Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Familial Cancer 3/2007

01.09.2007

Patient preferences regarding recontact by cancer genetics clinicians

verfasst von: Constance A. Griffin, Jennifer E. Axilbund, Ann Marie Codori, Ginny Deise, Betty May, Cheryl Pendergrass, Miriam Tillery, Jill D. Trimbath, Francis M. Giardiello

Erschienen in: Familial Cancer | Ausgabe 3/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Ongoing advances in cancer genetics lead to new opportunities for early disease detection, predictive genetic testing and potential interventions. Limited information exists on patient preferences concerning recontact to provide updated information. We evaluated colon cancer genetics patient preferences concerning recontact about advances in medical genetics.

Methods

Information was mailed to 851 individuals seen at the Colon Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and to participants in a colon cancer gene testing study seen during an 8-year period. Information provided included description of advances in gene testing technology, discovery of MSH6 and MYH genes, detailed fact sheets and a survey of patient preferences for notification and potential uses of new information.

Results

Most patients wanted an ongoing relationship with genetics providers (63%), reinitiated by genetics providers (65%) and contact only with information specifically relevant to them (51%). Most preferred personalized letters as the means of contact (55%). Reasons for and against recontact and circumstances in which individuals would pursue additional genetic testing were also tabulated. There were few statistically significant differences in the responses between clinic and study participants.

