nach oben

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Erschienen in:

28.01.2016 | Original Article

Prevalence of laparoscopic surgical treatment and its clinical outcomes in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan

verfasst von: Hideki Ueno, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Fumio Ishida, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Takao Hinoi, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Yasuhiro Inoue, Naohiro Tomita, Nagahide Matsubara, Koji Komori, Heita Ozawa, Takeshi Nagasaka, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Motoi Koyama, Yoshito Akagi, Toshimasa Yatsuoka, Kensuke Kumamoto, Kiyotaka Kurachi, Kohji Tanakaya, Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu, Toshiaki Watanabe, Kenichi Sugihara, Hideyuki Ishida

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the preferred technique for most colorectal interventions. This study aimed to clarify the time trend of surgical treatment for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and its relevance to clinical outcomes in Japan over a 13-year period.

Methods

This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study comprising 23 specialist institutions for colorectal disease and a cohort of 282 FAP patients who underwent total colectomy or proctocolectomy during 2000–2012. Patient clinical backgrounds and surgical outcomes were compared between the first and second halves of the study period.

Results

The proportion of surgical types adopted over the entire study period was 46, 21, 30, and 3 % for ileoanal anastomosis (IAA), ileoanal canal anastomosis, ileorectal anastomosis, and permanent ileostomy, respectively. FAP patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery have increased since 2008 and reached 74 % in the past 3 years. In particular, the number of patients undergoing laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IAA increased approximately four-fold from the first to the second half of the study period. A laparoscopic approach was increasingly used in patients with coexisting colorectal malignancies. Despite this trend, surgical results of the laparoscopic approach between the two study periods showed similar morbidity, pouch operation and stoma closure completion rates. No postoperative mortality was observed in this series, and laparoscopic surgery was comparable to open surgery in terms of stoma closure rate, incidence of intra-abdominal/abdominal desmoid tumors, and postoperative survival rate in both study periods.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic approach is increasingly being adopted for prophylactic FAP surgery in Japan and may provide clinically acceptable practical outcomes.

Vasen HFA, Möslein G, Alonso A et al (2008) Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Gut 57:704–713CrossRefPubMed

Wexner SD, Jahansen OB, Nogueras JJ et al (1992) Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 35:651–655CrossRefPubMed

Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 2004:984–992CrossRef

Kienle P, Z’graggen K, Schmidt J et al (2005) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 92:88–93CrossRefPubMed

Schiessling S, Leowardi C, Kienle P et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure in patients undergoing elective restorative proctocolectomy (LapConPouch Trial)−a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:807–816CrossRefPubMed

Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ et al (2006) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis. a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg 243:667–672CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Ouaïssi M et al (2009) Total laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: prospective series of 82 patients. Surg Endosc 23:166–173CrossRefPubMed

McNicol FJ, Kennedy RH, Philips RKS et al (2011) Laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), supported by an increased recovery programme in cases of familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis 14:458–462CrossRef

Vitellaro M, Bonfanti G, Sala P et al (2011) Laparoscopic colectomy and restrative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Endosc 25:1866–1875CrossRefPubMed

10.

Campos FG, Araújo SE, Melani AG et al (2011) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resections for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:327–333CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kim HJ, Choi G-S, Park JS et al (2012) Early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic treatment for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Korean Surg Soc 83:288–297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JFM et al (2001) Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy. a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1800–1807CrossRefPubMed

13.

Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JFM et al (2007) Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:1301–1307CrossRefPubMed

14.

AhmedAli U, Keus F, Heikens JT et al (2009) Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006267

15.

Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK et al (2000) Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 43:604–608CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bartels SAL, D’Hoore A, Cuesta MA et al (2012) Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 256:1045–1048CrossRefPubMed

17.

Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D et al (2013) A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A 2-center study. Ann Surg 258:275–282CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ganschow P, Warth R, Hinz U et al (2013) Early postoperative complications after stapled vs handsewn restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 148 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis coli: a matched-pair analysis. Colorectal Dis 16:116–122CrossRef

19.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2012) JSCCR guidelines 2012 for the clinical practice of hereditary colorectal cancer. Kanehara and Co., Ltd, Tokyo

20.

Church J, Simmang C (2003) Practice parameters for the treatment of patients with dominantly inherited colorectal cancer (familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer). Dis Colon Rectum 46:1001–1012CrossRefPubMed

21.

Moreira AL, Church JM, Burke CA (2009) The evolution of prophylactic colorectal surgery for familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1481–1486CrossRef

22.

Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Fazio VW et al (2006) Meta-analysis of observational studies of ileorectal versus ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 93:407–417CrossRefPubMed

23.

Iwama T, Tamura K, Morita T et al (2004) A clinical overview of familial adenomatous polyposis derived from the database of the polyposis registry of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 9:308–316CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kartheuser A, Stangherlin P, Brandt D et al (2006) Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited. Fam Cancer 5:241–260CrossRefPubMed

25.

Hor T, Zalinski S, Lefevre JH et al (2012) Feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy without diverting stoma. Dig Liver Dis 44:118–122CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kennedy RD, Zarroug AE, Moir CR et al (2014) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis in pediatric familial adenomatous polyposis: a 24-year review of operative technique and patient outcomes. J Pediat Surg 49:1409–1412CrossRefPubMed

27.

Vitellaro M, Ferrari A, Trencheva K et al (2012) Is laparoscopic surgery an option to support prophylactic colectomy in adolescent patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)? Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:1223–1228CrossRefPubMed

28.

Vitellaro M, Sala P, Signoroni S et al (2014) Risk of desmoid tumours after open and laparoscopic colectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 101:558–565CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Prevalence of laparoscopic surgical treatment and its clinical outcomes in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan
verfasst von: Hideki Ueno
Hirotoshi Kobayashi
Tsuyoshi Konishi
Fumio Ishida
Tatsuro Yamaguchi
Takao Hinoi
Yukihide Kanemitsu
Yasuhiro Inoue
Naohiro Tomita
Nagahide Matsubara
Koji Komori
Heita Ozawa
Takeshi Nagasaka
Hirotoshi Hasegawa
Motoi Koyama
Yoshito Akagi
Toshimasa Yatsuoka
Kensuke Kumamoto
Kiyotaka Kurachi
Kohji Tanakaya
Kazuhiko Yoshimatsu
Toshiaki Watanabe
Kenichi Sugihara
Hideyuki Ishida
Publikationsdatum: 28.01.2016
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0953-5

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Prevalence of laparoscopic surgical treatment and its clinical outcomes in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis in Japan