

14.

Minervini A, Siena G, Antonelli A, Bianchi G, Bocciardi AM, Cosciani Cunico S, Ficarra V, Fiori C, Fusco F, Mari A, Martorana G, Medica M, Mirone V, Morgia G, Porpiglia F, Rocco F, Rovereto B, Schiavina R, Simeone C, Terrone C, Volpe A, Carini M, Serni S, Members of the RP-LF (2014) Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project). World J Urol 32(1):257–263. doi:10.1007/s00345-013-1155-7 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Laviana AA, Hu JC (2014) Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies. World J Urol 32(3):591–596. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1277-6 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Breau RH, Crispen PL, Jenkins SM, Blute ML, Leibovich BC (2011) Treatment of patients with small renal masses: a survey of the American Urological Association. J Urol 185(2):407–413. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.092 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Sharma V, Margreiter M (2013) Partial nephrectomy: is there still a need for open surgery? Curr Urol Rep 14(1):1–4. doi:10.1007/s11934-012-0297-2 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Nemr E, Azar G, Fakih F, Chalouhy E, Moukarzel M, Sarkis P, Khoury R, Ayoub N, Merhej S (2007) Partial nephrectomy for renal cancers larger than 4 cm. Prog Urol J Assoc fr Urol Soc Fr Urol 17(4):810–814

19.

Hollenbeck BK, Taub DA, Miller DC, Dunn RL, Wei JT (2006) National utilization trends of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a case of underutilization? Urology 67(2):254–259. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.050 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Campbell SC, Novick AC (2006) Expanding the indications for elective partial nephrectomy: is this advisable? Eur Urol 49(6):952–954. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.03.005 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M, Tickoo SK, Kundu S, Katz D, Nogueira L, Reuter VE, Russo P (2009) Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 181(5):2033–2036. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.027 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

22.

Leibovich BC, Blute M, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H (2004) Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy. J Urol 171(3):1066–1070. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000113274.40885.db CrossRefPubMed

23.

Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC (2000) Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol 163(2):442–445CrossRefPubMed

24.

Belldegrun A, Tsui KH, deKernion JB, Smith RB (1999) Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system. J Clin Oncol 17(9):2868–2875PubMed

25.

Patard JJ, Pantuck AJ, Crepel M, Lam JS, Bellec L, Albouy B, Lopes D, Bernhard JC, Guille F, Lacroix B, De La Taille A, Salomon L, Pfister C, Soulie M, Tostain J, Ferriere JM, Abbou CC, Colombel M, Belldegrun AS (2007) Morbidity and clinical outcome of nephron-sparing surgery in relation to tumour size and indication. Eur Urol 52(1):148–154. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.039 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Thrasher JB, Robertson JE, Paulson DF (1994) Expanding indications for conservative renal surgery in renal cell carcinoma. Urology 43(2):160–168CrossRefPubMed

27.

Dulabon LM, Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Berkman DS, Rogers CG, Petros F, Bhayani SB, Stifelman MD (2011) Multi-institutional analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for hilar versus nonhilar lesions in 446 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 59(3):325–330. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.017 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Breau RH, Crispen PL, Jimenez RE, Lohse CM, Blute ML, Leibovich BC (2010) Outcome of stage T2 or greater renal cell cancer treated with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183(3):903–908. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.037 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hafez KS, Fergany AF, Novick AC (1999) Nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of tumor size on patient survival, tumor recurrence and TNM staging. J Urol 162(6):1930–1933CrossRefPubMed

30.

Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H (2000) Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 75(12):1236–1242CrossRefPubMed

31.

Joniau S, Vander Eeckt K, Srirangam SJ, Van Poppel H (2009) Outcome of nephron-sparing surgery for T1b renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 103(10):1344–1348. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08230.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Thompson RH, Frank I, Lohse CM, Saad IR, Fergany A, Zincke H, Leibovich BC, Blute ML, Novick AC (2007) The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 177(2):471–476. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.036 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Pahernik S, Roos F, Rohrig B, Wiesner C, Thuroff JW (2008) Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm. J Urol 179(1):71–74. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.165 (discussion 74) CrossRefPubMed

34.

Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB, Klein E, Licht M (1994) Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors. J Urol 151(5):1177–1180PubMed

35.

