Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013

01.02.2013 | Original Article

Perceptions of Neighborhood Park Quality: Associations with Physical Activity and Body Mass Index

verfasst von: Hua Bai, M.S., Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis, Ph.D., Andrew T. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Gina M. Besenyi, M.P.H.

Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Sonderheft 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Parks are important resources for physical activity (PA), yet few studies have examined how perceptions of park characteristics relate to PA and health.

Purpose

This study investigated associations between perceptions of neighborhood park quality and overall moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), park-based PA, and body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Data were collected via questionnaire from 893 households in Kansas City, Missouri.

Results

The newly developed neighborhood park quality scale demonstrated good test–retest and internal reliability. Residents’ perceptions of neighborhood park quality were related to PA and health outcomes. Perceiving parks as a benefit was positively related to overall MVPA and park-based PA and negatively related to BMI. Perceptions of well-used parks were positively related to BMI, while perceived cleanliness was negatively related to park-based PA.

Conclusions

Better measuring and understanding how perceptions of local parks are associated with PA and health can improve appreciation of how parks facilitate active living.
Literatur
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of physical activity, including lifestyle activities among adults—United States, 2000–2001. MMWR. 2003; 52: 764-769.
2.
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System prevalence and trends data: Nationwide (States and DC)—2010 overweight and obesity (BMI). Available at http://​apps.​nccd.​cdc.​gov/​brfss/​. Accessibility verified 15 March 2012
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System prevalence and trends data: Nationwide (States and DC)—2009 physical activity. Available at http://​apps.​nccd.​cdc.​gov/​brfss/​. Accessibility verified 15 March 2012
5.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav. 1988; 15: 351-377.CrossRef
6.
Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 297-322.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 159-168.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Buchner DM, Gobster PH. Promoting active visits to parks: Models and strategies for transdisciplinary collaboration. J Phys Act Health. 2007; 4: S36-S49.PubMed
9.
Cohen DA, Scribner RA, Farley TA. A structural model of health behavior: A pragmatic approach to explain and influence health behaviors at the population level. Prev Med. 2000; 30: 146-154.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Cohen DA, McKenzie TL, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D, Lurie N. Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 509-514.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kruger J. Parks, recreation, and public health collaborative. Environ Health Insights. 2008; 2: 123-125.PubMed
12.
Vinluan MH. Reducing obesity through recreation: Park and recreation agencies need increased federal funding to support efforts to reduce health problems. Parks Recreat. 2005; 40: 16-18.
13.
McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health Place. 2010; 16: 712-726.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Cohen DA, Marsh T, Williamson S, et al. Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med. 2010; 50: S9-S12.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Coombes E, Jones AP, Hillsdon M. The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70: 816-822.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Giles-Corti B, Broomhall MH, Knuiman M, et al. Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 169-176.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Saelens BE. Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1451-1456.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Kaczynski AT, Potwarka LR, Smale BJ, Havitz ME. Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leis Sci. 2009; 31: 174-191.CrossRef
19.
Saelens BE, Frank LD, Auffrey C, Whitaker RC, Burdette HL, Colabianchi N. Measuring physical environments of parks and playgrounds: EAPRS instrument development and inter-rater reliability. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3: S190-S207.
20.
Colabianchi N, Maslow AL, Swayampakala K. Features and amenities of school playgrounds: A direct observation study of utilization and physical activity levels outside of school time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 32-42.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Loukaitou-Sideris A, Sideris A. What brings children to the park? Analysis and measurement of the variables affecting children’s use of parks. J Am Plan Assoc. 2010; 76: 89-107.CrossRef
22.
Perry CK, Saelens BE, Thompson B. Rural Latino youth park use: Characteristics, park amenities, and physical activity. J Commun Health. 2011; 36: 389-397.CrossRef
23.
Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Broyles ST, Gustat J. The role of park conditions and features on park visitation and physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: S178-S187.PubMed
24.
Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: State of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36: S99-S123.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hoehner CM, Brennan Ramirez LK, Elliott MB, Handy SL, Brownson RC. Perceived and objective environmental measures and physical activity among urban adults. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 105-116.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Kirtland KA, Porter DE, Addy CL, et al. Environmental measures of physical activity supports: Perception versus reality. Am J Prev Med. 2003; 24: 323-331.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Lackey KJ, Kaczynski AT. Correspondence of perceived vs. objective proximity to parks and their relationship to park-based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Foster S, Giles-Corti B. The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings. Prev Med. 2008; 47: 241-251.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Mowen A, Orsega-Smith E, Payne L, Ainsworth B, Godbey G. The role of park proximity and social support in shaping park visitation, physical activity, and perceived health among older adults. J Phys Act Health. 2007; 4: 167-179.PubMed
30.
Spotts DM, Stynes DJ. Measuring the public’s familiarity with recreation areas. J Leis Res. 1985; 17: 253-265.
31.
Farnum J, Hall T, Kruger LE. Sense of Place in Natural Resource Recreation and Tourism: An Evaluation and Assessment of Research Findings. PNW-GTR-660. Portland: USDA FS, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 2005.
32.
Ries AV, Voorhees CC, Roche KM, Gittelsohn J, Yan AF, Astone NM. A quantitative examination of park characteristics related to park use and physical activity among urban youth. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45: S64-S70.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Babey SH, Hastert TA, Yu H, Brown ER. Physical activity among adolescents: When do parks matter? Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34: 345-348.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22: 188-199.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Gobster PH. Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leis Sci. 2002; 24: 143-159.CrossRef
36.
Romero AJ. Low-income neighborhood barriers and resources for adolescents’ physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 36: 253-259.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Ball K, Bauman A, Leslie E, Owen N. Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. Prev Med. 2001; 33: 434-440.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Addy CL, Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Sharpe P, Kimsey D. Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94: 440-443.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Pratt M, Macera CA, Sallis JF, O’Donnell M, Frank LD. Economic interventions to promote physical activity: Applications of the SLOTH model. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27: 136-145.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Goodman A, Mackett RL, Paskins J. Activity compensation and activity synergy in British 8–13 year olds. Prev Med. 2011; 53: 293-298.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Fremeaux AE, Mallam KM, Metcalf BS, Hosking J, Voss LD, Wilkin TJ. The impact of school-time activity on total physical activity: The activitystat hypothesis (EarlyBird 46). Int J Obes. 2011; 35: 1277-1283.CrossRef
42.
Lachowycz K, Jones AP. Greenspace and obesity: A systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev. 2011; 12: e183-e189.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Potwarka LR, Kaczynski AT, Flack A. Places to play: Association of park space and facilities with health weight status among children. J Commun Health. 2008; 33: 344-350.CrossRef
44.
45.
46.
Kaczynski AT, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Besenyi GM. Development and testing of a community stakeholder park audit tool. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42: 242-249.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2008.
48.
Tilt JH. Walking trips to parks: Exploring demographic, environmental factors, and preferences for adults with children in the household. Prev Med. 2010; 50: S69-S73.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Armstrong JS, Overton TS. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Market Res. 1977; 14: 396-402.CrossRef
50.
Coen SE, Ross NA. Exploring the material basis for health: Characteristics of parks in Montreal neighborhoods with contrasting health outcomes. Health Place. 2006; 12: 361-371.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Lee RE, Booth KM, Reese-Smith JY, Regan G, Howard HH. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: Evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005; 2: 13.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Ries AV, Gittelsohn J, Voorhees CC, Roche KM, Clifton KJ, Astone NM. The environment and urban adolescents’ use of recreational facilities for physical activity: A qualitative study. Am J Health Promot. 2008; 23: 43-50.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: Where should we look and what should we count? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3: 33-40.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: Increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005; 33: 175-181.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Walker JT, Mowen AJ, Hendricks WW, Kruger J, Morrow JR, Bricker K. Physical activity in the park setting (PA-PS) questionnaire: Reliability in a California statewide sample. J Phys Act Health. 2009; 6: S97-S104.PubMed
56.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2009.
57.
58.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993; 78: 98-104.CrossRef
60.
Garson GD. Variance Components Analysis, Blue Book Series. Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishing; 2012.
61.
Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis. Stat Neerl. 2004; 58: 127-137.CrossRef
62.
Maas CJM, Hox JJ. Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology. 2005; 1: 86-92.
63.
Norris CM, Ghali WA, Saunders LD, et al. Ordinal regression model and the linear regression model were superior to the logistic regression models. J Clin Epidemol. 2006; 59: 448-456.CrossRef
64.
Estabrooks PA, Lee RE, Gyurcsik NC. Resources for physical activity participation: Does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25: 100-104.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Ibitayo OO, Virden RJ. Visitor and manager perceptions of depreciative behaviors in urban park settings. J Park Recreat Admin. 1996; 14: 36-51.
66.
Floyd MF, Spengler JO, Maddock JE, Gobster PH, Suau LJ. Park-based physical activity in diverse communities of two U.S. cities: An observational study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34: 299-305.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson M, Page P, Popkin BM. Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics. 2006; 117: 417-424.PubMedCrossRef
68.
He XZ, Baker DW. Differences in leisure-time, household, and work-related physical activity by race, ethnicity, and education. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20: 259-266.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Sallis JF, Zakarian JM, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR. Ethnic, socioeconomic, and sex differences in physical activity among adolescents. J Clin Epidemol. 1996; 49: 125-134.CrossRef
70.
Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider I, Shinew K, Chavez D, Vogel M. Physical activity among Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino White visitors on urban-proximate public lands. In: Chavez DJ, Winter PL, Absher JD, eds. Recreation Visitor Research: Studies of Diversity. Albany: USDA FS, Pacific Southwest Research Station; 2008: 113-122.
71.
Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leis Sci. 2007; 29: 315-354.CrossRef
72.
Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Shinew KJ, Chavez DJ, Vogel MC. Physical activity and the recreation opportunity spectrum: Differences in important site attributes and perceived constraints. J Park Recreat Admin. 2009; 27: 73-91.
73.
Kaczynski AT, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Hastmann T, Besenyi GM. Variations in observed park physical activity intensity level by gender, race, and age: Individual and joint effects. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: 150-161.
74.
Mowen A, Kaczynski A, Cohen D. The potential of parks and recreation in addressing physical activity and fitness. Pres Counc Phys Fit Sports Res Dig. 2008; 9: 1-8.
75.
Tilt JH, Unfried TM, Roca B. Using objective and subjective measures of neighborhood greenness and accessible destinations for understanding walking trips and BMI in Seattle, Washington. Am J Health Promot. 2007; 21: 271-279.
76.
Slater SL, Ewing R, Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The association between community physical activity settings and youth physical activity, obesity, and body mass index. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47: 496-503.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Anderson DH, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Leahy JE. Proximate and distant visitors: Differences in importance ratings of beneficial experiences. J Park Recreat Admin. 2008; 26: 47-65.
78.
Duncan M, Mummery K. Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Prev Med. 2005; 40: 363-372.PubMedCrossRef
79.
Brownson RC, Baker EA, Housemann RA, Brennan LK, Bacak SJ. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 1995-2003.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Arnberger A, Brandenburg C. Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions, and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environ Manag. 2007; 40: 34-45.CrossRef
81.
Brunt P, Courtney P. Host perceptions of sociocultural impacts. Ann Tour Res. 1999; 26: 493-515.CrossRef
82.
Broyles ST, Mowen AJ, Theall KP, Gustat J, Rung AL. Integrating social capital into a park-use and active-living framework. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 522-529.PubMedCrossRef
83.
Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, Housemann R, Brownson RC. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2000; 54: 667-672.CrossRef
84.
Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ. Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29: 5-9.
85.
Sallis J, Saelens B. Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000; 71: 1-14.
86.
Baranowski T. Validity and reliability of self-report measures of physical activity: An information-processing perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1988; 59: 314-327.
87.
Warnecke RB, Johnson TP, Chávez N, et al. Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Ann Epidemiol. 1997; 7: 334-342.PubMedCrossRef
88.
McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. J Phys Act Health. 2006; 3: S208-S222.PubMed
89.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1552-1558.PubMedCrossRef
90.
Kaczynski AT, Mowen AJ. Does self-selection influence the relationship between park availability and physical activity? Prev Med. 2011; 52: 23-25.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Perceptions of Neighborhood Park Quality: Associations with Physical Activity and Body Mass Index
verfasst von
Hua Bai, M.S.
Sonja A. Wilhelm Stanis, Ph.D.
Andrew T. Kaczynski, Ph.D.
Gina M. Besenyi, M.P.H.
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9448-4

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2013

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Commentary

Using Evidence to Create Active Communities: Stories from the Field—Policy and Research with Chicago’s Child Care Centers: a Commentary to Accompany the Active Living Research Supplement to Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Original Article

Predictors of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) in African American Young Adolescents

Brief Report

Individual- and Area-Level Disparities in Access to the Road Network, Subway System and a Public Bicycle Share Program on the Island of Montreal, Canada

Original Article

Aesthetic Amenities and Safety Hazards Associated with Walking and Bicycling for Transportation in New York City

Original Article

Does Neighbourhood Walkability Moderate the Effects of Mass Media Communication Strategies to Promote Regular Physical Activity?

Original Article

School Sport Participation Under Two School Sport Policies: Comparisons by Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Socioeconomic Status

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Bildnachweise