Background
The identification of immune correlates of protection and risk against malaria is particularly challenging when dealing with a complex pathogen like
Plasmodium falciparum, which has a proteome of over 5000 proteins (
http://www.plasmodb.org), some of them polymorphic and/or variant. Consequently, malaria infection induces a very broad and diverse antigen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) subtype response [
1,
2]. Although the crucial role of IgG antibodies in protective malaria immunity was demonstrated long time ago [
3,
4], the antigenic targets of these antibodies have not yet been identified. However, it is presumed that such IgG responses are primarily directed to antigens on the surface of the
P. falciparum asexual blood stage (BS). Numerous immune-epidemiological surveys have reported significant associations between levels of BS-specific IgG antibodies and protection from clinical malaria [
5‐
7]. However, most of these studies have only described the magnitude of IgG responses and little is known about their subtypes, quality and functionality. Thus, the mechanisms mediating antibody immunity are not fully elucidated.
Early in vitro studies suggested that inhibitory IgG antibodies may control
P. falciparum growth in collaboration with monocytes through opsonic phagocytosis [
8‐
10] or antibody-dependent cellular inhibition [
11]. Collectively, studies have pointed to cytophilic IgG subclasses (IgG1 and IgG3) as the main contributors to naturally-acquired immunity, suggesting that cells bearing Fc-g receptors are involved in protective immune mechanisms [
12‐
16]. Recent studies have also highlighted the potential importance of IgM [
17,
18] or IgE [
19,
20] in malaria protection or risk, respectively, but these isotypes have been much less studied in the malaria field. Further studies addressing antibody isotypes, subclasses, and their antigenic breadth are needed to define correlates in natural and in artificial immunity induced by vaccines such as the RTS,S/AS01E and those based on attenuated sporozoites.
RTS,S/AS01E is the most advanced malaria vaccine in development globally [
21], however the immune surrogates of protection, the mode of action, and how vaccination affects or is affected by naturally-acquired immunity, remain unclear. A better characterization of the malaria serological profile at the Ig isotype and subclass levels could help address these questions. However, widely applicable standardized, miniaturized, multiplex, high-throughput assays, able to measure all Ig isotypes and subclasses, have been lacking.
The quantitative suspension array technology (qSAT) is an optimal platform for malaria biomarker discovery. The qSAT is a mid-high throughput platform that allows measuring multiple antigen-specific antibodies (up to 500) in small sample volumes and in one single reaction. To study the mechanisms of immunity in malaria, several in-house qSAT assays using panels of up to 15
P. falciparum antigens were previously developed to measure total IgG [
22], IgG
1–4, IgM and IgE [
23] and factors affecting IgG assay variability evaluated (Ubillos et al., pers. comm.). However, a major challenge in the development of serological tests has been the lack of standardized positive controls [
24] to allow comparability of data generated in different assays and laboratories, particularly when assessing large antigenic panels and diverse antibody isotypes/subclasses in samples of heterogeneous origin. Recently, a
P. falciparum-specific human serum reference reagent (10/198) stable at high temperature and up to 24 months of storage has been described [
25] that reduced inter-laboratory variation. This WHO standard has been characterized by ELISA to contain IgGs that recognize the circumsporozoite surface protein (CSP) and a handful of
P. falciparum antigens from different genotypes: the merozoite surface protein (MSP)-1
19 (K1 strain), MSP-1
42 (3D7), MSP-2 (3D7), MSP-3 (K1), and the apical membrane antigen (AMA)-1 (3D7, FC27 and FP3). The malaria community would benefit from having wider information on antigenic recognition of this reference reagent.
In previous studies, antigen-coupled beads were incubated with samples for 1 h at room temperature [
22,
23,
26,
27]. Temperature of incubation influences the antigen–antibody affinity [
28,
29] and 1 h might not ensure the appropriate association/dissociation equilibrium. Hence, expanded incubation times with lower (4 °C) and higher (37 °C) temperatures could affect the assay performance.
In this study, a broader antibody reactivity profile of the WHO reference reagent and other customized positive controls was examined with seven in-house qSAT antibody assays measuring IgG, IgG1–4, IgM and IgE against a panel of 40 antigens, including P. falciparum proteins that are part of the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine. This information will be generalizable to other applications and large sero-epidemiological and vaccine studies of sporozoite and BS antigen targets, being useful for the malaria research community as a whole. In addition, different sample incubation times and temperatures (4 °C overnight, 37 °C 2 h, room temperature 1 h) were tested to select the incubation conditions rendering the optimal quantification range and higher sensitivity without increasing unspecific binding.