Van Poppel H, Bamelis B, Oyen R, Baert L (1998) Partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma can achieve long-term tumor control. J Urol 160(3 Pt 1):674–678CrossRefPubMed

36.

Stephenson AJ, Hakimi AA, Snyder ME, Russo P (2004) Complications of radical and partial nephrectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 171(1):130–134. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000101281.04634.13 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky G (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional, and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol 31(1):51–56. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.10.008 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

38.

Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR Jr, Frank I, Permpongkosol S, Weight CJ, Kaouk JH, Kattan MW, Novick AC (2007) Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178(1):41–46. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV (1993) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 7(6):521–526CrossRef

40.

Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, Renard J, Scarpa RM (2008) Assessment of risk factors for complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 53(3):590–596. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.10.036 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Lane BR, Gill IS (2010) 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183(2):473–479. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.023 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Wadhwa P, Seth A, Gupta NP (2007) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol 177(3):862–866. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.053 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Tan HJ, Wolf JS Jr, Ye Z, Hafez KS, Miller DC (2014) Population level assessment of hospital based outcomes following laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy during the adoption of minimally invasive surgery. J Urol 191(5):1231–1237. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.11.002 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Marberger M (2007) Renal ischaemia: not a problem in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? BJU Int 99(1):3–4. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06612.x CrossRefPubMed

45.

Volpe A, Amparore D, Mottrie A (2013) Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours. Curr Opin Urol 23(5):403–410. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e328363a5c0 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Lifshitz DA, Shikanov SA, Deklaj T, Katz MH, Zorn KC, Shalhav AL (2010) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm: a comparative study. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24(1):49–55. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0348 CrossRef

47.

Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161(3):887–890CrossRefPubMed

48.

Siemer S, Lahme S, Altziebler S, Machtens S, Strohmaier W, Wechsel HW, Goebell P, Schmeller N, Oberneder R, Stolzenburg JU, Becker H, Luftenegger W, Tetens V, Van Poppel H (2007) Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study. Eur Urol 52(4):1156–1163. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.027 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, Mascha E, Thornton J, Sherief MH, Strzempkowski B, Novick AC (2003) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 170(1):64–68. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000072272.02322.ff CrossRefPubMed

50.

Janetschek G (2007) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for RCC: how can we avoid ischemic damage of the renal parenchyma? Eur Urol 52(5):1303–1305. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.006 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, Stief C, Gill I, Guazzoni G, Montorsi F, Russo P, Stockle M (2009) Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56(4):625–634. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.016 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Breda A, Stepanian SV, Liao J, Lam JS, Guazzoni G, Stifelman M, Perry K, Celia A, Breda G, Fornara P, Jackman S, Rosales A, Palou J, Grasso M, Pansadoro V, Disanto V, Porpiglia F, Milani C, Abbou C, Gaston R, Janetschek G, Soomro NA, de la Rosette J, Laguna MP, Schulam PG (2007) Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe. J Urol 178(1):47–50. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.045 (discussion 50) CrossRefPubMed

53.

Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, Fergany AF, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol 179(3):847–851. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.050 (discussion 852) CrossRefPubMed

54.

Thompson RH, Siddiqui S, Lohse CM, Leibovich BC, Russo P, Blute ML (2009) Partial versus radical nephrectomy for 4 to 7 cm renal cortical tumors. J Urol 182(6):2601–2606. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.087 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

55.

Liu Z, Wang P, Xia D, Lou YF, Pan HF, Wang S (2013) Comparison between laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 29(11):624–628. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2013.01.021 CrossRefPubMed

56.

Matin SF, Gill IS, Worley S, Novick AC (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 cm or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney. J Urol 168(4 Pt 1):1356–1359. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000025392.88454.47 (discussion 1359–1360) CrossRefPubMed

57.

Sprenkle PC, Power N, Ghoneim T, Touijer KA, Dalbagni G, Russo P, Coleman JA (2012) Comparison of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal tumors 4–7 centimeters. Eur Urol 61(3):593–599. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.040 CrossRefPubMed

58.

Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914–918. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.049 CrossRefPubMed

59.

Singh I (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: current review of the technique and literature. J Minim Access Surg 5(4):87–92. doi:10.4103/0972-9941.59305 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

60.

