Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Research article

Peripheral anterior chamber depth and screening techniques for primary angle closure disease in community elderly Chinese

verfasst von: Qin Luo, Wenwen Xue, Yin Yuan, Chaowei Fu, Jiangnan He, Haidong Zou, Xiaowei Tong, Richard K. Lee, Ling Ge

Erschienen in: BMC Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2020

Abstract

Background

To investigate the distribution of peripheral anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the relationship between peripheral ACD and gonioscopy compared to other ocular parameters for primary angle closure disease (PACD) screening. We performed a population-based survey in Pudong New District of Shanghai, China, in 2011.

Methods

Cross-sectional study. Adults 50 and older were enrolled from a population-based study using cluster random sampling in Pudong New District, Shanghai. Remote ocular screening was performed with digital anterior eye structure photography. Van Herrick measurements were used to evaluate the peripheral ACD, the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber, and corneal thickness (CT), and the ACD to CT ratio was calculated. Subjects with peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT were made follow-up appointments for clinical examination with gonioscopy. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were generated to show the performance of different tests in screening for primary angle closure disease (PACD).

Results

Two thousand five hundred twenty-eight adults participated in the study with 91 patients diagnosed with PACD. Two thousand four hundred sixty-three subjects had valid data in the right eye available for analysis. The mean peripheral ACD values for men and women were significantly different: 1.04 ± 0.46 (range 0.11–2.93) CT and 0.87 ± 0.41 (range 0.12–2.96) CT respectively (t = − 4.18; P<0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis reveals that peripheral ACD declined by 0.31 CT (P < 0.0001) per diopter of SE and was 0.19 CT (P < 0.0001) shallower in women than in men (r2 = 0.1304, P < 0.0001). Peripheral ACD performed best in screening for PACD.

Conclusions

Peripheral ACD measurement is recommended for PACD screening in community elderly Chinese.
Hinweise
Qin Luo and Wenwen Xue contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
ACD
Anterior chamber depth
SE
Spherical equivalent
IOP
Intraocular pressure
CT
Corneal thickness
ROC
Receiver operating characteristic curves
PACD
Primary angle closure disease
PACG
Primary angle closure glaucoma
POAG
Primary open angle glaucoma
RNFL
Retinal nerve fiber layer
OCT
Optical coherence tomography
VCDR
Vertical cup to disk ratio
PAS
Peripheral anterior synechiae

Background

Glaucoma is the most common cause of irreversible blindness worldwide, affecting about 67 million people [13]. Primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) is the major type of glaucoma in Asia and is a significant cause of global visual morbidity [48]. PACG is higher in Asians than Europeans and Africans, with over 80% of PACG worldwide cases in Asia. PACG affects approximately 0.75% adult Asians, doubling in incidence per decade, and 60% of patients are female. The prevalence rates vary greatly by ethnic region and has been calculated to be approximately 1.10% (0.85, 1.44) in the Chinese population [9]. The rate of blindness caused by PACG is high in mainland China. Random effect model meta-analysis results show the overall blindness rate was 38.3% [95%CI (28.1, 49.6%)] [10]. A means of detecting those at risk (people with occludable anterior chamber angles) is a prerequisite for a primary angle closure glaucoma prevention program.
Though gonioscopy is recognized as the gold standard for identifying individuals at risk for primary angle closure disease (PACD), this technique requires highly trained personnel and expensive equipment such as a slit lamp (along with gonioscopy lenses), which are in short supply in remote districts in China. Moreover, gonioscopy is relatively subjective, making it less than ideal for comparisons of prevalence between regions [11]. Gonioscopy requires ocular contact examination which may affect the informed consent rate for community screening.
Eyes with PACD tend to have certain biometric characteristics. These include shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD), thick lens, anterior lens position, small corneal diameter and radius of curvature, and short axial length [1214]. Among these parameters, shallow ACD is known as a key risk factor in most ethnic groups for PACD [1517].
Some studies suggest that this may not be true for central ACD in East Asian people, where the role of non-pupillary block angle closure in relatively deep anterior chambers has been debated [15, 18]. Peripheral ACD has proved to be significantly associated with primary angle closure (PAC) and may reflect a non-pupillary block risk factor for PAC to some extent [16].
We performed a population-based survey in Pudong New District of Shanghai, China, in 2011 [19]. 2528 cases were examined and 91 PACD were diagnosed (prevalence rate 3.6%), including 6 PACG (prevalence rate 0.24%), 9 PAC (prevalence rate 0.36%) and 76 primary angle closure suspects (PACS, prevalence rate 3.01%) [20]. The goal of this study was to report the distribution of peripheral ACD and its association with age, gender, refraction, and intraocular pressure (IOP) in elderly Chinese people. The relationship between peripheral ACD and gonioscopy was investigated, assessing different methods (peripheral ACD, spherical equivalent [SE], intraocular pressure [IOP]) for PACD screening in community. Peripheral ACD performed best in screening for PACD.

Methods

Investigation place and targets

This study assessed the Huamu community in Pudong New District of Shanghai. This community has a history of more than 30 years and is home to a stable population. The social and economic levels in the Huamu community are at the average level of Shanghai.
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University (registration number: 2010 K059). All subjects signed informed consents before being examined.

Sampling

The detailed study protocol has been described elsewhere [19]. According to the preceding criteria, a total of 3146 people aged 50 and older were enrolled from a population-based study using cluster random sampling in Pudong New District, Shanghai. In the current study, only data from right eyes were analyzed and exclusion criteria include previous cataract surgery and other intraocular operations, ocular trauma, intraocular inflammation, iris dysplasia, atrophic eyeball, and incomplete data.

Investigation procedure

This research adopted remote screening in the community in combination with subsequent clinical evaluation and diagnosis at a tertiary eye hospital. Subject identities (IDs) were verified and personal information was collected. Remote screening was then performed, including visual acuity, refraction, IOP measurement, slit lamp digital anterior eye structure photography, and digital fundus photography. The collected information was then transmitted to the Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center through a dedicated network. The ophthalmologists clinically experienced in glaucoma diagnosis reviewed the photographs and gathered data. The investigation team then made an appointment for examination at the Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center for glaucoma suspects after the preliminary check. Re-examinations included IOP measurement, gonioscopy, perimetry testing by Humphrey automated perimetry, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurement by optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Ophthalmic assessment

Visual acuity was measured using a standard illuminated LogMAR (minimum angle of resolution) E chart (Precision Vision, IL, USA), and the presenting visual acuity and the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. The autorefraction data were converted to the spherical equivalent (SE: sphere + 1/2 cylinder).
Digital anterior segment slit lamp photographs were taken in a dark room. Abnormalities of the anterior segment, such as corneal opacity, iris atrophy, pupil size, lens status, presence of glaucomflecken and turbidity of the crystalline lens were recorded. The peripheral ACD around the limbus on the temporal side using an illuminated slit lamp, which casts a clear line on the iris. As described in our previous study [19], peripheral ACD was described as a percentage of corneal thickness at the temporal limbus with the slit beam directed perpendicular to the ocular surface (The brightest, narrowest illumination beam was used. The illumination column was offset from the microscope axis by 40 °).
Centered by the optic disc and macula, two digital fundus photographs were taken using a digital nonmydriatic fundus camera (CanonCR-DGi, Japan).
All the data collected remotely were transmitted to the Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, and the film reading doctors used the Van Herrick method to evaluate the peripheral ACD. Microsoft Paint was used to measure the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber and the corresponding corneal thickness (CT) in the anterior segment photograph, and the ACD to the CT ratio was calculated. Three measurements were carried out and recorded, and the median of 3 readings was used to analyze. A modified Van Herrick grading scheme was used in this study with eight categories (0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45, 0.75, and ≥ 1.0 CT) instead of the usual five categories (0, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1 CT). These values were chosen to give class limits of 0, < 0.1, < 0.2, < 0.3, < 0.4, < 0.5, < 1.0, and ≥ 1.0 CT. All subjects with peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT were made an appointment for gonioscopy in the tertiary care eye hospital. Microsoft Paint was also used to measure the vertical diameters of the optic cup and optic disk, and vertical cup to disk ratio (VCDR) was calculated. Disk hemorrhage, optic nerve head notching, and other abnormal characteristics in the fundus photograph were recorded.
Gonioscopy was performed with a Goldman one-mirror lens (HaggStreit, Bern, Switzerland) at 16× magnification using a 1-mm-long slit with low ambient illumination to prevent light from irradiating the pupil area. A vertically oriented light beam was used for observing both the superior and the inferior anterior chamber angles and horizontally for the nasal and temporal quadrants. The anterior chamber angle was first evaluated statically, and then dynamically with the lens was performed. The anterior chamber angles were characterized with the Spaeth grading system. One senior doctor did gonioscopy for all participants in the hospital.
SITA-FAST 30–2 mode white-on-white automated perimetry (Humphrey 720, Carl Zeiss Meditec, CA, USA) was performed with refractive correction. RNFL thickness was measured using Cirrus spectral domain HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, CA, USA).

