Peak systolic longitudinal rotation: a new tool for detecting left ventricular systolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
verfasst von:
Jun Huang, Hai-Ling Hu, Zi-Ning Yan, Li Fan, Yi-Fei Rui, Dan Shen, Jie Li
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most prevalent cardiac and cerebrovascular risk factors. The study aimed to find a new way to investigate left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE).
Methods
Fifty-one untreated T2DM patients and 52 normal control subjects were enrolled for the research. Apical four-chamber view was acquired by two-dimensional echocardiography. Segmental and global peak systolic longitudinal rotation (PSLR) degrees were measured by the software of EchoPAC.
Results
In T2DM patients, global PSLR prominently rotated clockwise, while in normal subjects, global PSLR degrees were so small and almost had no PSLR. HBA1c negatively correlated with apex and global PSLR, that is, T2DM patients with higher HBA1c had a larger clockwise apex and global PSLR. ROC analysis showed that PSLR could detect the accuracy of LV systolic dysfunction.
Conclusion
Cardiac clockwise global PSLR was found in T2DM patients. The cardiac contractile function in T2DM patients was impaired. The new tool of PSLR can conveniently detect cardiac systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients. HBA1c could predict systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients.
Hinweise
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
2D-STE
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
IVSD
Interventricular septal thickness in end-diastolic period
LAD
Left atrial diameter
LV
Left ventricle/ventricular
LVEDV
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
LVEF
Left ventricular ejection fraction
LVESV
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
LVPWD
LV posterior wall thickness in end-diastolic period
PSLR
Peak systolic longitudinal rotation
T2DM
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
TDI
Tissue Doppler imaging
Background
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most prevalent cardiac and cerebrovascular risk factors [1]. T2DM may alter cardiac structure and function independently of underlying coronary artery disease or hypertension [2]. Left ventricle (LV) remodeling may lead to diabetic cardiomyopathy before LV contractile dysfunction [3]. Initial assessment of LV dysfunction in T2DM patients is vital for the treatment and prognosis.
Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has been introduced as a novel method for angle-independent and well reproducibility quantification of LV strain, strain rate and LV twist [4‐7], and by the measurement of these values, LV dysfunction could be assessed. The speckles are the result of constructive and destructive interference of conventional gray scale ultrasound images.
Anzeige
Most of previous studies have measured LV strain, strain rate, twist or torsion by 2D-STE or 3D-STE in T2DM patients for detecting LV systolic and diastole dysfunction, and then demonstrated the impairment of LV function [8‐12].
Peak systolic longitudinal rotation (PSLR) as a novel marker means the rotational motion in the long axis of heart. Previous studies have demonstrated that PSLR were small in normal subjects, however, systolic clockwise PSLR motion have been detected in dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and arterial hypertension patients [13‐15], however, the etiology of PSLR is still unknown.
In the research, we want to find a simple method to evaluate the LV contractile dysfunction in T2DM patients. We phased a specific hypothesis that T2DM patients had PSLR in cardiac cycle. The importance and necessity of the study was to determine whether T2DM patients had cardiac PSLR, and evaluated the relationship between PSLR and clinical laboratory indicators, just like fasting plasma glucose and HBA1c. At last, provide a simple and accurate method to detect LV systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients.
Methods
Ethical statement
The Human Subjects Committee of the Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People′s Hospital with Nanjing Medical University approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient enrolled to the research. The reference number for the ethical approval is: [2014]KY010–01.
Anzeige
Study population
Fifthy-seven untreated T2DM patients (37, males) and 52 normal controls (27, males) of similar age and gender were enrolled for this study, however, 4 untreated T2DM patients (2, males) were excluded for the large difference in heart rate, 1 untreated T2DM patients (male) was excluded for fat, and 1 untreated T2DM patients (female) was excluded for COPD. At last, 51 untreated T2DM patients (34, males) were enrolled for the study (Fig. 1). This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted between August 2015 and May 2017, and data was collected prospectively. Subjects with cardiovascular disease, such as coronary artery disease (all of the patients were had coronary artery CT scan to ensure that they had no coronary artery disease), arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, valvular disease, atrial fibrillation, congenital heart disease, thyroid disease, neoplastic disease, or kidney failure were excluded from the study. In normal control subjects, all of the physical examination tests, the electrocardiogram, and the echocardiography were showed normal. All normal subjects had an absence of diabetes (according to the diagnosis of T2DM, the fasting blood glucose, Two-hour postprandial blood sugar and HbA1c were all showed normal).