White MA, Haber GP, Autorino R, Khanna R, Hernandez AV, Forest S, Yang B, Altunrende F, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH (2011) Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of >/=7. Urology 77(4):809–813. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.005 CrossRefPubMed

61.

Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V (2010) Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 58(1):127–132. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.045 CrossRefPubMed

62.

Lee S, Oh J, Hong SK, Lee SE, Byun SS (2011) Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: effect on clinical outcome. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 25(7):1181–1185. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0670 CrossRef

63.

Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, Li T, Reyes JM, Canter D, Kutikov A, Chen DY, Greenberg RE, Uzzo RG, Viterbo R (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J Urol 187(6):2000–2004. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.064 CrossRefPubMed

64.

Minervini A (2014) Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of perioperative results and complications. World J Urol 32(1):287–293. doi:10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x CrossRefPubMed

65.

Autorino R, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, Samarasekera D, Rizkala E, Eyraud R, Stein RJ, Haber GP, Kaouk JH (2014) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience. BJU Int 113(5):762–768. doi:10.1111/bju.12455 CrossRefPubMed

66.

Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V, Haertig A, Chartier-Kastler E, Bitker MO, Vaessen C, Roupret M (2013) A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 31(6):924–929. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.08.004 CrossRefPubMed

67.

Ficarra V, Minervini A, Antonelli A, Bhayani S, Guazzoni G, Longo N, Martorana G, Morgia G, Mottrie A, Porter J, Simeone C, Vittori G, Zattoni F, Carini M (2014) A multicentre matched-pair analysis comparing robot-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 113(6):936–941. doi:10.1111/bju.12570 CrossRefPubMed

68.

Lucas SM, Mellon MJ, Erntsberger L, Sundaram CP (2012) A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg (JSLS)/Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16(4):581–587. doi:10.4293/108680812X13462882737177 CrossRef

69.

Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, Buffi N, Lee R, Cestari A, Mottrie A (2012) Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 61(2):395–402. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.046 CrossRefPubMed

70.

Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, Linehan WM, Pinto PA (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53(3):514–521. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.047 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

71.

Parsons JK, Palazzi K, Chang D, Stroup SP (2013) Patient safety and the diffusion of surgical innovations: a national analysis of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 27(5):1674–1680. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2655-z CrossRefPubMed

72.

Mir SA, Cadeddu JA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y (2011) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 25(3):447–453. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0510 CrossRef

73.

Castle SM, Gorbatiy V, Avallone MA, Eldefrawy A, Caulton DE, Leveillee RJ (2013) Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses. Urol Oncol 31(7):1327–1332. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.01.006 CrossRefPubMed

74.

Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA (2005) A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour. BJU Int 95(7):1039–1042. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05461.x CrossRefPubMed

75.

Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 363(8):701–704. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1006602 CrossRefPubMed

76.

Alemozaffar M, Chang SL, Kacker R, Sun M, DeWolf WC, Wagner AA (2013) Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 27(5):560–565. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0462 CrossRef

77.

Laydner H, Isac W, Autorino R, Kassab A, Yakoubi R, Hillyer S, Khalifeh A, Campbell SC, Fergany A, Simmons M, Kaouk JH (2013) Single institutional cost analysis of 325 robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies. Urology 81(3):533–538. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.104 CrossRefPubMed

78.

Zekri J, Dreosti LM, Ghosn M, Hamada E, Jaloudi M, Khorshid O, Larbaoui B (2015) Multidisciplinary management of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in Africa and the Middle East: current practice and recommendations for improvement. J Multidiscip Healthc 8:335–344. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S85538 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Open partial nephrectomy: ancient art or currently available technique?
verfasst von: Mauro Seveso
Fabio Grizzi
Giorgio Bozzini
Alberto Mandressi
Giorgio Guazzoni
Gianluigi Taverna
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1120-z

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

25.04.2024 Allergien und Intoleranzreaktionen Nachrichten

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

Hyponatremia in the outpatient setting: clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcome

Excellent graft and patient survival after renal transplantation from donors after brain death with acute kidney injury: a case–control study

Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy

Role of Smad signaling in kidney disease

The association of high sCD163/sTWEAK ratio with cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis patients