nach oben

Current Sexual Health Reports

Erschienen in:

31.07.2017 | Male and Female Surgical Interventions (A Burnett and C Carson, Section Editors)

Pros and Cons of Ectopic IPP Reservoir Placement

verfasst von: T. J. Pagliara, B. R. Viers, A. F. Morey

Erschienen in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The study’s purpose was to assess recent findings for the pros and cons of ectopic reservoir placement in the field of penile prostheses.

Recent Findings

Recent studies have demonstrated that ectopic reservoir placement is safe and durable when compared to traditional space of Retzius placement. It has also shown marked acceptance among polled implanters. The risk of deep pelvic complications after both placement and removal of ectopic reservoirs appears to be negligible when performed by experienced implanters, even in men who have had major pelvic surgery. The theoretical concerns relating to reservoir palpability and herniation have not been demonstrated in ongoing studies.

Summary

Ectopic placement of penile prosthesis reservoirs is emerging as the main stream technique of contemporary prosthetic urology practices.

Riemenschneider HW. Epigastric placement of reservoir for inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology. 1981;17(1):79–81.CrossRefPubMed

Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd. Ectopic placement of AMS 800 urinary control system pressure-regulating balloon. Urology. 2005;65(1):167–70. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.042.CrossRefPubMed

•• Wilson SK, Henry GD, Delk JR Jr, Cleves MA. The mentor Alpha 1 penile prosthesis with reservoir lock-out valve: effective prevention of auto-inflation with improved capability for ectopic reservoir placement. J Urol. 2002;168(4 Pt 1):1475–8. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000030603.29170.c2. Early description of lockout valve improvement helping the ectopic placement movement. CrossRefPubMed

Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs via transscrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10(2):603–10. doi:10.1111/jsm.12000.CrossRefPubMed

Brison D, Ilbeigi P, Sadeghi-Nejad H. Reservoir repositioning and successful thrombectomy for deep venous thrombosis secondary to compression of pelvic veins by an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir. J Sex Med. 2007;4(4 Pt 2):1185–7. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00266.x.CrossRefPubMed

Brusky J, Dikranin A, Aboseif S. Retrieval of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir from the bladder. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17(3):302–3. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901303.CrossRefPubMed

Eldefrawy A, Kava BR. An unusual complication during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Urology. 2010;76(4):847. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2009.11.034.CrossRefPubMed

Hudak SJ, Mora RV. Unilateral ureteral obstruction due to a migrated inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir. J Urol. 2008;180(1):336. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.160.CrossRefPubMed

Jiann BP, Ou CW, Lin JT, Huang JK. Compression of ureter caused by a retained reservoir of penile prosthesis. Int J Impot Res. 2006;18(3):316–7. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901402.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Kramer AC, Chason J, Kusakabe A. Report of two cases of bladder perforation caused by reservoir of inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2009;6(7):2064–7. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01277.x.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Cui T, Terlecki R, Mirzazadeh M. Infrequent reservoir-related complications of urologic prosthetics: a case series and literature review. Sex Med. 2015;3(4):334–8. doi:10.1002/sm2.85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

• Perito P, Wilson S. The history of nontraditional or ectopic placement of reservoirs in prosthetic urology. Sex Med Rev. 2016;4(2):190–3. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2015.10.008. Detailed review of reservoir evolution and history. CrossRefPubMed

13.

Tran CN, Boncher N, Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into neobladder. J Sex Med. 2013;10(9):2343–6. doi:10.1111/jsm.12239.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Levine LA, Hoeh MP. Review of penile prosthetic reservoir: complications and presentation of a modified reservoir placement technique. J Sex Med. 2012;9(11):2759–69. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02807.x.CrossRefPubMed

15.

• Pagliara TJ, Viers BR, Scott J, Morey AF. Extended experience with high submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs: refined technique for optimal outcomes. Urol Practice. 2017; In Press. High volume experience with detailed technique for HSM placement.

16.

• Stember DS, Garber BB, Perito PE. Outcomes of abdominal wall reservoir placement in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: a safe and efficacious alternative to the space of Retzius. J Sex Med. 2014;11(2):605–12. doi:10.1111/jsm.12408.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Karpman E, Brant WO, Kansas B, Bella AJ, Jones LA, Eisenhart E, et al. Reservoir alternate surgical implantation technique: preliminary outcomes of initial PROPPER study of low profile or spherical reservoir implantation in submuscular location or traditional prevesical space. J Urol. 2015;193(1):239–44. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.082.CrossRefPubMed

18.