×
Biochemistry
In T2DM patients and normal subjects, fasting plasma glucose, two-hour postprandial blood sugar and glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c) were measured.
Conventional 2D Doppler echocardiography
All enrolled subjects underwent conventional 2D Doppler echocardiography (Vivid E9, GE healthcare). Echocardiography examination was done before beginning drugs in T2DM patients. Left atrial diameter (LAD), interventricular septum thickness and LV posterior wall thickness in end-diastole (IVSD and LVPWD) were measured in the parasternal long-axis view of LV by M-mode. LV end-diastole volume (LVEDV), LV end-systole volume (LVESV) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by modified biplane Simpson′s method. Peak early and late diastolic velocities of mitral valve (E and A, respectively) were measured by pulsed-wave Doppler, and the ratio of E/A was then calculated. Peak early (e′) and late (a′) diastolic annular velocities were obtained by averaging the values at septum and lateral positions using pulse wave Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), and E/e′ was calculated.
ECG leads were connected to each patient. Standard high frame rate (> 60 /s) of the apical four-, three- and two-chamber views of three consecutive cycles while patients held their breath were stored for offline analysis.
Analysis of LV systolic function
The apical four-, three- and two-chamber views were analyzed using 2D-STE software (2D-Strain, EchoPAC PC 113, GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway) by two experienced cardiologist.
First, we defined cardiac PSLR as the rotation of the LV cross section. Segmental and global PSLR degrees were measured. Using the SAX-MV option of EchoPAC software displayed on the apical four-chamber view. The LV walls were divided into six segments: base-septal, middle-septal, apex, middle-lateral, and base-lateral, and one segment containing mitral valve, respectively. The segment containing mitral valve was excluded for the analysis. Then segmental and global PSLR of LV walls were measured via the software (Fig. 2).
×
Second, we used LAX, A4C and A2C options for the analysis of LV longitudinal strain and strain rate by the software, “LAX” means apical three chamber view. LV longitudinal strain (including LS-endo, LS-mid, and LS-epi, which represented LV endomycardial, middle myocardial and epimycardial walls, respectively) and LV longitudinal strain rate (LSr) were calculated and recorded.
Statistical analysis
All data analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Data was presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Kolmogorov-Smirnov′s test was used to detect the normality of all the segmental and global PSLR values. Differences between T2DM patients and normal subjects were compared with an independent Student′s t-test for the data distribution was normal. Differences among the first analysis, interobserver and intraobserver were compared with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For variables with a non-normal distribution, the nonparametric U Mann-Whitney test was used. Chi square was used for comparing the variable of sex. Spearman′s correlation was chosen for the test correlations among the fasting plasma glucose, HBA1c, LVEF, LS-endo, LS-mid, LS-epi, LSr, segmental PSLR and global PSLR. We defined the apex and global PSLR in control subjects as the normal state, and considered the values of T2DM patients as abnormal. Values for apex and global PSLR in T2DM patients were determined from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Yoden′s index was selected for the cut-off point which can give the best composite of specificity and sensitivity.
Anzeige
Reproducibility and repeatability
Intraobserver and interobserver variability for global PSLR were determined by repeating measurements in all enrolled T2DM patients and normal subjects. For the second intraobserver measurements, the observer was “blinded” to results of the initial measurements.
Results
Basic information in T2DM patients and normal subjects
There were significant differences in body weight, BSA (body surface area), BMI (body mass index), HR, SBP, DBP, LVEDV, Indexed LVEDV, indexed LVESV, LVEF, e′, a′ and E/E′. LVEDV, indexed LVEDV, indexed LVESV, LVEF and e′ in T2DM patients were significantly lower than normal subject, while a′ and E/e′ were significantly larger than normal subjects. (Table 1).
Table 1
Baseline clinical characteristics, conventional two-dimensional echocardiographic parameters between T2DM patients and normal subjects (mean ± SD)
Variable
T2DM
Normal
P
Clinical
Age (yrs)
55.57 ± 11.08
50.42 ± 13.88
0.207
Male
34(51)
27(52)
0.128
Height(cm)
166.08 ± 8.64
163.60 ± 8.15
0.137
Weight(kg)
66.08 ± 11.61
56.68 ± 8.57
< 0.001
BSA(m2)
1.71 ± 0.19
1.57 ± 0.14
< 0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
22.67 ± 1.44
21.99 ± 1.18
0.010
Heart Rate(bpm)
76.39 ± 9.52
71.85 ± 11.49
0.031
SBP (mmHg)
127.55 ± 12.64
118.25 ± 10.36
< 0.001
DBP (mmHg)
78.10 ± 8.85
72.60 ± 7.54
0.001
Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)
13.41 ± 4.38
4.82 ± 0.64
< 0.001
Two-hour postprandial blood sugar(mmol/L)
15.13 ± 4.52
5.66 ± 0.73
< 0.001
HbA1c (%)
10.34 ± 2.25
4.98 ± 0.73
< 0.001
NYHA Class
I
51(51)
52(52)
II
0(51)
0(52)
III
0(51)
0(52)
IV
0(51)
0(52)
Medical treatment
Diet treatment
0(51)
Oral drug
10(51)
Insulin
26(51)
Insulin+Oral drug
15(51)
Echocardiography
LA D(mm)
35.53 ± 3.88
34.65 ± 3.29
0.219
IVSD(mm)
9.39 ± 1.25
9.15 ± 0.98
0.283
LVPWD(mm)
9.06 ± 1.21
9.00 ± 1.08
0.795
LVDD(mm)
47.00 ± 3.64
46.94 ± 3.15
0.932
LVEDV(ml)
72.29 ± 14.78
79.02 ± 12.64
0.015
Indexed LVEDV (ml/m2)
42.72 ± 9.25
50.63 ± 8.68
< 0.001
LVESV(ml)
27.39 ± 5.99
28.29 ± 7.61
0.509
Indexed LVESV (ml/m2)
16.16 ± 3.58
18.08 ± 4.80
0.023
LVEF(%)
62.06 ± 4.75
64.53 ± 5.51
0.017
LV mass(g)
149.81 ± 34.70
145.92 ± 31.07
0.550
Indexed LV mass(g/m2)
88.49 ± 21.71
92.95 ± 18.42
0.263
E(m/s)
0.79 ± 0.14
0.83 ± 0.16
0.296
A(m/s)
0.69 ± 0.19
0.69 ± 0.18
0.958
E/A
1.23 ± 0.35
1.27 ± 0.38
0.590
e′(m/s)
0.09 ± 0.02
0.11 ± 0.02
0.001
a′ (m/s)
0.10 ± 0.02
0.08 ± 0.02
< 0.001
E/e′
10.39 ± 2.50
8.13 ± 2.61
< 0.001
Speckle Tracking Echocardiography
LS-endo
−23.46 ± 2.42
−24.22 ± 2.99
0.160
LS-mid
−20.29 ± 2.15
−20.92 ± 2.61
0.183
LS-epi
−17.64 ± 1.94
−18.15 ± 2.35
0.237
LSr
−1.06 ± 0.16
−1.12 ± 0.19
0.088
BSA: Body surface area, BMI: Body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, LAD: left atrial diameter, IVSD: interventricular septal thickness in end-diastolic period, LVPWD: left ventricular posterior wall thickness in end-diastolic period, LVDD: left ventricular diameter in end-diastolic period, LVEDV: left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVESV: left ventricular end-systolic volume, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, E: peak velocity during early diastole of anterior mitral valve, A: peak velocity during late diastole of anterior mitral valve, e′: peak early diastolic annular velocities using TDI, a′: peak late diastolic annular velocities using TDI. LS-endo: longitudinal strain of LV endomyocardial. LS-mid: longitudinal strain of LV middle myocardial. LS-epi: longitudinal strain of LV epimyocardial. LSr: longitudinal strain rate of LV
Segmental and global PSLR
In T2DM and normal subjects, segmental PSLR of lateral wall rotated counter-clockwise, while septum rotated clockwise. In normal subjects, global PSLR degrees were so small and almost had no PSLR. In T2DM patients, global PSLR prominently rotated clockwise. A smaller PSLR of base-lateral, middle-lateral walls, while a larger apex and global PSLR in T2DM patients were observed when compared with normal subjects. There were no significant differences in base-septum and middle septum between the two groups. (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Table 2
Segmental and global peak systolic longitudinal rotation (PSLR) between T2DM patients and normal subjects (mean ± SD)
Variable
T2DM
Normal
P
PSLR
base-Lateral
7.91 ± 4.24
9.86 ± 3.44
0.012
middle-Lateral
4.90 ± 4.32
6.49 ± 3.66
0.046
Apex
−1.00 ± 3.95
0.86 ± 3.60
0.014
middle-Septal
−6.72 ± 3.03
−5.21 ± 4.87
0.062
base-Septal
−9.53 ± 2.31
−10.05 ± 3.12
0.340
Global
−2.18 ± 3.26
−0.18 ± 2.50
0.001
×
Correlations among fasting plasma glucose, HBA1c, LVEF, LS-endo, LS-mid, LS-epi, LSr with the segmental and global PSLR in T2DM patients
HBA1c negatively correlated with apex and global PSLR (r = − 0.401, p = 0.004, and r = − 0.353, p = 0.001), respectively, that is, T2DM patients with higher HBA1c had a larger clockwise apex and global PSLR. LSr negatively correlated with PSLR of lateral wall. There were no correlations among fasting plasma glucose, LVEF, LS-endo, LS-mid, LS-epi with the segmental and global PSLR. (Table 3, Fig. 4).