Discussion
A major challenge in large malaria sero-epidemiological and vaccine studies is to have access to consistent and unlimited control reagents that provide assay quality control and facilitate data consolidation. A universal malaria reference pool would be ideal to monitor performance of serological assays, improve inter-laboratory reproducibility, make data from different studies comparable, and potentially give quantitative antibody measures. In this study, information was provided on the expanded antibody reactivity profile of the commercially available WHO reference reagent for anti-malaria (
P. falciparum) human plasma (10/198) [
25] and other customized positive controls by using seven in-house qSAT multiplex antibody assays to measure IgG, IgG
1–4, IgM and IgE against a panel of 40 antigens, including
P. falciparum proteins that are part of the RTS,S/AS01E vaccine. In addition, different sample incubation times and temperatures (4 °C ON, 37 °C 2 h, RT 1 h) were tested for the qSAT assays to select the incubation conditions rendering the optimal quantification range and higher sensitivity without increasing unspecific binding. Data generated in this study will be useful for clinical malaria studies involving assessment of naturally-acquired immune responses as well as immunogenicity evaluation of CSP-based vaccine candidates.
The estimation of malaria antibody concentration in multiplex assays is increasingly difficult. There are not appropriate standards or reference sera available that react strongly to complex antigen panels. Antibody concentrations have been previously estimated using an anti-human IgG curve [
22,
23,
26,
27]. However, the binding system and the affinity of the anti-human IgG curve differ from that of antibodies in samples or positive controls. Thus, different assay conditions give different slopes and curve parameters that could result in large deviations of concentration estimates. Thus, it has been recently reported that MFI responses measured independently from a standard curve might reflect actual variation, while estimated concentration values are dictated by the precision of the standard curve [
70]. As an alternative, the use of long positive control curves provide upper and lower asymptotes for most antigens, and allow establishing the linear quantification ranges, representing the optimal range to capture the breadth of antibody response in individual samples. However, a reference human serum pool with known levels of anti-
P. falciparum antibody concentrations is highly desirable for the malaria community. The challenge remains in sourcing adequate serum/plasma pools that cover all antigens as panels become larger and more complex.
To test the immuneprofile of the WHO reference reagent, antigen and isotype/subclass-specific curves constructed with serial dilutions of the reagent were fitted in non-linear equations, establishing the linear quantification ranges. Generation of curves with optimal linear quantification ranges is important to allow selecting the optimal dilution of test samples (lying on the linear range). In addition, the parameters of the curve may be used for the quality control of the assay. The WHO reference reagent is composed of samples from hyper-immune individuals from a malaria endemic region [
25], predominantly having anti-
P. falciparum IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies, rather than IgG2 and IgG4, reflecting the naturally-acquired antibody patterns. Thus, for most antigens, this pool is of restricted use to produce standard curves for IgG2, IgG4 or IgE antibodies, and this remains a limitation. Similarly, the WHO reference reagent might not be optimal for IgM measurements, particularly if high responses are expected in test samples. For this reason, a customized IgM pool with plasmas from naïve individuals experimentally challenged with
P. falciparum at a time point when IgM predominated over IgG was prepared. This IgM pool proved to be very adequate for the generation of IgM titration curves in the study. Thus, as the WHO reference reagent has been established to measure IgGs, a reference standard to measure IgM responses would still be lacking. Similarly, IgG2, IgG4 and IgE specific reference standards would improve the reproducibility of the malaria-based immune assays.
This study also aimed to assess the usefulness of the WHO reference reagent as a positive control to generate titration curves in the context of RTS,S immunology studies. For this reason, samples from RTS,S vaccinated children with diverse CSP and HBsAg IgG titres were assayed together with the WHO reference reagent for comparison. It is important to test samples at several dilutions to maximize the assay sensitivity, but keeping to the minimum for cost-effectiveness, which is key in large sero-epidemiological studies. For this reason RTS,S samples were assayed at 4 dilutions for IgG, 3 dilutions for IgM and IgG1, and 2 dilutions for IgG2 and IgG4. Samples from RTS,S vaccinated children had significantly higher CSP antibodies than individuals naturally-exposed to
P. falciparum sporozoites. Consequently, the WHO reference reagent could only be used to measure RTS,S-specific responses if a relative potency between the WHO reference reagent and the vaccinees samples was calculated [
71]. Alternatively, data showed that the WHO reference reagent enriched with pooled sera from RTS,S-vaccinated children (WHO-CSP pool) [
65] was adequate to capture all antibody responses, including the very high anti-CSP IgG levels in vaccinated children. To conserve the full reactivity of the WHO reference reagent to BS antigens, the WHO-CSP pool was constructed by adding half concentration of pooled plasmas from RTS,S vaccinated children (1:50 WHO reference reagent and 1:100 plasma from RTS,S vaccinees), ensuring that RTS,S specific antibodies were increased without diluting other anti-
P. falciparum antibodies. A proxy measure of relative potency of the WHO-CSP pool vs. the WHO reference reagent was estimated with EC
50. However, in 4PL and 5PL analysis, the dose–response is not the same over the entire tested concentration range, and the response changes relative to the concentration only in the middle part of the curves. Typically, these comparisons are made at the EC
50, however, these calculations are only valid under limited conditions. For instance, the dose–response curve would need to have a common slope, and the maximum achievable response should be identical [
72]. Unfortunately, these conditions are not met for the curves of most of the tested antigens and IgG subclasses. Similarly to CSP, it would be desirable to increase the WHO reference reagent reactivity to other
P. falciparum PE antigens that are also vaccine candidates like SSP2/TRAP, LSA-1 or CelTOS. Additionally, a second generation of the WHO reference reagent against other
Plasmodium species would be an advantage for other malaria immune studies in areas with
P. vivax co-infections.
The WHO-CSP pool presented GST reactivity, mainly coming from the RTS,S samples, which poses the question of whether the GST signal could be interfering with the responses to the GST-fused proteins. However, correlation analysis showed that the antibody response to GST was not associated to the antibody response against the GST-fused protein and, therefore, that responses were independent. For example, CSP-specific antibodies detected upon vaccination were very high and not interfered by anti-GST antibodies when using CSP GST fusion proteins as capture antigens. Because of these observations, the GST values were not subtracted during data pre-processing, and it was concluded that GST reactivity was not a major part of the antibody signal to the P. falciparum portion of the fused proteins. Nevertheless, the GST reactivity with CSP pools remains an unsolved limitation that will be addressed in future studies upon the application of the assays to the analysis of samples from RTS,S vaccinated volunteers using GST fusion proteins, e.g. by testing the blocking of the reactivity with soluble GST.
This first WHO reference reagent contains an arbitrary unitage of 100 Units per ampoule, however the concentrations of antibodies (IgG, IgG1–4, IgM, IgE) specific to antigens such as those tested here remain unknown. Thus, it has been suggested to the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization to assess the specific antibody concentrations in this reagent to allow absolute quantifications in future studies.
In a qSAT assay, temperature of incubation influences the reversible antigen–antibody kinetics by altering the constant association/dissociation equilibrium [
29], which can impact assay sensitivity [
73]. Raising the incubation temperature from 5 to 37 °C decreases the affinity of antigen–antibody complexes by decreasing the stability of the docking complex [
28,
74]. The conditions previously used in our laboratory for incubation of samples with antigen-coupled beads were 1 h and RT [
22,
23,
26,
27]. For this study, it was hypothesized that incubating samples for 1 h might not ensure the appropriate association/dissociation equilibrium. For this reason, expanded incubation times were tested and lower (4 °C) and higher (37 °C) temperatures were explored. Higher IgG and IgG
1–4 levels were detected when the WHO reference reagent was incubated ON at 4 °C compared to 2 h at 37 °C or 1 h at RT. The ON incubation at 4 °C increased the IgG levels detected at high concentrations of the WHO reference reagent, but also the negative control. Yet, the difference between the WHO reference reagent and the negative control was large enough to establish a positive threshold. Different incubation conditions showed small differences for the WHO reference reagent performance, but larger differences for the negative control, indicating more variability at very low IgG concentrations. The unspecific binding of IgGs to BSA-coupled beads or the background signal in the technical blanks was not affected by the incubation conditions, suggesting that the specificity of the IgG binding was not affected by incubation duration or temperature. For all these reasons, 4 °C ON was the incubation condition chosen for the anti-
P. falciparum IgG and IgG
1–4 profiling of the WHO reference reagent and the WHO-CSP pool.
The optimal incubation condition for the IgM assay was assessed using the WHO reference reagent and the IgM pool. IgM levels were higher when incubating at 4 °C ON, although no significant differences were detected between incubating at 4 °C ON or 37 °C 2 h. Similarly to IgG and IgG1–4 subclasses, IgM levels to BSA and blanks were low and not affected by the incubation condition. Based in these observations, 4 °C ON was also the incubation condition chosen for the IgM assay.
The main limitation of the IgM assay was the high reactivity of the negative control, also affected by the duration and temperature of incubation. IgMs are the first class of antibodies produced during a primary immune response. They are generated in the absence of apparent stimulation by specific antigens [
75], and are thought to aid in the neutralization of pathogens prior to the development of high affinity, antigen-specific antibodies [
76]. Natural IgMs tend to have rather low antigen-binding affinities, compensated (to some extent) by their pentameric nature. Thus, IgM is a highly polyreactive antibody [
28] and cross-reactivity of IgMs with antigens from other pathogens to which they have been exposed, or even pathogens that have not yet been “seen” by the host immune system [
77,
78], could account for the high reactivity observed in the negative control. Additional tests are currently being performed to improve the specificity of the IgM qSAT assay.
Authors’ contributions
Designed the study: IU, RA, AJ, MV, JJC, CD; performed the assays: IU, AJ, MV; provided the WHO reference reagent: PB; produced the recombinant proteins: DG, SD, BG, RC, VC, DL, CC, EA, JB, DC; wrote the first draft of the manuscript: IU, RA, CD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.