nach oben

Supportive Care in Cancer

Erschienen in:

28.12.2016 | Original Article

Peer support preferences among African-American breast cancer survivors and caregivers

verfasst von: Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Marlyn Allicock, La-Shell Johnson

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Breast cancer mortality rates continue to improve due to advances in cancer control and treatment. However, gains in breast cancer survival rates vary by race. Psychosocial support systems can lead to improved health outcomes among cancer survivors. This study was a part of a larger study exploring the challenges that both African-American cancer survivors and caregivers face across the cancer continuum. The objective of this paper was to explore African-American breast cancer survivors’ and caregivers’ preferences regarding characteristics and qualities of Peer Connect guides to inform the development of a peer support program.

Methods

Forty-one African-American cancer survivors and caregivers participated in five focus groups lasting approximately 90 min. Participants were asked about what qualities or characteristics they would prefer in a peer support guide to make them feel comfortable talking with them. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, an iterative coding process. Themes were identified based on the research team’s integrated and unified final codes.

Results

Twenty-two cancer survivors, 19 caregivers, and 3 individuals who were both survivors and caregivers participated in the focus groups. Participants discussed five preferences for peer support guides: (1) competency, (2) gender, (3) age, (4) cancer role status, and (5) relationship to participant.

Conclusions

This study highlights cancer survivors’ and caregivers’ perceptions of characteristics needed for peer support providers that in turn can influence whether and how they participate in cancer support programs.

Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. Cancer J Clin 64:9–29CrossRef

Bigsby JA, Holmes MD (2005) Disparities across the breast cancer continuum. Cancer Causes Control 16(1):35–44CrossRef

National Cancer Institute (2014). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2012/. Accessed 12 July 2015.

Tammemagi CM, Nerenz D, Neslund-Dudas C, Feldkamp C, Nathanson D (2005) Comorbidity and survival disparities among black and white patients with breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 294:1765–1772CrossRef

Peek ME, Han JH (2004) Disparities in screening mammography: current status, interventions, and implications. J Gen Intern Med 19:184–194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Press R, Carrasquillo O, Sciacca RR, Giardina EG (2008) Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. J Women's Health 17:923–930CrossRef

Davis C, Darby K, Likes W, Bell J (2009) Social workers as patient navigators for breast cancer survivors: what do African-American medically underserved women think of this idea? Soc Work Healthcare 48:561–578

Dirksen SR (2000) Predicting well-being among breast cancer survivors. J Advanced Nursing 32:937–943CrossRef

Giese-Davis J, Collie K, Rancourt KM, Neri E, Kraemer HC, Spiegel D (2011) Decrease in depression symptoms is associated with longer survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a secondary analysis. J Clin Oncol 29:413–420CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wenzel L, Osann K, Hsieeh S, Tucker JA, Monk BJ, Nelson EL (2015) Psychosocial telephone counseling for survivors of cervical cancer: results of a randomized biobehavioral trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1171–1179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Janz NK, Mujahid MS, Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Alderman A, Hamilton AS, Graff J, Katz SJ (2009) Racial/ethnic differences in quality of life after diagnosis of breast cancer. J Cancer Survivor 3:212–222CrossRef

12.

Wells AA, Gulbas L, Sanders-Thompson V, Shon E, Kreuter MW (2014) African-American breast cancer survivors participating in a breast cancer support group: translating research into practice. J Can Educ 29:619–625CrossRef

13.

Fisher EB, Earp JA, Maman S, Zolotor A (2010) Cross-cultural and international adaptation of peer support for diabetes management. Fam Pract 27(Suppl 1):i6–16CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fisher EB, Coufal MM, Parada H, Robinette JB, Tang PY, Urlaub DM (2014) Peer support in health care and prevention: cultural, organizational, and dissemination issues. Annu Rev Public Health 35:363–368CrossRefPubMed

15.

Haynes-Maslow L, Allicock M, Johnson L (2016) Cancer support needs for African American breast cancer survivors and caregivers. J Cancer Educ 31:166–171CrossRefPubMed

16.

Allicock M, Kaye L, Johnson LS, Carr C, Alick C, Gellin M, Campbell M (2012) The use of motivational interviewing to promote peer-to-peer support for cancer survivors. Clin J Oncol Nurs 16:E156–E163CrossRefPubMed

17.

Allicock M, Carr C, Johnson LS, Smith R, Lawrence M, Kaye L, Gellin M, Manning M (2014) Implementing a one-on-one peer support program for cancer survivors using a motivational interviewing approach: results and lessons learned. J Cancer Educ 29:91–98CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Miller WR, Rollnick S (2012) Motivational interviewing: helping people change. The Guilford Press, New York

19.

Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K (2001) Focus groups in social research. Sage, LondonCrossRef

20.

Warr DJ (2005) “It was fun...but we don’t usually talk about these things”: analyzing sociable interaction focus groups. Qual Inq 11:200–225CrossRef

21.

Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE (2012) Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications, Los AngelesCrossRef

22.

Wilbraham L (1995) Thematic content analysis: panacea for the ills of ‘intentioned opacity of discourse analysis? In: 1st annual qualitative methods conference: “a spanner in the works of the factory of truth”. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa Critical Methods Society.

23.

Strauss ACJ (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

24.

Rearick EM, Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Knafl KA (2011) Parents of children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: experiences with social support and family management. Diabetes Educ 37:508–518CrossRefPubMed

25.

Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Coufal MM, Baumann LC, Mbanya JC et al (2012) Peer support for self management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Aff 31:130–139CrossRef

26.

Skea ZC, MacLennan SJ, Entwistle VA, N’Dow J (2011) Enabling mutual helping? Examining variable needs for facilitated peer support. Patient Educ Couns 85:e120–e125CrossRefPubMed

27.

Hanson LC, Armstrong TD, Green MA, Hayes M, Peacock S et al (2012) Circles of care: development and initial evaluation of a peer support model for African Americans with advanced cancer. Health Educ Behav 40:536–543CrossRefPubMed

28.

Napoles-Springer AM, Ortız C, O’Brien H, Dıaz-Mendez M (2009) Developing a culturally competent peer support intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer. J Immigr Minor Health 11:268–280CrossRefPubMed

29.

Campbell H, Phaneuf M, Deane K (2004) Cancer peer support programs—do they work? Patient Educ Couns 55:3–15CrossRefPubMed

30.

Arora NK, Finney Ruten LJ, Gustafson DH, Moser R, Hawkins RP (2007) Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 16:474–486CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Peer support preferences among African-American breast cancer survivors and caregivers
verfasst von: Lindsey Haynes-Maslow
Marlyn Allicock
La-Shell Johnson
Publikationsdatum: 28.12.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3550-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Springer Medizin

Peer support preferences among African-American breast cancer survivors and caregivers

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Attitudes of palliative home care physicians towards palliative sedation at home in Italy

A systematic review of the impact of pain on overall survival in patients with cancer

Prospective evaluation of abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer

Prospective cohort study of cancer patients diagnosed with incidental venous thromboembolism on routine computed tomography scans

Quality of life of older African American breast cancer survivors: a population-based study

Hypercalcaemia and hypocalcaemia: finding the balance

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Onkologie