nach oben

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Erschienen in:

01.05.2012 | Knee

PCL to graft impingement pressure after anatomical or non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction

verfasst von: Takanori Iriuchishima, Goro Tajima, Sheila J. M. Ingham, Kenji Shirakura, Freddie H. Fu

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 5/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) has been postulated, but not thoroughly investigated.

Purpose

To evaluate PCL impingement pressure and biomechanical stability with different tibial and femoral tunnel positions in ACL reconstruction.

Methods

In 15 porcine knees, the impingement pressure between ACL and PCL was measured using pressure sensitive film before and after ACL single-bundle reconstruction. ACL reconstructions were performed in each knee with three different tibial and femoral tunnel position combinations: (1) tibial antero-medial (AM) tunnel to femoral AM tunnel (AM–AM), (2) tibial postero-lateral (PL) tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (PL–High-AM) and (3) tibial AM tunnel to femoral High-AM tunnel (AM–High-AM). Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was evaluated after each ACL reconstruction using robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system.

Results

There was no significant difference of the impingement pressure between AM and AM, PL–High-AM reconstructed groups and intact ACL. Only AM–High-AM ACL reconstruction group showed significantly higher impingement pressure compared with intact ACL. With regard to ATT, AM–AM group had significantly higher stiffness than PL–High-AM group.

Conclusion

Anatomical ACL reconstruction does not cause PCL impingement and it has biomechanical advantage in ATT when compared with non-anatomical ACL reconstructions in porcine knee. For the clinical relevance, in the anatomical ACL reconstruction, no ACL–PCL impingement is found.

Arnold MP, Kooloos J, Kampen A (2001) Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciateligament insertion: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:194–199PubMed

Bachus KN, DeMarco AL, Judd KT, Horwitz DS, Brodke DS (2006) Measuring contact area, force, and pressure for bioengineering applications: using Fuji film and tekscan system. Med Eng Phys 28:483–488PubMedCrossRef

Berkson E, Lee GH, Kumar A, Verma N, Bach BR Jr, Hallab N (2006) The effect of cyclic loading on rotated bone-tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament graft constructs. Am J Sports Med 34:1442–1449PubMedCrossRef

Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 22:683 e1–683 e5

Colvin AC, Shen W, Musahl V, Fu FH (2009) Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:956–963PubMedCrossRef

Darcy SP, Kilger RH, Woo SL, Debski RF (2006) Estimation of ACL forces by reproducing knee kinematics between sets of knees: a novel noninvasive methodology. J Biomech 39:2371–2377PubMedCrossRef

Debandi A, Maeyama A, Lu S et al (2011) Biomechanical comparison of three anatomic ACL reconstruction in a porcine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:728–735PubMedCrossRef

Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225PubMedCrossRef

Fujimoto E, Sumen Y, Deie M, Yasumoto M, Kobayashi K, Ochi M (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament graft impingement against the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis using MRI plus three-dimensional reconstruction software. Magn Reson Imaging 22:1125–1129PubMedCrossRef

10.

Fung DT, Zhang LQ (2003) Modeling of ACL impingement against the intercondylar notch. Clin Biomech 18:933–941CrossRef

11.

Goss BC, Howell SM, Hull ML (1998) Quadriceps load aggravates and roof plasty mitigates active impingement of anterior cruciate ligament grafts against the intercondylar roof. J Orthopaed Res 16:611–617CrossRef

12.

Goss BC, Hull ML, Howell SM (1997) Contact pressure and tension in anterior cruciate ligament grafts subjected to roof impingement during passive extension. J Orthopaed Res 15:263–268CrossRef

13.

Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ et al (2000) Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:141–150PubMed

14.

Hame SL, Markolf KL, Hunter DM, Oakes DA, Zoric B (2003) Effects of notch plasty and femoral tunnel position on excursion patterns of an anterior cruciate ligament graft. Arthroscopy 19:340–345PubMedCrossRef

15.

Harner CD, Vogrin TM (2002) What’s new in sports medicine? J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:1095–1099

16.

Howell SM (1998) Principles for placing the tibial tunnel and avoiding roof impingement during reconstruction of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S49–S55PubMedCrossRef

17.

Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G et al (2010) Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1226–1231PubMedCrossRef

18.

Iriuchishima T, Tajima G, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2010) Impingement pressure in the anatomical and non anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaver study. Am J Sports Med 38:1611–1617PubMedCrossRef

19.

Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2010) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:674–679PubMedCrossRef

20.

Jagodzinski M, Leis A, Iselborn KW, Mall G, Nerlich M, Bosch U (2003) Impingement pressure and tension forces of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:85–90PubMed

21.

Jagodzinski M, Richter GM, Passler HH (2000) Biomechanical analysis of knee hyperextension and of the impingement of the anterior cruciate ligament: a cinematographic MRI study with impact on tibial tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:11–19PubMedCrossRef

22.

Liau JJ, Cheng CK, Huang CH, Lo WH (2002) Effect of Fuji pressure sensitive film on actual contact characteristics of artificial tibiofemoral joint. Clin Biomech 17:698–704CrossRef

23.

Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SLY (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 19:297–304PubMedCrossRef

24.

Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T et al (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628PubMedCrossRef

25.

Musahl V, Bedi A, Cital M, O’Loughlin P, Choi D, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions on pivot-shift kinematics in anterior cruciate ligament-and meniscus-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 39:289–295PubMedCrossRef

26.

Nishimori M, Sumen Y, Sakaridani K, Nakamura M (2007) An evaluation of reconstructed ACL impingement on PCL using MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 25:722–726PubMedCrossRef

27.

Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA (2008) Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 36:176–189PubMedCrossRef

28.

Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666PubMed

29.

Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251PubMedCrossRef

30.

Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Peterson W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72PubMedCrossRef

31.

Zavras TD, Race A, Amis AA (2005) The effect of femoral attachment location on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: graft tension and restoration of normal anterior-posterior laxity patterns. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:92–100PubMedCrossRef

Titel: PCL to graft impingement pressure after anatomical or non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction
verfasst von: Takanori Iriuchishima
Goro Tajima
Sheila J. M. Ingham
Kenji Shirakura
Freddie H. Fu
Publikationsdatum: 01.05.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1680-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2012

Tuberculous arthritis of the knee joint mimicking pigmented villonodular synovitis

Effects of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on patellar tracking

Static rotational and sagittal knee laxity measurements after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

A new technique for arthroscopic meniscus transplant using soft tissue fixation and anatomical meniscal root reinsertion

Rollback of the femoral condyle in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction