Skip to main content

01.12.2011 | Original Paper

Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective comparative study

verfasst von: Fernando Marchant, Pedro Recabal, Mario I. Fernández, Francisco Osorio, Javiera Benavides

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL) is an established technique for the treatment of renal calculi. Some reports have challenged the need for a nephrostomy tube at the end of the procedure, arguing that it accounts for a longer hospital stay and increased postoperative pain. During the last years, several series have addressed the feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL, where a double-J ureteral stent is left in place after the end of intervention instead of a nephrostomy tube. The aim of our study was to compare conventional versus tubeless PNL in terms of postoperative morbidity. Eighty-five patients who underwent PNL at a single center met the inclusion criteria (complete intraoperative stone clearance, no evidence of active intraoperative bleeding, single percutaneous access, and operative time shorter than 2 h) and were randomized at the end of the procedure to have placed either a nephrostomy tube (group 1) or a double-J ureteral stent (group 2). Outcomes assessed were postoperative pain, bleeding complications, leakage complications, and length of hospital stay. The patients in the tubeless group had a shorter hospital stay (3.7 vs. 5.8 days; P < 0.001), and less postoperative pain at postoperative days 2 and 3 (P < 0.001). No significant difference in bleeding or leakage complications was observed. This study supports the feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL in a selected group of the patients, suggesting some intraoperative criteria to be considered when performing it. However, further controlled studies will have to determine its impact on stone-free rates prior to be considered the standard technique in these selected cases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ (1989) The first kidney stone. Ann Intern Med 111:1006–1009PubMed Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ (1989) The first kidney stone. Ann Intern Med 111:1006–1009PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R (1982) Percutaneous kidney stone removal. Eur Urol 8(5):304–311PubMed Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R (1982) Percutaneous kidney stone removal. Eur Urol 8(5):304–311PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP et al (1984) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: extraction of renal and ureteral calculi from 100 patients. J Urol 131(5):868–871PubMed Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP et al (1984) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: extraction of renal and ureteral calculi from 100 patients. J Urol 131(5):868–871PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ et al (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1, 000 cases. J Urol 134(6):1077–1081PubMed Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ et al (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1, 000 cases. J Urol 134(6):1077–1081PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W (1955) Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc 157(11):891–894PubMed Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W (1955) Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc 157(11):891–894PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris DS, Wei JT, Taub DA et al (2006) Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 175:1731–1736PubMedCrossRef Morris DS, Wei JT, Taub DA et al (2006) Temporal trends in the use of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 175:1731–1736PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Deane LA, Clayman RV (2007) Advances in percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am 34:383–395PubMedCrossRef Deane LA, Clayman RV (2007) Advances in percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am 34:383–395PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramakumar S, Segura JW (2000) Renal calculi: percutaneous management. Urol Clin North Am 27:617–622PubMedCrossRef Ramakumar S, Segura JW (2000) Renal calculi: percutaneous management. Urol Clin North Am 27:617–622PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J et al (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582PubMedCrossRef Bellman GC, Davidoff R, Candela J et al (1997) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 157(5):1578–1582PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sofer M, Beri A, Friedman A et al (2007) Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 70(3):412–416 discussion 416–417PubMedCrossRef Sofer M, Beri A, Friedman A et al (2007) Extending the application of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 70(3):412–416 discussion 416–417PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 180:612–614PubMedCrossRef Crook TJ, Lockyer CR, Keoghane SR et al (2008) A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 180:612–614PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM et al (2004) A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172(2):565–567PubMedCrossRef Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM et al (2004) A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172(2):565–567PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A et al (2008) A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22(3):439–442PubMedCrossRef Agrawal MS, Agrawal M, Gupta A et al (2008) A randomized comparison of tubeless and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22(3):439–442PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S et al (2001) The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 95(6):1356–1361PubMedCrossRef Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S et al (2001) The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 95(6):1356–1361PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Delnay KM, Wake RW (1998) Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):375–377PubMedCrossRef Delnay KM, Wake RW (1998) Safety and efficacy of tubeless percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. World J Urol 16(6):375–377PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Limb J, Bellman GC (2002) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology 59(4):527–531 discussion 531PubMedCrossRef Limb J, Bellman GC (2002) Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients. Urology 59(4):527–531 discussion 531PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS et al (2005) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 96(6):879–883PubMedCrossRef Shah HN, Kausik VB, Hegde SS et al (2005) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports. BJU Int 96(6):879–883PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rana AM, Mithani S (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol 21(2):169–172PubMedCrossRef Rana AM, Mithani S (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: call of the day. J Endourol 21(2):169–172PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA et al (2008) A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore vs tubeless. J Endourol 22(7):1433–1439PubMedCrossRef Shah HN, Sodha HS, Khandkar AA et al (2008) A randomized trial evaluating type of nephrostomy drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: small bore vs tubeless. J Endourol 22(7):1433–1439PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito T et al (2002) Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 69:136–140PubMedCrossRef Damiano R, Oliva A, Esposito T et al (2002) Early and late complications of double pigtail ureteral stent. Urol Int 69:136–140PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Vega Vega A, García Alonso D, García Alonso CJ (2007) Characterization of urinary tract symptoms and quality of life in patients with double-pig-tailed ureteral stents. Actas Urol Esp 31(7):738–742PubMedCrossRef Vega Vega A, García Alonso D, García Alonso CJ (2007) Characterization of urinary tract symptoms and quality of life in patients with double-pig-tailed ureteral stents. Actas Urol Esp 31(7):738–742PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pryor JL, Langley MJ, Jenkins AD (1991) Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol 145(4):719–722PubMed Pryor JL, Langley MJ, Jenkins AD (1991) Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol 145(4):719–722PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vallejo Herrador J, Burgos Revilla FJ, Alvarez Alba J et al (1998) Double J ureteral catheter. Clinical complications. Arch Esp Urol 51(4):361–373PubMed Vallejo Herrador J, Burgos Revilla FJ, Alvarez Alba J et al (1998) Double J ureteral catheter. Clinical complications. Arch Esp Urol 51(4):361–373PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, Keeley FX Jr et al (2001) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis. J Endourol 15:151–154PubMedCrossRef Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, Keeley FX Jr et al (2001) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of quality of life to aid outcome analysis. J Endourol 15:151–154PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Leibovici D, Cooper A, Lindner A et al (2005) Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life. Isr Med Assoc J 7(8):491–494PubMed Leibovici D, Cooper A, Lindner A et al (2005) Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life. Isr Med Assoc J 7(8):491–494PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Matin SF, Feeley T, Kennamer D (2009) Office cystoscopy and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies pose minimal risk: prospective evaluation of 921 procedures. Urology 73(6):1175–1178PubMedCrossRef Matin SF, Feeley T, Kennamer D (2009) Office cystoscopy and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies pose minimal risk: prospective evaluation of 921 procedures. Urology 73(6):1175–1178PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Bensalah K et al (2010) Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management. J Urol 183(1):188–189PubMedCrossRef Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Bensalah K et al (2010) Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: cost comparison of immediate second look flexible nephroscopy versus expectant management. J Urol 183(1):188–189PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective comparative study
verfasst von
Fernando Marchant
Pedro Recabal
Mario I. Fernández
Francisco Osorio
Javiera Benavides
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0367-9

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.