Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Cancer 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Research article

Pretreatment albumin/fibrinogen ratio as a promising predictor for the survival of advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy

verfasst von: Jun Ying, Danfei Zhou, Tongjie Gu, Jianda Huang, Haijian Liu

Erschienen in: BMC Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify potential predictive factors for the survival of advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 270 advanced NSCLC patients who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from June, 2011 to June, 2015 were enrolled. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of the albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) for overall survival (OS). The predictive factors for survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses via the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The OS and progression free survival (PFS) results were determined via the Kaplan–Meier method using the log-rank analysis.

Results

Based on the results of the ROC curve analysis, 8.02 was accepted as the cut-off AFR value for OS. The metastasis stage (M0 vs M1a/b, HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15–2.59, P = 0.020) and AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02, HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.09–2.78, P = 0.025) were two independent risk factors for PFS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02, HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.11–2.59, P = 0.029) was a significant predictive factor for OS in advanced NSCLC patients. The PFS (P = 0.008) and OS (P = 0.003) in the high AFR group were significantly improved compared with those in the low AFR group via the Kaplan–Meier method using the log-rank analysis.

Conclusions

The AFR could be a potential effective predictive factor for the survival in advanced NSCLC patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
Abkürzungen
AC
Adenocarcinoma
AFR
Albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio
Alb
Albumin
ALK
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase
AP
Pemetrexed combined with platinum
AUC
Area under the curve
CI
Confidence interval
CR
Complete response
CRP
C-reactive protein
DP
Docetaxel combined with platinum
ECOG PS
Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status
GP
Gemcitabine combined with platinum
HR
Hazard ratio
ICIs
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
LC
Lung cancer
NSCLC
Non–small cell lung cancer
OS
Overall survival
PD
Progressive disease
PD-1
Programmed death-1
PD-L1
Programmed death-ligand 1
PFS
Progression free survival
PR
Partial response
RECIST
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
ROC
Receiver operating characteristic
SCC
Squamous carcinoma
SD
Stable disease
TKIs
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors
TNM
Tumor–nodes–metastasis
WBC
White blood cell

Background

Lung cancer (LC) is consistently the leading cause of the cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most common type of LC, compromises for nearly 85% of all LC cases [2]. For early-stage NSCLC, surgery has been widely accepted as the main therapeutic strategy; however, high postoperative recurrence and metastasis rates are commonly observed [3]. Most NSCLC patients are diagnosed at a relatively late stage (stage III or IV), which may preclude surgical resections [4]. Platinum-based chemotherapy, which consists of third-generation chemotherapy and platinum, is widely accepted as a standard treatment for advanced NSCLC [5]. In the past decades, new available therapeutic options for advanced NSCLC have been proposed and developed quickly. Recently, immunotherapy has been increasingly applied as clinical treatments for LC patients [6]. For example, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been proven proved to be clinically effective across a broad range of solid tumors, including NSCLC [7]. Targeted therapy, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has also attracted much attention due to its improvements in tolerability and efficacy [8]. Other researchers have also suggested that the combination treatment strategies may maximize the treatment efficacy for NSCLC [7].
Due to individual differences in chemotherapy efficacy and the relatively high recurrence rate, an early prediction for chemotherapy response and clinical outcomes is urgently needed [9]. Investigating valid predictive biomarkers can aid in timely, effective intervention and better clinical efficacy. A minimally invasive predictor can serve as a tool for treatment monitoring and provide a new view on future guidance. Furthermore, it is also helpful to explore new and more effective therapeutic targets for advanced NSCLC. Various clinicopathological prognostic factors have been identified by previous studies, however, the prognosis prediction of NSCLC still remains unsatisfactory [10]. In recent decades, many studies have illustrated that inflammation and immunology are two important characteristics that enable malignancies and they are both significantly associated with tumour initiation, distant metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy [11, 12]. Furthermore, significantly different expressions of immune cells and inflammatory proteins such as albumin (Alb) and fibrinogen (Fib) are widely observed in LC patients in comparison with healthy controls [13]. Alb has been widely used as an effective tool for evaluating nutritional and inflammatory status. In addition, recent evidence with various malignancies has also revealed a close relation between coagulation and tumor progression and metastasis [14, 15]. Fib is an essential protein in the coagulation cascade and it has been reported by some studies to be associated with tumor development [16]. However, the correlation between the Alb-to-Fib ratio (AFR) and the prognosis of NSCLC with patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy remains unknown until now. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether the AFR could serve as an effective predictor for the survival of NSCLC patients.

Methods

Patients

This retrospective study was approved by the Medical Institutional Ethics Committee of Hwa Mei Hospital and Zhejiang province. Eligible patients admitted to the Department of Respiratory of Hwa Mei Hospital, University Of Chinese Academy Of Sciences from June, 2011 to June, 2015 were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were as follows: [1] newly diagnosed NSCLC patients with histopathological or cytological evidence; [2] advanced NSCLC patients in stage IIIB and IV (including stage IIIA, which is not suitable for surgery) according to the tumor–nodes–metastasis (TNM) criteria (7th edition, AJCC criteria 2009) and [3] patients who underwent at least two cycles of first-lined platinum-based chemotherapy. The exclusion criteria were as follows: [1] patients who were pregnancy, or had brain metastases or concomitant malignancies; [2] patients with abnormal liver function, autoimmune or hematological diseases; [3] patients who had previous radiation therapy or surgery and [4] patients who did not have complete clinical data or who were lost to follow-up. Considering the impact of different treatment strategies on prognosis, the patients with radical-intent radiotherapy, surgery or who were not treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were also excluded.

Treatment and follow up

All enrolled NSCLC patients were treated intravenously with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, which consisted of platinum and third-generation chemotherapy agents (pemetrexed, docetaxel, and gemcitabine). The same regimen was repeated for an interval of 21 days for at least two cycles. Then, the therapy response of all patients was evaluated by the same independent radiologists and clinical physicians according to the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline (version 1.1) [17]. The invited radiologists were blinded to this study and they reviewed all scans of the enrolled patients to evaluate the therapy response. The follow-up duration was from the time chemotherapy was initiated to October 31, 2017.

Prognosis evaluation

The therapeutic response was classified as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Progression free survival (PFS) was calculated from the initiation of chemotherapy to disease progression, death or the set deadline of the study. The overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the initiation of chemotherapy to death or the set deadline of the study. (Oct 31, 2017).

Data collection

The clinical demographics (including age, gender, etc.), history of smoking, alcohol consumption habits, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension), pathological characteristics (tumor size, lymph node, metastasis stage, etc.), gene characteristics, chemotherapy regimens, clinical response and laboratory test results were recorded for all NSCLC patients. Pretreatment fasting peripheral blood samples were collected at 7:00 am 1 day prior to chemotherapy. The obtained blood samples were processed within 48 h to detect biomarkers including blood cells, Alb, Fib, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The AFR was calculated by dividing the Alb level by the Fib level.

Statistical analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are summarized as the number and proportion, or mean ± standard deviation (SD). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of AFR for OS, with respect to the cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity. Chi-squared tests, Student’s t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to compare baseline clinical characteristics as appropriate. The predictive factors for survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses via the Cox proportional hazards regression model. OS and PFS results were determined via the Kaplan–Meier method using the log-rank analysis. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Based on the inclusion criteria, 297 NSCLC patients who underwent at least two cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Finally 270 were included into the analysis and the following 27 patients were excluded according to the exclusion criteria, 3 with concomitant malignancies, 4 with abnormal liver function, 3 with hematological diseases, 10 with incomplete data, and 7 lost to follow-up. The mean age of all enrolled patients was 59.4 years, and 173 (64.1%) patients were male. Seventy-eight (28.9%) patients were in stage III and 192 (71.1%) in stage IV, respectively.

AFR and clinical characteristics

Based on the results of the ROC curve analysis, 8.02 was accepted as the cut-off AFR value for OS, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.791, a sensitivity of 65.64% and a specificity of 77.33%, respectively (Fig. 1). A total of 151 (55.9%) patients were categorized into the low AFR group (pretreatment AFR ≤8.02) and 119 (44.1%) in the high AFR group (pretreatment AFR > 8.02). The demographic and clinical characteristics associated with the AFR are presented in Table 1. The patients in the high and low AFR groups did not differ significantly from each other in age, gender, history of smoking, alcohol consumption habits, comorbidity morbidities, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), tumor location, tumor size, lymph node, metastasis stage, tumor–nodes–metastasis (TNM) stage, gene mutation status of EGFR,EML4-ALK and K-ras, histology or chemotherapy regimens (P > 0.05). Patients in the low AFR group were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of poorly differentiated tumors than those in the high AFR group (P = 0.039). Moreover, patients with an AFR value ≤8.02 had a worse clinical response to chemotherapy than patients with an AFR > 8.02 (P = 0.015). A significant difference of pretreatment CRP levels was also observed between the high and low AFR groups (P = 0.018).
Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of NSCLC patients associated with AFR
Parameters
AFR ≤ 8.02
AFR > 8.02
p value
No. of patients
151
119
Age (years)
60.1 ± 10.7
58.5 ± 10.8
0.226
Gender (n, %)
  
0.180
 Male
102(67.5)
71(59.7)
 Female
49(32.5)
48(40.3)
Current smokers (n, %)
81(53.6)
52(43.7)
0.105
Alcohol (n, %)
34(22.5)
21(17.6)
0.308
Diabetes (n, %)
25(16.6)
13(10.9)
0.186
Hypertension (n, %)
32(21.2)
20(16.8)
0.364
ECOG PS (n, %)
  
0.641
 0
100(66.2)
82(68.9)
  ≥ 1
51(33.8)
37(31.1)
Location of primary tumor (n, %)
  
0.586
 Left
71(47.0)
52(43.7)
 Right
80(53.0)
67(56.3)
Tumor size (n, %)
  
0.391
 T1/T2
72(47.7)
63(52.9)
 T3/T4
79(52.3)
56(47.1)
Lymph node (n, %)
  
0.089
 N0
20(13.2)
25(21.0)
 N1–3
131(86.8)
94(79.0)
Metastasis stage (n, %)
  
0.709
 M0
45(29.8)
33(27.7)
 M1a/M1b
106(70.2)
86(72.3)
TNM stage (n, %)
  
0.709
 III
45(29.8)
33(27.7)
 IV
106(70.2)
86(72.3)
Differentiation (n, %)
  
0.039*
 Well/moderate
36(23.8)
42(35.3)
 Poor
115(76.2)
77(64.7)
Histology (n, %)
  
0.448
 SCC or others
104(68.9)
87(73.1)
 AC
47(31.1)
32(26.9)
Chemotherapy (n, %)
  
0.085
 DP
90(59.6)
83(69.7)
 AP/GP
61(40.4)
36(30.3)
EGFR status
  
0.95
 Wide-type
77(51.0)
63(52.9)
 Mutation
43(28.5)
33(27.7)
 Unknown
31(20.5)
23(19.3)
EML4-ALK status
  
0.93
 Wide-type
102(67.5)
83(69.7)
 Mutation
18(11.9)
13(10.9)
 Unknown
31(20.5)
23(19.3)
K-ras status
  
0.77
 Wide-type
93(61.6)
78(65.5)
 Mutation
27(17.9)
18(15.1)
 Unknown
31(20.5)
23(19.3)
Clinical response (n, %)
  
0.015*
 CR/PR/SD
99(65.6)
94(79.0)
 PD
52(34.4)
25(21.0)
Laboratory tests (n, %)
 Hemoglobin (g/L)
104.1 ± 13.3
106.3 ± 14.1
0.190
 Platelet (109/L)
177.4 ± 62.3
181.5 ± 75.8
0.626
 WBC(109/L)
7.2 ± 2.4
7.4 ± 2.6
0.513
 CRP (ng/L)
8.4 ± 11.3
5.3 ± 9.7
0.018*
NSCLC Non–small cell lung cancer, AFR Albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio, ECOG PS Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, TNM Tumor–node–metastasis, SCC Squamous carcinoma, AC Adenocarcinoma, DP Docetaxel combined with platinum, AP Pemetrexed combined with platinum, GP Gemcitabine combined with platinum, CR Complete response, PR Partial response, SD Stable disease, PD Progressive disease, WBC White blood cell, CRP C-reactive protein. P-values were calculated by Student’s t test, Mann–Whitney U test or Chi-squared test. * P < 0.05

Predictive factors for PFS and OS

The potential risk factors for PFS and OS were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression model. Only factors with a P value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were enrolled into the multivariate analysis. As shown in Table 2, the metastasis stage (M0 vs M1a/b, HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15–2.59, P = 0.020) and AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02, HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.09–2.78, P = 0.025) were two independent risk factors for PFS by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The resulting predictive factors for OS are presented in Table 3, and the AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02, HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.11–2.59, P = 0.029) was found to be a significant predictive factor for OS in advanced NSCLC patients.
Table 2
Risk factors for PFS by univariate and multiple Cox proportional hazards regression analysis
 
Univariate Multivariate
Parameters
HR(95% CI)
p value
HR(95% CI)
p value
Age (high vs low)
1.18(0.98–1.46)
0.089
1.14(0.91–1.41)
0.131
Gender (male vs female)
1.12(0.72–1.73)
0.523
  
Current smokers (yes vs no)
1.33(0.82–2.05)
0.251
  
Alcohol (yes vs no)
1.03(0.83–1.29)
0.754
  
Diabetes (yes vs no)
1.21(0.94–1.52)
0.122
  
Hypertension (yes vs no)
1.47(0.79–2.58)
0.132
  
ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1)
0.86(0.71–1.07)
0.845
  
Tumor size (T1/T2 vs T3/T4)
0.78(0.39–1.55)
0.461
  
Lymph node (N0 vs N1–3)
1.92(0.89–3.78)
0.058
1.53(0.69–2.87)
0.205
Metastasis stage (M0 vs M1a/b)
1.79(1.15–2.64)
0.011*
1.73(1.15–2.59)
0.020*
Differentiation (Well/moderate vs poor)
1.74(1.03–2.88)
0.039*
1.60(0.89–2.73)
0.089
Histology (AC vs non-AC)
0.85(0.51–1.29)
0.407
  
Chemotherapy (DP vs AP/GP)
1.52(0.74–3.05)
0.245
  
CRP (high vs low)
0.86(0.71–1.07)
0.845
  
AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02)
2.07(1.32–3.12)
0.009*
1.80(1.09–2.78)
0.025*
NSCLC Non–small cell lung cancer, ECOG PS Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, TNM Tumor–node–metastasis, SCC Squamous carcinoma, AC Adenocarcinoma, DP Docetaxel combined with platinum, AP Pemetrexed combined with platinum, GP Gemcitabine combined with platinum, CRP C-reactive protein, AFR Albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio, PFS Progression free survival, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval. *P < 0.05
Table 3
Risk factors for OS by univariate and multiple Cox proportional hazards regression analysis
 
Univariate Multivariate
Parameters
HR(95%CI)
p value
HR(95%CI)
p value
Age (high vs low)
1.13(0.57–2.17)
0.587
  
Gender (male vs female)
1.49(0.76–2.78)
0.224
  
Current smokers (yes vs no)
1.11(0.60–1.97)
0.754
  
Alcohol (yes vs no)
1.42(0.75–2.55)
0.215
  
Diabetes (yes vs no)
1.78(0.61–4.45)
0.287
  
Hypertension (yes vs no)
1.14(0.53–2.51)
0.678
  
ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1)
0.88(0.45–1.61)
0.612
  
Tumor size (T1/T2 vs T3/T4)
1.67(0.92–3.15)
0.089
1.88(0.92–3.58)
0.073
Lymph node (N0 vs N1–3)
1.92(0.87–3.98)
0.142
  
Metastasis stage (M0 vs M1a/b)
2.06(1.07–3.88)
0.024*
1.73(0.90–2.92)
0.093
Differentiation (Well/moderate vs poor)
1.55(1.04–2.36)
0.041*
1.22(0.81–1.72)
0.312
Histology (AC vs non-AC)
1.24(0.70–2.14)
0.412
  
Chemotherapy (DP vs AP/GP)
1.43(0.88–2.45)
0.126
  
CRP (high vs low)
1.39(0.78–2.43)
0.244
  
AFR (≤8.02 vs > 8.02)
1.93(1.28–2.98)
0.011*
1.79(1.11–2.59)
0.029*
NSCLC Non–small cell lung cancer, ECOG PS Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, TNM Tumor–node–metastasis, SCC Squamous carcinoma, AC Adenocarcinoma, DP Docetaxel combined with platinum, AP Pemetrexed combined with platinum, GP Gemcitabine combined with platinum, CRP C-reactive protein, AFR Albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio, OS Overall survival, HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval. *P < 0.05

AFR and survival analysis

To further explore the association between the AFR and survival in advanced NSCLC patients, the Kaplan-Meier curves of PFS and OS were calculated. As shown in Figs. 2 and 3, the PFS (P = 0.008) and OS (P = 0.003) were significantly improved in the high AFR group compared with the low AFR group by log-rank tests.

Discussion

As demonstrated by recent studies, inflammation and nutritional status play key roles in tumor progression [18]. It is also well known that nutritional status and chronic inflammation are two main causes for NSCLC [19]. This current study focused on the potential predictive factors for prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Our results showed that the pretreatment AFR was an independent risk factor for both PFS and OS in advanced NSCLC patients. Patients with a lower pretreatment AFR had a worse clinical response to for chemotherapy, PFS and OS than patients with a high pretreatment AFR. In addition to the AFR, the present study also indicated that metastasis stage is a significant prognostic factor for PFS.
Albumin, a sensitive marker in nutritional status assessments, is an acute-phase reactant for systemic inflammation status and its synthesis is suppressed by inflammatory cytokines [20]. A systematic review of the epidemiological literature reveals the significant prognostic role of pretreatment serum albumin in cancer and baseline albumin levels that are recommended for risk stratification [21]. The close association between inflammation and tumors has attracted much attention. Inflammation in the tumor microenvironment plays important roles in the proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and metastasis of malignant cells [18]. Inflammation also accounts for the response alterations of the adaptive immune system to chemotherapeutic agents [18]. It has been demonstrated that malnutrition status is closely related to the progression of malignancy due to its association with high leukocytes levels, high risks of infection, and weak immune systems [21, 22].
Fib, an essential constituent of the coagulation system, plays an important role in platelet aggregation and blood coagulation. Furthermore, Fib is also widely accepted as a reliable biomarker that reflects systemic inflammation and Fib can promote the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines [23]. High Fib expression induced by the excess production of inflammatory cytokines may be associated with tumor aggressiveness in NSCLC patients [24]. Plasma Fib contributes to the coagulation status and promotes the survival and adhesion of tumor cells, which results in LC metastasis [25]. Elevated Fib levels are reported to be tightly associated with high risk of colorectal, lung and breast cancer [26]. Preoperative serum Fib levels are suggested to be a candidate prognostic biomarker in operable NSCLCs [27].
Other studies have indicated the prognostic roles of plasma fibrinogen [28] and albumin [29] for survival in NSCLC patients. Our results showed that the AFR, which takes both albumin and fibrinogen into account, served as a strong predictor for prognosis. The AFR is an indicator of nutritional status, coagulation condition, and systemic inflammation. It has been indicated that the interactions between the inflammatory response and tumor cells promote tumor progression in the host environment [30]. Previous studies have reported that inflammatory cytokines are involved in the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of tumor cells in various cancers [15]. A recent study in advanced esophageal cancer patients reported that changes in AFR can serve as an independent risk factor for prognosis [31]. Moreover, in comparison with single Alb or Fib measurements, the AFR could amplify the sensitivity of nutritional and inflammatory status changes in NSCLC patients. Importantly, pretreatment AFR could clearly predict the clinical response to chemo-radiotherapy, which could partly explain its predictive role for survival. The AFR closely correlates with blood coagulation, nutritional and systemic inflammatory status, which may be possible explanations for the predictive role of AFR for survival in advanced NSCLC patients. In addition, some studies have indicated that chronic inflammation-associated biomarkers (such as elevated neutrophil count, CRP, etc.) can be potential predictors for nivolumab therapy in NSCLC [32]. The status of KRAS mutation has also been suggested as a prognostic biomarker for advanced NSCLC patients undergoing ICIs [33]. Some molecular predictive markers have been applied for NSCLC patients with platinum-based chemotherapy, such as excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) [34], ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) [35], class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) [36] and breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) expression [37]. Another circulating biomarker, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been recommended as a potential predictor for outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab [38]. Scilla et al. have also indicated that the baseline NLR is a novel prognostic factor in locally advanced NSCLC patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation with or without surgery [39]. However, whether these circulating biomarkers can serve as potential predictive/prognostic markers for NSCLC remains controversial and further validation is required for the clinical application for these markers.
We must admit that this study has some limitations. First, this is a signal-center retrospective study with a small sample size and the results require further validation in larger prospective data sets. Second, the observed sample cohort was quite specific and the lack of control group analyses (e.g. patients who were or were not receiving radiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy) was a great limitation for this study. Next, we will perform a study to investigate whether the AFR can serve as a prognostic factor for advanced NSCLC patients undergoing different treatment strategies (e.g. immunotherapy, targeted agents, combination therapy, etc.).

