Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2016

01.09.2016 | Original Article

Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study

verfasst von: Daniel Altman, Tomi S. Mikkola, Karl Möller Bek, Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo, Jonas Gunnarsson, Marie Ellström Engh, Christian Falconer, For the Nordic TVM group

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective was to assess safety and clinical outcomes in women operated on using the Uphold™ Lite Vaginal Support System.

Methods

We carried out a 1-year, multicenter, prospective, single cohort study of 207 women with symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage ≥2 apical pelvic organ prolapse, with or without concomitant anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Safety data were collected using a standardized questionnaire. Anatomical outcome was assessed by the POP-Q and subjective outcomes by the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory after 2 months and 1 year using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale.

Results

The overall rate of serious complications was 4.3 % (9 out of 207 patients), including 3 patients with bladder perforations, 1 with bleeding >1,000 ml, 2 who had undergone re-operations with complete mesh removal because of pain, and 3 surgical interventions during follow-up because of mesh exposure. POP-Q stage ≤1 after 1 year was 94 % and subjective symptom relief was reported by 91 % of patients (p < 0.001). Pain after 2 months and 1 year was 60 % lower compared with the preoperative mean (p < 0.001). Minor complications occurred in 20 women (9.7 %) and were dominated by lower urinary tract dysfunction. No predisposing risk factors for complications were found.

Conclusions

The Uphold™ Lite procedure in women with apical pelvic organ prolapse provided satisfactory restoration of vaginal topography and symptom relief. However, serious complication rates were largely comparable with those of other transvaginal mesh kits.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:891–898CrossRefPubMed Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ (2008) Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111:891–898CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364:1826–1836CrossRefPubMed Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group (2011) Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med 364:1826–1836CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat De Tayrac R, Sentilhes L (2013) Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention. Int Urogynecol J 24:1859–1872 De Tayrac R, Sentilhes L (2013) Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention. Int Urogynecol J 24:1859–1872
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A, Wu N, Pashos CL, Clemens JQ et al (2013) Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet Gynecol 122:981–987CrossRefPubMed Eilber KS, Alperin M, Khan A, Wu N, Pashos CL, Clemens JQ et al (2013) Outcomes of vaginal prolapse surgery among female medicare beneficiaries: the role of apical support. Obstet Gynecol 122:981–987CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C et al (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113:117–126CrossRefPubMed Elmer C, Altman D, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Vayrynen T, Falconer C et al (2009) Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 113:117–126CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu MK, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H et al (2012) Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23:1753–1761CrossRefPubMed Vu MK, Letko J, Jirschele K, Gafni-Kane A, Nguyen A, Du H et al (2012) Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 23:1753–1761CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Raalte HM, Lucente VR, Molden SM, Haff R, Murphy M (2008) One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:694.e1–694.e6 Van Raalte HM, Lucente VR, Molden SM, Haff R, Murphy M (2008) One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199:694.e1–694.e6
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Falconer C (2007) Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 109:303–308CrossRefPubMed Altman D, Falconer C (2007) Perioperative morbidity using transvaginal mesh in pelvic organ prolapse repair. Obstet Gynecol 109:303–308CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan ZA, Thomas L, Emery SJ (2014) Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:1155–1157 Khan ZA, Thomas L, Emery SJ (2014) Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290:1155–1157
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjelic-Radisic V, Aigmueller T, Preyer O, Ralph G, Geiss I, Muller G et al (2014) Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry. Int Urogynecol J 25:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed Bjelic-Radisic V, Aigmueller T, Preyer O, Ralph G, Geiss I, Muller G et al (2014) Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry. Int Urogynecol J 25:1047–1052CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford EJ, Moore RD, Roovers JP, Courtieu C, Lukban JC, Bataller E et al (2013) Elevate anterior/apical: 12-month data showing safety and efficacy in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19:79–83CrossRefPubMed Stanford EJ, Moore RD, Roovers JP, Courtieu C, Lukban JC, Bataller E et al (2013) Elevate anterior/apical: 12-month data showing safety and efficacy in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 19:79–83CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Baessler K, Maher C (2013) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and bladder function. Int Urogynecol J 24:1843–1852CrossRefPubMed Baessler K, Maher C (2013) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and bladder function. Int Urogynecol J 24:1843–1852CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL et al (2011) De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:487.e1–487.e4CrossRef Kasturi S, Diaz SI, McDermott CD, Woodman PJ, Bump RC, Terry CL et al (2011) De novo stress urinary incontinence after negative prolapse reduction stress testing for total vaginal mesh procedures: incidence and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:487.e1–487.e4CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Oude Rengerink K, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP (2014) Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJOG 121:537–547 Van der Ploeg JM, van der Steen A, Oude Rengerink K, van der Vaart CH, Roovers JP (2014) Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BJOG 121:537–547
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila GW, Jijon A (2012) Managing vaginal mesh exposure/erosions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:343–348CrossRefPubMed Davila GW, Jijon A (2012) Managing vaginal mesh exposure/erosions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:343–348CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL (2011) Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol 118:629–636CrossRefPubMed Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL (2011) Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol 118:629–636CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Soules K, Winters JC, Chermansky CJ (2012) Central compartment and apical defect repair using synthetic mesh. Curr Urol Rep 13:222–223CrossRefPubMed Soules K, Winters JC, Chermansky CJ (2012) Central compartment and apical defect repair using synthetic mesh. Curr Urol Rep 13:222–223CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, West of Scotland Study Group (2008) Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115:22–30CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Fattah M, Ramsay I, West of Scotland Study Group (2008) Retrospective multicentre study of the new minimally invasive mesh repair devices for pelvic organ prolapse. BJOG 115:22–30CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2012) Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:85–91CrossRefPubMed Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR (2012) Single-incision vaginal approach to treat cystocele and vault prolapse with an anterior wall mesh anchored apically to the sacrospinous ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:85–91CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH (2014) Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 25:901–908CrossRefPubMed Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH (2014) Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 25:901–908CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823CrossRefPubMed Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM et al (2004) Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104:805–823CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M et al (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309:2016–2024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M et al (2013) Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 309:2016–2024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitehead WE, Bradley CS, Brown MB, Brubaker L, Gutman RE, Varner RE et al (2007) Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:78.e1–78.e7CrossRef Whitehead WE, Bradley CS, Brown MB, Brubaker L, Gutman RE, Varner RE et al (2007) Gastrointestinal complications following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:78.e1–78.e7CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME (2012) Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 119:354–360CrossRefPubMed Withagen MI, Milani AL, de Leeuw JW, Vierhout ME (2012) Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 119:354–360CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, Ghetti C, Moalli P, Zyczynski H et al (2008) The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 111:152–157CrossRefPubMed Lowder JL, Park AJ, Ellison R, Ghetti C, Moalli P, Zyczynski H et al (2008) The role of apical vaginal support in the appearance of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 111:152–157CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wetta LA, Gerten KA, Wheeler TL, Holley RL, Varner RE, Richter HE (2009) Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1307–1312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wetta LA, Gerten KA, Wheeler TL, Holley RL, Varner RE, Richter HE (2009) Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:1307–1312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Pelvic organ prolapse repair using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study
verfasst von
Daniel Altman
Tomi S. Mikkola
Karl Möller Bek
Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo
Jonas Gunnarsson
Marie Ellström Engh
Christian Falconer
For the Nordic TVM group
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2973-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.