nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 23.04.2016 | Original Paper

Predictors of Infant Age at Enrollment in Early Infant Diagnosis Services in Kenya

verfasst von: Kathy Goggin, Catherine Wexler, Niaman Nazir, Vincent S. Staggs, Brad Gautney, Vincent Okoth, Samoel A. Khamadi, Andrea Ruff, Michael Sweat, An-Lin Cheng, Sarah Finocchario-Kessler

Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior | Ausgabe 9/2016

Abstract

Despite the importance of early detection to signal lifesaving treatment initiation for HIV+ infants, early infant diagnosis (EID) services have received considerably less attention than other aspects of prevention of mother to child transmission care. This study draws on baseline data from an on-going cluster randomized study of an intervention to improve EID services at six government hospitals across Kenya. Two logistic regressions examined potential predictors of “on time” (infant ≤6 weeks of age) vs. “late” (≥7 weeks) and “on time” versus “very late” (≥12 weeks) EID engagement among 756 mother-infant pairs. A quarter of the infants failed to get “on time” testing. Predictors of “on time” testing included being informed about EID by providers when pregnant, perceiving less HIV stigma, and mother’s level of education. Predictors of “very late” testing (≥12 weeks of age) included not being informed about EID by providers when pregnant and living farther from services. Findings highlight the importance of ensuring that health care providers actively and repeatedly inform HIV+ mothers of the availability of EID services, reduce stigma by frequently communicating judgment free support, and assisting mothers in early planning for accessing EID services. Extra care should be focused on engaging mothers with less formal education who are at increased risk for seeking “late” EID testing. This study offers clear targets for improving services so that all HIV-exposed infants can be properly engaged in EID services, thus increasing the potential for the best possible outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Introduction

Early infant diagnosis (EID; infant ≤6 weeks of age) of HIV infection that facilitates prompt treatment of HIV+ infants is a critical component of prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) efforts. EID is especially important in Kenya where HIV prevalence among pregnant women is 6.2 % [1] and 15 % of infants born to HIV+ mothers become infected [2]. In 2008 the Children with HIV Early ART (CHER) study provided evidence that early antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (before 12 weeks) reduced mortality by 76 % and slowed the progression of HIV by 75 % by improving long-term viral suppression and weight for age scores [3]. These findings prompted new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines to treat all HIV+ infants under age 2 rather than waiting for immunologic thresholds to be reached [4]. Initiating ART early and suppressing the virus before significant deterioration of the immune system occurs, preserves immune function to prevent clinical disease progression [5, 6], improves gross motor and neurodevelopmental profiles [7], and can reduce the presence of viral reservoirs in adolescence [8, 9]. Thus, EID is critical to the early identification, treatment, and long term health of these infants. EID also provides reassurance to the mothers of infants who remain HIV negative [10] which has been associated with improved infant bonding [11].

Despite the obvious benefits of receiving EID services, UNAIDS estimates that less than 40 % of HIV-exposed infants actually receive services within their first 2 months of life [12]. Eighteen studies from across East Africa have reported on the proportion and/or age of HIV exposed infants who are enrolled in EID [usually defined as age when a dried blood sample (DBS) was provided] [13‐31]. Estimates of uptake from these studies range from 25 % [17] to 88.3 % [15] with age of first DBS ranging from a median of 5.6 weeks [15] to 5 months [17, 21]. While the National AIDS Control Council of Kenya (NACC) estimates that EID coverage in Kenya reached 45 % of eligible infants in 2013 [32], estimates from individual Kenyan studies range widely from a low of 40 % up to a high of 87 % [18, 27, 28]. Median age of enrollment in the few Kenyan studies that tracked it ranged from between 8 weeks to 5 months [21, 27]. The limited coverage and shortcomings of current EID services means that many HIV+ infants are not diagnosed early enough to fully benefit from available treatment [33].

Despite the importance of early detection to signal treatment initiation for HIV+ infants, EID services in East Africa have received considerably less attention than other aspects of PMTCT care. Especially lacking are studies that investigate predictors of “on-time” (infant ≤6 weeks of age) engagement in EID that would help to identify factors that put infants at risk for late engagement and mutable targets for intervention. We could identify only 3 peer-reviewed published studies and one publically available master’s thesis conducted in East Africa [17, 22, 25, 34] that report on predictors of engagement in EID. None were conducted in Kenya. Combined, these studies highlight several potentially important predictors of timely engagement in EID (infant ≤6–8 weeks of age), specifically: mother’s current ART status (being on ART [22, 25]; not being on ART [17]; mother’s engagement in PMTCT during pregnancy [22]); mother’s access to an independent source of income [17]; having ≥2 previous children [25]; having fewer concerns that her child will face discrimination if HIV+ [34]; and delivering in a government facility [22]. While far from definitive, these studies offer some preliminary evidence for the importance of these predictors in timely EID engagement. Nevertheless, more studies are needed. Also lacking are studies that explore predictors of “very late” engagement (≥12 weeks of age) when the benefits of costly ART treatment are compromised. Predictors of really late engagement might be quite different than those that predict early engagement and are critical for the development of outreach and retention efforts.

This study draws on baseline data from an on-going cluster randomized study of an intervention to improve EID services at six sites across Kenya [35]. Potential predictors of “on time” (infant ≤6 weeks of age) EID engagement and “very late” (infant ≥12 weeks of age) are examined in a large and diverse sample.

Methods

This study sample included 756 HIV-infected mothers and their HIV-exposed infants (mother-infant pairs) enrolled in early infant diagnosis (EID) programs at six Kenyan government hospitals between February 2014 and June 2015. The hospitals ranged in size (provincial, county, and sub-county level), geographic regions (2 western, 2 central and 2 coastal), and population density (3 urban and 3 peri-urban sites). Participants were enrolled in a larger RCT evaluating the impact of the HIV Infant Tracking System (HITSystem) web-based intervention (35; Clinical Trials Id: NCT02072603). The focus of this study, predictors of age at EID enrollment, is neither an outcome of the larger study nor targeted by the HITSystem (a system level documentation and patient tracking system with text reminders for mothers) that seeks to improve communication and accountability of all stakeholders once infants are enrolled in EID services.

Participant Eligibility and Consent

HIV-infected mothers whose infant is <18 months of age at the time of initial enrollment in EID and presents for care through the maternal and child health (MCH) department at each site were eligible for inclusion in this dataset. Data from mothers <18 years of age or who present for care through other departments (e.g., Pediatric Inpatient Ward) were not included in analyses. Mothers were informed about the study during EID enrollment by trained research or clinical staff, and those wanting to participate provided written informed consent prior to enrollment or completion of the baseline survey. Less than 2 % of mothers declined participation. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Kenya Medical Research Institute (protocol #2726), and the University of Kansas Medical Center (protocol #13793).

Procedures

During the first EID enrollment visit, a brief survey was conducted with each consenting mother to collect basic demographic data and other variables of interest including: maternal age, parity, education level, partner status, partner support, income level, disclosure status, HIV stigma, violence, mother’s current HIV care status, how she was informed about EID services, EID knowledge, travel time to hospital and associated costs, and financial concerns. Other data (i.e., infant’s date of birth, antenatal care, maternal ARV prophylaxis regimens, and postpartum infant prophylaxis) was abstracted from patient charts.

Measures

The dependent and potential predictor variables are described in Table 1.

Table 1

Study measures

Measure	Definition/Survey Item	Scaling
Dependent variable
Infant age at DBS collection	Infant age in weeks based on number of days between the date of birth and DBS collection	“On-time”: 0–6 weeks vs. ≥7^a “very late”: ≥12 weeks vs. 0–11
Independent variables
Study site^b	Study site where mother enrolled
Maternal age	Mother’s current age	Continuous variable; years
Number of children	Number of children currently in mother’s care	Continuous variable; number
Education level	“What is the highest level of education you have completed?”	0 (No formal education), 1 (Partial/completed primary), or 2 (Partial secondary or beyond)^c
Partner status	“Are you currently with a partner?”	0 (No) or 1 (Yes, regardless of cohabitation status)
Partner/family support^d	“My partner/family members support my efforts to come to the hospital for my own health” “My partner/family members support my efforts to come to the hospital for my infant’s health”	1 (strongly disagree) through 4 (strongly agree)
Income level	Average weekly income	<750 Kenya Shillings^e or ≥750 Kenya Shillings
Disclosure	“To whom have you disclosed your HIV status?”	0 (No one) or 1 (Anyone)
HIV stigma^d	“Medical staff treat me badly because I am HIV positive” “Medical staff look down on me because I am HIV positive and had a baby”	1 (strongly disagree) through 4 (strongly agree)
Physical/psychological violence	“Has your partner mistreated you physically or psychologically in the past week?” “Has any family member mistreated you physically or psychologically in the past week?”	0 (No to both items) or 1 (Yes to either item)
How mother was informed about EID	“How did you learn about EID?”	0 (anyone else) or 1 (a health care worker while pregnant (PMTCT))
EID knowledge	Five ‘true’ or ‘false’ statements^f	Correct answers summed to create a 0 (lower) to 5 (higher) knowledge scale
Travel time to hospital	Number of minutes	Converted to hours for modeling
Cost of travel to hospital	Cost of round trip in Kenyan Shillings	Continuous variable; Kenyan Shillings
Concerns about money	“I worry that I won’t have enough money to get to the hospital for my infant’s scheduled HIV tests and re-tests”	1 (strongly disagree) through 4 (strongly agree) Continuous variable

^aCut-offs based on findings from the CHER study³ that demonstrated the benefits of early ART initiation in reducing mortality and HIV progression

^bIncluded as a control variable in the analysis

^cBased on feedback from our in-country colleagues, the six original educational level categories were collapsed into the more meaningful categories

^dResponses to items were averaged to create scales used in modeling

^eApproximately $7.74 USD

^fQuestions related to knowledge about testing and follow-up strategy for HIV testing among infants

Analyses

The goal of our analyses was to identify predictors of (1) “on-time” (≤6 weeks of age) versus “late” (≥7 weeks) and (2) “on-time” (≤6 weeks) versus “very late” (≥12 weeks) infant testing and quantify their association with the odds of “on-time” or “very late” testing. For descriptive purposes we compared the “on-time” and “late” (tested at or after 7 weeks of age) groups by computing their respective medians and standard deviations on the quantitative variables and frequencies on the categorical variables. Similarly, the “very late” group (a subset of the “late” group) was compared with the rest of the “late” group.

We used logistic regression to examine associations between the variables and the dichotomous dependent variables. Including the full set of variables in a logistic regression model would result in too large a model given the limited numbers in the “late” and “very late” groups and potentially raise multicollinearity concerns. Thus we followed a two-step model selection and fitting process for both dependent variables [36].

First we used the ‘lasso’ (least absolute shrinkage selection operator) [37] to select a subset of candidate predictors for each dependent variable. The lasso is similar to ridge regression in imposing a constraint on the magnitude of the regression coefficients but tends to shrink some coefficients to zero, thereby providing variable selection without the drawbacks of selection methods based on p values.

We implemented the lasso for logistic regression using the ‘glmnet’ package in R [38]. All variables except study site (a six-category control variable to be included in the final logistic regression models regardless of association with the dependent variables) were included in the lasso modeling; two dummy variables were created to model education level. For the “on-time” versus “late” model we set the lasso tuning parameter to select 12 candidate predictors, resulting in about 10 late observations per variable (including the site variable, equivalent to five dummy variables) in the final logistic regression model. Given the small size of the “very late” group, we took a less conservative approach and set the tuning parameter in the “very late” model to select seven candidate predictors, resulting in five “very late” observations per variable in the final logistic regression model [39]. Observations (n = 186) with missing data on any variable, including the individual stigma, support, and violence items, were excluded from this step of the analysis, leaving 570 observations in the lasso models for both dependent variables.

Next we fit the final logistic regression model for each dependent variable using the LOGISTIC Procedure in SAS 9.4, including study site and the candidate predictors selected in the lasso step. The lasso yields regression coefficient estimates that are biased toward zero, a limitation that can be addressed by re-fitting the lasso-selected model without the lasso constraint [31]. Observations with missing data on any candidate predictor were excluded from the final models, leaving 630 (with 168 “late”) for the model examining “on time” (≤6 weeks of age) versus “late” and 710 (with 67 “very late”) for the “very late” (≥12 weeks of age) model. Firth regression was used for the “very late” variable to avoid quasi-complete separation.

Results

Descriptive statistics for the total sample shown in Table 2. Nearly three quarters (73.8 %) of the mothers in our sample were able to secure testing for their infant at or before 6 weeks of age, however over a quarter (25.8 %) were not. Rate of “on time” testing varied greatly by study site. Most sites (4 of 6) had the majority of their infants tested at or before 6 weeks (66–92 %). However, one peri-urban and one urban site evidenced much poorer rates of on-time testing with only 47–59 % of infants getting tested before 7 weeks of age. Average age of mothers who brought their child “on time” versus “late” was very similar, however mothers who came “late” were more likely to: have lower levels of education, not have disclosed their HIV+ status to anyone, not have been on ART before becoming pregnant, not have learned about EID from health care staff during PMTCT, report longer travel time to the hospital, and more concern about having sufficient funds to get to the hospital. The majority of mothers “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that their partner/family members support their efforts to come to the hospital for their infant’s health (“on time” 85 %, “late” 73 %), but more “late” mothers “disagreed” or “strongly disagreed” (32 %) with this statement than mothers who were “on time” (21 % p > 0.05; not displayed in Table 2). Similarly, the majority of mothers “disagreed” or “strongly disagreed” with the statement that “Medical staff look down on me because I am HIV positive and had a baby” (“on time” 87 %, “late” 86 %), but more “late” mothers “agreed” or “strongly agreed” (5 %) than mothers who were “on time” (2 % p < 0.04; not displayed in Table 2).

Table 2

Characteristics of maternal/infant pairs who completed “on time” or “late” infant testing February 2013 to June 2014

Variable	Total sample (n = 756)	“On-time” <6 weeks of age (n = 552)	“Late” ≥7 weeks of age (n = 204)	p value	“Very late” ≥12 weeks age (n = 73)
Variable		N (%)	N (%)	p value
Study site				<0.0001
Peri-urban site	134	100 (74.6)	34 (25.4)		15
Urban site	115	66 (57.4)	49 (42.6)		18
Peri-urban site	62	34 (54.8)	28 (45.2)		17
Urban site	276	225 (81.5)	51 (18.5)		15
Peri-urban site	58	50 (86.2)	8 (13.8)		0
Urban site	111	77 (69.4)	34 (30.6)		8
Maternal age [median (IQR)]	756	29 (25–34)	29 (24–33)	0.139^a	27 (23–32)
Education level				0.0004
No formal education	46	26 (56.5)	20 (43.5)		8
Partial/completed primary	389	271 (69.7)	118 (30.3)		44
Partial secondary/beyond partial/University	306	244 (79.7)	62 (20.3)		18
Partner status				0.092
Yes and live together	525	394 (75)	131 (25)		41
Yes but don’t live together/no current partner	206	142 (68.9)	64 (31.1)		28
Income level				0.434
<750 KSH	406	292 (71.9)	114 (28.1)		46
≥750 KSH	295	220 (74.6)	75 (25.4)		22
Disclosure				0.014
Disclosed to anyone	666	497 (74.6)	169 (25.4)		55
Has not disclosed to anyone	57	34 (59.7)	23 (40.4)		13
Violence				0.112
Partner/family member mistreated in past week	143	112 (78.3)	31 (21.7)		10
No	595	427 (71.8)	168 (28.2)		58
Mother’s ART status prior to pregnancy				0.005
Already on HAART before pregnancy	297	232 (78.1)	65 (21.9)		15
No	345	236 (68.4)	109 (31.6)		43
How mother was informed about EID				<0.0001
By health care worker during PMTCT/pregnant	628	477 (76)	151 (24)		46
All others	116	66 (56.9)	50 (43.1)		24
EID knowledge [median (IQR)]	745	4 (3–5)	4 (3–5)	0.618^a	4 (3–5)
Travel time to hospital [minutes, median (IQR)]	721	30 (30–60)	60 (30–60)	0.046^a	60 (30–90)
Travel costs to hospital [KSH, median (IQR)]	733	120 (100–200)	100 (100–200)	0.910^a	100 (100–200)
Concerns about money				0.021
Strongly disagree	284	224 (78.9)	60 (21.1)		15
Disagree	173	124 (71.7)	49 (28.3)		17
Agree	123	86 (69.9)	37 (30.1)		13
Strongly agree	162	107 (66)	55 (34)		25

Note Denominator changes due to missing values. Results of analyses contrasting the “very late” subset with the rest of the mothers in the “late” group (n = 131) are presented in the text

KSH Kenyan Shillings

^aTwo-sided p value for Wilcoxon two-sample test

When compared to the rest of the mothers in the “late” group (n = 131), mothers in the “very late” (n = 73) subset were less likely to have sought services in an urban site (56 vs. 71 %, p = 0.033), disclosed to anyone (81 vs. 92 %, p = 0.024), been on ART prior to pregnancy (26 vs. 43 %, p = 0.027), and learned about EID from a health care worker (66 vs. 80 %, p = 0.024). The “very late” group also had a longer median travel time [60 min (IQR 30–90) vs. 30 min (30–60), p = 0.009] and higher median scores on the money worries item [3 (IQR 2–4) vs. 2 (1–3), p = 0.026]. The two groups were similar on the remaining descriptive variables in Table 2.

Logistic Regressions

Of the variables analyzed in the lasso stage, the following 12 were selected as candidate predictors for the model examining “on time” versus “late” infant testing: education level (two dummy variables), maternal age, travel time to hospital, concern about money for transportation, disclosure, how mother was informed about EID, stigma, social support, violence, income, and partner status. The seven candidate predictors selected in the lasso step for “very late” enrollment were education level (two dummy variables), maternal age, travel time to hospital, concern about money for transportation, disclosure, how mother was informed about EID, and social support.

Results of the final logistic regression models are provided in Tables 3 and 4. Area under the ROC curve was 0.72 for the “on time” model and 0.79 for the “very late” model, indicating moderate to good predictive power.

Table 3

Regression results from model for “on-time” versus all late enrollment

Variable	Chi square	df	p value	aOR	95 % CI for aOR
Site	25.99	5	<0.001
Education	9.98	2	0.007
At least partial primary^a	4.06	1	0.044	2.19	1.02–4.71
At least partial secondary^a	8.91	1	0.003	3.54	1.54–8.11
Mother’s age	1.26	1	0.262	1.02	0.99–1.06
Travel time (hours)	2.07	1	0.150	0.80	0.60–1.08
Money worries^b	3.64	1	0.056	0.81	0.65–1.01
Any disclosure	1.66	1	0.198	1.65	0.78–3.55
How informed about EID	18.35	1	<0.001	3.05	1.83–5.09
Stigma^b	5.46	1	0.019	0.78	0.64–0.96
Social support^b	1.15	1	0.283	1.13	0.91–1.40
Violence (any)	3.47	1	0.063	1.71	0.97–3.01
Income (750+)	0.41	1	0.525	0.87	0.56–1.34
Has partner	0.18	1	0.668	0.87	0.47–1.63

Note All late = “late” and “very late”

^aReferent is no formal education

^bStandardized

Table 4

Regression results from model for “very late” vs. all other enrollment

Variable	Chi square	df	p value	aOR	95 % CI for aOR
Site	12.37	5	0.030
Education	4.70	2	0.095
Mother’s age	2.86	1	0.091	0.96	0.92–1.01
Travel time (hours)	4.84	1	0.028	1.50	1.05–2.14
Money worries^a	1.65	1	0.199	1.22	0.90–1.64
How informed about EID	15.09	1	<0.001	0.31	0.17–0.56
Social support^a	0.72	1	0.396	0.89	0.67–1.17

Note All other = “on-time” and “late” enrollment

^aStandardized

Predictors of “On-time” Infant Testing

At α = 0.05 there were five statistically significant predictors of “on-time” testing (in addition to study site, included as a control variable). The strongest predictor was how the mother was informed about EID, with those informed by a health care worker during pregnancy having three times the odds of “on-time” testing as those informed by another source. The odds of on-time testing were about twice as high for mothers with at least partial primary education (vs. no formal education), and 3.5 times as high for those with at least partial secondary education. Higher scores on the stigma measure were associated with lower odds of “on-time” testing, with a reduction in odds of 22 % per 1-SD higher score on the stigma scale.

Predictors of “Very Late” Infant Testing

As with “on-time” vs. “late” testing, the strongest predictor of “very late” (≥12 weeks of age) testing was how the mother was informed about EID; odds of “very late” testing were nearly 70 % lower for mothers informed by a health care worker during pregnancy. Odds of “very late” testing were 1.5 times higher per additional hour of reported travel time to the hospital. Study site was the only other statistically significant predictor of “very late” testing.

Discussion

This study explored rates and predictors of “on time” versus “late” and “very late” engagement in EID services among a large sample of mother-infants dyads seeking care at six health care facilities in Kenya. Consistent with other East African studies [14, 16, 24], nearly three quarters of mothers secured EID testing for their infant before 7 weeks of age. Nevertheless, more than a quarter of infants who needed testing did not receive it in a timely manner. Delays in initiation of EID testing compromise the effectiveness of life sustaining ART treatment for HIV-infected infants [4, 40] and contribute to poor health outcomes in this vulnerable population [8]. Early infant testing is also a cornerstone in achieving the global goals of closing the treatment gap for eligible infants and preventing child mortality due to HIV [41, 42].

Descriptive analyses revealed significant variation of “on time” testing by clinic site with 2 of 6 facilities reporting that only about half of their infants had been tested before 7 weeks. Why these specific clinics (one peri-urban, one urban from different regions) struggled to achieve testing rates seen in other similar facilities is unknown, but we assume they are specific to the sites themselves and as such we controlled for site in the logistic regression analyses. While not directly examined in this study, we have observed this same pattern in our experience working to scale-up novel system-level interventions across multiple sites. Facilities often have their own unique barriers (e.g., lack of space, consistent medication supply and/or poor coordination between different clinics), cultures (e.g., stigmatizing beliefs, established procedures that contradict care guidelines) and staffing challenges (e.g., providers who lack knowledge or motivation) that decrease the likelihood of meeting clinical guideline goals [43]. Future studies should explore site-specific barriers to EID engagement to better inform needed changes.

Results of the logistic regression analyses revealed that mothers who were informed about EID services by a healthcare provider during their pregnancies had three times the odds of bringing their infant for testing before 7 weeks of age as mothers who learned about EID from other sources. Clearly mothers had to be engaged in PMTCT and/or other prenatal care to have had the opportunity to be informed about EID during their pregnancies which has been highlighted in prior research [22]. This finding underscores the critical role that healthcare providers play in engaging women early and retaining them throughout their pregnancies to ensure that they are linked to EID services after giving birth. Ensuring continuity of care is critical, yet in most settings prenatal care, delivery, EID and HIV care services are provided by separate provider groups who are located in several different clinics often housed in different sections of health centers. This puts the burden on mothers to stay engaged in care by finding their way to the next clinic, establishing new relationships with new providers, and adapting to a new setting and schedule. Our findings reinforce other work [16, 23, 44, 45] that has highlighted the need for co-locating services and linking mothers to the next clinic or provider group as essential to improving “on-time” EID service utilization. Other options include task shifting [46, 47] so that the same staff follow mothers all the way from PMTCT to EID services and/or outreach [48, 49] to mothers during transitions to ensure that they stay engaged.

Mothers with less formal education were found to be at increased risk for seeking “late” EID testing. Like findings in PMTCT engagement and retention [50‐52], mothers with less education experienced a whole host of additional barriers to seeking care, which are also likely at play here. Additional outreach and retention efforts focused on engaging these mothers will be necessary.

Mothers who perceived less stigma from health care providers for being HIV+ and having a baby were considerably more likely to seek “on-time” testing for their infant. This finding is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated the negative impact of perceived stigma on EID treatment engagement [34], sharing of fertility desires [53, 54], and ART adherence [55]. It also highlights the importance of ensuring that all providers send a consistent and supportive message about childbearing options to prevent patient disengagement from care which in turn leads to worse outcomes for mother, partners and infants [56, 57].

Predictors of “very late” (≥12 weeks of age) infant testing included being informed by a healthcare provider about EID during pregnancy and travel time to the hospital. Like the earlier “on-time” findings, results of this analysis highlight the critical role that providers play with the odds of seeking “very late” infant testing being 70 % lower for mothers who were informed by a healthcare provider while they were pregnant. Not surprisingly, living farther away from the hospital greatly contributed to “very late” seeking of EID services. Enhancing options for mothers who live great distances from EID services, like increasing the number of EID clinics and/or developing mobile EID services, would address this known barrier. However, limited resources in an already overburdened Kenyan healthcare system limit the likelihood of these options coming to fruition. Other more cost effective approaches, like small stipends for mothers to pay for transport and accommodations at or near the hospitals might be effective and are already being used to support other health behaviors (e.g., ART adherence) [58]. At the very least, providers should start early to develop a plan with women to facilitate early infant testing.

This study makes an important and novel contribution to the literature, but it is not without its limitations. Chief among them are that all of the mothers in this study did eventually present for EID services. We do not have any information about mothers who never sought services, nor do we know if the group of users of the services in this study represents a small or large proportion of the total number of mothers of HIV-exposed infants. Future studies should explore what proportion of all HIV-exposed infants receive EID services, as well as, what predicts non-engagement.

Conclusion

This study found that a quarter of infants in EID services at six Kenyan hospitals failed to get tested “on time” (before 7 weeks of age). Findings highlight the importance of ensuring that health care providers actively and repeatedly inform HIV+ mothers of the availability of EID services, reduce stigma by frequently communicating judgment free support, and assist mothers in early travel planning to access EID services after their babies are born. Extra care should be focused on engaging mothers with less formal education who are at increased risk for seeking “late” EID testing. Getting all HIV exposed infants engaged in EID services and tested before 6 weeks is critical to optimize HIV pediatric outcomes. This study offers clear targets for improving outreach and service integration that could help to make this important goal a reality.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by private donations to Global Health Innovations and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, R01HD076673 (Finocchario-Kessler PI).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict to disclose.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Jetzt testen ¹

National AIDS and STI Control Program. Sentinel surveillance of HIV and syphillis from antenatal clinics in Kenya, 2010 [Internet]. 2010. http://healthpromotionkenya.org/LIBRARY%20OF%20DATA/HIV/Project%20Reports/Final%20Sentinel%20Surveillance%20Report%20for%20Kenya%202010%20.pdf.

UNAIDS. 2013 progress report on the global plan [Internet]. 2013. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/unaidspublication/2013/20130625_progress_global_plan_en.pdf.

Violari A, Cotton MF, Gibb DM, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy and mortality among HIV-infected infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2233–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on the diagnosis of HIV infection in infants and children [Internet]. 2010. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK138551/.

Chiappini E, Galli L, Tovo P-A, et al. Five-year follow-up of children with perinatal HIV-1 infection receiving early highly active antiretroviral therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9(1):140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cagigi A, Rinaldi S, Cotugno N, et al. Early highly active antiretroviral therapy enhances B-cell longevity: a 5 year follow up. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33(5):e126–31.CrossRefPubMed

Laughton B, Cornell M, Grove D, et al. Early antiretroviral therapy improves neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants. AIDS. 2012;26(13):1685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Persaud D, Patel K, Karalius B, et al. Influence of age at virologic control on peripheral blood human immunodeficiency virus reservoir size and serostatus in perinatally infected adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(12):1138–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zanoni B, Phungula T, Zanoni HM, France H, Cook EF, Feeney ME. Predictors of poor CD4 and weight recovery in HIV-infected children initiating ART in South Africa. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33611.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Creek TL, Sherman GG, Nkengasong J, et al. Infant human immunodeficiency virus diagnosis in resource-limited settings: issues, technologies, and country experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(3):S64–71.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Varga C, Sherman G, Maphosa J, Jones S. Psychosocial consequences of early diagnosis of HIV status in vertically exposed infants in Johannesburg, South Africa. Health Care Women Int. 2005;26(5):387–97.CrossRefPubMed

12.

UNAIDS. 2014 progress report on the global plan [Internet]. 2014. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/documents/JC2681_2014-Global-Plan-progress_en.pdf.

13.

Binagwaho A, Mugwaneza P, Irakoze AA, et al. Scaling up early infant diagnosis of HIV in Rwanda, 2008–2010. J Public Health Policy. 2013;34(1):2–16.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Buchanan AM, Dow DE, Massambu CG, et al. Progress in the prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV in three regions of Tanzania: a retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Chiduo MG, Mmbando BP, Theilgaard ZP, et al. Early infant diagnosis of HIV in three regions in Tanzania; successes and challenges. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):910.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Ciampa PJ, Burlison JR, Blevins M, et al. Improving retention in the early infant diagnosis of HIV program in rural Mozambique by better service integration. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(1):115–9.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Cook RE, Ciampa PJ, Sidat M, et al. Predictors of successful early infant diagnosis of HIV in a rural district hospital in Zambezia, Mozambique. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;56(4):e104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Dillabaugh LL, Lewis Kulzer J, Owuor K, et al. Towards elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: the impact of a rapid results initiative in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Res Treat. 2012;2012:602120.PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Dube Q, Dow A, Chirambo C, et al. Implementing early infant diagnosis of HIV infection at the primary care level: experiences and challenges in Malawi. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(9):699–704.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Feinstein L, Edmonds A, Chalachala JL, et al. Temporal changes in the outcomes of HIV-exposed infants in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo during a period of rapidly evolving guidelines for care (2007–2013). AIDS. 2014;28:S301–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Hassan AS, Sakwa EM, Nabwera HM, et al. Dynamics and constraints of early infant diagnosis of HIV infection in rural Kenya. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(1):5–12.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kebede B, Gebeyehu A, Jain S, Sun S, Haubrich R. Delay in early infant diagnosis and high loss to follow-up among infant born to HIV-infected women in Ethiopia. World J AIDS. 2014;4(04):402.CrossRef

23.

McCollum ED, Johnson DC, Chasela CS, et al. Superior uptake and outcomes of early infant diagnosis of HIV services at an immunization clinic versus an “under-five” general pediatric clinic in Malawi. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;60(4):e107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Mirkuzie AH, Hinderaker SG, Sisay MM, Moland KM, Mørkve O. Current status of medication adherence and infant follow up in the prevention of mother to child HIV transmission programme in Addis Ababa: a cohort study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2011;14(1):50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Mugasha C, Kigozi J, Kiragga A, et al. Intra-facility linkage of HIV-positive mothers and HIV-exposed babies into HIV chronic care: Rural and urban experience in a resource limited setting. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha H, Werq-Semo B, Abdallah A, et al. Introducing a multi-site program for early diagnosis of HIV infection among HIV-exposed infants in Tanzania. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10(1):44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Nyandiko WM, Otieno-Nyunya B, Musick B, et al. Outcomes of HIV-exposed children in western Kenya: efficacy of prevention of mother to child transmission in a resource-constrained setting. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;54(1):42–50.PubMed

28.

Odeny TA, Bukusi EA, Cohen CR, Yuhas K, Camlin CS, McClelland RS. Texting improves testing: a randomized trial of two-way SMS to increase postpartum prevention of mother-to-child transmission retention and infant HIV testing. AIDS. 2014;28(15):2307–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Sutcliffe CG, van Dijk JH, Hamangaba F, Mayani F, Moss WJ. Turnaround time for early infant HIV diagnosis in rural Zambia: a chart review. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87028.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Tejiokem MC, Faye A, Penda IC, et al. Feasibility of early infant diagnosis of HIV in resource-limited settings: the ANRS 12140-PEDIACAM study in Cameroon. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21840.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Van Lettow M, Bedell R, Landes M, et al. Uptake and outcomes of a prevention-of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) program in Zomba district, Malawi. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):426.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

National AIDS Control Council. Kenya AIDS response progress report 2014 [Internet]. 2014. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/country/documents/KEN_narrative_report_2014.pdf.

33.

World Health Organization JUNPoHAU. Global HIV/AIDS response epidemic update and health sector progress towards Universal Access: progress report 2011, World Health Organization [Internet]. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241502986%5Feng.pdf.

34.

Gaka E. Factors associated with uptake of HIV testing among HIV exposed infants in Goromonzi District, 2012 [Internet]. 2013. http://ir.uz.ac.zw/bitstream/handle/10646/1334/Gaka.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

35.

Finocchario-Kessler S, Goggin K, Khamadi S, et al. Improving early infant HIV diagnosis in Kenya: study protocol of a cluster-randomized efficacy trial of the HITSystem. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Hastie T TRFJ, eds. The elements of statistical learning. 2nd ed ed: Springer; 2009.