Conclusions

In summary, our results indicated that the AFR could be a potential effective predictive factor for the survival in advanced NSCLC patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. However, more relevant studies with a larger sample sizes are warranted to validate our conclusions and explore the potential mechanisms.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the author Haijian Liu (liuhaijiantg@sina.​com) upon reasonable requests.
This study was approved by the Medical Institutional Ethics Committee of Zhejiang province. The patients enrolled all presented written informed consent.
Not Applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRef Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87–108.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ni XF, Wu J, Ji M, Shao YJ, Xu B, Jiang JT, et al. Effect of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio on prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018. Ni XF, Wu J, Ji M, Shao YJ, Xu B, Jiang JT, et al. Effect of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio on prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Pechoux C. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a reassessment based on new data. Oncologist. 2011;16(5):672–81.CrossRef Le Pechoux C. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer: a reassessment based on new data. Oncologist. 2011;16(5):672–81.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Crino L, Weder W, van Meerbeeck J, Felip E, Group EGW. Early stage and locally advanced (non-metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v103–15.CrossRef Crino L, Weder W, van Meerbeeck J, Felip E, Group EGW. Early stage and locally advanced (non-metastatic) non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 5):v103–15.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothschild SI. Epigenetic therapy in lung Cancer - role of microRNAs. Front Oncol. 2013;3:158.CrossRef Rothschild SI. Epigenetic therapy in lung Cancer - role of microRNAs. Front Oncol. 2013;3:158.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Osmani L, Askin F, Gabrielson E, Li QK. Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52(Pt 1:103–9.CrossRef Osmani L, Askin F, Gabrielson E, Li QK. Current WHO guidelines and the critical role of immunohistochemical markers in the subclassification of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): moving from targeted therapy to immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2018;52(Pt 1:103–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SW, Ahn MJ. Current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Korean J Intern Med. 2019;34(1):50–9.CrossRef Lim SW, Ahn MJ. Current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Korean J Intern Med. 2019;34(1):50–9.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, Chitale DA, Dacic S, Giaccone G, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15(4):415–53.CrossRef Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, Chitale DA, Dacic S, Giaccone G, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2013;15(4):415–53.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nilssen Y, Strand TE, Fjellbirkeland L, Bartnes K, Moller B. Lung cancer survival in Norway, 1997-2011: from nihilism to optimism. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(1):275–87.CrossRef Nilssen Y, Strand TE, Fjellbirkeland L, Bartnes K, Moller B. Lung cancer survival in Norway, 1997-2011: from nihilism to optimism. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(1):275–87.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS. Survivorship in non-small cell lung Cancer: challenges faced and steps forward. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(9):1151–61.CrossRef Vijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS. Survivorship in non-small cell lung Cancer: challenges faced and steps forward. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(9):1151–61.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436–44.CrossRef Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436–44.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRef Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.CrossRef Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Giudici S, Serati M, Formenti G, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative plasma fibrinogen in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(2):309–13.CrossRef Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Giudici S, Serati M, Formenti G, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative plasma fibrinogen in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119(2):309–13.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun ZQ, Han XN, Wang HJ, Tang Y, Zhao ZL, Qu YL, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative fibrinogen in patients with colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(26):8583–91.CrossRef Sun ZQ, Han XN, Wang HJ, Tang Y, Zhao ZL, Qu YL, et al. Prognostic significance of preoperative fibrinogen in patients with colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(26):8583–91.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kijima T, Arigami T, Uchikado Y, Uenosono Y, Kita Y, Owaki T, et al. Combined fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(2):193–9.CrossRef Kijima T, Arigami T, Uchikado Y, Uenosono Y, Kita Y, Owaki T, et al. Combined fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2017;108(2):193–9.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–7.CrossRef Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–7.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal V, El Rayes T, Narula N, McGraw TE, Altorki NK, Barcellos-Hoff MH. The microenvironment of lung Cancer and therapeutic implications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;890:75–110.CrossRef Mittal V, El Rayes T, Narula N, McGraw TE, Altorki NK, Barcellos-Hoff MH. The microenvironment of lung Cancer and therapeutic implications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;890:75–110.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Artigas A, Wernerman J, Arroyo V, Vincent JL, Levy M. Role of albumin in diseases associated with severe systemic inflammation: pathophysiologic and clinical evidence in sepsis and in decompensated cirrhosis. J Crit Care. 2016;33:62–70.CrossRef Artigas A, Wernerman J, Arroyo V, Vincent JL, Levy M. Role of albumin in diseases associated with severe systemic inflammation: pathophysiologic and clinical evidence in sepsis and in decompensated cirrhosis. J Crit Care. 2016;33:62–70.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2010;9:69.CrossRef Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2010;9:69.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zitvogel L, Pietrocola F, Kroemer G. Nutrition, inflammation and cancer. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(8):843–50.CrossRef Zitvogel L, Pietrocola F, Kroemer G. Nutrition, inflammation and cancer. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(8):843–50.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen T, Kierulf P, Sandset PM, Klingenberg O, Joo GB, Godal HC, et al. Fibrinogen and fibrin induce synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines from isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97(5):822–9.CrossRef Jensen T, Kierulf P, Sandset PM, Klingenberg O, Joo GB, Godal HC, et al. Fibrinogen and fibrin induce synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines from isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97(5):822–9.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen S, Yan H, Du J, Li J, Shen B, Ying H, et al. Prognostic significance of pre-resection albumin/fibrinogen ratio in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;482:203–8.CrossRef Chen S, Yan H, Du J, Li J, Shen B, Ying H, et al. Prognostic significance of pre-resection albumin/fibrinogen ratio in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;482:203–8.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Palumbo JS, Kombrinck KW, Drew AF, Grimes TS, Kiser JH, Degen JL, et al. Fibrinogen is an important determinant of the metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells. Blood. 2000;96(10):3302–9.PubMed Palumbo JS, Kombrinck KW, Drew AF, Grimes TS, Kiser JH, Degen JL, et al. Fibrinogen is an important determinant of the metastatic potential of circulating tumor cells. Blood. 2000;96(10):3302–9.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Allin KH, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of cancer in 84,000 individuals from the general population. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(7):1493–500.CrossRef Allin KH, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of cancer in 84,000 individuals from the general population. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(7):1493–500.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheng L, Luo M, Sun X, Lin N, Mao W, Su D. Serum fibrinogen is an independent prognostic factor in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(11):2720–5.PubMed Sheng L, Luo M, Sun X, Lin N, Mao W, Su D. Serum fibrinogen is an independent prognostic factor in operable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(11):2720–5.PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones JM, McGonigle NC, McAnespie M, Cran GW, Graham AN. Plasma fibrinogen and serum C-reactive protein are associated with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;53(1):97–101.CrossRef Jones JM, McGonigle NC, McAnespie M, Cran GW, Graham AN. Plasma fibrinogen and serum C-reactive protein are associated with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;53(1):97–101.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Morano MT, Mesquita R, Da Silva GP, Araujo AS, Pinto JM, Neto AG, et al. Comparison of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation with chest physical therapy on the levels of fibrinogen and albumin in patients with lung cancer awaiting lung resection: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:121.CrossRef Morano MT, Mesquita R, Da Silva GP, Araujo AS, Pinto JM, Neto AG, et al. Comparison of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation with chest physical therapy on the levels of fibrinogen and albumin in patients with lung cancer awaiting lung resection: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:121.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140(6):883–99.CrossRef Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140(6):883–99.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Suda K, et al. Prognostic impact of change in the fibrinogen and albumin score during preoperative treatment in esophageal Cancer patients. World J Surg. 2017;41(11):2788–95.CrossRef Matsuda S, Takeuchi H, Kawakubo H, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Suda K, et al. Prognostic impact of change in the fibrinogen and albumin score during preoperative treatment in esophageal Cancer patients. World J Surg. 2017;41(11):2788–95.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Svaton M, Zemanova M, Skrickova J, Jakubikova L, Kolek V, Kultan J, et al. Chronic inflammation as a potential predictive factor of Nivolumab therapy in non-small cell lung Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(12):6771–82.CrossRef Svaton M, Zemanova M, Skrickova J, Jakubikova L, Kolek V, Kultan J, et al. Chronic inflammation as a potential predictive factor of Nivolumab therapy in non-small cell lung Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(12):6771–82.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Kim HS, Kim BJ. Prognostic value of KRAS mutation in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis and review. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):48248–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Kim JH, Kim HS, Kim BJ. Prognostic value of KRAS mutation in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis and review. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):48248–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton G, Rath B. Pharmacogenetics of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: predictive validity of polymorphisms of ERCC1. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14(1):17–24.CrossRef Hamilton G, Rath B. Pharmacogenetics of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: predictive validity of polymorphisms of ERCC1. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14(1):17–24.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Nie X, Cheng G, Ai B, Zhang S. The tailored chemotherapy based on RRM1 immunohistochemical expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2013;13(6):433–40.CrossRef Nie X, Cheng G, Ai B, Zhang S. The tailored chemotherapy based on RRM1 immunohistochemical expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2013;13(6):433–40.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang ZL, Cao X, Luo RZ, Chen YF, Zhu LC, Wen Z. Analysis of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1 and TUBB3 as predictors of prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective study. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(1):299–305.CrossRef Huang ZL, Cao X, Luo RZ, Chen YF, Zhu LC, Wen Z. Analysis of ERCC1, BRCA1, RRM1 and TUBB3 as predictors of prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective study. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(1):299–305.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang LR, He LJ, Wang Y, Li YY, Lou Y, Zhang GB, et al. Correlation between BRCA1 and TopBP1 protein expression and clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015;76(1):163–70.CrossRef Wang LR, He LJ, Wang Y, Li YY, Lou Y, Zhang GB, et al. Correlation between BRCA1 and TopBP1 protein expression and clinical outcome of non-small cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015;76(1):163–70.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagley SJ, Kothari S, Aggarwal C, Bauml JM, Alley EW, Evans TL, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;106:1–7.CrossRef Bagley SJ, Kothari S, Aggarwal C, Bauml JM, Alley EW, Evans TL, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2017;106:1–7.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Scilla KA, Bentzen SM, Lam VK, Mohindra P, Nichols EM, Vyfhuis MA, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced (stage IIIA and IIIB) non-small cell lung Cancer treated with combined modality therapy. Oncologist. 2017;22(6):737–42.CrossRef Scilla KA, Bentzen SM, Lam VK, Mohindra P, Nichols EM, Vyfhuis MA, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced (stage IIIA and IIIB) non-small cell lung Cancer treated with combined modality therapy. Oncologist. 2017;22(6):737–42.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pretreatment albumin/fibrinogen ratio as a promising predictor for the survival of advanced non small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy
verfasst von
Jun Ying
Danfei Zhou
Tongjie Gu
Jianda Huang
Haijian Liu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5490-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

BMC Cancer 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.