Table 3
Correlations between segmental PSLR, global PSLR and GLU, HBA1c and LVEF in T2DM patients
Variable
Fasting plasma glucose
HBA1c
LVEF
LS-endo
LS-mid
LS-epi
LSr
r
p-value
r
p-value
r
p-value
r
p-value
r
p-value
r
p-value
r
p-value
base-Lateral
−0.156
0.273
−0.018
0.898
0.127
0.375
−0.082
0.567
−0.103
0.470
−0.145
0.312
−0.351
0.011
middle-Lateral
−0.213
0.134
−0.062
0.664
−0.017
0.904
−0.138
0.333
−0.137
0.337
−0.157
0.270
−0.447
0.001
Apex
−0.263
0.062
−0.401
0.004
−0.017
0.904
0.135
0.346
0.103
0.474
0.067
0.643
−0.147
0.304
middle-Septal
−0.141
0.325
−0.226
0.111
−0.018
0.901
0.251
0.076
0.221
0.119
0.170
0.232
0.019
0.893
base-Septal
−0.028
0.847
−0.270
0.055
0.000
0.996
0.203
0.154
0.205
0.149
0.188
0.187
0.059
0.679
Global
−0.196
0.168
−0.353
0.011
−0.087
0.546
0.214
0.132
0.188
0.187
0.144
0.313
−0.093
0.517
×
Anzeige
ROC analysis for detecting the accuracy of apex and global PSLR
The area under ROC curve values, sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value and Youden index for apex PSLR in T2DM patients were 0.693, 68.63, 71.15%, − 1.45 and 0.3978, respectively. The area under ROC curve values, sensitivity, specificity, cut-off value and Youden index for global PSLR in T2DM patients were 0.641, 66.67, 57.79%, 1.92 and 0.2436, respectively. Comparison of ROC analysis curves between apex and global PSLR showed no significant difference (p = 0.189). (Table 4, Fig. 5).
Table 4
ROC analysis for detecting the accuracy of apex and global PSLR in T2DM patients
Variable
Global LR
Apex LR
p-value
Sensitivity
68.63
66.67
0.189
Specificity
71.15
57.69
Cut-off Value
−1.45
1.92
Area under curve
0.693
0.641
Youden index
0.3978
0.2436
×
Reproducibility and repeatability
The results for the intraobserver and interobserver variability for the global PSLR upon repeated measurements in all study patients were shown in Table 5. We compared the interobserver and intraobserver variability with the first time, and found there were no differences among the three time. There were significant differences between T2DM patients and normal subjects in interobserver and intraobserver analysis. What′s more, the results demonstrated that the analysis of the software had the well repeatability and reliability of the study.
Table 5
Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and repeatability
Variable
Global PSLR(°)
P-value
First analysis
Interobserver
Intraobserver
Mean ± SD
95% CI
Mean ± SD
95% CI
Mean ± SD
95% CI
T2DM
−2.18 ± 3.26
−3.10~ −1.26
−2.16 ± 3.21
−3.06~ − 1.26
−2.25 ± 3.27
−3.17~ − 1.33
0.989
Normal
−0.18 ± 2.50
−0.87~0.52
−0.16 ± 2.42
− 0.89~ 0.47
−0.17 ± 2.39
− 0.90~ 0.45
0.999
P-value
0.001
0.001
< 0.001
Discussion
The main findings of the research were: ①Global PSLR motion prominently rotated clockwise in T2DM patients. ②Higher HBA1c had larger apex and global PSLR in T2DM patients. ③Apex and global PSLR could reflect LV contractile dysfunction in T2DM patients. No significant difference was found between the two results.