37.

Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective. J R Stat Soc B. 2011;73(3):273–82.CrossRef

38.

Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE. Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165(6):710–8.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wamalwa DC, Obimbo EM, Farquhar C, et al. Predictors of mortality in HIV-1 infected children on antiretroviral therapy in Kenya: a prospective cohort. BMC Pediatr. 2010;10(1):33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Prendergast AJ, Essajee S, Penazzato M. HIV and the millennium development goals. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(Suppl 1):S48–52.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Kellerman SE, Ahmed S, Feeley-Summerl T, et al. Beyond prevention of mother-to-child transmission: keeping HIV-exposed and HIV-positive children healthy and alive. AIDS. 2013;27(0 2):S225–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Finocchario-Kessler S, Odera I, Okoth V, et al. Lessons learned from implementing the HIV infant tracking system (HITSystem): a web-based intervention to improve early infant diagnosis in Kenya. Healthcare. 2015;3(4):190–5. doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.07.004.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Ong’ech JO, Hoffman HJ, Kose J, et al. Provision of services and care for HIV-exposed infants: a comparison of maternal and child health clinic and HIV comprehensive care clinic models. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61(1):83–9.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Wiegert K, Dinh T-H, Mushavi A, Mugurungi O, Kilmarx PH. Integration of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) postpartum services with other HIV care and treatment services within the maternal and child health setting in Zimbabwe, 2012. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98236. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098236.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Callaghan M, Ford N, Schneider H. A systematic review of task-shifting for HIV treatment and care in Africa. Hum Resour Health. 2010;8:8–16. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-8-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

McCollum ED, Preidis GA, Kabue MM, et al. Task shifting routine inpatient pediatric HIV testing improves program outcomes in urban Malawi: a retrospective observational study. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9626. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Van Griensven J, De Naeyer L, Uwera J, Asiimwe A, Gazille C, Reid T. Success with antiretroviral treatment for children in Kigali, Rwanda: experience with health center/nurse-based care. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8(1):39. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-8-39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Bahwere P, Piwoz E, Joshua MC, et al. Uptake of HIV testing and outcomes within a Community-based Therapeutic Care (CTC) programme to treat severe acute malnutrition in Malawi: a descriptive study. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8(1):106. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-8-106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Delvaux T, Elul B, Ndagije F, Munyana E, Roberfroid D, Asiimwe A. Determinants of nonadherence to a single-dose nevirapine regimen for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Rwanda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;50(2):223–30.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Kuonza LR, Tshuma CD, Shambira GN, Tshimanga M. Non-adherence to the single dose nevirapine regimen for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Bindura town, Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional analytic study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Ayuo P, Musick B, Liu H, et al. Frequency and factors associated with adherence to and completion of combination antiretroviral therapy for prevention of mother to child transmission in western Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16(1):17994.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Finocchario-Kessler S, Wanyenze R, Mindry D, et al. “I may not say we really have a method, it is gambling work”: knowledge and acceptability of safer conception methods among providers and HIV clients in Uganda. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(7–9):896–917.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Wagner GJ, Goggin K, Mindry D, et al. Correlates of use of timed unprotected intercourse to reduce horizontal transmission among Ugandan HIV clients with fertility intentions. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(6):1078–88. doi:10.1007/s10461-014-0906-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Dlamini PS, Wantland D, Makoae LN, et al. HIV stigma and missed medications in HIV-positive people in five African countries. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(5):377–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Goggin K, Mindry D, Beyeza-Kashesya J, et al. “Our hands are tied up”: current state of safer conception services suggests the need for an integrated care model. Health Care Women Int. 2014;35(7–9):990–1009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Goggin K, Finocchario-Kessler S, Staggs V, Woldetsadik MA, Wanyenze RK, Beyeza J, Mindry D, Khanakwa S, Wagner GJ. Attitudes, knowledge and correlates of self-efficacy for the provision of Safer Conception Counseling among Ugandan HIV providers. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2015;29(12):1–10. doi:10.1089/apc.2015.0089.CrossRef

58.

Linnemayr S, Rice T. Insights from behavioral economics to design more effective incentives for improving chronic health behaviors, with an application to adherence to antiretrovirals. J AIDS. 2016. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000972.

Titel: Predictors of Infant Age at Enrollment in Early Infant Diagnosis Services in Kenya
verfasst von: Kathy Goggin
Catherine Wexler
Niaman Nazir
Vincent S. Staggs
Brad Gautney
Vincent Okoth
Samoel A. Khamadi
Andrea Ruff
Michael Sweat
An-Lin Cheng
Sarah Finocchario-Kessler
Publikationsdatum: 23.04.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: AIDS and Behavior / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 1090-7165
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3254
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1404-z

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen