The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-230X-14-125) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
HA, JH, BS: study design, data collection and manuscript preparation. ZA: statistics analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
When primary care of constipation fails, the patient may need emergency hospitalisation for disimpaction. This study aimed to provide population-based data on the number of unplanned admissions and the cost to the healthcare system for constipation in Victoria, Australia in financial year 2010–11.
The Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset was examined to find the number of emergency hospital separations coded as constipation (ICD-10-AM Code K390). An estimate of costs was determined from the number of weighted inlier equivalent separations (WIES) multiplied by the WEIS price, used by the Victorian Government for funding purposes.
There were 3978 emergency separations for constipation in Victoria in 2010–2011, 92% in public hospitals. Fifty-five percent were female and 38% > 75 years old. One third stayed overnight and 1/3 more than 1 day. The emergency bed day rate was 7.1 per 10,000 of population. The estimate of cost, based on WEIS, was approximately $8.3 million. Potential savings could be made by reducing the number of separations in 6 Local Government Areas (LGAs).
This study shows that the burden (in number of admissions, emergency bed days and overall direct costs) in managing emergency admissions for constipation in Victoria, Australia, is very significant and likely to be similar in other developed countries. Improved primary healthcare and alternative ways to achieve faecal disimpaction without emergency admission could save the public health system a proportion of this $8.3 million.
Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey T, Blank A, Newman L: Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff. 1993, 12: 162-173. CrossRef
Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C, Sharp D: Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public Health (Elsevier). 2009, 123: 169-173. 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001. CrossRef
Balogh RS: Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions Among Persons with an Intellectual Disability, Manitoba, 1999–2003. 2010, PhD thesis: University of Toronto
Sanderson C, Dixon J: Conditions for which onset or hospital admission is potentially preventable by timely and effective ambulatory care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000, 5: 222-230. PubMed
Acute Health Division: The Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset: An Overview. 2001, Melbourne: Department of Human Services
Mugie SM, Di Lorenzo C: From ACE to replace: role of surgery and transplantation in motility disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011, 53 (Suppl 2): S59-S61. PubMed
ABS: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) - Technical Paper, 2006 pp. Cat. No. 2039.2030. 2008, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)
AIHW: Australian Hospital Statistics 2010–11. 2012, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), Health Services Series No 43, Cat No HSE117
Jordan-Ely J, Hutson J, Southwell B: Top down medical treatment for disimpaction of patients in aged-care setting. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012, 24 (S2): A238-P114.
- Potentially avoidable hospitalisation for constipation in Victoria, Australia in 2010–11
John M Hutson
Bridget R Southwell
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Inneren Medizin
Mail Icon II