Prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in allied health workers: a cross-sectional pilot study in a tertiary hospital in Singapore

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is increasingly being identified as a problem around the world. Women can have problems in various parts of the sexual cycle - desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm or they may experience pain related to sexual activity. These abnormalities collectively may be enough to interfere significantly with sexual function, resulting in dysfunction. Research suggests that FSD is multifactorial, with potential causes and risk factors such as age, educational level, community and religious values, relationship issues, obesity, psychological and psychiatric problems, medical conditions, gynaecological disorders, and medications [1, 2].

The only study involving Singapore with regard to sexual dysfunction in women, the Asian Global Studies of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviours in 2002, found that Singapore had the lowest rate of reported age-standardised sexual dysfunction of 32% amongst middle-aged and elderly women when compared with other Asian countries [3]. Since then, prevalence rates of FSD in Singapore have not been investigated or analysed and the impact on society remains unknown. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013 interviewed 80 women with FSD on the impact of this condition on their daily life. They cited negative impacts on relationships, self-esteem, identity and mood. All of these affect quality of life and may even have consequences to society and nationally (possibly affecting birth rates, happiness index). More studies would be needed to establish correlation, but suffice to say that with a high prevalence of FSD, there could be a detrimental impact that extends beyond the individual.

Other Asian studies investigating FSD have demonstrated a varying range of prevalence rates, from 5.5% among healthcare workers in Malaysia [4] to 46.1% of women in Korea, of which 21.5% was self-reported as recognised [5]. Viswanathan et al. [6] and Singh et al. [7] have found that up to two thirds of the population in India suffers from sexual dysfunction, with barely a tenth of them identifying it as a problem. While the lack of consistent methodology and variability of the criteria applied for FSD definition partly explain why the prevalence rates differ in various studies, consensus is that there is a large community in Asia plagued by female sexual dysfunction [8].

The main aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction among allied health workers in a tertiary hospital in Singapore and to determine the significant risk factors for FSD.

A cross sectional study was conducted in a 830-bedded Tertiary Hospital in Singapore between May 2015 and August 2015. An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to a total of approximately 1400 allied health workers, from the Departments of Nursing, Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Dietetics, Medical Social Services and Pharmacy. Participation was entirely voluntary and responses were obtained via central collection boxes to ensure anonymity. Our targeted sample population was based on all the allied health workers who were working in the hospital during the study period. The responses were collected only after formal working hours. This was particularly important as sex still remains a taboo topic in some parts of Asia.

The questionnaire contained basic demographic questions – age, marital status, race, vocation, frequency of sexual activity, as well as the 19 questions of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) [9]. A sample of our questionnaire can be found in the supplementary files section (Additional file 1). This is a useful, validated tool in the assessment of sexual function that incorporates 6 domains – desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction and pain. There are 2 to 4 questions per domain assessed as part of the FSFI. For the domain of desire, the 2 questions asked were about the frequency of feeling sexual desire and a rating of the level of sexual desire. For the domain of arousal, the 4 questions asked related to frequency, level of sexual arousal, confidence in becoming sexually aroused and how often they were satisfied with arousal during sexual activity. For the domain of lubrication, the 4 questions asked were on frequency, difficulty level to become lubricated, how often they could maintain the lubrication until completion of sexual intercourse and how difficult it was to maintain this lubrication. For the domain of orgasm, the 2 questions asked were related to frequency of attaining orgasm during sexual intercourse, and how difficult it was to reach an orgasm. For the domain of satisfaction, the 4 questions asked were about satisfaction levels with ability to orgasm, satisfaction levels with emotional closeness with partner, satisfaction levels with their sexual relationship and satisfaction levels with their overall sex life. For the last domain of pain, the 3 questions asked were related to frequency of pain felt during vaginal penetration, frequency of pain felt after vaginal penetration and the level of pain or discomfort felt during or after vaginal penetration. One option is selected per question, which gives an idea of the frequency with which the problem exists (almost always, most times, sometimes, a few times, almost never) or the severity (extremely difficult, very difficult, difficult, slightly difficult, not difficult) of the domain assessed. Satisfaction levels were also assessed with similar gradation (very satisfied, moderately satisfied, equally satisfied and dissatisfied, moderately dissatisfied, very dissatisfied). Respondents can also answer with the option “no sexual activity” for the questions. The answers are then weighted (multiplied by a corresponding factor) depending on the domain in question and calculated into an overall score. The minimum score is 2 and the maximum score attainable is 36.

The inclusion criterion was specified as any female allied healthcare worker between the ages of 18 and 70 who have a partner they are sexually active with. We excluded males, women without a partner and women who have never been sexually active. This was stated clearly in the participation information sheet as well as at the heading of the questionnaire. Incomplete questionnaires in which any of the 19 questions of the FSFI were not answered were excluded from analysis.

A clinical cut off score of 26.55 in accordance with the use of the FSFI was used to identify female sexual dysfunction in our study, this value was found to have good discriminant validity [10]. While many of the studies in various Asian countries employing the FSFI have used different cut-off scores, we employed the official, universal cut-off score for this pilot study.

Results were analysed from 330 respondents. See Fig. 1.

The following were the characteristics of the participants in our study.

In our study, we found that 185 of the 330 (56.0, 95% CI: 50.67–61.32%) respondents were classified as having female sexual dysfunction, with a FSFI score of < 26.55.

The mean scores across the different domains of sexual function are shown in Table 1.

Analysis was conducted across the independent variables to see if there was a significant difference between the patients classified as having female sexual dysfunction and those without (see Table 2). No significant difference was found for age, race, marital status and for the presence of chronic medical conditions. However, there was a significant difference in the prevalence of FSD between the nursing (52.4%) and other allied health staff (67.1%) groups.

The univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the nursing group had a significantly lower risk of FSD (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.28–0.90, p = 0.020) when compared to the other allied health staff (reference group). See Table 3.

Among the patients with FSD, we looked into the various domains of female sexual function against the variables (see Table 4). Statistically significant differences were found between age and satisfaction score, where respondents below 40 years of age had lower satisfaction scores (mean scores + SD: age 21–30: 3.4 ± 1.5, age 31–40: 3.5 ± 1.4) than those above the age of 40 (mean scores: age 41–50: 4.0 ± 1.2, age 51 to 60 3.9 ± 1.0, age > 60 3.7 ± 0.5). We found significant differences (p = 0.018, p = 0.021) among our racial groups in the domains of pain and lubrication. The mean scores in the pain domain for Indians (2.6, ± 2.2) and Filipinos (2.5, ± 2.1) were lower than the Chinese (3.4 ± 1.9) and Malays (3.8 ± 1.7), and the mean scores for lubrication in Indians (2.4 ± 4.2) and Filipinos (2.4 ± 2.2) were also found to be lower than in the Chinese (3.3 ± 1.9) and Malays (3.4 ± 1.5).

We only accepted questionnaires in which all the 19 questions of the FSFI were filled, our primary aim of determining the prevalence of FSD among allied health workers in a tertiary hospital was achieved. However, in order to maintain a sizeable sample, we also included questionnaires in the study even if the demographic questions were not fully filled. This could have potentially skewed the analysis of the data for our secondary aim, which was to analyse if demographic variables were associated with the prevalence rates of FSD among the respondents. Also, we did not obtain a full medical background or ask about the presence of pregnancy for the respondents, which could be contributory to their sexual function.

The prevalence of FSD in the allied health population cannot be extrapolated to the general population as it is not a representative sample in view of inherent differences, but it does serve as a useful platform for further studies to be done. While previous studies have shown that FSD is more prevalent among working women, healthcare workers were at particular risk due to their working environment and patterns of work schedules [8]. This could possibly account for the higher than average prevalence rate found in the study.

There is a high prevalence (56%) of female sexual dysfunction in allied health workers between the ages of 21 to 70 in a tertiary hospital in Singapore, and this was independent of age, race, marital status and presence of chronic medical conditions. Nurses were found to have a lower prevalence rate than their other allied health counterparts, and were less likely to develop female sexual dysfunction.

Analysis across the domains of sexual dysfunction revealed that Indians and Filipinos tend to have less problems with lubrication and pain. It also found higher satisfaction with sex life for women above 40.

The diverse population in Singapore would make it a suitable place for more detailed assessment on the impact of race on female sexual function.

We will need further population studies with a wider sample size to assess the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in the general population, to identify associated risk factors, assess the psychological impact of this condition and determine if people would be willing to seek help for such problems.