Diagnostic definitions

Glaucoma suspects were identified according to presence of any of the following signs: VCDR > 0.5 in either eye, VCDR asymmetry ≥0.2, or a neuroretinal rim width reduced to < 0.1 CDR (between 11 and 1 o’clock or 5 and 7 o’clock), optic disk hemorrhage, notching in the optic disc rim or RNFL defects on the superior or inferior temporal near the disc in the fundus photograph, or IOP ≥21 mmHg [19].
Glaucoma cases were diagnosed using ISGEO criteria [21]. Glaucoma was identified in accordance with three levels of evidence. The division of glaucoma into PACG versus primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) was based on gonioscopic finding of a narrow angle. PACS was defined as an eye with appositional contact between the peripheral iris and posterior trabecular meshwork [21]. In epidemiological research, a narrow angle has most often been defined as an angle in which > 270° of the posterior trabecular meshwork (the part which is often pigmented) cannot be seen during a static examination. PAC was regarded as an eye with an occludable drainage angle and features indicating that trabecular obstruction by the peripheral iris have occurred, such as peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), elevated IOP, iris whorling (distortion of the radially orientated iris fibers), “glaucomfleken” lens opacities, or excessive pigment deposition on the trabecular surface and and the optic disc does not have glaucomatous damage [21].

Statistical analysis

A database was established with EpiData 3.0 (EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark). Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.1.3 (SAS Inc., NC, USA). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated assuming a normal distribution. This study first performed univariate logistic regression analysis on the factors influencing peripheral ACD, and then performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to explore the association of age, gender, IOP, and refraction with peripheral ACD. A value of P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 2528 subjects of the screened 3146 adults participated in the study with valid data, giving a response rate of 80.36% [20]. Sixty-five cases were excluded in the study because of previous intraocular surgery, ocular trauma, intraocular inflammation, iris dysplasia, atrophic eyeball, and/or incomplete data in right eye. Two thousand four hundred sixty-three subjects had valid data in right eye available for analysis (Fig. 1).
The mean peripheral ACD values for men and women were significantly different: 1.04 ± 0.46 (range 0.11–2.93) CT and 0.87 ± 0.41 (range 0.12–2.96) CT respectively (t = − 4.18; P<0.0001; Table 1). Older subjects had shallower peripheral ACD, observed in both men and women and all subjects (F = 4.54; P = 0.0035; Table 1), except in the oldest group (80–94 years old). The peripheral ACD between age group 50–60 and age group 70–80 were significantly different.
Table 1
Characteristic of peripheral ACD in right eyes
 
n
Mean ± SD
Median
25th Percentile
50th Percentile
75th Percentile
Missing
Range
Men (age)
 50–60
368
1.06 ± 0.47
1.00
0.72
1.00
1.37
0
0.18–2.93
 60–70
398
1.02 ± 0.46
0.94
0.69
0.94
1.30
0
0.11–2.81
 70–80
218
1.00 ± 0.44
0.94
0.67
0.94
1.24
0
0.21–2.60
 80–94
52
1.11 ± 0.59
1.02
0.65
1.02
1.29
0
0.28–2.72
 All
1036
1.04 ± 0.46
0.97
0.69
0.97
1.30
0
0.11–2.93
Women (age)
 50–60
610
0.91 ± 0.40
0.85
0.63
0.85
1.11
0
0.12–2.65
 60–70
497
0.84 ± 0.40
0.79
0.54
0.79
1.08
0
0.13–2.33
 70–80
245
0.84 ± 0.44
0.75
0.54
0.75
1.06
0
0.17–2.85
 80–94
75
0.94 ± 0.52
0.78
0.60
0.78
1.18
0
0.26–2.96
 All
1427
0.87 ± 0.41
0.81
0.59
0.81
1.09
0
0.12–2.96
Men and Women (age)
 50–60
978
0.97 ± 0.43
0.90
0.65
0.90
1.21
0
0.12–2.93
 60–70
895
0.92 ± 0.43
0.86
0.60
0.86
1.16
0
0.11–2.81
 70–80
463
0.91 ± 0.45
0.83
0.60
0.83
1.15
0
0.17–2.85
 80–94
127
1.01 ± 0.56
0.87
0.61
0.87
1.26
0
0.26–2.96
 All
2463
0.94 ± 0.44
0.87
0.63
0.87
1.19
0
0.11–2.96
SD Standard deviation
Univariate logistic regression analysis on demographic factors (age, gender, IOP, SE) influencing peripheral ACD showed that gender (r = − 0.18, P < 0.0001) and SE (r = − 0.31, P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with peripheral ACD (Table 2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between peripheral ACD and other ocular parameters (r2 = 0.1304, P < 0.0001) revealed that peripheral ACD declined by 0.31 CT (P < 0.0001) per diopter of SE and was 0.19 CT (P < 0.0001) shallower in women than in men (Table 3).
Table 2
Multivariate analysis of the association between peripheral ACD and other parameters
Variable
Nonstandardized Regression Coefficient(95% CI)
Standardized Regression Coefficient
Variance Inflation Factor
P value
Intercept
1.34 (1.17,1.51)
0.00
0.00
<.0001
Age
−0.00 (−0.00,0.00)
−0.02
1.02
0.2112
Gender
−0.17 (− 0.20,-0.13)
−0.19
1.01
<.0001
IOP
−0.00 (− 0.01,0.00)
−0.04
1.02
0.0605
SE
−0.04 (− 0.05,-0.04)
−0.31
1.01
<.0001
Table 3
Peripheral ACD values and SE in 291 subjects with peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT in right eyes
Gender
Age
Peripheral ACD
SE
n
Mean ± SD
Range
n
Mean ± SD
Range
Men
50–60
25
0.36 ± 0.09
0.18–0.49
25
0.93 ± 1.27
−1.00-4.625
60–70
28
0.37 ± 0.08
0.11–0.47
28
1.00 ± 1.61
−5.375-3.75
70–80
19
0.39 ± 0.08
0.21–0.48
16
0.09 ± 5.03
−17.375-4.25
80–94
5
0.43 ± 0.09
0.28–0.49
4
1.22 ± 2.12
−1.625-3.50
subtotal
77
0.37 ± 0.08
0.11–0.49
73
0.79 ± 2.67
−17.375-4.625
Women
50–60
61
0.37 ± 0.10
0.12–0.49
60
0.78 ± 1.03
−3.00-3.75
60–70
91
0.35 ± 0.09
0.13–0.49
90
0.77 ± 1.53
−8.25-3.875
70–80
53
0.35 ± 0.09
0.17–0.49
49
0.96 ± 1.65
−4.625-4.125