Conclusion

Patients evaluated in a colon cancer risk assessment clinic want updated information at a rate similar to those who participated in a colon cancer gene testing study. These findings have implications for the consultative nonlongitudinal nature of such clinics and suggest patient preferences for personally-tailored information could be labor intensive.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Falk MJ, Dugan RB, O’Riordan MA, Matthews AL, Robin NH (2003) Medical Geneticists’ duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 120:374–380CrossRef Falk MJ, Dugan RB, O’Riordan MA, Matthews AL, Robin NH (2003) Medical Geneticists’ duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 120:374–380CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Offit K, Groeger E, Turner S, Wadsworth EA, Weiser MA (2004) The “duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA 292:1469–1473PubMedCrossRef Offit K, Groeger E, Turner S, Wadsworth EA, Weiser MA (2004) The “duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA 292:1469–1473PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Letendre M, Godard B (2004) Expanding the physician’s duty of care: a duty to recontact? Med Law 23:531–539PubMed Letendre M, Godard B (2004) Expanding the physician’s duty of care: a duty to recontact? Med Law 23:531–539PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzpatrick JL, Hahn C, Costa T, Huggins MJ (1999) The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers. Am J Hum Genet 64:852–860PubMedCrossRef Fitzpatrick JL, Hahn C, Costa T, Huggins MJ (1999) The duty to recontact: attitudes of genetics service providers. Am J Hum Genet 64:852–860PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunter AG, Sharpe N, Mullen M, Meschino WS (2001) Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics. Am J Med Genet 103:265–276 Hunter AG, Sharpe N, Mullen M, Meschino WS (2001) Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics. Am J Med Genet 103:265–276
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard LE, McGillivray B, Van Allen MI, Friedman JM, Langlois S (1999) Duty to re-contact: a study of families at risk for Fragile X. J Genet Couns 8:3–15PubMedCrossRef Bernard LE, McGillivray B, Van Allen MI, Friedman JM, Langlois S (1999) Duty to re-contact: a study of families at risk for Fragile X. J Genet Couns 8:3–15PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith KR, Croyle RT (1995) Attitudes toward genetic testing for colon cancer risk. Am J Public Health 85:1435–1438PubMed Smith KR, Croyle RT (1995) Attitudes toward genetic testing for colon cancer risk. Am J Public Health 85:1435–1438PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman C, Marshall J, Audrain J, Gomez-Caminero A (1996) Genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: anticipated reactions of patients and challenges to providers. Int J Cancer 69:58–61PubMedCrossRef Lerman C, Marshall J, Audrain J, Gomez-Caminero A (1996) Genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: anticipated reactions of patients and challenges to providers. Int J Cancer 69:58–61PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vernon SW, Gritz ER, Peterson SK, Amos CI, Perz CA, Baile WF, Lynch PM (1997) Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer. Health Psychol 16:73–86PubMedCrossRef Vernon SW, Gritz ER, Peterson SK, Amos CI, Perz CA, Baile WF, Lynch PM (1997) Correlates of psychologic distress in colorectal cancer patients undergoing genetic testing for hereditary colon cancer. Health Psychol 16:73–86PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Glanz K, Grove J, Lerman C, Gotay C, Le Marchand L (1999) Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(4 Pt 2):329–336PubMed Glanz K, Grove J, Lerman C, Gotay C, Le Marchand L (1999) Correlates of intentions to obtain genetic counseling and colorectal cancer gene testing among at-risk relatives from three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8(4 Pt 2):329–336PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Codori AM, Waldeck T, Petersen GM, Miglioretti D, Trimbath JD, Tillery MA (2005) Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. J Genet Couns 4:119–132CrossRef Codori AM, Waldeck T, Petersen GM, Miglioretti D, Trimbath JD, Tillery MA (2005) Genetic counseling outcomes: perceived risk and distress after counseling for hereditary colorectal cancer. J Genet Couns 4:119–132CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, Heinimann K, Fidalgo P, Phillips RK, Bisgaard ML, Orntoft TF, Aaltonen LA, Hodgson SV, Thomas HJ, Tomlinson IP (2003) Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. N Engl J Med 348:791–799PubMedCrossRef Sieber OM, Lipton L, Crabtree M, Heinimann K, Fidalgo P, Phillips RK, Bisgaard ML, Orntoft TF, Aaltonen LA, Hodgson SV, Thomas HJ, Tomlinson IP (2003) Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH. N Engl J Med 348:791–799PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sampson JR, Dolwani S, Jones S, Eccles D, Ellis A, Evans DG, Frayling I, Jordan S, Maher ER, Mak T, Maynard J, Pigatto F, Shaw J, Cheadle JP (2003) Autosomal recessive colorectal adenomatous polyposis due to inherited mutations of MYH. Lancet 362:39–41PubMedCrossRef Sampson JR, Dolwani S, Jones S, Eccles D, Ellis A, Evans DG, Frayling I, Jordan S, Maher ER, Mak T, Maynard J, Pigatto F, Shaw J, Cheadle JP (2003) Autosomal recessive colorectal adenomatous polyposis due to inherited mutations of MYH. Lancet 362:39–41PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Baudhuin LM, Boardman LA, Steenblock KJ, Petersen GM, Halling KC, French AJ, Johnson RA, Burgart LJ, Rabe K, Lindor NM, Thibodeau SN (2004) MYH mutations in patients with attenuated and classic polyposis and with young-onset colorectal cancer without polyps. Gastroenterology 127:9–16PubMedCrossRef Wang L, Baudhuin LM, Boardman LA, Steenblock KJ, Petersen GM, Halling KC, French