Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer 6/2019

08.06.2019 | Original Article

Pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan: results of an online survey

verfasst von: Chikako Shimizu, Yukinori Sakata, Ruiko Sakai, Hiroki Ikezawa, Yoshiki Uetaki, Toshiyuki Matsuoka

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although communication between patients with breast cancer and physicians is central to treatment decision-making for patients and the concept of shared decision-making has been increasingly advocated worldwide, little is known about decision-making and perceptions among the population in Japan. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to clarify the status of pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan and assess factors associated with patient satisfaction with patient–physician communication.

Methods

Data for women previously treated with pharmacotherapy agents for breast cancer in Japan were collected in July 2017 using an online survey. Respondents were categorized by their decision-making role (active, shared, passive). Characteristics, decisional conflict level, and satisfaction with communication with their physician at the time of pharmacotherapy selection were stratified by decision-making roles. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with satisfaction.

Results

Of 486 women that responded, nearly half played an active decision-making role (48.4%) and 26.0% played a shared role. The lowest decisional conflict and higher satisfaction were observed among those who played a shared role. The highest decisional conflict and lower satisfaction were observed in passive decision-makers. Shared decision-making, a longer consultation time with the physician, and multiple treatment options provided by the physician were significantly associated with satisfaction with communication with the physician.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that among patients with breast cancer, a shared role in treatment decision-making, longer consultation time at treatment selection, and having multiple treatment options are important for higher patient satisfaction with communication with their physician.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima M, Kuroki S, Shinkoda H, Suetsugu Y, Shimada K, Kaku T. Information-seeking experiences and decision-making roles of Japanese women with breast cancer. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2012;103(6):120–30.PubMed Nakashima M, Kuroki S, Shinkoda H, Suetsugu Y, Shimada K, Kaku T. Information-seeking experiences and decision-making roles of Japanese women with breast cancer. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi. 2012;103(6):120–30.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82(5):260–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82(5):260–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5275–80.CrossRefPubMed Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, Kissane DW, Schrag D. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5275–80.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilligan T, Coyle N, Frankel RM, Berry DL, Bohlke K, Epstein RM, et al. Patient-clinician communication: American society of clinical oncology consensus guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(31):3618–32.CrossRefPubMed Gilligan T, Coyle N, Frankel RM, Berry DL, Bohlke K, Epstein RM, et al. Patient-clinician communication: American society of clinical oncology consensus guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(31):3618–32.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelblatt J, Kreling B, Figeuriedo M, Feng S. What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(30):4908–13.CrossRefPubMed Mandelblatt J, Kreling B, Figeuriedo M, Feng S. What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(30):4908–13.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards A, Elwyn G. Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect. 2006;9(4):307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Edwards A, Elwyn G. Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Health Expect. 2006;9(4):307–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA. SCRN communication team. The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology. 2005;14(10):831–45 (discussion 846-7).CrossRefPubMed Hack TF, Degner LF, Parker PA. SCRN communication team. The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review. Psychooncology. 2005;14(10):831–45 (discussion 846-7).CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown R, Butow P, Wilson-Genderson M, Bernhard J, Ribi K, Juraskova I. Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):857–62.CrossRefPubMed Brown R, Butow P, Wilson-Genderson M, Bernhard J, Ribi K, Juraskova I. Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(8):857–62.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamauchi K, Nakao M, Nakashima M, Ishihara Y. Congruence between preferred and actual participation roles increases satisfaction with treatment decision making among Japanese women with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(4):987–94.PubMedPubMedCentral Yamauchi K, Nakao M, Nakashima M, Ishihara Y. Congruence between preferred and actual participation roles increases satisfaction with treatment decision making among Japanese women with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(4):987–94.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer. 2002;94(7):2076–80.CrossRefPubMed Bruera E, Willey JS, Palmer JL, Rosales M. Treatment decisions for breast carcinoma: patient preferences and physician perceptions. Cancer. 2002;94(7):2076–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaede U, Mahlich J, Nakayama M, Kobayashi H, Takahashi Y, Saito K, et al. Shared decision-making in patients with prostate cancer in Japan: patient preferences versus physician perceptions. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1–9.CrossRefPubMed Schaede U, Mahlich J, Nakayama M, Kobayashi H, Takahashi Y, Saito K, et al. Shared decision-making in patients with prostate cancer in Japan: patient preferences versus physician perceptions. J Glob Oncol. 2018;4:1–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):2883–5.CrossRefPubMed Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, Palmer L, Benisch-Tolley S. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):2883–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawaguchi T, Azuma K, Yamaguchi T, Soeda H, Sekine Y, Koinuma M, et al. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the decisional conflict scale to investigate the value of pharmacists’ information: a before and after study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawaguchi T, Azuma K, Yamaguchi T, Soeda H, Sekine Y, Koinuma M, et al. Development and validation of the Japanese version of the decisional conflict scale to investigate the value of pharmacists’ information: a before and after study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, Gagnon S, D’Amours D, Rousseau M, et al. Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(8):e308–14.PubMedPubMedCentral Légaré F, Kearing S, Clay K, Gagnon S, D’Amours D, Rousseau M, et al. Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(8):e308–14.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Linder SK, Swank PR, Vernon SW, Mullen PD, Morgan RO, Volk RJ. Validity of a low literacy version of the decisional conflict scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):521–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Linder SK, Swank PR, Vernon SW, Mullen PD, Morgan RO, Volk RJ. Validity of a low literacy version of the decisional conflict scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(3):521–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Légaré F, Leblanc A, Robitaille H, Turcotte S. The decisional conflict scale: moving from the individual to the dyad level. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(4):247–52.CrossRefPubMed Légaré F, Leblanc A, Robitaille H, Turcotte S. The decisional conflict scale: moving from the individual to the dyad level. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(4):247–52.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Atherton PJ, Smith T, Singh JA, Huntington J, Diekmann BB, Huschka M, et al. The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life. Cancer. 2013;119(12):2342–9.CrossRefPubMed Atherton PJ, Smith T, Singh JA, Huntington J, Diekmann BB, Huschka M, et al. The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life. Cancer. 2013;119(12):2342–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kokufu H. Conflict accompanying the choice of initial treatment in breast cancer patients. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2012;9(2):177–84.CrossRefPubMed Kokufu H. Conflict accompanying the choice of initial treatment in breast cancer patients. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2012;9(2):177–84.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrøm LH, Groenvold M. Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World’. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):235–44.CrossRefPubMed Ross L, Petersen MA, Johnsen AT, Lundstrøm LH, Groenvold M. Cancer patients’ evaluation of communication: a report from the population-based study ‘The Cancer Patient’s World’. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(1):235–44.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(4):1008–16.CrossRefPubMed Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(4):1008–16.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Japanese Breast Cancer Society (Ed.). The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer treatment 2018, vol. 1. 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara-Shuppan Publishers; 2018 (in Japanese). Japanese Breast Cancer Society (Ed.). The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer treatment 2018, vol. 1. 4th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara-Shuppan Publishers; 2018 (in Japanese).
Metadaten
Titel
Pharmacotherapy decision-making among patients with breast cancer in Japan: results of an online survey
verfasst von
Chikako Shimizu
Yukinori Sakata
Ruiko Sakai
Hiroki Ikezawa
Yoshiki Uetaki
Toshiyuki Matsuoka
Publikationsdatum
08.06.2019
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Elektronische ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-019-00986-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Breast Cancer 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.