nach oben

Journal of Prevention

Erschienen in:

01.06.2012 | Original Paper

Predicting High Risk Adolescents’ Substance Use Over Time: The Role of Parental Monitoring

verfasst von: Heddy Kovach Clark, Stephen R. Shamblen, Chris L. Ringwalt, Sean Hanley

Erschienen in: Journal of Prevention | Ausgabe 2-3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We examined whether parental monitoring at baseline predicted subsequent substance use in a high-risk youth population. Students in 14 alternative high schools in Washington State completed self-report surveys at three time points over the course of 2 years. Primary analyses included 1,423 students aged 14–20 who lived with at least one parent or step-parent at baseline. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we found that high parental monitoring at baseline predicted significantly less use of alcohol, marijuana, downers, cocaine, PCP, LSD, and prescription drugs and drinking to intoxication at the first posttest. Approximately 1 year later, high parental monitoring at baseline predicted significantly less use of alcohol, cocaine, prescription drugs, uppers, and ecstasy and drinking to intoxication. Study results suggest that parental monitoring serves as a protective factor, even for high-risk alternative high school students. Including a parental monitoring component may increase the effectiveness of traditional drug prevention programs.

Arthur, M. W., Hawkins, J. D., Pollard, J. A., Catalano, R. F., & Baglioni, A. J., Jr. (2002). Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review, 26, 575–601.PubMed

Barnes, G. M., & Farrell, M. P. (1992). Parental support and control as predictors of adolescent drinking, delinquency, and related problem behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 763–776.CrossRef

Barnes, G. M., Hoffman, J. H., Welte, J. W., Farrell, M. P., & Dintcheff, B. A. (2006). Effects of parental monitoring and peer deviance on substance use and delinquency. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1084–1104.CrossRef

Bauman, K., Foshee, V., Ennett, S., Hicks, K., & Pemberton, M. (2001). Family matters: A family-directed program designed to prevent adolescent tobacco and alcohol use. Health Promotion Practice, 2, 81–96.CrossRef

Beck, K. H., Boyle, J. R., & Boekeloo, B. O. (2003). Parental monitoring and adolescent alcohol risk in a clinic population. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 108–115.PubMedCrossRef

Beck, K. H., Boyle, J. R., & Boekeloo, B. O. (2004). Parental monitoring and adolescent drinking: Results of a 12-month follow-up. American Journal of Health Behavior, 28, 272–279.PubMedCrossRef

Chassin, L., Curran, P. J., Hussong, A. M., & Colder, C. R. (1996). The relation of parent alcoholism to adolescent substance use: A longitudinal follow-up study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 70–80.PubMedCrossRef

Chen, C.-Y., Storr, C. L., & Anthony, J. C. (2005). Influences of parenting practices on the risk of having a chance to try cannabis. Pediatrics, 115, 1631–1639.PubMedCrossRef

Chilcoat, H. D., & Anthony, J. C. (1996). Impact of parent monitoring on initiation of drug use through late childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 91–100.PubMedCrossRef

Chilcoat, H. D., Dishion, T. J., & Anthony, J. C. (1995). Parent monitoring and the incidence of drug sampling in urban elementary school children. American Journal of Epidemiology, 141, 25–31.PubMed

Clark, H. K., Ringwalt, C. L., Hanley, S., Shamblen, S. R., Flewelling, R. L., & Hano, M. C. (2010). Project SUCCESS’ effects on the substance use of alternative high school students. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 209–217.PubMedCrossRef

Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39, 1–38.

Dishion, T. J., & Loeber, R. (1985). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: The role of parents and peers revisited. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 11, 11–25.PubMedCrossRef

Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75.PubMedCrossRef

Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., & Kavanagh, K. (2003). The family check-up with high-risk young adolescents: Preventing early-onset substance use by parent monitoring. Behavior Therapy, 34, 553–571.CrossRef

Duncan, T., Duncan, S., & Stoolmiller, M. (1994). Modeling developmental processes using latent growth structural equation methodology. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 343–354.CrossRef

Ellickson, P. L., McCaffrey, D. F., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Longshore, D. L. (2003). New inroads in preventing adolescent drug use: Results from a large-scale trial of Project ALERT in middle schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1830–1836.PubMedCrossRef

Embry, D., Hankins, M., Biglan, A., & Boles, S. (2009). Behavioral and social correlates of methamphetamine use in a population-based sample of early and later adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 34, 343–351.PubMedCrossRef

Grunbaum, J. A., Kann, L., Kinchen, S. A., Ross, J. G., Gowda, V. R., Collins, J. L., et al. (2000a). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—National alternative high school Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 1998. Journal of School Health, 70, 5–17.PubMedCrossRef

Grunbaum, J. A., Lowry, R., & Kann, L. (2001). Prevalence of health-related behaviors among alternative high school students as compared with students attending regular high schools. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29, 337–343.PubMedCrossRef

Grunbaum, J. A., Tortolero, S., Weller, N., & Gingiss, P. (2000b). Cultural, social, and intrapersonal factors associated with substance use among alternative high school students. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 145–151.PubMedCrossRef

Hurlbert, S., & Lombardi, C. (2009). Final collapse of the Neyman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and rise of the neoFisherian. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 46, 311–349.

Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2007). Monitoring the Future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2006, Vol. 1. Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 07-6205). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 39–64.CrossRef

Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (2001). Preparing for the drug free years: Session-specific effects of a universal parent-training intervention with rural families. Journal of Drug Education, 31, 47–68.PubMedCrossRef

Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., & Whiteside, H. O. (2003). Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 1759–1787.PubMedCrossRef

Lac, A., & Crano, W. D. (2009). Monitoring matters: Meta-analytic review reveals the reliable linkage of parental monitoring with adolescent marijuana use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 578–586.CrossRef

Lehr, C. A., & Lange, C. M. (2003). Alternative schools and the students they serve: Perceptions of state directors of special education. (Policy Research Brief No. 14[1]). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute on Community Integration.

Li, X., Stanton, B., & Feigelman, S. (2000). Impact of perceived parental monitoring on adolescent risk behavior over 4 years. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 49–56.PubMedCrossRef

Martins, S. S., Storr, C. L., Alexandre, P. K., & Chilcoat, H. D. (2008). Adolescent ecstasy and other drug use in the National Survey of Parents and Youth: The role of sensation-seeking, parental monitoring and peer’s drug use. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 919–933.PubMedCrossRef

Morehouse, E., Fallick, A., & Pierce, B. (2002). Project SUCCESS implemenation manual: Schools using coordinated community efforts to strengthen students. Tarrytown, NY: Student Assistance Services Corporation.

National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. (2008). National Survey of American Attitudes on Substance Abuse XIII: Teens and Parents. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from http://www.casacolumbia.org/articlefiles/380-2008%20Teen%20Survey%20Report.pdf.

National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign. (n.d.). Parents: The anti-drug. Retrieved December 6, 2010, from http://www.theantidrug.com/.

Orwin, R., Cadell, D., Chu, A., Kalton, G., Maklan, D., Morin, C., et al. (2006). Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug media campaign 2004 report of findings, Executive summary (NCJ 215286). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Rai, A. A., Stanton, B., Wu, Y., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cottrell, L., et al. (2003). Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: An analysis of six cross-sectional data sets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 108–118.PubMedCrossRef

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reifman, A., Barnes, G. M., Dintcheff, B. A., Farrell, M. P., & Uhteg, L. (1998). Parental and peer influences on the onset of heavier drinking among adolescents. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 311–317.PubMed

Research Triangle Institute. (2003). 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (SAMHSA Contract No. 238-98-9008, Project No. 7190). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

Ringwalt, C., Paschal, M., Gorman, D., Derzon, J., & Kinlaw, A. (2011). The use of one- vs. two-tailed tests to evaluate prevention programs. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 34, 135–150.CrossRef

Shillington, A., Lehman, S., Clapp, J., Hovell, M., Sipan, C., & Blumberg, E. (2005). Parental monitoring: Can it continue to be protective among high-risk adolescents? Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 15, 1–15.CrossRef

Sooraksa, N. (2009). Influences of family and peer on amphetamine use behaviors in Thailand and implication for counseling. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 2, 449–460.

Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Galbraith, J., Cornick, G., Feigelman, S., Kaljee, L., et al. (2000). Parental underestimates of adolescent risk behavior: A randomized, controlled trial of a parental monitoring intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 18–26.PubMedCrossRef

Steinberg, L., Fletcher, A., & Darling, N. (1994). Parental monitoring and peer influences on adolescent substance use. Pediatrics, 93, 1060–1064.PubMed

Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., Stacy, A. W., & Craig, S. (1998). One-year outcomes of Project Towards No Drug Abuse. Preventive Medicine, 27, 632–642 [erratum: 627(635, Pt631), pp. 766, 1998].

Tang, J., & Sable, J. (2009). Characteristics of the 100 largest public elementary and secondary school districts in the United States: 2006–07 (No. NCES 2009-342). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.

Tobler, A. L., & Komro, K. A. (2010). Trajectories or parental monitoring and communication and effects on drug use among urban young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 560–568.PubMedCrossRef

Tucker, J., Ellickson, P., & Klein, D. (2008). Growing up in a permissive household: What deters at-risk adolescents from heavy drinking? Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 528–534.PubMed

US Census Bureau. (2003). United States Census 2000: Questionnaires. Retrieved August 11, 2008, from http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/2000quest.html.

Walls, T. A., Fairlie, A. M., & Wood, M. D. (2009). Parents do matter: A longitudinal two-part mixed model of early college alcohol participation and intensity. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 908–918.PubMed

Weller, N. F., Tortolero, S. R., Kelder, S. H., Grunbaum, J. A., Carvajal, S. C., & Gingiss, P. M. (1999). Health risk behaviors of Texas students attending dropout prevention/recovery schools in 1997. Journal of School Health, 69, 22–28.PubMedCrossRef

Wu, Y., Stanton, B. F., Galbraith, J., Kaljee, L., Cottrell, L., Li, X., et al. (2003). Sustaining and broadening intervention impact: A longitudinal randomized trial of 3 adolescent risk reduction approaches. Pediatrics, 111, e32–e38.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Predicting High Risk Adolescents’ Substance Use Over Time: The Role of Parental Monitoring
verfasst von: Heddy Kovach Clark
Stephen R. Shamblen
Chris L. Ringwalt
Sean Hanley
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Prevention / Ausgabe 2-3/2012
Print ISSN: 2731-5533
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-5541
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-012-0266-z

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2-3/2012

The Knowledge of Effective Parenting Scale (KEPS): A Tool for Public Health Approaches to Universal Parenting Programs

Association Between School Engagement and Disclosure of Suicidal Ideation to Adults Among Latino Adolescents

Physical Activity Interventions for Adolescents: An Ecological Perspective

How Parents of Adolescents Store and Monitor Alcohol in the Home

A Review of Social Isolation: An Important but Underassessed Condition in Older Adults

Adolescent Behavior: Multiple Levels of Social Influence