LVEF is always used for detecting contractile function in normal subjects and cardiac disease patients. However, in the study, LVEF was similar in T2DM patients and normal subjects. It cannot reflect early systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients. Previous reports used 2D-STE or 3D-STE to measure strain, strain rate or LV torsion for assessment of cardiac systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Ernande L et al. [16] used 2D-STE to measure longitudinal and radial systolic strain in T2DM patients, and found that longitudinal and radial systolic function were impaired in asymptomatic patients with T2DM. Enomoto M et al. [17] found global longitudinal and circumferential strain were lower in patients with T2DM than in the controls by using 3D-STE, and concluded that diabetic microangiopathy and its accumulated effects significantly related to subclinical LV dysfunction were characterized by impaired longitudinal shortening.
Anzeige
In the research, we introduced a new way to detect systolic dysfunction which was defined as PSLR. PSLR was first reported by Popović ZB in 2007, and the researcher found that in dilated cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, the cardiac had LR [13]. The orientation of the LR is unclear at present. In T2DM patients, prominently clockwise PSLR was detected. A smaller PSLR of base-lateral, middle-lateral walls, while a larger apex and global PSLR in T2DM patients was observed when compared with normal subjects, and there was no significant difference in septum wall. The pathogenesis of T2DM cardiomyopathy is likely to be multifactorial, including micro vascular disease, altered myocardial metabolism, and structural changes in the myocardium with increased fibrosis [18]. We considered the orientation of PSLR may be linked to myocardium fibrosis. According to the theory of “myocardial band” [19], and a normal myocardium consists of subendocardial, middle, and subepicardial fibers. When the normal myocardium became fibrosis, we thought the primary balance among the myocardium was disappeared, as a result, PSLR was detected. Further researches of our group want to verify the hypothesis between PSLR and myocardium fibrosis in T2DM animal model.
From the results, we found that there were no differences in LS-endo, LS-middle, LS-epi and LSr between T2DM patients and normal subjects, however, global, apex and lateral PSLR had the significant difference between the two groups, so we concluded that PSLR was an accurate and simple method.
HBA1c negatively correlated with apex and global PSLR, respectively. No correlations were discovered among fasting plasma glucose, LVEF with segmental and global PSLR. Therefore, higher HBA1c of T2DM patients had larger apex and global PSLR. ROC analysis showed that the area under ROC curve values of apex and global PSLR was: 0.693 and 0.641. Comparison of ROC analysis curves between apex and global LR had no significant difference. From the results, we concluded that apex and global PSLR could reflect the contractile dysfunction in T2DM patients. HBA1c could predict systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients.
Conclusions
In the study, we found contractile function was impaired in T2DM patients. Cardiac clockwise PSLR was found in T2DM patients. The new tool PSLR can be flexible and conveniently to detect cardiac systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients. HBA1c could also predict systolic dysfunction in T2DM patients.
Limitations
First, the number of T2DM patients and normal subjects in this study was small. Second, the technique of EchoPAC in the analysis of two-dimensional images has the shortcoming of out-of plane motion, if the speckles move out of plane during contraction, the software cannot be tracked successfully. In the research, we just told the patients hold their breath to prevent the condition. Third, large differences in heart rate, fat patients and patients with COPD were insufficient and excluded for the analysis.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the department of Echocardiography and Endocrine, ChangZhou No. 2 People′s Hospital Affiliated to NanJing Medical University.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was reviewed and approved by the Human Subjects Committee of Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from each couple enrolled in the study.
Consent for publication
This manuscript does not include any individual person’s data.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Peak systolic longitudinal rotation: a new tool for detecting left ventricular systolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
verfasst von
Jun Huang Hai-Ling Hu Zi-Ning Yan Li Fan Yi-Fei Rui Dan Shen Jie Li
Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.
Ältere Frauen, die von chronischen Erkrankungen weitgehend verschont sind, haben offenbar die besten Chancen, ihren 90. Geburtstag zu erleben, wenn ihr systolischer Blutdruck < 130 mmHg liegt. Das scheint selbst für 80-Jährige noch zu gelten.
Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.
Im Vergleich zu anderen Blutdrucksenkern sind Kalziumantagonisten vom Diyhdropyridin-Typ mit einem erhöhten Risiko für eine Mikroalbuminurie und in Abwesenheit eines RAS-Blockers auch für ein terminales Nierenversagen verbunden.
Update Kardiologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.