Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology 1/2016

01.03.2016 | Original Research

Predictors of long-term survival for localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose IMRT stratified by NCCN 2015 guidelines in a community hospital setting

verfasst von: Anthony Ricco, Rachelle Lanciano, Alexandra Hanlon

Erschienen in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The primary goal of this study is to determine prognostic factors associated with freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and survival for men with localized prostate cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) stratified according to the NCCN 2015 guidelines in a community hospital setting. A secondary objective is to evaluate long-term toxicity at last follow-up compared to pretreatment status (bowel, bladder, and sexual functioning) using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity grading system. A final objective is to compare our results of IMRT in a community-based radiation practice to published results from academic institutions.

Methods

Two hundred and twenty-eight consecutive men treated with IMRT for organ-confined prostate cancer at Delaware County Memorial Hospital (DCMH) from 2003 when the IMRT program began to 2012 were reviewed on this IRB-approved retrospective study. Biochemical failure was assessed using the Phoenix Nadir +2 definition. CT and MRI treatment planning was used and treatment volumes included prostate +/− seminal vesicles and true pelvic lymph nodes depending on risk assessment based on pretreatment prognostic factors. Median dose to the prostate was 75.6 Gy. Median follow-up for the entire group was 72 months.

Results

Ten-year actuarial FFBF for the entire group was 83.2 %. Eight-year actuarial FFBF stratified by 2015 NCCN risk stratification was 95.2 % very low risk, 96.3 % low risk, 81.5 % intermediate risk, 75.4 % high risk, and 38.7 % for the very high risk group (p = 0.02). Patients with PSA <30.65 had improved 8-year FFBF of 85.9 % compared with 46.1 % for PSA >30.65 (p = 0.0001). Multivariable analysis revealed only the five NCCN risk groups were independent prognosticators for FFBF. Ten-year actuarial survival for the entire group was 61.1 %. Only 8 deaths were secondary to prostate cancer out of 59 total deaths (13.6 %). Ten-year actuarial overall survival stratified by 2015 NCCN risk stratification was 68.8 % very low risk, 81.5 % low risk, 67.2 % intermediate risk, 46.3 % high risk, and 54.9 % for the very high risk group (p = 0.02). Ten-year overall survival rates stratified by age less than or greater than 71.5 were 75.9 % for age ≤71.5 and 55.2 % for age >71.5 (p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed only age was an independent significant factor for survival with p = 0.0008. Grade 3 GI toxicity at last follow-up was 0.5 % with no grade 4 toxicities. Grade 3 GU toxicity at last follow-up was 1 % with no grade 4 toxicities. FFBF and toxicity rates are comparable to those reported by academic institutions and literature review of published data with comparison to our community hospital data will be presented.

Conclusions

The outcome of IMRT for men with prostate cancer treated in a community hospital is comparable to that of published literature from academic institutions. NCCN 2015 risk stratification is prognostic for FFBF. Age at diagnosis was the only significant independent predictor of survival, suggesting that cancer-specific mortality is minimized after IMRT in localized prostate cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheets NC et al (2012) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA 307:1611–1620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheets NC et al (2012) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA 307:1611–1620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs BL et al (2013) Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA 309:2587–2595CrossRefPubMed Jacobs BL et al (2013) Use of advanced treatment technologies among men at low risk of dying from prostate cancer. JAMA 309:2587–2595CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes JH et al (2010) Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis. JAMA 304:2373–2380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hayes JH et al (2010) Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis. JAMA 304:2373–2380CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayes JH et al (2013) Observation versus initial treatment for men with localized, low-risk prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 158:853–860CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hayes JH et al (2013) Observation versus initial treatment for men with localized, low-risk prostate cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med 158:853–860CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thames H et al (2003) Comparison of alternative biochemical failure definitions based on clinical outcome in 4839 prostate cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy between 1986 and 1995. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:929–943CrossRefPubMed Thames H et al (2003) Comparison of alternative biochemical failure definitions based on clinical outcome in 4839 prostate cancer patients treated by external beam radiotherapy between 1986 and 1995. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:929–943CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chism DB et al (2003) Late morbidity profiles in prostate cancer patients treated to 79-84 Gy by a simple four-field coplanar beam arrangement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:71–77CrossRefPubMed Chism DB et al (2003) Late morbidity profiles in prostate cancer patients treated to 79-84 Gy by a simple four-field coplanar beam arrangement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:71–77CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawton CA et al (1991) Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:935–939CrossRefPubMed Lawton CA et al (1991) Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:935–939CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Smit WG et al (1990) Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:23–29CrossRefPubMed Smit WG et al (1990) Late radiation damage in prostate cancer patients treated by high dose external radiotherapy in relation to rectal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:23–29CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ling CC et al (1996) Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35:721–730CrossRefPubMed Ling CC et al (1996) Conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer using inversely-planned intensity-modulated photon beams produced with dynamic multileaf collimation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 35:721–730CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelefsky MJ et al (2000) Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 55:241–249CrossRefPubMed Zelefsky MJ et al (2000) Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 55:241–249CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelefsky MJ et al (2002) High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1111–1116CrossRefPubMed Zelefsky MJ et al (2002) High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1111–1116CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Spratt DE et al (2013) Long-term survival and toxicity in patients treated with high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:686–692CrossRefPubMed Spratt DE et al (2013) Long-term survival and toxicity in patients treated with high-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:686–692CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dearnaley DP et al (2007) Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 8:475–487CrossRefPubMed Dearnaley DP et al (2007) Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 8:475–487CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollack A et al (2000) Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3904–3911PubMed Pollack A et al (2000) Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:3904–3911PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Zietman AL et al (2005) Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 294:1233CrossRef Zietman AL et al (2005) Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 294:1233CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Peeters STH et al (2006) Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. J Clin Oncol 24:1990–1996CrossRefPubMed Peeters STH et al (2006) Dose-response in radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: results of the Dutch multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing 68 Gy of radiotherapy with 78 Gy. J Clin Oncol 24:1990–1996CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cahlon O et al (2008) Ultra-high dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT for localized prostate cancer: toxicity and biochemical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:330–337CrossRefPubMed Cahlon O et al (2008) Ultra-high dose (86.4 Gy) IMRT for localized prostate cancer: toxicity and biochemical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:330–337CrossRefPubMed
21.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Litwin MS et al (2007) Quality of life after surgery, external beam irradiation, or brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer 109:2239–2247CrossRefPubMed Litwin MS et al (2007) Quality of life after surgery, external beam irradiation, or brachytherapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Cancer 109:2239–2247CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Penson DF, Litwin MS (2003) Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 4:185–195CrossRefPubMed Penson DF, Litwin MS (2003) Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 4:185–195CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelefsky MJ et al (2008) Long-term results of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: impact of dose escalation on biochemical tumor control and distant metastases-free survival outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1028–1033CrossRefPubMed Zelefsky MJ et al (2008) Long-term results of conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: impact of dose escalation on biochemical tumor control and distant metastases-free survival outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:1028–1033CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kupelian PA, Willoughby TR, Reddy CA, Klein EA, Mahadevan A (2007) Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1424–1430CrossRefPubMed Kupelian PA, Willoughby TR, Reddy CA, Klein EA, Mahadevan A (2007) Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1424–1430CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Teh BS et al (2001) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:705–712CrossRefPubMed Teh BS et al (2001) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer with the use of a rectal balloon for prostate immobilization: acute toxicity and dose-volume analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:705–712CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat De Meerleer GO et al (2007) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: late morbidity and results on biochemical control. Radiother Oncol 82:160–166CrossRefPubMed De Meerleer GO et al (2007) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: late morbidity and results on biochemical control. Radiother Oncol 82:160–166CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat De Meerleer GO et al (2000) Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:639–648CrossRefPubMed De Meerleer GO et al (2000) Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without intensity modulated beams: a planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:639–648CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollack A et al (2002) Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1097–1105CrossRefPubMed Pollack A et al (2002) Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1097–1105CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Reese AC, Pierorazio PM, Han M, Partin AW (2012) Contemporary evaluation of the national comprehensive cancer network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology 80:1075–1079CrossRefPubMed Reese AC, Pierorazio PM, Han M, Partin AW (2012) Contemporary evaluation of the national comprehensive cancer network prostate cancer risk classification system. Urology 80:1075–1079CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jani AB, Su A, Correa D, Gratzle J (2007) Comparison of late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy using localized fields. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:82–86. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500910 Jani AB, Su A, Correa D, Gratzle J (2007) Comparison of late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity of prostate cancer patients undergoing intensity-modulated versus conventional radiotherapy using localized fields. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:82–86. doi:10.​1038/​sj.​pcan.​4500910
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Vora SA, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ezzell GA, Halyard MY (2007) Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1053–1058. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.043 Vora SA, Wong WW, Schild SE, Ezzell GA, Halyard MY (2007) Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1053–1058. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2007.​01.​043
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of long-term survival for localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose IMRT stratified by NCCN 2015 guidelines in a community hospital setting
verfasst von
Anthony Ricco
Rachelle Lanciano
Alexandra Hanlon
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Radiation Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Elektronische ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0224-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Journal of Radiation Oncology 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

CAR-M-Zellen: Warten auf das große Fressen

22.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Auch myeloide Immunzellen lassen sich mit chimären Antigenrezeptoren gegen Tumoren ausstatten. Solche CAR-Fresszell-Therapien werden jetzt für solide Tumoren entwickelt. Künftig soll dieser Prozess nicht mehr ex vivo, sondern per mRNA im Körper der Betroffenen erfolgen.

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.