Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2014

01.09.2014 | Original Article

Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse

verfasst von: Mallika Anand, Joshua L. Woelk, Amy L. Weaver, Emanuel C. Trabuco, Christopher J. Klingele, John B. Gebhart

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Open abdominal sacrocolpopexy has been the preferred treatment for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. In light of the rise in popularity of less invasive robotic sacrocolpopexy, our objective was to compare perioperative complications of robotic vs open sacrocolpopexy.

Methods

This was a single-institution, retrospective cohort study of robotic and open sacrocolpopexies. Robotic sacrocolpopexies performed between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2009 were compared with open cases performed between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2006. Baseline and intraoperative variables of the groups were compared. Complications were compared univariately and in a multivariable logistic regression model to adjust for prior transabdominal surgery.

Results

A total of 50 robotic and 87 open sacrocolpopexies were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar, but patients in the open group had more prior transabdominal surgeries. The robotically assisted group had decreased estimated blood loss (median, 100 mL vs 150 mL; P = 0.002) and hospital stay (median, 2 days vs 3 days; P < 0.001), but increased operative time (median, 4.6 vs 2.9 h; P < 0.001), cystotomy (10.0 % [5 out of 50] vs 1.1 % [1 out of 87]; P = 0.02), and vaginotomy (24.0 % [12 out of 50] vs 5.7 % [5 out of 87]; P = 0.003). Two patients in the robotically assisted group had postoperative hernia. There were no differences in rates of ureteral or bowel injury, urinary tract infection, ileus, bowel obstruction, or overall complications.

Conclusions

Overall complication rates of robotic and open sacrocolpopexy were not significantly different. The robotically assisted group experienced shorter hospital stay but increased operative times and increased incidence of cystotomy and vaginotomy, possibly reflecting the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C (2013) Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004014PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrzenski A (1996) Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(2):147–152PubMed Ostrzenski A (1996) Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55(2):147–152PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63(2):373–376PubMedCrossRef Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 63(2):373–376PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):331–336PubMedCrossRef Advincula AP, Song A (2007) The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19(4):331–336PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Parnell BA, Matthews CA (2011) Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):412–419PubMedCrossRef Parnell BA, Matthews CA (2011) Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54(3):412–419PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112(6):1201–1206PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG (2012) Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(5):435.e1–435.e5CrossRef Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG (2012) Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(5):435.e1–435.e5CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P et al (2013) A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 24(3):377–384PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394PubMedCrossRef Akl MN, Long JB, Giles DL, Cornella JL, Pettit PD, Chen AH et al (2009) Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve. Surg Endosc 23(10):2390–2394PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988PubMed Mustafa S, Amit A, Filmar S, Deutsch M, Netzer I, Itskovitz-Eldor J et al (2012) Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: establishment of a learning curve and short-term outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(4):983–988PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):87–95PubMed Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):87–95PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):589–594PubMed Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):589–594PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(3):93–95 Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U (2009) The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med 62(3):93–95
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E (2011) Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS 15(1):122–126PubMedCentralPubMed Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E (2011) Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS 15(1):122–126PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse
verfasst von
Mallika Anand
Joshua L. Woelk
Amy L. Weaver
Emanuel C. Trabuco
Christopher J. Klingele
John B. Gebhart
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2379-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2014

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Not all minislings are alike

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Embryotransfer erhöht womöglich Leukämierisiko der Kinder

13.05.2024 Assistierte Reproduktion Nachrichten

Reproduktionsmedizinische Techniken haben theoretisch das Potenzial, den epigenetischen Code zu verändern und somit das Krebsrisiko der Kinder zu erhöhen. Zwischen Embryotransfer und Leukämie scheint sich ein solcher Zusammenhang bestätigt zu haben.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.