Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Familial Cancer 3/2017

22.11.2016 | Original Article

Outcomes of retesting BRCA negative patients using multigene panels

verfasst von: Siddhartha Yadav, Ashley Reeves, Sarah Campian, Amy Paine, Dana Zakalik

Erschienen in: Familial Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The utility of multigene panels in retesting patients who previously tested negative for a pathogenic mutation by BRCA1/2 testing is not well established. Patients who previously tested negative for a pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation by standard sequencing, and who were seen in cancer genetics center between November 1, 2012 and June 30, 2015 for additional testing utilizing multigene panels, were identified using our genetic testing registry. Data on demographics, personal and family history of cancer, results of panel testing and the impact on patient management was collected retrospectively. A total of 122 patients underwent retesting during the study period. Thirteen (11%) pathogenic mutations were identified in the following genes: CHEK2(4), PALB2(3), ATM(2), CDH1, APC, BARD1 and MRE11A. Eleven out of these thirteen mutations were deemed actionable based on published guidelines. Of these eleven, seven patients had an actual change in clinical management as a result of retesting. Furthermore, retesting also led to a change in clinical management in the two patients with mutations in genes (BARD1 and MRE11A) which do not have clear guidelines for management. There were no significant differences in demographics and personal and family history of cancer between patients who tested positive and those who tested negative on retesting. This study demonstrates the clinical utility of multigene panels in a group of high risk individuals who previously tested negative for a BRCA1/2 mutation. This retesting approach revealed a pathogenic mutation in 11% of cases. Retesting led to significant change in clinical management in a majority of patients with actionable mutations (7 out of 11), as well as in those with mutations in genes which do not have specific management guidelines.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang B, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Long J, Zheng W (2011) Genetic variants associated with breast-cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Lancet Oncol 12(5):477–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang B, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Long J, Zheng W (2011) Genetic variants associated with breast-cancer risk: comprehensive research synopsis, meta-analysis, and epidemiological evidence. Lancet Oncol 12(5):477–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardis ER (2008) The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet 24(3):133–141CrossRefPubMed Mardis ER (2008) The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends Genet 24(3):133–141CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Meldrum C, Doyle MA, Tothill RW (2011) Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin Biochem Rev 32(4):177–195PubMedPubMedCentral Meldrum C, Doyle MA, Tothill RW (2011) Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin Biochem Rev 32(4):177–195PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurian AW, Hare EE, Mills MA, Kingham KE, McPherson L, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, Ladabaum U, Kobayashi Y, Lincoln SE, Cargill M, Ford JM (2014) Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol 32(19):2001–2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurian AW, Hare EE, Mills MA, Kingham KE, McPherson L, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, Ladabaum U, Kobayashi Y, Lincoln SE, Cargill M, Ford JM (2014) Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Clin Oncol 32(19):2001–2009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat LaDuca H, Stuenkel AJ, Dolinsky JS, Keiles S, Tandy S, Pesaran T, Chen E, Gau CL, Palmaer E, Shoaepour K, Shah D, Speare V, Gandomi S, Chao E (2014) Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genet Med 16(11):830–837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral LaDuca H, Stuenkel AJ, Dolinsky JS, Keiles S, Tandy S, Pesaran T, Chen E, Gau CL, Palmaer E, Shoaepour K, Shah D, Speare V, Gandomi S, Chao E (2014) Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients. Genet Med 16(11):830–837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B, Kaldate R, Bhatnagar S, Bowles K, Timms K, Garber JE, Herold C, Ellisen L, Krejdovsky J, DeLeonardis K, Sedgwick K, Soltis K, Roa B, Wenstrup RJ, Hartman AR (2015) Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer 121(1):25–33CrossRefPubMed Tung N, Battelli C, Allen B, Kaldate R, Bhatnagar S, Bowles K, Timms K, Garber JE, Herold C, Ellisen L, Krejdovsky J, DeLeonardis K, Sedgwick K, Soltis K, Roa B, Wenstrup RJ, Hartman AR (2015) Frequency of mutations in individuals with breast cancer referred for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing using next-generation sequencing with a 25-gene panel. Cancer 121(1):25–33CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson M (2014) Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics. J Clin Oncol 32(19):1987–1989CrossRefPubMed Robson M (2014) Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics. J Clin Oncol 32(19):1987–1989CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, Domchek SM, Ford JM, Hampel HL, Lipkin SM, Syngal S, Wollins DS, Lindor NM (2015) American society of clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 33(31):3660–3667CrossRefPubMed Robson ME, Bradbury AR, Arun B, Domchek SM, Ford JM, Hampel HL, Lipkin SM, Syngal S, Wollins DS, Lindor NM (2015) American society of clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 33(31):3660–3667CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall MJ, Forman AD, Pilarski R, Wiesner G, Giri VN (2014) Gene panel testing for inherited cancer risk. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12(9):1339–1346CrossRefPubMed Hall MJ, Forman AD, Pilarski R, Wiesner G, Giri VN (2014) Gene panel testing for inherited cancer risk. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12(9):1339–1346CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Swisher EM (2015) Usefulness of multigene testing: catching the train that’s left the station. JAMA Oncol 1(7):951–952CrossRefPubMed Swisher EM (2015) Usefulness of multigene testing: catching the train that’s left the station. JAMA Oncol 1(7):951–952CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, Mills MA, Anderson MJ, Kobayashi Y, Horick N, Yang S, Shannon KM, Tung N, Ford JM, Lincoln SE, Ellisen LW (2015) Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol 1(7):943–951CrossRefPubMed Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, Mills MA, Anderson MJ, Kobayashi Y, Horick N, Yang S, Shannon KM, Tung N, Ford JM, Lincoln SE, Ellisen LW (2015) Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol 1(7):943–951CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartkova J, Tommiska J, Oplustilova L et al (2008) Aberrations of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 DNA damage sensor complex in human breast cancer: MRE11 as a candidate familial cancer-predisposing gene. Mol Oncol 2:296–316CrossRefPubMed Bartkova J, Tommiska J, Oplustilova L et al (2008) Aberrations of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 DNA damage sensor complex in human breast cancer: MRE11 as a candidate familial cancer-predisposing gene. Mol Oncol 2:296–316CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Damiola F, Pertesi M, Oliver J et al (2014) Rare key functional domain missense substitutions in MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN contribute to breast cancer susceptibility: results from a Breast Cancer Family Registry case-control mutation-screening study. Breast Cancer Res 16:R58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damiola F, Pertesi M, Oliver J et al (2014) Rare key functional domain missense substitutions in MRE11A, RAD50, and NBN contribute to breast cancer susceptibility: results from a Breast Cancer Family Registry case-control mutation-screening study. Breast Cancer Res 16:R58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Tischkowitz M, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL et al (2015) Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 372(23):2243–2257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Easton DF, Pharoah PD, Antoniou AC, Tischkowitz M, Tavtigian SV, Nathanson KL et al (2015) Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 372(23):2243–2257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Phimister EG (2015) Curating the way to better determinants of genetic risk. N Engl J Med 372:2227–2228CrossRefPubMed Phimister EG (2015) Curating the way to better determinants of genetic risk. N Engl J Med 372:2227–2228CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodage T, King SM, Wacholder S, Hartge P, Struewing JP, McAdams M et al (1998) The APCI1307K allele and cancer risk in a community-based study of Ashkenazi Jews. Nat Genet 20(1):62–65CrossRefPubMed Woodage T, King SM, Wacholder S, Hartge P, Struewing JP, McAdams M et al (1998) The APCI1307K allele and cancer risk in a community-based study of Ashkenazi Jews. Nat Genet 20(1):62–65CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong HL, Peters U, Hayes RB, Huang WY, Schatzkin A, Bresalier RS et al (2010) Polymorphisms in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene and advanced colorectal adenoma risk. Eur J Cancer 46(13):2457–2466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wong HL, Peters U, Hayes RB, Huang WY, Schatzkin A, Bresalier RS et al (2010) Polymorphisms in the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene and advanced colorectal adenoma risk. Eur J Cancer 46(13):2457–2466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearnhead NS, Wilding JL, Winney B, Tonks S, Bartlett S, Bicknell DC et al (2004) Multiple rare variants in different genes account for multifactorial inherited susceptibility to colorectal adenomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(45):15992–15997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fearnhead NS, Wilding JL, Winney B, Tonks S, Bartlett S, Bicknell DC et al (2004) Multiple rare variants in different genes account for multifactorial inherited susceptibility to colorectal adenomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(45):15992–15997CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A (1999) Genetic susceptibility to non-polyposis colorectal cancer. J Med Genet 36(11):801–818PubMedPubMedCentral Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A (1999) Genetic susceptibility to non-polyposis colorectal cancer. J Med Genet 36(11):801–818PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gryfe R, Di Nicola N, Lal G, Gallinger S, Redston M (1999) Inherited colorectal polyposis and cancer risk of the APC I1307K polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 64(2):378–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gryfe R, Di Nicola N, Lal G, Gallinger S, Redston M (1999) Inherited colorectal polyposis and cancer risk of the APC I1307K polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 64(2):378–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapoor NS, Curcio LD, Blakemore CA, Bremner AK, McFarland RE, West JG, Banks KC (2015) Multigene panel testing detects equal rates of pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations and has a higher diagnostic yield compared to limited BRCA1/2 Analysis alone in patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Ann SurgOncol 22(10):3282–3288 Kapoor NS, Curcio LD, Blakemore CA, Bremner AK, McFarland RE, West JG, Banks KC (2015) Multigene panel testing detects equal rates of pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations and has a higher diagnostic yield compared to limited BRCA1/2 Analysis alone in patients at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Ann SurgOncol 22(10):3282–3288
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirotsu Y, Nakagomi H, Sakamoto I, Amemiya K, Oyama T, Mochizuki H, Omata M (2015) Multigene panel analysis identified germline mutations of DNA repair genes in breast and ovarian cancer. Mol Genet Genomic Med 3(5):459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hirotsu Y, Nakagomi H, Sakamoto I, Amemiya K, Oyama T, Mochizuki H, Omata M (2015) Multigene panel analysis identified germline mutations of DNA repair genes in breast and ovarian cancer. Mol Genet Genomic Med 3(5):459–466CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Castéra L, Krieger S, Rousselin A et al (2014) Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes. Eur J Hum Genet 22(11):1305–1313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Castéra L, Krieger S, Rousselin A et al (2014) Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes. Eur J Hum Genet 22(11):1305–1313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Walsh T, Casadei S, Lee MK et al (2011) Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(44):18032–18037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walsh T, Casadei S, Lee MK et al (2011) Mutations in 12 genes for inherited ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma identified by massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(44):18032–18037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Maxwell KN, Wubbenhorst B, D’Andrea K et al (2015) Prevalence of mutations in a panel of breast cancer susceptibility genes in BRCA1/2-negative patients with early-onset breast cancer. Genet Med 17(8):630–638CrossRefPubMed Maxwell KN, Wubbenhorst B, D’Andrea K et al (2015) Prevalence of mutations in a panel of breast cancer susceptibility genes in BRCA1/2-negative patients with early-onset breast cancer. Genet Med 17(8):630–638CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D et al (2008) IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 29(11):1282–1291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D et al (2008) IARC Unclassified Genetic Variants Working Group. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 29(11):1282–1291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook-Deegan R, Conley JM, Evans JP, Vorhaus D (2013) The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? Eur J Hum Genet 21(6):585–588CrossRefPubMed Cook-Deegan R, Conley JM, Evans JP, Vorhaus D (2013) The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets? Eur J Hum Genet 21(6):585–588CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P et al (2012) CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(35):4308–4316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P et al (2012) CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(35):4308–4316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Ellervik C, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG (2008) CHEK2* 1100delC genotyping for clinical assessment of breast cancer risk: meta-analyses of 26,000 patient cases and 27,000 controls. J Clin Oncol 26(4):542–548CrossRefPubMed Weischer M, Bojesen SE, Ellervik C, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG (2008) CHEK2* 1100delC genotyping for clinical assessment of breast cancer risk: meta-analyses of 26,000 patient cases and 27,000 controls. J Clin Oncol 26(4):542–548CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Renwick A, Thompson D, Seal S et al (2006) Breast Cancer Susceptibility Collaboration (UK), Easton DF, Stratton MR, Rahman N. ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet 38(8):873–875CrossRefPubMed Renwick A, Thompson D, Seal S et al (2006) Breast Cancer Susceptibility Collaboration (UK), Easton DF, Stratton MR, Rahman N. ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet 38(8):873–875CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Njiaju UO, Olopade OI (2012) Genetic determinants of breast cancer risk: a review of current literature and issues pertaining to clinical application. Breast J 18(5):436–442CrossRefPubMed Njiaju UO, Olopade OI (2012) Genetic determinants of breast cancer risk: a review of current literature and issues pertaining to clinical application. Breast J 18(5):436–442CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston JJ, Rubinstein WS, Facio FM et al (2012) Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. Am J Hum Genet 91(1):97–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnston JJ, Rubinstein WS, Facio FM et al (2012) Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. Am J Hum Genet 91(1):97–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Post RS, Vogelaar IP, Carneiro F et al (2015) Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical guidelines with an emphasis on germline CDH1 mutation carriers. J Med Genet 52(6):361–374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Post RS, Vogelaar IP, Carneiro F et al (2015) Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: updated clinical guidelines with an emphasis on germline CDH1 mutation carriers. J Med Genet 52(6):361–374CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Lord CJ, Ashworth A (2012) The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 481(7381):287–294CrossRefPubMed Lord CJ, Ashworth A (2012) The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nature 481(7381):287–294CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME (2013) Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol 31(10):1267–1270CrossRefPubMed Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME (2013) Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol 31(10):1267–1270CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Outcomes of retesting BRCA negative patients using multigene panels
verfasst von
Siddhartha Yadav
Ashley Reeves
Sarah Campian
Amy Paine
Dana Zakalik
Publikationsdatum
22.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Familial Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9956-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Familial Cancer 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.