Background
The polysaccharopeptide (PSP) extract of the Chinese medicinal mushroom
Coriolus versicolor (
Yunzhi) has been used in Asia to treat cancer as well as to alleviate weakness, improve immunological activities, appetite and comfort for patients [
1]. The strong immunomodulatory effects of PSP such as elevation of IL-2, natural killer cell activity and T-cell proliferation may be beneficial to advanced cancer patients with depressed immunity [
2,
3]. PSP can be potentially used to treat cancer due to its ability to distinguish cancerous cells from normal cells [
4‐
6]. However, concerns remain that the PSP extract may diminish the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic regimens because little is known about the PSP anti-tumor action mechanism. Our recent studies showed that instead of interfering with the anticancer actions of drugs PSP potentiated the anticancer effects of doxorubicin and etoposide in human leukemia cells [
3] and human breast cancer cells through interfering the S phase progression and DNA synthesis [
4]. As PSP synchronizes cells in S-phase, we hypothesize in this study that PSP may serve as a chemotherapeutic agent in combination therapy with other S-phase targeted drugs such as Camptothecin (CPT). CPT is a cytotoxic quinoline alkaloid isolated from the bark and stem of
Camptotheca acuminate (
Camptotheca,
Xishu, Happy Tree), a native plant of China. CPT kills cancer cells by interfering with the function of DNA topoisomerase I (TopI) during DNA replication in the S-phase [
7,
8]. Incubation of cells with CPT stabilizes the TopI-DNA cleavable complexes, leading to fragmentation of nuclear DNA [
8]. The cell sensitivity to cytotoxic effects of CPT was reported to reach the highest in the late S-phase and early G
2[
9]. CPT demonstrated remarkable anticancer activity in preliminary clinical trials but also produced side effects such as leucopenia [
10].
Using the S-phase synchronization strategy, the present study tests the hypothesis that pre-exposing the human myelogenous leukemia HL-60 cells to PSP increases cell death at low concentrations.
Methods
PSP (340 mg/capsule, Winsor Health Products Ltd, Hong Kong) powder was dissolved in distilled water by boiling. All water soluble fractions were collected, centrifuged and freeze-dried for a dry power. PSP stock solutions of 10 mg/ml were prepared from the dry powder to be used in all experiments.
Cell line and cell culture
HL-60 cells were routinely cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. The cultures were supplied with fresh complete medium and cell density was adjusted to 1 × 105 cells/ml per flask every three days to maintain asynchronicity and exponential growth. Cell densities were monitored to ensure that they did not exceed 1 × 106 cells/ml. In all experiments, cells were fed with fresh complete medium a day before experiments. Human peripheral blood (Buffy coat) obtained from healthy donors (age ranged 20-40 years) was provided by the Hong Kong Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated with Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden). Briefly, the diluted Buffy coat (1:1 with RPMI medium) was layered on the Ficoll-Paque and centrifuged at 400 g for 30 minutes at room temperature. The PBMCs were washed twice with RPMI medium and then suspended in the RPMI medium.
A series of dilutions was prepared from the PSP stock solution (10 mg/ml) in RPMI and incubated with the HL-60 cells for 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively. For combination treatment of PSP and CPT, the HL-60 cells were first exposed to PSP (25 μg/ml) for 72 hours before being exposed to CPT (1 μM) for five more hours. The PBMCs were treated with PSP and CPT in the same manner.
Cell proliferation and [3H] thymidine uptake assay
Cell proliferation and cell size were determined every 24 hours with Beckman Coulter Multisizer (Beckman Coulter Electronics Ltd, USA). Cell suspension was diluted in 20 ml PBS and the mixture was analyzed with the multisizer. Cell viability was evaluated with the Trypan Blue Exclusion test (Sigma, USA).
For [3H] thymidine uptake assay, HL-60 cells (1 × 104 per well) were pipetted onto a 96-well plate. After incubation with or without PSP, the cells were pulsed with 0.5 μCi/well of [3H] thymidine for six hours before harvest. Incorporated radioactivity was counted in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS3000, Beckman, USA). Each concentration was tested in quadruplicates and repeated on three separate occasions.
BrdUrd/PI immunostaining analysis by flow cytometry
Bromodeoxuridine (BrdUrd) propidium iodide (PI) flow cytometry was used to determine DNA synthesis time (Ts) via measurement of the relative movement of the BrdUrd labeled S-phase cells as previously described [
11‐
13]. Cells were pulsed with BrdUrd (10 μM) in the last 20 minutes of PSP incubation and were washed, re-suspended in warm complete culture medium with or without PSP and further incubated for one and six hours for BrdUrd analysis. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with ice-cold ethanol (75%w/v in Milli-Q water) and the fixed samples were stored at -20°C for further analysis. Fixative was removed by centrifugation and the cell pellets were washed with PBS. DNA was partially denatured by incubation with 1 M HCl for 20 minutes at room temperature, after which the cells were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20. Cells were incubated with 100 μl of anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody (5 μg/ml; 1:100) for one hour and further incubation with a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (100 μl; 1:40) in the dark for another 30 minutes. The cells were stained with PI staining solution (50 μg/ml PI, 10 μg/ml RNase, 0.01 M Tris and 10 mM NaCl) before flow cytometric analysis. The amount of DNA distribution in the difference phases of the cell cycle was analyzed with the use of the WinList (Version 1.04, Verity Software House Inc., USA) and ModFit software (Version 5.11, Verity Software House Inc., USA).
Relative movement (RM) and DNA synthesis time (Ts) were calculated as previously described [
6,
11‐
15]:
where Flud(t), FG0/G1 and FG2/M are the mean PI fluorescence (DNA content) of the BrdUrd labeled undivided population G0/G1 and G2/M at time t (hour) after BrdUrd pulsing respectively. RM(0) and RM(t) are the relative movement values at time 0 and t (hour) respectively after BrdUrd pulsing.
Quantification of apoptosis by annexin V/PI flow cytometry
Using the annexin V binding assay with the Apoptosis Detection Kit (Trevigen Inc., USA) and flow cytometry, we determined the apoptosis induction effect of CPT with and without PSP treatment on both HL-60 cells and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Cells (2 × 105) after incubation with or without PSP and CPT were harvested and centrifuged at 400 × g for five minutes to remove the culture medium. Cell pellets were washed with 3 ml PBS and re-suspended in 500 μl binding buffer. After centrifugation and removal of the binding buffer, 100 μl of annexin V incubation reagent (10 μl 10 × binding buffer, 10 μl propidium iodide, 1 μl annexin V conjugate and 79 μl Milli-Q water) were added to each sample. Samples were incubated for 15 minutes in the dark at room temperature. Cell suspension was then diluted with 400 μl binding buffer and was analyzed with a Coulter's Epic Elite flow cytometer (Beckman and Coulter Electronics Ltd, USA).
Bivariate analysis of cyclin E and cyclin B1 expression by flow cytometry
Cells were harvested into 15 ml centrifugation tubes. All samples were washed twice with 10 ml PBS and centrifuged at 400 g for five minutes. Supernatant was removed and cell pellets were fixed with ice-cold ethanol (75%w/v in Milli-Q water). The fixed samples were stored at -20°C for further analysis.
The fixed samples were washed with 10 ml PBS-BSA (1%). The cells were incubated with 100 μl of anti-cyclin E monoclonal antibody (5 μg/ml; 1:100) or anti-cyclin B1 monoclonal antibody (1 μg/ml; 1:100) for one hour. Mouse monoclonal isotype controls at equivalent concentration were used instead of the anti-cyclin antibodies for the background fluorescence check. After incubation, the primary antibodies of the cells were washed twice with PBS-BSA, labeled with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (100 μl; 1:40) and kept in the dark at room temperature for one hour. The cells were stained with PI solution before flow cytometric analysis.
Western blot analysis of the expression of cyclin E and cyclin B1
Cells were harvested and washed twice with ice-cold PBS (45 ml) followed by centrifugation at 400 × g for five minutes. Cell pellet was re-suspended in lysis buffer (5 × 106 cells/100 μl) with HEPES (25 mM; pH7.5), NaCl (150 mM), EDTANa2 (1 mM), DTT (1 mM), Triton × 100 (1%) and protease inhibitor cocktail. The suspension was then frozen and thawed three times with cold methanol at -80°C before it was placed in ice for further 30 minutes and then centrifuged. After centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 30 minutes at 4°C, the suspension was collected and stored at -80°C. Protein quantity was determined with Bradford assay. Protein extracts were mixed with an equal volume of 2× sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% v/v glycerol, 0.2 M DTT, 0.02% bromophenol blue, pH6.8) and the mixture was heated in boiling water for three minutes.
Equal amounts of total protein (20 μg) were subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting onto a PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA). Membranes were incubated with anti-cyclin E antibodies and detected with the matching species specific secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies. Proteins were detected with the ECL system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) and the band intensity was measured with Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences between the treatment and control groups were determined by post-hoc Duncan's test with SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 12·0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Probability values (P) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Discussion
One of the advantages of PSP over many western anticancer drugs is its ability to distinguish cancer cells from the normal cells [
4‐
6]. Moreover, PSP can synchronize cells and kill them in S-phase [
5,
6]. PSP is therefore a useful anticancer agent against rapidly proliferating tumor cells characterized by high proportion of S-phase cells exemplified by the HL-60 cells. The present study shows that PSP-pretreated cells enhanced the cytotoxicity of CPT.
Exposure of HL-60 cells to PSP delayed cell progression, predominantly through S and with lesser extent through G2. To a lesser degree, cells exiting G2/M were also impaired, significantly reducing G1 cells after PSP treatment. PSP increased the DNA content in HL-60 cells (detected with BrdUrd labeling); however, the rate of DNA synthesis was reduced (detected with [3H]-thymidine uptake).
CPT is cytotoxic to human promyelocytic HL-60 cells in both S and G
2 phase [
16]. Its increased toxicity towards S-phase cells may be explained by the possible collision between moving replication forks and CPT-stabilized topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complexes, resulting in fork arrest and its breakage [
17]. We previously reported that PSP inhibited topoisomerase IIα in the HL-60 cells [
5]. It is not clear whether PSP exhibits similar effect as CPT in terms of inhibiting the TOP1 activity. Further studies are warranted to test such a possibility.
Similar to many anticancer agents, PSP is capable of inducing DNA fragmentation (pre-G
1 peak) at higher doses (100 μg/ml) [
5]. The present study demonstrated that PSP enhanced cytotoxicity or the sensitivity of the HL-60 cells induced by CPT (detected with annexin V/PI flow cytometry). Flow cytometry analysis showed that PSP enhanced the anticancer effects of CPT via either cell cycle perturbation at low dose or apoptotic machinery at high dose. PSP at low dose (25 μg/ml) caused S-phase accumulation, which may be up-regulated by the G
1/S checkpoint cyclin E. The pre-G
1 population increased with a significant decrease in S-phase population, suggesting that PSP must first accumulate the S-phase cells before exerting its cytotoxic effect on the HL-60 cells. Our propose that the ability of PSP to arrest cancer cells in the DNA synthesis (S) phase PSP sensitizes the HL-60 cells to undergo apoptosis induced by CPT.
Study results indicated that cyclin E was more important than cyclin B
1 in CPT-induced apoptosis in the HL-60 cells. Cyclin E is essential in the cell cycle from G
1 to S-phase and the initiation of DNA replication [
18‐
21]. PSP-induced cyclin E expression led to S-phase cell accumulation, which subsequently delayed DNA synthesis, hence a longer Ts in the PSP pre-treated HL-60 cells. In addition to the regulatory role in G
1-S transition, cyclin E may also be involved in apoptosis. A recent study demonstrated that the induction of cyclin E expression sensitized the IM-9 cells to γ-irradiation-induced apoptosis [
22]. Irradiation-induced cyclin E overexpression could result in an enhanced caspases activation and phosphatidylserine translocation on the plasma membrane, leading to cell death in the IM-9 cells [
22]. Furthermore, DNA-damage-induced cyclin E-H1K was suggested to be involved in a late apoptosis checkpoint [
23]. We believe that the up-regulation of the cyclin E may be a sensitization process of PSP whereby the HL-60 cells undergo DNA damage by CPT. Consequently, a larger number of protein-associated DNA strand breaks may lead to more pronounced apoptosis induction.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by donation received from the Hong Kong Health Association for Health Ltd (Hong Kong, SAR, China) and the RGC Grants 7511/03M of the University of Hong Kong. We wish to thank Jill Eaton-Evans for her assistance in revising this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
JMFW designed the study, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. WHS, XTY, PPJ and LLYW conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.