Anzeige
Erschienen in:
14.11.2016 | Urology - Original Paper
Primary non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty long-term success rates are similar to transecting urethroplasty
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 1/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objectives
To review the long-term outcomes of transecting versus non-transecting urethroplasty to repair bulbar urethral strictures.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted of 342 patients who underwent anterior urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon from 2003 to 2014. Patients were excluded from further analysis if there had been prior urethroplasty, stricture location outside the bulbous urethra, or age <18 years. In the transecting group, surgical techniques used included excision and primary anastomosis and augmented anastomotic urethroplasty. In the non-transecting group, surgical techniques used included non-transecting anastomotic urethroplasty and dorsal and/or ventral buccal grafting. The primary endpoint was stricture resolution in transecting vs. non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty. Success was defined as freedom from secondary procedures including dilation, urethrotomy, or repeat urethroplasty.
Results
One hundred and fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. At a mean follow-up of 65 months (range: 10–138 months), stricture-free recurrence in the transecting and non-transecting groups was similar, 83% (n = 85/102) and 82% (n = 41/50), respectively (p = 0.84). Surgical technique (p = 0.91), stricture length (p = 0.8), and etiology (p = 0.6) did not affect stricture recurrence rate on multivariate analysis. There was no difference detected in time to stricture recurrence (p = 0.21).
Conclusions
In this retrospective series, transecting and non-transecting primary bulbar urethroplasty resulted in similar long-term stricture resolution rate. Prospective studies are needed to determine what differences may present in outcomes related to sexual function and long-term success.