• Henry G, Hsiao W, Karpman E, Bella AJ, Carrion R, Jones L, et al. A guide for inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement: pertinent anatomical measurements of the retropubic space. J Sex Med. 2014;11(1):273–8. doi:10.1111/jsm.12361. First anatomic measurements for pelvic relationships to implanted reservoirs. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hakky T, Lentz A, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Khera M. The evolution of the inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir and surgical placement. J Sex Med. 2015;12(Suppl 7):464–7. doi:10.1111/jsm.13011.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Simon R, Hakky TS, Henry G, Perito P, Martinez D, Parker J, et al. Tips and tricks of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir placement: a case presentation and discussion. J Sex Med. 2014;11(5):1325–33. doi:10.1111/jsm.12481.CrossRefPubMed

21.

• Garaffa G, Ralph DJ. Ectopic reservoir during inflatable penile implant surgery: is it now standard of care? J Sex Med. 2017;14(3):316–7. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.12.008. Questions the use of the space of Retzius at all. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Karpman E, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Henry G, Khera M, Morey AF. Current opinions on alternative reservoir placement for inflatable penile prosthesis among members of the Sexual Medicine Society of North America. J Sex Med. 2013;10(8):2115–20. doi:10.1111/jsm.12203.CrossRefPubMed

23.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. FDA PMA supplemental approval. Approval for changes in the labeling of the Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis surgical protocol to incorporate ectopic placement. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2015.

24.

Mirheydar H, Zhou T, Chang DC, Hsieh TC. Reoperation rates for penile prosthetic surgery. J Sex Med. 2016;13(1):129–33. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.11.013.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kava BR, Burdick-Will J. Complications associated with retained foreign bodies from infected penile implants: proposal for the use of an implant-specific checklist at the time of device removal. J Sex Med. 2013;10(6):1659–66. doi:10.1111/jsm.12145.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Staller AL, Chang CM, Wagenheim GN, Wang R. A novel approach for removal of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir using laparoscopic instruments. Asian journal of andrology. 2017;19(1):132–4. doi:10.4103/1008-682x.188661.PubMed

27.

Garber BB, Bickell M. Subcutaneous placement of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoirs. Urology. 2016;88:93–6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.027.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kavoussi NL, Hofer MD, Viers BR, Cordon BH, Mooney RP, Pagliara TJ, et al. Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of prosthetic balloons and reservoirs. J Sex Med. 2017;14(2):264–8. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

29.

• Chung PH, Morey AF, Tausch TJ, Simhan J, Scott JF. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs: 2-year experience and patient-reported outcomes. Urology. 2014;84(6):1535–40. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.029. Patient tolerance and low bother for ectopic HSM placement. CrossRefPubMed

30.

• Ziegelmann MJ, Viers BR, Lomas DJ, Westerman ME, Trost LW. Ectopic penile prosthesis reservoir placement: an anatomic cadaver model of the high submuscular technique. J Sex Med. 2016;13(9):1425–31. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.06.012. This article calls into question the accuracy of ectopic submuscular placement. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Baten E, Vandewalle T, van Renterghem K. Stretch due to penile prosthesis reservoir migration. Urology case reports. 2016;5:20–1. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2015.12.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Skandalakis PN, Zoras O, Skandalakis JE, Mirilas P. Transversalis, endoabdominal, endothoracic fascia: who’s who? Am Surg. 2006;72(1):16–8.PubMed

33.

Grein U, Noll F, Schreiter F. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with a penile prosthesis. Der Urologe Ausg A. 1989;28(5):266–70.PubMed

34.

Sadeghi-Nejad H, Sharma A, Irwin RJ, Wilson SK, Delk JR. Reservoir herniation as a complication of three-piece penile prosthesis insertion. Urology. 2001;57(1):142–5.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Pros and Cons of Ectopic IPP Reservoir Placement
verfasst von: T. J. Pagliara
B. R. Viers
A. F. Morey
Publikationsdatum: 31.07.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Sexual Health Reports / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Elektronische ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-017-0109-2

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Health Disparities Among Kinky Sex Practitioners

Estimates and Correlates of Engagement in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships

Transgender Health Care in the U.S. Military and Veterans Health Administration Facilities

Cannabis and Sexuality