nach oben

Die Orthopädie

Erschienen in:

23.10.2017 | Originalien

Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing

verfasst von: Dr. B. S. Werner, J. Stehle, A. Abdelkawi, P. Plumhoff, R. Hudek, F. Gohlke

Erschienen in: Die Orthopädie | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Cementless surface replacement of the shoulder represents an alternative to conventional stemmed anatomic prostheses. Glenoid erosion is a well-known complication in hemiarthroplasty. However, there is limited data concerning radiographic evaluation and prognostic factors for this phenomenon.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to determine the development of glenoid erosion following shoulder resurfacing using a new measurement technique and detect potential prognostic factors.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis on 38 shoulders undergoing humeral head resurfacing with a mean follow-up of 65.4 ± 43 months. Clinical and radiographic evaluation followed a standardized protocol including pre- and postoperative Constant score, active range of motion, and X‑rays in true anteroposterior view. Three independent observers performed measurements of glenoid erosion.

Results

We found good interobserver reliability for glenoid erosion measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.74–0.78). Progressive glenoid erosion was present in all cases, averaging 5.5 ± 3.9 mm at more than 5 years’ follow-up. Male patients demonstrated increased glenoid bone loss within the first 5 years (p < 0.04). The mean Constant score improved to 55.4 ± 23.6 points at the latest follow-up. Younger age was correlated to increased functional outcome. Revision rate due to painful glenoid erosion was 37%.

Conclusions

Glenoid erosion can be routinely expected in patients undergoing humeral head resurfacing. Painful glenoid erosion leads to deterioration in functional outcome and necessitates revision surgery in a high percentage of cases.

Al-Hadithy N, Domos P, Sewell MD, Naleem A, Papanna MC, Pandit R (2012) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder for osteoarthritis: results of fifty Mark III Copeland prosthesis from an independent center with four-year mean follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(12):1776–1781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.024 CrossRefPubMed

Bailie DS, Llinas PJ, Ellenbecker TS (2008) Cementless humeral resurfacing arthroplasty in active patients less than fifty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):110–117. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01552 CrossRefPubMed

Ball CM, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2001) Meniscal allograft interposition arthroplasty for the arthritic shoulder: description of a new technique. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg 2:247:254

Boileau P, Walch G (1997) The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:857–865CrossRefPubMed

Carroll RM, Izquierdo R, Vazquez M, Blaine TA, Levine WN, Bigliani LU (2004) Conversion of painful hemiarthroplasty to total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:599–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.016 CrossRefPubMed

Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

Copeland S (2006) The continuing development of shoulder replacement: “reaching the surface”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:900–905PubMed

Elhassan B, Ozbaydar M, Diller D, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2009) Soft-tissue resurfacing of the glenoid in the treatment of glenohumeral arthritis in active patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(268):419–424. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00318 CrossRefPubMed

Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Neradilek B, Matsen FA 3rd (2007) The complex characteristics of 282 unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.11.004 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, Hammerman SM (2000) Shoulder arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the glenoid in patients who have osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:26–34CrossRefPubMed

11.

Geervliet PC, van den Bekerom MPJ, Spruyt P, Curvers M, van Noort A, Visser CPJ (2017) Outcome and revision rate of uncemented resurfacing (C.A.P.) after 5–8 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2688-9 PubMed

12.

Hasan SS, Leith JM, Campbell B, Kapil R, Smith KL, Matsen FA 3rd (2002) Characteristics of unsatisfactory shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:431–441. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.125806 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Krishnan SG, Nowinski R, Harrison D, Burkhead WZ (2007) Humeral hemiarthroplasty with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid for glenohumeral arthritis; two to fifteen-year outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:727–734. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01291 PubMed

14.

Lee KT, Bell S, Salmon J (2009) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(6):915–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.014 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Levine WM, Djurasovic M, Glasson JM, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1997) Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: results correlated to degree of glenoid wear. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:449–454CrossRefPubMed

16.

Levy O, Copeland SA (2001) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder. 5‑ to 10-year results with the Copeland mark-2 prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:213–221CrossRefPubMed

17.

Levy O, Copeland SA (2004) Cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (Copeland CSRA) for osteoarthritis of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.005 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Nicholson GP, Goldstein JL, Romeo AA, Cole BJ, Hayden JK, Twigg SL, McCarty LP, Detterline AJ (2007) Lateral meniscus allograft biologic glenoid arthroplasty in total shoulder arthroplasty for young shoulders with degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(5):261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.003 CrossRef

19.

Parsons IM, Millett PJ, Warren JJ (2004) Glenoid wear after shoulder hemiarthroplasty: quantitative radiographic analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000119249.61696.f1 CrossRef

20.

Pritchett JW (2011) Long-term results and patient satisfaction after shoulder resurfacing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.014 PubMed

21.

Raiss P, Kasten P, Baumann F, Moser M, Rickert M, Loew M (2009) Treatment of osteonecrosis of the humeral head with cementless surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(2):340–349. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00560 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Raiss P, Weiter M, Sowa B, Zeifang F, Loew M (2015) Results of cementless humreal head resurfacing with cemented glenoid components. Int Orthop 39:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2540-6 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Rispoli DM, Sperling JW, Athwal GS, Schleck CD, Cofield RH (2006) Humeral head replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(12):2637–2644. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01383 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Soudy K, Szymanski C, Lalanne C, Bourgault C, Thiounn A, Cotten A, Maynou C (2017) Results and limitations of humeral head resurfacing: 105 cases at a mean follow-up of 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.015 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (2004) Minimum fifteen-year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients age fifty years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(6):604–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.013 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM (1998) Neer hemiarthroplasty and Neer total shoulder arthroplasty in patients fifty years old or less. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:464–473CrossRefPubMed

27.

Thomas SR, Wilson AJ, Chambler A, Harding I, Thomas M (2005) Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.011 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Wirth MA, Tapscott RS, Southworth C, Rockwood CA Jr. (2006) Treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with a hemiarthroplasty: a minimum five-year follow-up outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:964–973. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.03030 PubMed

29.

Wirth MA (2009) Humeral head arthroplasty and meniscal allograft resurfacing of the glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1109–1119. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00677 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing
verfasst von: Dr. B. S. Werner
J. Stehle
A. Abdelkawi
P. Plumhoff
R. Hudek
F. Gohlke
Publikationsdatum: 23.10.2017
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Die Orthopädie / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 2731-7145
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-7153
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-017-3483-6

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Progressive glenoid bone loss caused by erosion in humeral head resurfacing

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Überlegungen zum Nachweis des positiven Effektes durch Endocert

Therapeutische Anwendung von Stammzellen in der Orthopädie

Pyrocarbon interposition shoulder arthroplasty in advanced collapse of the humeral head

Allografts bei Revisionen von Ellenbogenprothesen

Knochendefekte bei der endoprothetischen Versorgung von Schulter und Ellenbogen

Ergebnisse des deutschen Schulter- und Ellenbogenprothesenregisters (SEPR)

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie