Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Erschienen in: Archives of Women's Mental Health 4/2010

01.08.2010 | Review Article

Prevalence and incidence of postnatal depression: what can systematic reviews tell us?

verfasst von: Rachel Mann, Simon Gilbody, Joy Adamson

Erschienen in: Archives of Women's Mental Health | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Postnatal depression (PND) has a significant impact on maternal mental health. Systematic reviews provide a useful tool to summarise research, however little is known about the quantity and quality of existing systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND.

Objective

The objective of this paper is to provide a systematic overview of existing systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND in the first 12 postnatal months.

Method

Medline, Embase, Cinahl, PsychInfo and the Cochrane Library were searched for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence of PND which met the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria. Characteristics of selected reviews, completeness of reporting results and methodological quality were evaluated.

Results

Five reviews were selected for appraisal. Only one systematic review was identified; four reviews were non-systematic. Only two reviews provided a quantitative summary estimate of prevalence of PND. Completeness of reporting results using published guidelines was not undertaken by any review. The methodological quality of four reviews revealed limitations.

Conclusions

Limited generalisable evidence exists in the form of high-quality systematic reviews to inform current knowledge of the prevalence and incidence of PND. The implication of this represents an important limitation for health services planning and service delivery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Altman DG, Bland MJ (1994) Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ 309:102PubMed
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, text revision (DSM-IV-TR), 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DCCrossRef
Andrews G, Sanderson K, Corry J, Lapsley HM (2000) Using epidemiological data to model efficiency in reducing the burden of depression. J Mental Health Policy Econ 3:175–186CrossRef
Becker LA, Oxman AD (2009) Overviews of reviews [Chapter 22]. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2 [updated Sept 2009] The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from http://​www.​cochrane-handbook.​org
Chisholm D, Sanderson K, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Saxena S (2004) Reducing the global burden of depression: population-level analysis of intervention cost-effectiveness in 14 world regions. Br J Psychiatry 184:393–403CrossRefPubMed
Coghill SR, Caplan HL, Alexander H (1986) Impact of maternal depression on cognitive development of young children. BMJ 292:1165–1167CrossRef
Downs S, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefPubMed
Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) (2001a) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ, London
Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M (2001b) Systematic reviews of observational studies. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ, LondonCrossRef
Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Meltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T (2005) Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol 106:1071–1083PubMed
Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, Lohr K, Swinson T, Gartlehner G, Brody S, Miller W (2005) Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Goodman JH (2004) Postpartum depression beyond the early postpartum period. JOGN Nursing 33:410–420
Halbreich U, Karkun S (2006) Cross-cultural and social diversity of prevalence of postpartum depression and depressive symptoms. J Affect Disord 91:97–111CrossRefPubMed
Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Mayrent SL (1987) Epidemiology in medicine. Little, Brown, Boston
Hewitt CE, Gilbody SM, Brealey S, Paulden M, Palmer S, Mann R, Green J, Morrell J, Barkham M, Light K, Richards D (2009) Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. Health Technology Assessment 13(36)
Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trial for meta-analysis. JAMA 282:1054–1060CrossRefPubMed
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS (2003) The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). JAMA 289:3095–3105CrossRefPubMed
Leahy-Warren P, Mccarthy G (2007) Postnatal depression: prevalence, mothers’ perspectives, and treatments. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 21:91–100CrossRefPubMed
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup D (1999) Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 354:1896–1900CrossRefPubMed
Murray CJ, Lopez AD (eds) (1996) The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from disease, injuries and risk factors in 1990. Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Bank, Harvard University Press, Boston
Murray L, Cooper P, Hipwell A (2003) Mental health of parents caring for infants. Arch Womens Ment Health 6(Suppl 2):s71–s77CrossRefPubMed
Murray L, Cooper PJ (1996) The impact of postpartum depression and child development. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:55–63CrossRef
National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (2007) Antenatal and post-natal mental health, the nice guideline on clinical management and service guidance. The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London
Nicholson P (1998) Post-natal depression, psychology, science and the transition to motherhood. Routledge, LondonCrossRef
Nielsen Forman D, Videbech P, Hedegaard M, Dalby Salvig J, Secher NJ (2000) Postpartum depression: identification of women at risk. BJOG 107:1210–1217CrossRefPubMed
O’Hara MW, Swain AM (1996) Rates and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry 8:37–54CrossRef
Oates M (2003) Postnatal depression and screening: too broad a sweep? B J Gen Pract 53:596–597
Oxman AD, Guyatt GH (1991) Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. J Clin Epidemiol 44:1271–1278CrossRefPubMed
Paulden M, Palmer S, Hewitt C, Gilbody S (2009) Screening for postnatal depression in primary care: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 339:b5203CrossRefPubMed
Pope S, Watts J, Evans S, Mcdonald S, Henderson J (2000) Post-natal depression- a systematic review of published scietific literature to 1999. National Health and Medical Research Council
Ross LE, Dennis C-L (2009) The prevalence of postpartum depression amongst women with substance use, an abuse history, or chronic illness: A systematic review. J Womens Health 18(4):475–486CrossRef
Shea B, Dube C, Moher D (2001) Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews: the QUOROM statement compared to other tools. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analyses in context, 2nd edn. BMJ, London
Shea B, Grimshaw J, Wells G, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter A, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter L (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:10CrossRefPubMed
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB, Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Group (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283:2008–2012CrossRefPubMed
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Strobe initiative (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806–808CrossRef
Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Brownwer WS (1997) Case-finding instruments for depression: two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med 12:439–445CrossRefPubMed
Yonkers KA, Chantilis SJ (1995) Recognition of depression in obstetric/gynecology practices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:632–638CrossRefPubMed
Yonkers KA, Ramin SM, Rush AJ, Navarrete CA, Carmody T, March D, Heartwell SF, Leveno KJ (2001) Onset and persistence of postpartum depression in an inner-city maternal health clinic system. Am J Psychiatry 158:1856–1863CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence and incidence of postnatal depression: what can systematic reviews tell us?
verfasst von
Rachel Mann
Simon Gilbody
Joy Adamson
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2010
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Archives of Women's Mental Health / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1434-1816
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-1102
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-010-0162-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Archives of Women's Mental Health 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Association between antenatal distress and uterine artery pulsatility index

Letter to the Editor

Use of valproate in women of childbearing potential: pre- and post-NICE bipolar guidelines

Original Article

Web-based treatment for infertility-related psychological distress

Original Article

Paternal support and preterm birth, and the moderation of effects of chronic stress: a study in Los Angeles County mothers

Original Contribution

Adapting and testing telephone-based depression care management intervention for adolescent mothers

Short Communication

Post-partum transverse sinus thrombosis presenting as acute psychosis

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Bildnachweise