80–94
9
0.33 ± 0.07
0.26–0.46
6
2.08 ± 1.43
0.50–4.25
subtotal
214
0.35 ± 0.09
0.12–0.49
205
0.85 ± 1.44
−8.25-4.25
All
50–60
86
0.37 ± 0.09
0.12–0.49
85
0.82 ± 1.10
−3.00-4.625
60–70
119
0.35 ± 0.09
0.11–0.49
118
0.82 ± 1.55
−8.25-3.875
70–80
72
0.36 ± 0.09
0.17–0.49
65
0.74 ± 2.84
−17.375-4.25
80–94
14
0.37 ± 0.09
0.26–0.49
10
1.74 ± 1.68
−1.625-4.25
total
291
0.36 ± 0.09
0.11–0.49
278
0.84 ± 1.84
−17.375-4.625
Totally, 291 subjects had peripheral ACDs less than 0.5 CT in right eyes. The mean peripheral ACD values for men and women with peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT in right eyes were 0.37 ± 0.08 (range 0.11–0.49) CT and 0.35 ± 0.09 (range 0.12–0.49) CT respectively (t = − 1.46; P = 0.1464; Table 4). The mean peripheral ACD in different age groups was not significantly different.
Table 4
AUC of different ROC curve and cut-off value
ROC curve
AUC (95% CI)
Cut-off Value
Se
Sp
PV+
Youden Index
peripheral ACD + SE
0.786 (0.726, 0.847)
peripheral ACD =0.360 SE =2.120
0.809
0.670
0.527
0.479
peripheral ACD
0.777 (0.715, 0.839)
peripheral ACD =0.305
0.618
0.862
0.498
0.480
SE
0.547 (0.476, 0.619)
SE =1.188
0.652
0.468
0.346
0.120
AUC Area under curve, Se Sensitivity, Sp Specificity, PV+ Positive predictive value
A total of 291 subjects with peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT were made an appointment for gonioscopy in the tertiary eye hospital and 91 PACD subjects were identified, including 6 PACG, 9 PAC and 76 PACS.
As gonioscopy was the standard examination for identifying PACD, we compared the efficacy of three screening indexes (peripheral ACD, SE, peripheral ACD combined with SE) with gonioscopy in 291 subjects for identifying PACD (Fig. 2). Using peripheral ACD as screening index achieved sensitivity of 0.618, specificity of 0.862, positive predictive value of 0.498 and Youden index of 0.48 with a cut-off value of 0.305 CT. Using SE as screening index was not significant and the combination of peripheral ACD and SE did not improve screening efficiency (Table 4).
When a modified Van Herrick grading scheme was used to grade the peripheral ACD, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and Youden index were presented in Table 5. The Youden index was greatest with the cut point of the peripheral ACD grade as 0.3 (Table 5).
Table 5
The efficacy of identifying PACD with different peripheral ACD
Peripheral ACD grade
Se
Sp
PV+
Youden Index
< 0.2
0.154
0.995
0.933
0.100
< 0.3
0.571
0.890
0.703
0.403
< 0.4
0.846
0.475
0.423
0.291
< 0.5
1.000
0.000
0.313
0.000
Se Sensitivity, Sp Specificity, PV+ Positive predictive value

Discussion

In this population-based study of Chinese residents of Shanghai, 291 subjects were observed to have a peripheral ACD less than 0.5 CT in their right eyes. Among these subjects, 91 (31.27%, 91/291) subjects were diagnosed as having PACD. In this study, digital remote screening and clinical re-examination for a diagnosis were used at a tertiary eye hospital. Information on all subjects was first collected and analyzed remotely, including visual acuity examination, refraction, IOP measurement, digital anterior slit lamp eye structure photography and digital fundus photography. After this information transmitted to the Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment Center, glaucoma suspects were asked permission to proceed with additional and confirmatory reexamination [20].
In this study, the peripheral ACD in 2463 subjects were 0.94 ± 0.44 CT, and 11.8% subjects had reported a peripheral ACD < 0.5 CT. The population distribution of peripheral ACD has been studied in Europe, North America, and Asia [2224].
Based on peripheral anterior chamber depth, Van Herrick classification has been used to detect angle closure glaucoma (ACG) eyes [25]. This method has proved to be effective and suitable for glaucoma screening. However, Van Herrick’s classification only had five categories (0, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1 CT). The Van Herrick’s classification has been suggested to have low sensitivity and specificity to detect patients with ACG [11]. Studies in southern India, and Greenland reported suboptimal performance of this test in screening for PAC [26, 27]. Therefore, in this study, a modified Van Herrick grading scheme was performed with eight categories (0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45, 0.75, and ≥ 1.0 CT) instead of the usual five categories. These values were chosen to give class limits of 0, < 0.1, < 0.2, < 0.3, < 0.4, < 0.5, < 1.0, and ≥ 1.0 CT. This technique has been demonstrated to be valid in other studies [2830].
Our research shows that the peripheral ACD declines by 0.31 CT per diopter of SE and was 0.19 CT shallower in women than in men. Our findings agree with previous studies that women are more likely to have a shallower peripheral ACD [31]. Similar to other reports, our results are consistent with hyperopic patients likely to have shallower ACDs [32].
The present study used three different indexes (SE, peripheral ACD, SE combined with peripheral ACD) to investigate the most efficient way for PACD screening. The independent SE as the screening index for PACD was not statistically observed and did not significantly improve the screen capability of peripheral ACD for PACD, too. On the basis of these findings, only peripheral ACD measurement should be used to PACD screening in community elderly Chinese.
In our research, when peripheral ACD was < 0.3 CT, Youden index performed best in all groups and the positive predictive value was 0.703, however, a higher sensitivity is needed for effective community screening. The use of a CT cut off value of 0.4 would achieve much higher sensitivity (0.846). Our findings disagree with those from North America, Greenland, and Australia, which reported a cut-off value of 0.25 CT [26, 28, 33]. The reasons may be that the pathogenisis of angle closure is different in different population and the assessment method of peripheral ACD in this study is different from that in other studies. Similarly, Foster et al. also reported the augmented Van Herrick scheme offers enhanced performance in detection of established PACG [29].
A limitation of this study is that only subjects with peripheral ACD < 0.5 CT were asked to undergo gonioscopy, which may give rise to a potential cause of bias. Three major rationales were used for our screening method design. First, according to Van Herrick, a subject with a peripheral ACD ≥0.5 CT would have a very low probability of having angle closure [25]. Second, there was a study in Australia, in which goniscopy was carried out only with peripheral ACD ≤ 0.3 CT [28]. Third, Foster et al. performed goniscopy on subjects and indicated that in subjects witth peripheral ACD ≥0.5 CT, no patients had closed angles. Moreover, when the cut off of < 0.3 CT with peripheral ACD was used in this study, the Youden index was still not particularly high, which called a measure with a higher sensitivity for community screening of glaucoma. Therefore, a peripheral ACD < 0.5 CT is likely to be a relatively cost-effective index for glaucoma screening, although we do not recommend that only the estimation of peripheral ACD be used instead of gonioscopic examination in patients suspected of glaucoma.

Conclusions

Peripheral ACD measurement is recommended for PACD screening in community elderly Chinese. Further research is still required for finding out the most efficient screening technique for primary angle closure disease in China.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University (registration number: 2010 K059).
Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(5):389–93.CrossRef Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80(5):389–93.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Thylefors B, Negrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, et al. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong TY, Loon SC, Saw SM. The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(4):506–11.CrossRef Wong TY, Loon SC, Saw SM. The epidemiology of age related eye diseases in Asia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(4):506–11.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hovsgol province, northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1996;114(10):1235–41.CrossRef Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, et al. Glaucoma in Mongolia. A population-based survey in Hovsgol province, northern Mongolia. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1996;114(10):1235–41.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2000;118(8):1105–11.CrossRef Foster PJ, Oen FT, Machin D, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in Chinese residents of Singapore: a cross-sectional population survey of the Tanjong Pagar district. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2000;118(8):1105–11.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1710–6.CrossRef Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(9):1710–6.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(7):2782–8.CrossRef He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of glaucoma in adult Chinese: a population-based study in Liwan District, Guangzhou. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(7):2782–8.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baskaran M, Foo RC, Cheng CY, et al. The prevalence and types of Glaucoma in an urban Chinese population: the Singapore Chinese eye study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):874–80.CrossRef Baskaran M, Foo RC, Cheng CY, et al. The prevalence and types of Glaucoma in an urban Chinese population: the Singapore Chinese eye study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):874–80.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng JW, Zong Y, Zeng YY, et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in adult Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103222.CrossRef Cheng JW, Zong Y, Zeng YY, et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in adult Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103222.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu ML, Wang YX. The prevalence of blindness caused by primary angle closure glaucoma in middle-aged Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 2017;53(5):373–7. Liu ML, Wang YX. The prevalence of blindness caused by primary angle closure glaucoma in middle-aged Chinese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 2017;53(5):373–7.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, et al. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74(2):113–9.CrossRef Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, et al. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74(2):113–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsbirk PH. Primary angle-closure glaucoma. Oculometry, epidemiology, and genetics in a high risk population. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1976;127:5–31. Alsbirk PH. Primary angle-closure glaucoma. Oculometry, epidemiology, and genetics in a high risk population. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1976;127:5–31.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54(3):161–9.CrossRef Lowe RF. Aetiology of the anatomical basis for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biometrical comparisons between normal eyes and eyes with primary angle-closure glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1970;54(3):161–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sihota R, Lakshmaiah NC, Agarwal HC, et al. Ocular parameters in the subgroups of angle closure glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;28(4):253–8.CrossRef Sihota R, Lakshmaiah NC, Agarwal HC, et al. Ocular parameters in the subgroups of angle closure glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000;28(4):253–8.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quigley H, et al. Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(9):1489–95.CrossRef Congdon NG, Youlin Q, Quigley H, et al. Biometry and primary angle-closure glaucoma among Chinese, white, and black populations. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(9):1489–95.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho H, Ozaki M, Mizoguchi T, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in Asians: comparison of biometric and anterior segment parameters between Japanese and Chinese subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(4):601–8.CrossRef Ho H, Ozaki M, Mizoguchi T, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in Asians: comparison of biometric and anterior segment parameters between Japanese and Chinese subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(4):601–8.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2005;123(4):527–32.CrossRef Aung T, Nolan WP, Machin D, et al. Anterior chamber depth and the risk of primary angle closure in 2 East Asian populations. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2005;123(4):527–32.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hung PT, Chou LH. Provocation and mechanism of angle-closure glaucoma after iridectomy. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1979;97(10):1862–4.CrossRef Hung PT, Chou LH. Provocation and mechanism of angle-closure glaucoma after iridectomy. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1979;97(10):1862–4.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat He J, Zou H, Lee RK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma in a city of Eastern China: a population-based study in Pudong New District, Shanghai. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:134.CrossRef He J, Zou H, Lee RK, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma in a city of Eastern China: a population-based study in Pudong New District, Shanghai. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15:134.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat He J, Zou H, Tong X, et al. Prevalence of primary glaucoma among adults aged 50 years or above population in Huamu community: a cross-sectional survey in Shanghai, 2011. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 2014;50(5):349–54. He J, Zou H, Tong X, et al. Prevalence of primary glaucoma among adults aged 50 years or above population in Huamu community: a cross-sectional survey in Shanghai, 2011. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 2014;50(5):349–54.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–42.CrossRef Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, et al. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86(2):238–42.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreuger DE, Milton RC, Maunder LR. The Framingham eye study: introduction to the monograph. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24(6):614–20.CrossRef Kreuger DE, Milton RC, Maunder LR. The Framingham eye study: introduction to the monograph. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24(6):614–20.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfs RC, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, et al. Risk of acute angle-closure glaucoma after diagnostic mydriasis in nonselected subjects: the Rotterdam study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(12):2683–7.PubMed Wolfs RC, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, et al. Risk of acute angle-closure glaucoma after diagnostic mydriasis in nonselected subjects: the Rotterdam study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38(12):2683–7.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao JL. An epidemiological survey of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in Tibet. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 1990;26(1):47–50. Zhao JL. An epidemiological survey of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in Tibet. [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chin J Ophthalmol. 1990;26(1):47–50.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(4):626–9.CrossRef Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68(4):626–9.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Alsbirk PH. Limbal and axial chamber depth variations. A population study in Eskimos. Acta Ophthalmol. 1986;64(6):593–600.CrossRef Alsbirk PH. Limbal and axial chamber depth variations. A population study in Eskimos. Acta Ophthalmol. 1986;64(6):593–600.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas R, George T, Braganza A, et al. The flashlight test and van Herick's test are poor predictors for occludable angles. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1996;24(3):251–6.CrossRef Thomas R, George T, Braganza A, et al. The flashlight test and van Herick's test are poor predictors for occludable angles. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1996;24(3):251–6.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cockburn DM. Slitlamp estimate of anterior chamber depth as a predictor of the gonioscopic visibility of the angle structures. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1982;59(11):904–8.CrossRef Cockburn DM. Slitlamp estimate of anterior chamber depth as a predictor of the gonioscopic visibility of the angle structures. Am J Optom Physiol Optic. 1982;59(11):904–8.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(2):186–92.CrossRef Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(2):186–92.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Baskaran M, Oen FT, Chan YH, et al. Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):501–6.CrossRef Baskaran M, Oen FT, Chan YH, et al. Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):501–6.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamo J, Saso M, Tsuruta M, et al. Aging effect on peripheral anterior chamber depth in male and female subjects investigated by scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007;111(7):518–25.PubMed Kamo J, Saso M, Tsuruta M, et al. Aging effect on peripheral anterior chamber depth in male and female subjects investigated by scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007;111(7):518–25.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohamed-Noor J, Abd-Salam D. Refractive errors and biometry of primary angle-closure disease in a mixed Malaysian population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(8):1246–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Mohamed-Noor J, Abd-Salam D. Refractive errors and biometry of primary angle-closure disease in a mixed Malaysian population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(8):1246–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Vargas E, Drance SM. Anterior chamber depth in angle-closure glaucoma. Clinical methods of depth determination in people with and without the disease. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1973;90(6):438–9.CrossRef Vargas E, Drance SM. Anterior chamber depth in angle-closure glaucoma. Clinical methods of depth determination in people with and without the disease. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 1973;90(6):438–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Peripheral anterior chamber depth and screening techniques for primary angle closure disease in community elderly Chinese
verfasst von
Qin Luo
Wenwen Xue
Yin Yuan
Chaowei Fu
Jiangnan He
Haidong Zou
Xiaowei Tong
Richard K. Lee
Ling Ge
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2415
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01618-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

BMC Ophthalmology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Die Verwendung von Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit stellt immer eine Off-label-Anwendung dar. Ein Einsatz von Arzneimitteln muss daher besonders sorgfältig auf sein Risiko-Nutzen-Verhältnis bewertet werden. In der vorliegenden …

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Originalie

Die endogene Endophthalmitis ist eine hämatogen fortgeleitete, bakterielle oder fungale Infektion, die über choroidale oder retinale Gefäße in den Augapfel eingeschwemmt wird [ 1 – 3 ]. Von dort infiltrieren die Keime in die Netzhaut, den …

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

Vitrektomie Leitthema

Eine endogene Endophthalmitis stellt einen ophthalmologischen Notfall dar, der umgehender Diagnostik und Therapie bedarf. Es sollte mit geeigneten Methoden, wie beispielsweise dem Freiburger Endophthalmitis-Set, ein Keimnachweis erfolgen. Bei der …

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Die bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea, insbesondere ohne die Ausbildung von lichtstreuenden Narben, ist oberstes Gebot, um einer dauerhaften Schädigung der Hornhaut frühzeitig entgegenzuwirken und die Funktion des Auges zu erhalten.   

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.