AJ, Johnson RA, Burgart LJ, Rabe K, Lindor NM, Thibodeau SN (2004) MYH mutations in patients with attenuated and classic polyposis and with young-onset colorectal cancer without polyps. Gastroenterology 127:9–16PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Plaschke J, Engel C, Kruger S, Holinski-Feder E, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Moeslein G, Schulmann K, Gebert J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Ruschoff J, Loeffler M, Schackert HK (2004) Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium. J Clin Oncol 22:4486–4494PubMedCrossRef Plaschke J, Engel C, Kruger S, Holinski-Feder E, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Moeslein G, Schulmann K, Gebert J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Ruschoff J, Loeffler M, Schackert HK (2004) Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium. J Clin Oncol 22:4486–4494PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakagawa H, Hampel H, de la Chapelle A (2003) Identification and characterization of genomic rearrangements of MSH2 and MLH1 in Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) by novel techniques. Hum Mutat 22:258PubMedCrossRef Nakagawa H, Hampel H, de la Chapelle A (2003) Identification and characterization of genomic rearrangements of MSH2 and MLH1 in Lynch syndrome (HNPCC) by novel techniques. Hum Mutat 22:258PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Casey G, Lindor NM, Papadopoulos N, Thibodeau SN, Moskow J, Steelman S, Buzin CH, Sommer SS, Collins CE, Butz M, Aronson M, Gallinger S, Barker MA, Young JP, Jass JR, Hopper JL, Diep A, Bapat B, Salem M, Seminara D, Haile R (2005) Colon Cancer Family Registry. Conversion analysis for mutation detection in MLH1 and MSH2 in patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 293:799–809PubMedCrossRef Casey G, Lindor NM, Papadopoulos N, Thibodeau SN, Moskow J, Steelman S, Buzin CH, Sommer SS, Collins CE, Butz M, Aronson M, Gallinger S, Barker MA, Young JP, Jass JR, Hopper JL, Diep A, Bapat B, Salem M, Seminara D, Haile R (2005) Colon Cancer Family Registry. Conversion analysis for mutation detection in MLH1 and MSH2 in patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA 293:799–809PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirschhorn K, Fleisher LD, Godmilow L, Howell RR, Lebel RR, McCabe ER, McGinniss MJ, Milunsky A, Pelias MZ, Pyeritz RE, Sujansky E, Thompson BH, Zinberg RE (1999) Duty to re-contact. Genet Med 1:171–172PubMed Hirschhorn K, Fleisher LD, Godmilow L, Howell RR, Lebel RR, McCabe ER, McGinniss MJ, Milunsky A, Pelias MZ, Pyeritz RE, Sujansky E, Thompson BH, Zinberg RE (1999) Duty to re-contact. Genet Med 1:171–172PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman AN, Wideroff L, Olson L, Davis W, Klabunde C, Srinath KP, Reeve BB, Croyle RT, Ballard-Barbash R (2003) US physicians’ attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 120:63–71CrossRef Freedman AN, Wideroff L, Olson L, Davis W, Klabunde C, Srinath KP, Reeve BB, Croyle RT, Ballard-Barbash R (2003) US physicians’ attitudes toward genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 120:63–71CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sifri RD, Wender R, Paynter N (2002) Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice. J Fam Pract 51:856PubMed Sifri RD, Wender R, Paynter N (2002) Cancer risk assessment from family history: gaps in primary care practice. J Fam Pract 51:856PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L, Tschoegl E, Syngal S (2004) Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:813–819PubMedCrossRef Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L, Tschoegl E, Syngal S (2004) Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:813–819PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S (2004) Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am J Prev Med 27:239–245PubMed Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S (2004) Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am J Prev Med 27:239–245PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Patterson AR, Robinson LD, Naftalis EZ, Haley BB, Tomlinson GE (2005) Custodianship of genetic information: clinical challenges and professional responsibility. J Clin Oncol 23:2100–2104PubMedCrossRef Patterson AR, Robinson LD, Naftalis EZ, Haley BB, Tomlinson GE (2005) Custodianship of genetic information: clinical challenges and professional responsibility. J Clin Oncol 23:2100–2104PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Epplein M, Koon KP, Ramsey SD, Potter JD (2005) Genetic services for familial cancer patients: a follow-up survey of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers. J Clin Oncol 23:4713–4718PubMedCrossRef Epplein M, Koon KP, Ramsey SD, Potter JD (2005) Genetic services for familial cancer patients: a follow-up survey of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers. J Clin Oncol 23:4713–4718PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobbs P, Smith A, George WD, Sellwood RA (1980) Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves. J Epidemiol Community Health 34:19–22PubMedCrossRef Hobbs P, Smith A, George WD, Sellwood RA (1980) Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves. J Epidemiol Community Health 34:19–22PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Patient preferences regarding recontact by cancer genetics clinicians
verfasst von
Constance A. Griffin
Jennifer E. Axilbund
Ann Marie Codori
Ginny Deise
Betty May
Cheryl Pendergrass
Miriam Tillery
Jill D. Trimbath
Francis M. Giardiello
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2007
Verlag
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Erschienen in
Familial Cancer / Ausgabe 3/2007
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-007-9117-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2007

Familial Cancer 3/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.